iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Fukushima Power Plant Damaged Worse Than Thought, New Report Says

By MARI YAMAGUCHI 03/27/12 10:40 PM ET AP

Fukushima Reactor Report
In this photo taken by an endoscope and released by Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), a white thermometer, right, is seen through the surface of water in the Unit 2 reactor's primary containment vessel at the the tsunami-crippled Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Okuma town, Fukushima Prefecture, northeastern Japan, Monday, March 26, 2012. (AP Photo/Tokyo Electric Power Co.)

TOKYO — One of Japan's crippled nuclear reactors still has fatally high radiation levels and hardly any water to cool it, according to an internal examination that renews doubts about the plant's stability.

A tool equipped with a tiny video camera, a thermometer, a dosimeter and a water gauge was used to assess damage inside the No. 2 reactor's containment chamber for the second time since the tsunami swept into the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant a year ago.

The data collected Tuesday showed the damage from the disaster was so severe, the plant operator will have to develop special equipment and technology to tolerate the harsh environment and decommission the plant, a process expected to last decades.

The other two reactors that had meltdowns could be in even worse shape. The No. 2 reactor is the only one officials have been able to closely examine so far.

Tuesday's examination with an industrial endoscope detected radiation levels up to 10 times the fatal dose inside the chamber. Plant officials previously said more than half of the melted fuel has breached the core and dropped to the floor of the primary containment vessel, some of it splashing against the wall or the floor.

Particles from melted fuel have probably sent radiation levels up to a dangerously high 70 sieverts per hour inside the container, said Junichi Matsumoto, spokesman for Tokyo Electric Power Co. The figure far exceeds the highest level previously detected, 10 sieverts per hour, which was detected around an exhaust duct shared by No. 1 and 2 units last year.

"It's extremely high," he said, adding that an endoscope would last only 14 hours in those conditions. "We have to develop equipment that can tolerate high radiation" when locating and removing melted fuel during the decommissioning.

The probe also found that the containment vessel – a beaker-shaped container enclosing the core – had cooling water up to only 60 centimeters (2 feet) from the bottom, far below the 10 meters (yards) estimated when the government declared the plant stable in December. The plant is continuing to pump water into the reactor.

Video footage taken by the probe showed the water inside was clear but contained dark yellow sediments, believed to be fragments of rust, paint that had been peeled off or dust.

A probe done in January failed to find the water surface and provided only images showing steam, unidentified parts and rusty metal surfaces scarred by exposure to radiation, heat and humidity. Finding the water level was important to help locate damaged areas where radioactive water is escaping.

Matsumoto said that the actual water level inside the chamber was way off the estimate, which had used data that turned out to be unreliable. But the results don't affect the plant's "cold shutdown status" because the water temperature was about 50 degrees Celsius (122 Fahrenheit), indicating the melted fuel is cooled.

Three Dai-ichi reactors had meltdowns, but the No. 2 reactor is the only one that has been examined because radiation levels inside the reactor building are relatively low and its container is designed with a convenient slot to send in the endoscope.

The exact conditions of the other two reactors, where hydrogen explosions damaged their buildings, are still unknown. Simulations have indicated that more fuel inside No. 1 has breached the core than the other two, but radiation at No. 3 remains the highest.

The high radiation levels inside the No. 2 reactor's chamber mean it's inaccessible to the workers, but parts of the reactor building are accessible for a few minutes at a time – with the workers wearing full protection.

Last year's massive earthquake and a tsunami set off the worst nuclear accident since Chernobyl, sending three reactor cores to melt and causing massive radiation leaks. The government said in December that the reactors are safely cooled and the plant has stabilized, while experts have questioned its vulnerability.

During a recent visit by a group of journalists including The Associated Press, the head of the plant said it remains vulnerable to strong aftershocks and tsunami, and that containing contaminated water and radiation is a challenge. Radioactive water had leaked into the ocean several times already.

Workers found a fresh leak of 120 tons from a water treatment unit this week from one of its hoses, with estimated 80 liters (20 gallons) escaping into the ocean, Matsumoto said. Officials are still investigating its impact.

Fukushima's accident has instilled public distrust and concerns about nuclear safety, making it difficult for the government to start up reactors even after regular safety checks. All but one of Japan's 54 reactors are now offline, with the last one scheduled to stop in early May.

Loading Slideshow...
  • Members of the media, wearing protective suits and masks, visit the Unit 3 and Unit 4 reactor buildings of tsunami-crippled Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power station of Tokyo Electric Power Co., during a press tour escorted by TEPCO officials, in Okuma, Fukushima prefecture, northeastern Japan, Tuesday, Feb. 28, 2012. (AP Photo/Kimimasa Mayama, Pool)

  • A radiation monitor indicates 131.00 mSv per hour near Unit 3 and 4 reactor buildings at Tokyo Electric Power Co.,'s tsunami-crippled Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power station in Okuma, Fukushima prefecture, northeastern Japan, Tuesday, Feb. 28, 2012. (AP)

  • A journalist checks radiation level with her dosimeter near stricken Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant of Tokyo Electric Power Co., during a press tour led by TEPCO officials, in Okuma town, Fukushima prefecture, northeastern Japan Tuesday, Feb. 28, 2012. (AP)

  • Damage of tsunami-crippled Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power station building is seen through a bus window during a press tour led by officials of Tokyo Electric Power Co., in Okuma, Fukushima prefecture, northeastern Japan, Tuesday, Feb. 28, 2012. (AP Photo/Kimimasa Mayama, Pool)

  • A journalist visits stricken Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant of Tokyo Electric Power Co., during a press tour led by TEPCO officials, in Okuma town, Fukushima prefecture, northeastern Japan Tuesday, Feb. 28, 2012. (AP)

  • Stricken Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant buildings of Tokyo Electric Power Co., are seen in Okuma town, Fukushima prefecture, northeastern Japan Tuesday, Feb. 28, 2012. (AP)

  • Trucks are overturned before the Unit 4 reactor building of stricken Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant of Tokyo Electric Power Co., in Okuma town, Fukushima prefecture, northeastern Japan Tuesday, Feb. 28, 2012. (AP)

  • Tokyo Electric Power Co workers stand near stricken Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant buildings during a press tour in Okuma town, Fukushima prefecture, northern Japan, in Okuma town, Fukushima prefecture, northeastern Japan Tuesday, Feb. 28, 2012. (AP)

  • Damaged Unit 3, left, and Unit 4, right, reactor buildings are seen at Tokyo Electric Power Co.,'s tsunami-crippled Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power station in Okuma, Fukushima prefecture, northeastern Japan, Tuesday, Feb. 28, 2012. (AP Photo/Kimimasa Mayama, Pool)

  • Takeshi Takahashi, center, head of Tokyo Electric Power Co.,'s Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant, speaks to journalists at the emergency operation center of the crippled nuclear power plant in Okuma town, Fukushima prefecture, northeastern Japan Tuesday, Feb. 28, 2012. (AP)

  • A worker takes a rest at the emergency operation center of the stricken Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant of Tokyo Electric Power Co., in Okuma town, Fukushima prefecture, northeastern Japan Tuesday, Feb. 28, 2012. (AP)

  • Debris is seen scattered near the Unit 6 reactor building of stricken Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant of Tokyo Electric Power Co., in Okuma town, Fukushima prefecture, northeastern Japan Tuesday, Feb. 28, 2012. (AP)


FOLLOW WORLD

TOKYO — One of Japan's crippled nuclear reactors still has fatally high radiation levels and hardly any water to cool it, according to an internal examination that renews doubts about the plant'...
TOKYO — One of Japan's crippled nuclear reactors still has fatally high radiation levels and hardly any water to cool it, according to an internal examination that renews doubts about the plant'...
Filed by Ryan Craggs  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 406
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EveryoneLies
05:17 PM on 04/24/2012
Really the Nuclear power industry would lie about how bad things are. The worst part to all this is the Japanese Government tookoveer the liability so all the citizens that get radiation posioning paid for it with their tax money. Believe that is what would happen here. There are 4 million people in the "evacuation" zone around the White Plians, NY plant. If the Nuclear Power companies had to actually carry insurance to cover all liability there would not be one nuclear plant in the US, but because the government gives an "implied" (wink, wink) liability guarantee we have nuclear plants. can't wait til my tax money goes to paying for radiation posioning.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seer Clearly
Only truth remains when fear is denied
04:27 PM on 05/02/2012
Awful, it's true, but if the true cost of fossil fuels were also taken into account, electricity costs would go up by a factor of 10, to account for the costs of global warming, ocean rise, mercury poisoning from coal plants, deforestation, water pollution, etc. Instead, all those costs have been "socialized" so we pay for them anyway through taxes and future disaster costs. (I choose the word "socialized" because Republicans are so afraid of socialism yet they practice it every day when it comes to having the public absorb the costs of irresponsible industry.)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oahutrading
03:21 AM on 04/08/2012
Nothing substitutes for critical thinking. We know nuke is terrible, most people know. Some of the smarter ones allowed themselves to be brainwashed, save the world by the most dangerous thing on earth ...silliness. Being brainwashed at the "academy" .....hmmmm

Don't trust pro-nukers that are in the business of nuke. They lie to themselves. And the LIE to you.

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/p/baseline-is-just-one-of-lies.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oahutrading
04:09 AM on 04/03/2012
Geiger Counter Interpretation Simplified
This pretty much kicks some serious butt, this little chart that I made.

A super condensed table on how to interpret Geiger Readings

And seriously, if you take this radiation stuff at all seriously, then get a Geiger. All the rest is guesswork.

Radiation Alert Inspector, $530 to $600 Amazon

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/04/geiger-counter-interpretation.html

And Here are LIVE radiation reports from independent reporting stations.

I am sending my Radiation Alert Inspector to Japan to a family that needs real data---soooo You won't see an Oahu based reporting station until I get my next Geiger delivered.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
10:58 PM on 04/04/2012
nothing substitutes for real pedigreed training. Buying a GM tube over the internet without understanding how it can saturate is like giving a 4 year old a paintball gun and asking him to reproduce Monet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oahutrading
03:29 AM on 04/05/2012
Bully, I don't think there are many who would not see you in your true light, playing in the corner with Satan's Matchsticks.
photo
batguano
As Long As Grass Grow, Wind Blow & The Sky Is Blue
04:20 PM on 04/02/2012
The Indian Point nuclear plant (IP), owned/operated by Entergy Corporation, is only 35 miles north of downtown Manhattan; 20 million people & the economic/financial center of our nation live/operate within the 50 mile evacuation zone the NRC recommended after the Fukushima complex event; astonishingly only a 10 mile evacuation radius is required for IP; why?

Entergy is trying to “re-license” & extend IP operation another 20 years; an aged plant already leaking radioactive elements into groundwater & Hudson River, sitting atop two geologic faults, very dangerous spent-fuel pools, a long record of accidents & other anomalies, including highest NY thyroid cancer rates in surrounding counties; IP should be shut-down immediately to save our nation what Japan tragically is already experiencing. The NRC has continually LOWERED IP safety requirements/standards as dangers & deterioration become apparent including weakening fire standards & refusing include evacuation for re-licensing! An IP nuclear "accident" has NO workable "evacuation" plan; potentially millions forced to leave homes/work & attempt to flee.

“Benefits” & “low-cost” nuclear power are highly exaggerated; when ALL is counted it’s the most expensive & inherently deadly, regardless of specious claims by operators. The amount of power IP produces is insignificant relative to potential threats/danger to millions of people & the economy of our entire nation.

What do we stand to gain, & what do we stand to lose? Allowing IP to continue operating is just NOT worth the risks! Better active today than radioactive tomorrow!

SHUT IT DOWN NOW!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
10:45 PM on 04/02/2012
Pish posh. Indian Point is vital to the economy and industry of the area.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oahutrading
04:03 AM on 04/03/2012
Although Indian Point provides work for 800 people, the cost of a nuclear accident could be measured in the hundreds of billions, maybe even trillions of dollars.

Its another Cash for Clunker. Seriously the Fed Gov should buy it at market value after a bidding contest in which the winner would have to immediately escrow $2.0Billion for expected decommissioning costs.

Lets see $250M operating profit per year, a purchase price equal to the decommisioning cost only $2B. 10 years of operating = 2.5B. Net profit of $500M, or $50M per year.

That equals 2.5% Annual rate of return on investment!!! No one would take such a crazy bad deal to own a clunker!

Sheesh, but it would be better than a new plant, which only generate 1.666% annual rate of return on investment.

Nuke makes no cents, no dollars, no sense. Nuke is a poison factory, that's its.

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/03/nuke-makes-no-economic-sense.html

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/03/cash-for-clunker-plants.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oahutrading
04:51 AM on 04/02/2012
Did you ever wonder about the SMOKING gun
I found it, it took a set of German occasionally undercover reporters
former PM Kan spills his guts about the extortion from the Nuclear Village as he calls it.

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/04/german-report-on-fukushima-interview.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
10:46 PM on 04/02/2012
The Germans hate nuclear power. The report is biased as is the koolaid site you promote.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rachel Flanagan
10:43 AM on 04/04/2012
Atoms4Peace, you think everything is pish posh that doesn't agree with your nuclear is so wonderful agenda. Your the one drinking the Koolaid and the color is green.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oahutrading
03:28 PM on 04/01/2012
Manifesto of Why Shut Them All Down
I discovered just how poorly these plants were being run and how poorly
they were designed from the get-go. And then I discovered how one of
the basic premises of risk control, separation of risks, was completely
ignored. That being that the used fuel rods were the most dangerous
part of the plant, but for "convenience" the most dangerous things were
stored right next too or even RIGHT ON TOP OF the reactors themselves.

This is done to conserve cost, if they were to ship off the ......

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/p/manifesto-why-shut-them-down.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
06:44 PM on 04/01/2012
You discovered nothing since you live in Hawaii and are miles removed from the nearest facility. I bet you never came within 5 miles of a commercial plant.

The ludicrousness of your koolaid site is legendary. Those of us with formal technical training in this area can spot the many falsehoods and prevarications on that rag. No sale.
photo
batguano
As Long As Grass Grow, Wind Blow & The Sky Is Blue
04:19 PM on 04/02/2012
Just because someone claims to "be trained" is no reason to believe anything they say or respect the modality they espouse. "Training" is often just brainwashing (in some cases only a light rinse is needed) by an industry and associated "education" to create shills, robots to mindless indoctrination, who blindly support their industry, divert criticism, white-wash deadly dangers, and make asinine claims/assertions defending the industry, in this case the most deadly and dangerous to our environment, people and nations economy of any; a technology that cannot be made safe and non-poisonous, that would potentially make hundreds of square miles uninhabitable, with any unlucky enough to live or work in the dead-zone forced to flee for their lives, never to be repaid for their losses, all for private profits at the expense of people! How utterly irresponsible and self-interested are the nuclear corporations and pro-nuc shills, parroting industry apologist propaganda.

Yeah, many of us can spot the many falsehoods, lies and diversionary claims nuclear-shills peddle trying to pull the wool over the publics eyes. It’s telling they never include links relating to absurd claims so readers may judge for themselves.

http://truth-out.org/news/item/7301-400-chernobyls-solar-flares-electromagnetic-pulses-and-nuclear-armageddon

http://www.radiation.org/press/090311_pressrelease_fox.html

http://www.clearwater.org/indianpoint021209-cw.html

http://www.propublica.org/article/while-nuclear-waste-piles-up-in-u.s.-billions-in-fund-to-handle-it-sits-unu/single
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
06:52 PM on 04/01/2012
Yawn.
photo
batguano
As Long As Grass Grow, Wind Blow & The Sky Is Blue
04:59 PM on 04/02/2012
All any reader here has to do is review the record of your shallow posts. They are short on facts, assertions not backed-up by any links to third-party sources, long on sophomoric, demeaning attacks on other posters & critics of nuclear death and disease. Comments on "koolaid", your nuclear engineering "training" at university, and all the other misinformation and 12 year-old snarky comments tells the tale. You are a great advocate for nuclear plant de-commissioning; any industry filled with "experts" in your mold is surely a disaster waiting to happen.
strangiato
Ha Ha...Charade You Are
11:51 PM on 03/31/2012
"All but one of Japan's 54 reactors are now offline, with the last one scheduled to stop in early May."

Well look at that nuclear schill boys and girls! Japan - the nuclear renaissance nation is running its grids without nuclear power! How can this be? Wasn't Japan supposed to be brought to its knees without nuclear power?

Like I said about 25 years ago - the nuclear fission based power industry is dying - time for the giant zirconium plated fork!

But don't despair nuclear schill boys and girls. There's still plenty of work to do. You can put away your talking points and reputation fixing scripts. I'm offering free one way air fare to Tokyo and a complimentary pair of rubber gloves and booties to all card carrying nuclear industry schills. I hear TEPCO pay top dolla for reactor remediation specialists and radiation containment "vice presidents". Now's your chance to cash in on all the knowledge you recently acquired in that one day course on "why nuclear power is our future"! Don't hesitate. Operators are standing by!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oahutrading
03:27 AM on 04/02/2012
How many pro-nukers responded to your offer? Let me guess ---none.

I am send my radiation alert inspector to a family in Japan that really needs it. I am convinced my home state is pretty OK NOW, except for the hot particles rammed down our throats last year.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
10:49 PM on 04/02/2012
You have no idea what a "hot particle" damage function looks like.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
10:52 PM on 04/02/2012
wait till the summer. Wait till Toyota, Sony cringe on production losses. Japan is going backwards.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oahutrading
09:52 PM on 03/30/2012
Nuke Makes No Economic Sense
Nuke makes no sense from an economic viewpoint.

It costs around $15B to build a modern nuke plant, and takes about 10 years.

Investors want a 10% or even 20% annual rate of return in general, maybe on something super safe and reliable they would be willing to receive 7%.

But with nuke, picture that at year 5 you have the heavy infrastructure in place, much of the big money spent, say $10B,

At that point investors would want at least $1B minimum a year, and yet you have to wait 5 more years to get anything. more...........

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/03/nuke-makes-no-economic-sense.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
11:23 AM on 03/31/2012
The paradigm for nuclear is adapting. New SMRs are being planned such as mPower, which are rewriting the playbook. Antinukes and their koolaid sites are constantly trying with no avail, to define the new generation of technology based on the past technology.

Antinukes are behind the times primarily because they lack the knowledge afforded to those trained in the technology to understand that everything evolves.

Koolaid sites are just that - full of misinformation. Drink it and go into a mental coma.
strangiato
Ha Ha...Charade You Are
11:33 PM on 03/31/2012
Desperately trying to save your pathetic job by spreading misinformation. Nice. Well to your snow job, I'll offer the counterpoint:

http://www.internationalnews.fr/article-radiation-coverups-and-the-legacy-of-fukushima-by-dr-helen-caldicott-video-102052522.html

Have a nice day nuclear schill boy!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:54 AM on 04/01/2012
I find it hard to believe someone who is trying to prove a point and keeps saying koolaid and antinukes.

Your talking 'down' points fall on deaf ears, even if you had something of note to say, all I hear are the insults and no facts.

As for Small modular reactor, I don't see how this is any safer? So we lose 1 square mile in a nuclear meltdown, instead of 15 miles? Or if you daisy chain them, it would be the same problem.

Since you mention mPower I can only assume you have a stake.

Look, I'm sorry that your industry is really dangerous but it is and this form of power generation must come to an end because quite frankly, it's not needed.
04:48 PM on 03/30/2012
Why do the people profiled on DOOMSDAY PREPPERS look like geniuses right now????

They are right not to trust our govt. to give us the truth---

WHERE IS THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA on such colossal issues???? WHY are they hiding from the truth on this??

This is REGULATORY CAPTURE on an obscene level----
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oahutrading
09:36 PM on 03/30/2012
Sheesh, I was a prepper before the word prepper existed, LOL.

Nice checklist here on combo Shelter in Place box, good all around emergency prep kit.....really it is like 2 large boxes. Check it out, free download, I made it.

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/p/radiation-preparation-resources.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
11:26 AM on 03/31/2012
still pushing the koolaid I see. You and Jim Jones, to the end.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oahutrading
04:29 PM on 03/31/2012
Pushing free information that can help people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
11:26 AM on 03/31/2012
There is no regulatory capture in nuclear. Even the FAA is staffed with ex-airline employees. Government requirements for hiring in these agencies includes experience
04:44 PM on 03/30/2012
WHY is this story NOWHERE to be found in the mainstream media right now??

Fukushima Radiation Plume Hit Southern and Central California

The Journal Environmental Science and Technology reports in a new study that the Fukushima radiation plume contacted North America at California “with greatest exposure in central and southern California”, and that Southern California's seaweed tested over 500% higher for radioactive iodine-131 than anywhere else in the U.S. and Canada:

Projected paths of the radioactive atmospheric plume emanating from the Fukushima reactors, best described as airborne particles or aerosols for 131I, 137Cs, and 35S, and subsequent atmospheric monitoring showed it coming in contact with the North American continent at California, with greatest exposure in central and southern California. Government monitoring sites in Anaheim (southern California) recorded peak airborne concentrations of 131I at 1.9 pCi m−3

Anaheim is where Disneyland is located.
photo
Silken17
Just a hare in your soup
01:57 PM on 03/31/2012
"WHY is this story NOWHERE to be found in the mainstream media right now?? "

Because there is no story to tell.

The Fukushima plume came and went nearly a year ago. At no time were levels (which where monitored by independent groups) ever even close to being a public health concern.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
06:45 PM on 04/01/2012
There just isnt a story. Sorry the world isnt coming to an end.
photo
ecoalex
Ecofarmer
03:50 PM on 03/30/2012
4 reactor had melt downs.More inaccurate information.The industry and reporting cannot be trusted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
11:27 AM on 03/31/2012
Its journalists that get it wrong. All the time.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:40 AM on 03/30/2012
I really dislike seeing some shrugging this off as if it's no big deal. If a power source can make a 10 - 20 - 50 mile area unlivable for a 1000 years, then that power source is not worth what it gives. Like they say, buy land cause they aren't making anymore of it. Well, how about let's not destroy land, for the same reason. It's ridiculous to argue otherwise.

Similar to the global warming deniers. Now we have nuclear deniers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
11:28 AM on 03/31/2012
If is a conditional word. It implies likelihood.

Risk = likelihood * consequences

Likelihood is a small number. Did you play the MegaMillions last night?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:59 PM on 03/31/2012
Nope, I didn't play because it's pointless. However, winning that doesn't take out a city and make it uninhabitable.

That is a risk that outweighs the benefits and one of the reasons is we have alternatives, despite the falsehoods to the contrary that have been spread, namely by the industries currently making over a billions annually.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:44 AM on 03/30/2012
I spent time in the EZP earlier this year, and measured on my equipment, as well as saw on the new government monitoring stations, readings of up to 10.9 mSv per hour - although most averaged between 4 and 6 mSv per hour. This is not immediately life threatening (a few days or weeks at that level of radiation will do little to add to your health risks), BUT it does become statistically relevant within two or three years of exposure. These areas are condemned to long-term human habitation. If you are interested in seeing images from the evacuated zone them and read the testimony here: http://smithjan.com/blog/2012/03/11/cesium-tours-images-from-the-fukushima-radioactive-zone-one-year-later/.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:23 AM on 03/30/2012
You said "a few days or weeks at that level of radiation will do little to add to your health risks" but I'll tell you... I personally wouldn't count on it.

I mean if someone said you could get 10,000 xrays and it would do any damage, you probably wouldn't. So I don't take the word of those in charge of this.

Interesting photos though.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:36 PM on 03/31/2012
Cheers.

Short term exposure in many parts of Fukushima is possible without significant increases in the probability of negative health consequences. As a point of comparison, a frequent flier (100,000 miles p/year =c.200 hours) is exposed to nearly 100% the average natural yearly background radiation (200-300 mrem). This is in turn equivalent to +/- 200 arm x-rays or +/- 30 chest x-rays.

A day in Fukushima at 4 microSv p/hour = 24 microSv per day, or roughly 240 arm x-rays. That's a lot to concentrate in a day but if the rest of the year is spent elsewhere it's mitigated. One could spend three days there and still only reach exposure levels equivalent to a year in parts of Brazil and India (200% higher than the global average background radiation).

I am not saying Fukushima is safe, because at those levels the accumulated levels of radiation exposure quickly stack-up: your example of 10,000 x-rays would be equivalent to about 40 days in Fukushima. That is still within mostly safe thresholds (where increases to health hazards are likely less than 1%) but after about 200 days, exposure would be at levels that show strong correlation with increases in health hazards--and that is not accounting for possible internal contamination and higher pockets of exposure.

Again, I am not downplaying the size of the disaster or the levels of radiation. I just wanted to put things in a bit of proportion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
06:47 PM on 04/01/2012
You arent a nuclear professional trained in radiaiton protection so your assertions are way off.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
11:30 AM on 03/31/2012
Two or three years it decays to miniscule levels. Way wigner law says t^-1.2 power for fission products and you really think its not decreasing? Physics say decay heat lessens with time.

No koolaid sites please.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:08 PM on 03/31/2012
I this case the two immediate variables to address are: a) what elements were released and b) how much of each element was released. A third variable is the propensity of certain elements to concentrate in certain organs. e.g. Iodine tends to accumulate in the thyroid and is therefore very dangerous in the first months after release and has a direct link to thyroid cancer. A fourth variable is time. Time affects the half-life, the accumulated level of exposure, and increased the risk of internal contamination occurring.

Therefore if the composition of a given plume is 90% iodine, 5% cesium, and 5% other elements, the bulk of the radiation is caused by iodine. The levels of radiation will decrease as the half-life of iodine progresses, and the radioactivity measured between n+1 and n+365 days is much less. (I do not recall off-hand the Fukushima plume composition, but tend to recall iodine being the largest portion)

The half-life of iodine-131 is about one week. The readings from various international CTBT stations point to about 60% of the levels released by Chernobyl. This points to the bulk of radioactive material in Fukushima being less radioactive today than one year ago.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:13 PM on 03/31/2012
The half-life of Cesium-137 is about 30 years. Radiation caused by Cesium would not change between n+1 and n+365 days. The levels of radiation emitted by Cesium in Fukushima are high enough to be a health concern over a medium to long term.

So although the "risk" from iodine may have decreased to levels that allow for short exposure, this does not mean the area is safe. Radiation emitted by Cesium and other elements is still high enough to be a risk after a few days or weeks.

This danger is compounded if internal contamination occurs. This can happen through food, smoke, and dust. In the case of iodine, some mitigation can be achieved by saturating the body with inherit iodine, thereby leaving no space for radioactive iodine to be absorbed and concentrated in the thyroid. Hence the use of iodine tablets.

If internal contamination with cesium or other elements occurs, it is hard to flush them from the body, and the affected organism is constantly exposed to radiation, even when no longer in a radioactive area.

I hope this helps explain why, today, in areas around Fukushima, short exposure is possible without a significant increase in negative health effects. The "safe" window of time is too short for anybody to live or be productive in the area. The area is condemned until the half life of elements other than iodine fall---and this won't happen for thousands of years.
professor
Correkt the Spelling and Pick on the Moniker
08:29 PM on 03/29/2012
Of course it's damaged worse than thought. And it will be found to be damaged worse than this report thinks, too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
06:48 PM on 04/01/2012
BS. You cant assess because you are untrained.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Margie Kronewitter
07:38 AM on 03/29/2012
Believe your EYES, Not the LIES. Radiation is still escaping and Circulating around Home Planet. Our Air, our Oceans, our Soil. Tokyo soil, 200 miles away, must be disposed of as Nuclear Waste per: U.S. standards. WHY hasn't this been on MSMedia? LIES, LIES & Cover Up. Watch all the videos. This is Crimes Against Humanity. Watch Arnie Gunderson videos on You Tube. Thank You Huff Po.
strangiato
Ha Ha...Charade You Are
12:11 PM on 03/29/2012
All true. It was evident to most of us who aren't as technically challenged as the average person that we were witnessing the BEGINNING of a disaster of epic proportions last March. We had to endure the propaganda from nuclear industry schills who still appear on this site today to try to defend the indefensible. If we didn't have the exact same reactors and overloaded storage pools sitting in vulnerable locations across the United States, perhaps the issue would be a little less urgent. But that's not the case. There are plants near large metropolitan areas, some of which received extensions on their licensing 20 years ago because the operators were able to convince the NRC that "new computer programs allowed spent fuel assemblies to be stored closer together". The American public needs to wake up to the fact that if a disaster similar to this occurs in their own back yard, plant operators are indemnified legally from cleanup and reimbursement responsibility. If your house on the ocean becomes uninhabitable, either you or the bank get left holding the giant paper bag - putting aside risks to your health from initial radiation exposure.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
04:02 AM on 03/30/2012
you had your chance to study nuclear engineering in college and took a pass. I did not, now you have to listen to something - everything you said is wrong. Thank God for a nuclear engineering education.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
04:57 PM on 03/29/2012
Arnie Gundersen is not the end all. He is a paid antinuclear activist. Believe your eyes, you live in a radioactive planet already. You will get more radiation sleeping next to someone for a year than those that left Fukushima. (20 mSv).

Its not on MSM because frankly, its a non starter.

The amount of radiation is not harmful to human health and this has been shown by science.

More radiation escaped with the Iceland volcano eruption than Fukushima.
strangiato
Ha Ha...Charade You Are
09:31 PM on 03/29/2012
Are you volunteering then to test out and prove your claim that "the amount of radiation is not harmful to human health"? If so, I will gladly pay for your air fare to Tokyo so you can go down to the plant site and show them all that there's nothing to worry about. They can give you some rubber gloves and boots and you can scoop up the remains of the melted down reactor and fuel pools yourself. And if your successful, I'll even throw in a return flight - first class. Still interested Mr. Industry mouth piece?

You couldn't hold a candle to Arnie Gunderson on any basis or criteria - professionally, intellectually, integrity, veracity, or compassion. You have one heck of a lot of nerve.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:49 PM on 03/29/2012
Nonsense...