iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mark Blumenthal
GET UPDATES FROM Mark:

Obamacare Polls Show Little Change Since Reform's Passage

Posted: 03/27/2012 9:48 am Updated: 03/27/2012 10:38 am

Obamacare Polls
Demonstrators for and against the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act march and chant in outside the U.S. Supreme Court Building on March 26, 2012 in Washington, DC.

WASHINGTON -- With the U.S. Supreme Court hearing arguments on the constitutional challenge to the Affordable Care Act, polling on the health care reform law passed by Congress two years ago is once again taking center stage.

Throughout the health care reform debate, pundits and partisans have often tried to boil down public opinion into simple and often contradictory assertions, as they have : Americans either "oppose the Affordable Care Act by comfortable margins" or are "deeply divided." Either they "want to get rid of it" or they want the government to "implement this law smartly" but not "start over."

For better or worse, the reality lies somewhere in between, and public support for the law can not easily be expressed by a single number. The survey data we have, however, do help us better understand the multifaceted opinions that Americans hold on this contentious subject.

While polls may yield conflicting results about the level of support or opposition, most of the general measures show little or no change since the law passed in April 2010. For two years, for example, the Kaiser Family Foundation has asked representative samples of Americans whether they have "a generally favorable or generally unfavorable opinion" of the "health reform bill [that] was signed into law in 2010." Kaiser's most recent survey, conducted in early March, finds that roughly as many Americans rate the law favorably (41 percent) as rate it unfavorably (40 percent), although over the last year they have typically found negative ratings exceeding positive ones by a few percentage points.

2012-03-26-Blumenthal-kaiserfavoroppose.png

Similar questions asked by other pollsters yield more varied results. While recent surveys by the Pew Research Center and the USA Today/Gallup poll found Americans roughly divided on the health care law, three polls also conducted in the last month by CNN and ORC International, ABC News and the Washington Post and CBS News and The New York Times show significantly more opposition than support.

2012-03-26-Blumenthal-allfavoroppose.png

Whatever the reasons for variation, when summarized with the single trend line on the HuffPost Pollster health reform law chart (below), the various public polls show no consistent trend over the past two years. General opinions formed in the Spring of 2010 have largely persisted.

One consistent finding is that support for the law on all the polls falls short of a majority. All of the surveys also show near monolithic opposition among Republicans. What these well-reported results often miss, however, is that a non-trivial portion of expressed opposition comes from more liberal Americans disappointed that the Affordable Care Act does not go farther.

For example, the CNN/ORC International polls conducted over the past two years have found between 50 and 59 percent saying they are generally opposed to the "bill that makes major changes to the country's health care system [that] became law in 2010." However, the same surveys also asked a follow-up question showing that 11 and 14 percent of all Americans oppose the health reform law because they think its approach "is not liberal enough."

That particular wrinkle -- the relatively small but significant number who see critical shortcomings in the law and want it repealed, but want its replacement to do more rather than less -- helps explain why poll questions about repealing the law sometimes produce even more divergent results. The Rasmussen Reports' automated, recorded voice surveys typically find just over 50 percent of likely voters saying they favor a proposal "to repeal the health care bill and stop it from going into effect." But those polls offer only favor or oppose as answers (and use a potentially confusing format that requires respondents to say they "favor" repeal in order to mean that they "oppose" the law).

Surveys that offer three or more choices to better reflect respondents' sometimes conflicted views on the subject find far less enthusiasm for complete repeal. For example, the Pew Research Center has simply asked Americans what "Congress should do with the health care law, expand it, leave it as is [or] repeal it?" They found 38 percent choosing repeal, 20 who want to leave it alone and 33 percent favoring an expansion of the law.

Other pollsters asking about repeal using a similar three-category format, including the Bloomberg News and Suffolk University national polls, have found roughly the same number (between 34 and 37 percent) favoring repeal. The Kaiser Family Foundation, which added a fourth choice to "repeal the law and replace it with a Republican-sponsored alternative," only boosted combined support for total repeal or "repeal and replace" to 41 percent of adults.

Pew Research (3/7-11, n=1,503): What, if anything, do you think Congress should do with the health care law? Expand it. Leave it as is. Repeal it.
38% repeal
20% leave as is
33% expand
9% unsure

Bloomberg/Selzer (3/8-11, n=1,002 adults): Turning to the health care law passed last year, what is your opinion of the law? It should be repealed. It may need small modifications, but we should see how it works. It should be left alone.
37% should be repealed
46% see how works
11% should be left alone
6% unsure

Suffolk University (3/21-15, n=1,070 likely voters): Do you think that the near-universal health care bill passed in Washington in 2009 should be repealed, modified or left alone?
34% repealed
32% modified
23% left alone
11% unsure

Kaiser Family Foundation (2/29-3/5, n=1,208 adults) What would you like to see Congress do when it comes to the health care law? They should expand the law. They should keep the law as is. They should repeal the law and replace it with a Republican-sponsored alternative. OR, They should repeal the law and not replace it.
28% Expand
19% Keep as is
18% replace with GOP law
23% repeal and not replace
12% unsure

These questions just scratch the surface, since they only probe general attitudes toward the reform law rather than its more specific provisions. The Kaiser Family Foundation notes that the "component parts" of the law have been "consistently popular over the past two years," with one "glaring exception." Just 32 percent say they have a favorable reaction to the requirement that "nearly all Americans ... have health insurance by 2014 or else pay a fine."

2012-03-27-Blumenthal-kaisercomponentstable.png

That individual mandate is at the heart of the ongoing challenge to the law being argued in the Supreme Court this week. Many pollsters have asked about how the court should rule, with varying results. One difficulty in measuring these attitudes is that, as of a few weeks ago at least, very few Americans were paying close attention to legal challenges to the health reform law.

"The public is not yet paying close attention to the legal proceedings," the Kaiser Foundation analysts concluded in mid-March, "and opinions on what the Court should do about the mandate mirror views on the law overall." They find most Americans saying the court's ultimate decision will do little to change their views on the health reform law.

The most likely reason general attitudes about the law have not changed is that so few Americans have sense of how the law will affect them. "Two years after passage," the Kaiser analysts write, "the ACA is not yet 'real' for most Americans -- six in ten say they don't have enough information to understand how the law will impact them, and two thirds say the law has not yet affected their family in either a positive or negative way."

Unless and until that experience changes, attitudes toward the health care reform law are unlikely to shift in a meaningful way.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- With the U.S. Supreme Court hearing arguments on the constitutional challenge to the Affordable Care Act, polling on the health care reform law passed by Congress two years ago is once a...
WASHINGTON -- With the U.S. Supreme Court hearing arguments on the constitutional challenge to the Affordable Care Act, polling on the health care reform law passed by Congress two years ago is once a...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 303
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
larmarch5 12:17 PM on 03/27/2012
People who have actually gone through the provisions and looked at how it personally affects them range for OK to Wow, that's great. Imagine giving birth to a child that would have been denied coverage because of something before Obama Care compared to after Obama Care. Even small businesses are looking at being able to get group insurance for, not only their employees, but themselves, too, for the first  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cailleach Echo
05:27 PM on 04/18/2012
I have already benefited from the Affordable Care Act and, to be very honest, I don't want to have to give the money back. Those who think this will hurt us really have not looked at how they benefit.

I hope the SCOTUS does not vote it down but I suspect they will - 5-4, along party lines but not because its "unconstitutional". Its not. But, the conservative activist judges will do what ever they can to hurt Obama - even if it means hurting us as well.
02:44 PM on 03/30/2012
Fascinating article. Thank you Mr. Blumenthal.

It is amazing how sage the line is "it's not what you say, it's how you say it"...

When dissected into t's "pieces parts", people seem to love the ACA, and by wide margins.
When pejoratives are injected into the discussion, logic and reason flee.

In fact, when the data is examined, only @ 2% of the population is affected by the "individual mandate", those without health insurance who make more than $90,000 per year. All the rest, below that income total receive some sort of subsidy.

A better job "selling" the benefits would have helped the ACA and the administration. They allowed the law to be characterized by the opposition, abused with terms like "freedom", "liberty", "oppression" and "socialism", and the misinformation took hold on the nation's psyche.

Personally, I think that a "single payer/public option" plan would have done more to cut health care costs, and allow portability, the chance for the insured to hold their policy rather than have held hostage with their employer provided insurance. It would also take the burden of being a "insurance agent/provider" off the backs of American business...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hope4us2change
06:03 PM on 03/29/2012
Obamacare is going to be a disaster for our country if it is not struck down. The IRS is going to be overwhelmed with the extra paper work and the invasion of privacy it will cause will be a barrel of worms for everyone. There are better ways to handle the health care crisis and I agree with the idea of making the insurance companies compete outside the state's borders, even world-wide--put them in a free market so we can shop on our own for the best deals. This would change the insurance industry radically. Then they would have to compete with other insurance companies and insurance rates would drop and it would be a better deal for the consumer. Then make the providers of services and products PROVE their prices are fair and uninflated--that would also change the health care costs dramatically. There are better ways to handle this health care crisis--Obamacare is not the answer.
05:19 PM on 04/01/2012
Obamacare will help people who cannot afford insurance to be covered at an affordable cost. The insurance companies, as horrible as they are will still stay in business. However, they will have to lower cost since they have competition. I have been in the healthcare world for 20 years. Competing outside of the states will not work. Insurance today is unaffordable for poor working people, end of story. Getting rid of pre-existing for individual plans is another great part of this plan. I am self employed and unfortunaltely, I had high cholesterol at one point in my life, purely generic. I am slender, eat well and exercise twice a week but they still hold it against me. I make great money, but I look out for coverage for all. I would like to expand on the new healthcare bill. At this point, we are all paying for the uninsured, so yes, they should be forced to buy an affordable plan, just like in car insurance. We all drive a car and we all have insurance on our cars and houses.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddanimal
04:46 PM on 07/01/2012
Huh? Thats complete nonsense.

The ACA does the things you recommend.

What, specifically, are the "better ways" you refer to?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
George R Williams
Publius Cincinatus
08:50 AM on 03/28/2012
"Those who would trade in their freedom for their protection deserve neither."

Obamacare trades the liberty of the people choose their health care for the tyranny of the government to mandate that the people engage in commerce, i.e. Obamacare. If you want to trade your freedoms for the security of the bosom of dependency on the central government, do so in your own names. Leave those of us who object to it alone. It won't be our fault if you can't find enough lemmings to make your plan work.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddanimal
04:47 PM on 07/01/2012
The ACA improves and increases freedom because it allows people to move, change jobs, and have health problems without fear of losing health coverage.

The ACA is a great benefit for freedom.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jawbey
06:01 PM on 03/27/2012
THE REPUB/?BAGGERS HAVE CONVINCED THEIR FOLLOWERS TO VOTE AGAINST THEMSELVES WITHOUT STOPPING TO ------ T H I N K ----- just do as WE tell you.
photo
catgirl666
FDR must be rolling in his grave
05:36 PM on 03/27/2012
The original bill was created by a white guy the other one not.

That's the only difference other than Romneycare covers a b or tions, Ob amacare does not!

**Crickets from the Republicans
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
stephan67
Eternity and a day
04:44 PM on 03/27/2012
It is obvious .The GOP wants the ordinary people to be poor. No universal healthcare , no free education , lower wages for the 99%ers, this is their programme. The average people will become the modern slaves.
01:34 PM on 03/30/2012
The average people already are slaves. They just don't know it yet.
They've still got "Dancing with the Stars", American Idol" and the Kardashians...
Clevelandinwi
Progressive is good; regressive, not so much.
04:20 PM on 03/27/2012
Remember how many 'hired' line holders were in line. So how many of these 'demonstrators' who have no idea what is going on, are 'hired'?
04:03 PM on 03/27/2012
The gop misinformation machine has done a wonderful job of blinding many American citizens.
06:34 PM on 03/27/2012
If I were you I'd have used the term "brainwashed" because that sounds more like it. Say it's too much spending? Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm almost sure that spending money on war equipment is also spending and costing American taxpayers a whole lot more
06:47 PM on 03/27/2012
If I were you I'd have used the term "brainwashed". Another thing. Talk about spending? Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm almost sure it costs a whole lot more for war equipment. And guess what? Tax-payers are stuck with the burden. Guess we'd rather spend money on weapons that take lives as opposed to what will save lives
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Frey
unCommon sense for the common good
03:59 PM on 03/27/2012
Decide for yourself.

http://napoleonlive.info/economics/obamacare-is-poison-4/
01:44 PM on 03/30/2012
Quoting from your link:

"Premiums are being affected by the implementation of the new federal health care law, but the impact is expected to be minimal.

“Health care reform has added to the cost burden, but that is only an additional percent or two,” Vlajkovic said.

Industry analysts have said the health law could temper cost increases for everybody once the more than 30 million uninsured have coverage because it will spread risk over a larger population. But that will take time. Although several major new consumer benefits started last week, this broadened coverage will not go into effect until 2014.

“Reform creates opportunities for meaningful change in how health care is delivered in the U.S., but most of these positive effects won’t be felt for a few years,” said Ken Sperling, Hewitt’s health care practice leader. “In the meantime, employers continue to struggle to balance the significant health care needs of an aging work force with the economic realities of a difficult business environment.”

From reading your link, the ACA seems like a good thing.

The recent rise in insurance premiums is not linked to the ACA, rather it is more likely that the insurance companies are consolidating their financial positions prior to the implementation of "care provided/overhead-profit" constraints contained in the law, restricting the insurance agencies to a 20% cap in overhead/profit.
rdk70816
Yellowhammer
03:50 PM on 03/27/2012
Obamacare is a travesty. The only way to avoid total confusion, corruption, and bankruptcy of the Nation is to abolish Obamacare and start anew under Republican leadership.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ginger23
Sempre ubi sub ubi.
04:38 PM on 03/27/2012
Because Bush was SO successful.

As if.
rdk70816
Yellowhammer
12:07 AM on 03/28/2012
Bush has nothing to do with it. He was more adequate than Obama but not by much.
05:25 PM on 04/01/2012
You had 8 years of Bush and healthcare was never discussed, except Bush was trying to turn Medicare into a voucher program. If you are a middle class working person, you would appreciate Obamacare, as you call it. It will benefit people like you. I can never understand how poor people or working class people can vote republican. They are not for the working class, not at all.
rdk70816
Yellowhammer
05:50 PM on 04/01/2012
The Republican Party is the middle class. Don't listen to the class warfare claptrap of Obama and his fellow travelers.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
slickbottom
03:48 PM on 03/27/2012
Americans are too dumb. We don't deserve universal health coverage. If there are that many stupid people walking among us this country may well be a lost cause.
doublerainbow
Keep looking up and forward!
03:56 PM on 03/27/2012
Like that Yellowhammer behind you.
03:36 PM on 03/27/2012
we dont need mandated healthcare. insurance companies and healthcare providers will take care of us without the pesky government in the way. the free market and competion ( the bulwark of American capitalism ) will drive down prices and cause a race for better patient care between providers and insurance companies. If you happen to believe the above statements, you need to crawl out from under the rock you have been living under and see the world for what is actually happening. Turn off Rush limbaugh and wake up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ginger23
Sempre ubi sub ubi.
04:39 PM on 03/27/2012
You are correct.
05:31 PM on 04/01/2012
To add to your statement, we are #29 in the world in terms of healthcare and life expectancy. We do not have the best healthcare, just the highest cost. People travel to foreign countries for kidney and other transplants. I wish I understood how the poor stupid people in this country is against something that would help them. No teeth in their mouth, but they are holding the signs against healthcare....amazing!
photo
SantaMonican
Visit the carousel, in the Hippodrome, on the pier
03:33 PM on 03/27/2012
After republicans saw Clinton succeed with his Economic Plan, the GOP must have all taken a vow to never give a Democratic President the chance to succeed of fail on their own policies, ever again.
Their new plan with this President is to just lie about anything, block everything, and blame President Obama.
03:31 PM on 03/27/2012
The health care overhaul is complicated and most Americans are as sharp as marbles so no surprise. Faux Nooz is doing all it can to keep the ignorance alive and has many willing lemmings!