iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Arthur Delaney
GET UPDATES FROM Arthur:

Health Care Reform Beneficiary 'Very Nervous' About Supreme Court

Posted: 03/28/2012 4:57 pm

Supreme Court
Paul Clement, a lawyer for 26 states seeking to have the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act tossed out in its entirety, leaves the Supreme Court in Washington, Wednesday, March 28.

Mary Duffy is worried that if the Supreme Court strikes down health care reform, she will lose her health insurance.

Duffy, who is 62 and lives in Redwood City, Calif., signed up for the Affordable Care Act's insurance plan for people with pre-existing conditions as soon as it launched in 2010.

It's not clear what would happen to the 50,000 people enrolled in the Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan, as it is known, if the nation's highest court rules unfavorably on health care reform. On Wednesday, the court concluded three days of oral arguments on the new law, and to many observers, five of the court's nine justices seemed deeply skeptical of its constitutionality.

For Duffy and people like her, there's real cause for concern. The conservatives on the Supreme Court pushed hard against the Obama administration's defense of the so-called individual mandate in the law, which will require nearly all U.S. residents to obtain health insurance coverage starting in 2014. The Court could strike only the mandate or other specific provisions of the law, but justices could also overturn the entire thing, which would eradicate the promise of benefits for people with pre-existing conditions.

Duffy figures that's bad news for her, since her status as a three-time cancer survivor makes her virtually uninsurable. The PCIP, which is open to anyone who's been uninsured for at least six months and has a pre-existing condition of any kind, covers Duffy for $557 a month.

"I'm very nervous," she said. "I think the insurance companies, certainly those involved in PCIP, would be very quick to rearrange our premiums. Why would they not be? Within 90 days I'll be getting an extraordinary premium increase and I'll be dropping the insurance."

The Obama administration, for its part, has said repeatedly that it has no backup plan if the law is partially or completely struck down. A spokeswoman for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services did not immediately respond to a request for comment on what would happen to PCIP enrollees.

After losing her job in 2008, Duffy maintained her company health insurance for 18 months via the government's COBRA program. She has since launched her own food service consulting business but has no idea how she'd buy insurance if the government weren't making it possible.

Duffy said that in December, she started feeling bad and having trouble breathing. She called her doctor, who told her to go immediately to an emergency room in case she was experiencing symptoms of complications from a recent hysterectomy. It turned out to be the start of a bronchial infection, not a complication from surgery, but Duffy wouldn't have known either way if she hadn't had insurance.

"My god, I never would have gone if I didn't have PCIP," she said.

The health care reform law is supposed to make it possible for Duffy and others with pre-existing conditions to obtain good, affordable health insurance beginning in 2014. From that year on, all legal U.S. residents who don't get insurance at work or through a government program like Medicare or Medicaid will be able to shop for plans on state-based "networks." The plans on those networks can't turn anyone away, are limited in how much extra they can charge older or sicker people, and must cover "essential health benefits" as defined by state and federal guidelines.

That system is in jeopardy because of the Supreme Court case. If the justices repeal the entire law, the new insurance market will never be created and consumer protections already in place, such as a rule against refusing to cover children with pre-existing conditions or a prohibition against dropping customers when they become ill, will go away. Another possible outcome would be the elimination of only the individual mandate, which would disrupt the health insurance market but still require plans to accept people with pre-existing conditions and offer subsidies to low- and middle-income people.

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Mary Duffy is worried that if the Supreme Court strikes down health care reform, she will lose her health insurance. Duffy, who is 62 and lives in Redwood City, Calif., signed up for the Affordable...
Mary Duffy is worried that if the Supreme Court strikes down health care reform, she will lose her health insurance. Duffy, who is 62 and lives in Redwood City, Calif., signed up for the Affordable...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 83
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:24 AM on 03/29/2012
hile this addresses wow gold the issue of the "emergency" design mentioned by GC in his original post, it still doesn't address just how fleshed out the spec actually is, along with all the other reasons given below. As he said though, it's still early in the beta, so maybe there is hope for the future. I still believe that there is only a small gap between what is on the current beta build, and a viable balanced tanking spec.
09:41 PM on 03/28/2012
If access to insurance through the pre existing condition insurance plan is cut off I'm in big trouble. This program allowed me to purchase health insurance after being diagnosed with an autoimmune condition. I can't imagine another insurance company would cover me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jaye4412
Proud Liberal Marine..
08:49 PM on 03/28/2012
If repealed, it's going to be a big win for the insurance companies.. And their cronies on the right..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vidtrainer110
Fear is the tool of tyrants
07:11 PM on 03/28/2012
If the law is repealed, the Reps have made it clear they don't intend to replace it and don't intend to make any major changes. In other words, the previous status quo is fine. Translation, if its ruled unconstitutional, we are probably screwed without a hugh upheaval in the membership of the House and Senate.
My true wish is that the law is upheld and we end up with a system that doesn't involve employers. I have a small business (now 5.5 employees) and every year I have to deal with ridiculous hikes in health insurance rates. I feel an obligation to provide healthcare (the cost would be prohibitive if they had to get coverage individually) but feel that it is unfair to both employees (who lose their care if they lose their job) and employers who face constant double digit annual increases in their bills. Then, if you feel that you must do better, you have to waste time dealing with changing plans (within the same company, so far) and then explaining why their co-pays went from $15 to $50 since 2007. Please, let some freaking sanity reign.
07:24 PM on 03/28/2012
If you can't afford health care for your employees, maybe you shouldn't be in business for yourself.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blubird106
08:21 PM on 03/28/2012
It sounds as though vidtrainer110 is trying hard to keep his employees insured, even with the ridiculous premiums charged by insurance companies. Kudos to you for trying to do what was right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maryannto
Please mind the gap
08:27 PM on 03/28/2012
You are not only an idiot, Life With HC, but how dare you say such a thing to vidtrainer! You are clearly not a very nice person.
06:12 PM on 03/28/2012
I am really sorry and sad to say it will be a 5, 4 decision, we the people lose. The people corp. wins.
Thanks to the repug right
06:49 PM on 03/28/2012
The insurance companies want this because they can enroll more people. In fact this law was set up for their benefit as much as anyone elses.
04:08 PM on 03/29/2012
the insurance companies do not win. The more sickly people that they enroll, the more they pay oppose to gaining money from monthly premiums from enrollees that are healthy.
07:24 PM on 03/28/2012
Maybe Obama should have worked with Republicans. Why did he allow something patently unconstititional to go into effect?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blubird106
08:23 PM on 03/28/2012
It occurs to me that Obama has tried every which way he can to come up with a way to get Republicans to work with him on anything. They're not interested. So don't blame it on not working with the republicans. Blame it on the republicans who would not work with him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
09:22 PM on 03/28/2012
Huh? Have you had your head in the sand for the past three+ years? O has tried to work with these Repubs time and time again and has nothing to show for it. And it is NOT patently unconstitutional. Medicare and Social Security were seen as unconstitutional as well, as they are still her, still protecting us.
photo
SantaMonican
Visit the carousel, in the Hippodrome, on the pier
05:59 PM on 03/28/2012
Striping rights from Americans, is a republican top priority.
06:48 PM on 03/28/2012
So in other words by forcing people who don't want to buy insurance, the government is protecting your rights? What about the rights of the people who don't want to buy that insurance?
06:55 PM on 03/28/2012
SO, if something happens to these people who don't want to buy insurance, and they end up in the hospital with major surgery, complications, and then rehab for several months - and the bills add up to well over $800,000 - WHO is going to pay this bill, for that person who doesn't want to buy insurance?
As for mandates, keep in mind, social security was NOT voluntary!! How many people now receiving SS would GIVE IT UP?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blubird106
08:23 PM on 03/28/2012
Are you not required to have insurance if you drive a car? What's the difference?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jablonskimary
09:56 AM on 03/29/2012
LMFAO. It kills me that people like you don't get that if Congress is allowed to exert this power over you for healthcare that you've opened the door to controlling other choices too. Okay, you might be happy while the looney left is in charge, but when the Republicans are in charge, the republican Congress can force you to buy or do things you don't want, i.e. CONTROL YOU. THAT IS WHAT TAKES YOUR RIGHTS AWAY. duh!
photo
SantaMonican
Visit the carousel, in the Hippodrome, on the pier
10:18 AM on 03/29/2012
Just fine and dandy for your party to government mandate unneeded untrasounds....right?.....duh
photo
McSpooty
Slightly left of Lenin. Or is it Lennon?
05:27 PM on 03/28/2012
This is a scary time. I too, was finally able to receive healthcare insurance through the Federal Pool of the MHIP (MO High-Risk Pool) after two years without insurance. Now, thanks to the haters of the GOP and the Bush-appointed court, I could be back where I was: without insurance and no insurance companies will take anyone over 60 years without the High Risk Pools.
09:13 PM on 03/28/2012
I feel for you. In my case, I became disabled due to lack of HC and now am on Medicare.
How much more $$$ is that?
I agree. This is a very scary time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
09:42 PM on 03/28/2012
My husband has a boatload of pre-existing conditions, and his COBRA just ran out last month. We were hoping for the PHIP after another 5 months. I was hoping that I could eventually get health insurance again in 2014. I really don't think that either of us, 60-ish, are again going to have with medical insurance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rogersturnback
Yellow Dog Democrat
12:23 AM on 03/29/2012
Relics and their supreme Court justices would like to see you just go away and die. if ACA is struct down then The Supreme Court will become the death panel the tea party has been yelling about
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ShawnRay
05:20 PM on 03/28/2012
justices need to repeal the entire law
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smallpawsdk
Hillary 2016
05:45 PM on 03/28/2012
NO!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blubird106
08:27 PM on 03/28/2012
We need to repeal the damn justices.
11:39 PM on 03/28/2012
Unfortunately, they are appointed for life. They cannot be voted out of office or recalled! We can only hope for a short life span or vote in people in the House and retain the Senate to make laws that make sense and reign in the power of these greedy, self serving insurance companies.