iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

SAT, ACT Testing To Have Tighter Security In Wake Of Cheating

By FRANK ELTMAN 03/27/12 03:22 PM ET AP

MINEOLA, N.Y. — The millions of students who take the SAT or ACT each year will have to submit photos of themselves when they sign up for the college entrance exams, under a host of new security measures announced Tuesday in the aftermath of a major cheating scandal on Long Island.

The two companies that administer the tests, the College Board and ACT Inc., agreed to the precautions under public pressure brought to bear by Nassau County District Attorney Kathleen Rice, who is overseeing the investigation. The measures take effect in the fall.

"I believe these reforms, and many others which are happening behind the scenes, will prevent the kind of cheating that our investigation uncovered and give high schools and colleges the tools they need to identify those who try to cheat," Rice said.

Rice has charged 20 current or former students from a cluster of well-to-do, high-achieving suburbs on Long Island with participating in a scheme in which teenagers hired other people for as much as $3,500 each to take the exam for them. The five alleged ringers arrested in the case were accused of flashing phony IDs when they showed up for the tests. All 20 have pleaded not guilty.

In one instance, a young man allegedly produced ID and took the test for a teenage girl who had a name that could have been either male or female.

Students have long been required to show identification when they arrive for one of the tests. Under the new rules, they will have to submit head shots of themselves in advance with their test application. A copy of the photo will be printed on the admission ticket mailed to each student, and will also appear on the test site roster.

School administrators are "going to be able to compare the photo and the person who showed up and say that's either John Doe or that's not John Doe. They didn't have the ability to do that before," the district attorney said.

The photo will also be attached to the student's scores, which, for the first time, will be sent to his or her high school, so that administrators and guidance counselors can see the pictures. Previously, test results were sent only to the student.

"Millions of college-bound students who take the SAT and ACT each year can have a new confidence that their hard work and preparation will be rewarded and not diminished by cheaters," Rice said.

Officials from the College Board and ACT Inc. said that any additional costs would be absorbed and not passed on to students. The College Board charges $49 for the SAT; ACT Inc. charges $34 for the basic test, $49.50 if it includes a writing exam.

"We believe these measures support both test integrity and access and equity for all students," said Kathryn Juric, vice president of the SAT program for the College Board.

During the 2010-11 school year nearly 3 million students worldwide took the SAT; 1.6 million students took the ACT in 2011.

In another key change, students will be required to identify on their application the high school they attend. In the Long Island scandal, the impostors often went to high schools in neighboring communities so they would not be recognized.

Bob Schaeffer, public education director of FairTest: National Center for Fair & Open Testing, a longtime critic of the SAT, said the new procedures would still not prevent cheating if a student submitted an impostor's photograph.

"The image on the registration form will match up with that of the person taking the exam so long as an equally phony ID is used at the test site," he said.

But Rice argued that the follow-up report to the student's high school, with the photograph, should deter most cheating.

"Knowing that's going to be going back to their high schools, specifically their guidance counselor, that's the backup check that's going to prevent it from happening," Rice said. She also said the photos would be kept in a database should any questions of cheating arise later.

In addition, administrators will check student IDs more frequently at test centers. IDs will be examined when students enter a test site, whenever they re-enter the test room after breaks, and again when the answer sheets are collected.

Students will have to upload the photo of themselves or else mail it in.

Vivian Tam, a 17-year-old senior at the LaGuardia School for the Performing Arts High School in New York, welcomed the changes.

"Some people are getting better grades because they have more money to pay somebody to take the test for them," she said.

___

Associated Press Writer Verena Dobnik in New York City contributed to this report.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW EDUCATION

Filed by Emmeline Zhao  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Summer77
02:15 PM on 03/28/2012
Do away with the Test let everyone enter College after all they are paying for it and if they fail they fail on their own money. If you get a student loan from the Government of any bank you cannot include it in a bankruptcy so there is protection there. The test is a waste of time and there are some people who do not tell well but do excellent in college and then there are those who do test well and fail in College. Get rid of them all together they are useless.
11:21 AM on 03/28/2012
Sweet Jesus. What has education come to? Concerned about the future of public education? Go to dumpduncan.org
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fozzi58
I want my country back
11:13 AM on 03/28/2012
Why should a single test decide the fate of a student? What of those that don't take tests well. Anyone can memorize a bunch of facts and regurgitate it on paper when posed with questions and possible answers. That doesn't make one test taker smarter than the other.

I have worked with many people who scored much higher than myself on SATs and many of those people are less able to accomplish tasks or comprehend basic information to function in a job.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SheikArbusto
06:41 AM on 03/28/2012
The predictive validity of college entrance exams is extraordinarily poor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Chingaso
Fighting for mental superiority...
03:11 AM on 03/28/2012
"The five alleged ringers arrested in the case were accused of flashing phony IDs when they showed up for the tests. All twenty have pleaded 'not guilty'."

And they're not guilty...of any "real" crime. Hammer out that cr*p in civil courts.

How about indicting public school employees who are responsible for misappropriating taxpayer funds, via innumerable cheating scandals that occur on standardized tests? Now that would be real justice, unlike the "imaginary" charges filed against twenty vendors who took an SAT or ACT exam on behalf of their respective clients.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fozzi58
I want my country back
11:11 AM on 03/28/2012
Its the board members and administrators who are to blame. Not the "grunts" in the classrooms.
01:15 AM on 03/28/2012
Pretty good system but certainly not fool proof. No doubt there will be test takers who will be able to alter their look enough
to look close enough to a photo on the admission ticket
when ticket is presented at another school.

They should forbid kids the option of taking the test at an out of town location (only cheaters do this), or they should have extra ID safeguards for those taking the test at a location where no one knows them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Natalie Worlow
11:03 AM on 03/28/2012
Well, that's a pretty broad generalization. When I was in high school, our marching band had a major competition in Memphis (an hour from our town) on the same Saturday that the SAT was given. Several of us had to take the test in Memphis, then rush to the competition. So, yes, maybe some of the people who take it out of town are cheaters, but others actually do have legitimate reasons.
02:36 AM on 03/29/2012
there may be rare exceptions, but in general, everybody knows that the people who have these stories of why they have to take the test out of town are really cheating. Everyone knows this.
11:03 PM on 03/27/2012
nteresting article. Reminds me of the days I had to take the ACT. Still have nightmares.

Anyways, I feel the implementation of new standards for taking the ACT and SAT to prevent cheating, could set a model for public school state standardized testing. I have been dismayed to see so many stories of teachers, schools, districts and students cheating on state standardized tests (and even more dismayed to see people defending cheating as an outcome of pressure under NCLB - really).

So if we know cheating is occurring - just like those who oversee the SAT and ACT did - why not take necessary steps to prevent it? Have students undergo measures that support the seriousness of the test, provide clear penalties for teachers and schools who cheat and find ways to right a wrong.

I strongly support the SAT and ACT overseers for their efforts to swiftly end cheating as soon as they realized it was a problem. Lets do the same with state standardized testing.

http://solutions-for-schools.com/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kimhoulian
10:04 PM on 03/27/2012
Why not required them to have a state ID. If a state ID is good enough for voting in an election then surely it should be good enough to take a test. And by the way it's a good idea to start having the state ID issued in high school instead of the school ID.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
yeti7
don't need no stink'n badges
08:06 PM on 03/27/2012
Photo idea to take a test?
Is that even constitutional ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Natalie Worlow
11:46 PM on 03/27/2012
How would that be unconstitutional?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
yeti7
don't need no stink'n badges
08:05 AM on 03/28/2012
well you cannot ask someone for a photo ID to vote. Then why should they be able to ask for an ID for this test.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
yeti7
don't need no stink'n badges
10:25 AM on 03/28/2012
this is why I'm asking the question.
01:16 AM on 03/28/2012
a lot of universities do this, because there are so many cheaters
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
yeti7
don't need no stink'n badges
08:06 AM on 03/28/2012
but we cannot ask for an ID to vote because no one cheats at the polls. ???
photo
tissa
Chicago Liberal /Sales/Marketing Director
06:15 PM on 03/27/2012
So, they send in the photo of their test taker.

Duh.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hope Richardson
Cynical Comedian, Future World Dictator, Otaku
05:34 PM on 03/27/2012
The tighter the security, the better the challenge it is work out a way to cheat!
03:48 PM on 03/27/2012
This is nothing but another opportunity to stereo-type and racially-profile our kids. Now that Administrators, Colleges and universities will be able to see the photograph of the applicant, how do we ensure that scores are not skewed in favour of one demographic over another; or that acceptance to certain prestigious institutions will not be based upon physical appearance rather than ability??? In what direction is this country going.... what is happening to us as a people and Nation? Is this the land of Liberty or Hitler's 3rd Reich all over again???
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:51 PM on 03/27/2012
Jeanneintheatl, you need to stop whatever your are doing and check yourself into a mental institution immediately.
photo
Pavane
I pick my battles and walk from the rest.
12:32 AM on 03/28/2012
The concerns and questions jeanneintheatl posed have merit. Discrimination, racial profiling and their harmful effects are, unfortunately, very real. That you don't think so is up to you, however, you were rude and I think you owe jeanneintheatl an apology.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
yeti7
don't need no stink'n badges
08:08 PM on 03/27/2012
no test at all.
Let your first semester be the test.
If you fail you are out. Go get a job.