iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

New Tornado Warnings Based On Storm's Severity Aim To Scare

Tornado Warnings

First Posted: 03/31/2012 5:26 pm Updated: 04/ 1/2012 3:32 am

KANSAS CITY, Mo. (AP) — Even expert storm chases would have struggled to decipher the difference between the tornado warnings sent last May before severe weather hit Joplin and, a few days later, headed again toward downtown Kansas City.

The first tornado was a massive EF-5 twister that killed 161 people as it wiped out a huge chunk of the southwest Missouri community. The second storm caused only minor damage when two weak tornadoes struck in the Kansas City suburbs.

In both cases, the warnings were harbingers of touchdowns. But three out of every four times the National Weather Service issues a formal tornado warning, there isn't one. The result is a "cry wolf" phenomenon that's dulled the effectiveness of tornado warnings, and one the weather service hopes to solve with what amounts to a scare tactic.

In a test that starts Monday, five weather service offices in Kansas and Missouri will use words such as "mass devastation," ''unsurvivable" and "catastrophic" in a new kind of warning that's based on the severity of a storm's expected impact. The goal is to more effectively communicate the dangers of an approaching storm so people understand the risks they're about to face.

"We'd like to think that as soon as we say there is a tornado warning, everyone would run to the basement," said Ken Harding, a weather service official in Kansas City. "That's not how it is. They will channel flip, look out the window or call neighbors. A lot of times people don't react until they see it."

The system being tested will create two tiers of warnings for thunderstorms and three tiers for tornadoes, each based on severity. A research team in North Carolina will analyze the results of the experiment, which runs through late fall, and help the weather service decide whether to expand the new warnings to other parts of the country.

Laura Myer, a social science research professor at Mississippi State University, said people she has interviewed want more advance warning about a potential tornado strike and more information on the specific locations where the storms are expected to hit.

"We have found in Mississippi and Alabama and various other Southern states that people feel they would constantly be going to a shelter if they heeded every tornado warning," she said. "For people in mobile homes, that's the craziest thing.

"To get to a shelter, they have to leave home," she said. "They feel like if they left during every watch or warning, they would be on the road all the time."

The primary audiences for weather service's written bulletins are broadcasters who issue warnings on the air and emergency management agencies that activate sirens and respond to the storm's aftermath. In the event of a Joplin-like tornado, the new-look warning would have an urgency hard to ignore.

Andy Bailey, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service office in Pleasant Hill, Mo., said it might look something like this: "THIS IS AN EXTREMELY DANGEROUS TORNADO WITH COMPLETE DEVASTATION LIKELY. ... SEEK SHELTER NOW! ... MOBILE HOMES AND OUTBUILDINGS WILL OFFER NO SHELTER FROM THIS TORNADO — ABANDON THEM IMMEDIATELY."

Had such a warning come across his television set on May 22, Joplin resident Jeff Lehr said he might have sought shelter. Instead, it wasn't until a siren distracted him from a sporting event he was watching on TV that he looked out a window and saw what appeared to be dark thunderstorm clouds.

Even then, he didn't take cover until the windows began imploding in his apartment.

"After hundreds of times of similar thunderstorms approaching Joplin, many of those with tornado warnings attached, and you see them pass ... after all those storms, you kind of get jaundiced about the warnings and tend not to give them the weight you probably should give them," said Lehr, a reporter at The Joplin Globe.

James Spann, chief meteorologist with WBMA-TV in Birmingham, Ala., said the impact-based warning experiment could provide broadcasters and emergency management agencies with a useful tool in an age when a majority of people still wait for an outdated technology — tornado sirens — to seek shelter.

He blames the siren mentality and high number of false alarms for the complacency of people living in tornado-prone areas such as Alabama, where 252 people were killed last April 27 in a tornado outbreak that struck communities across the South.

"A lot of politicians and people who don't understand tornadoes try to jump into this," Spann said. "Their first reaction is, 'We've got to get more sirens.' What are these people thinking? They clearly do not understand the issue."

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 30
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
07:42 AM on 04/03/2012
Frankly, if you're the kind of information-underprivileged person who ignores tornado warnings, there's probably not so much that a warning system can do for you. If a guy in a black robe with a scythe doesn't impress....
Kommonman
Blame it on Dyslexic fingers..next question
02:14 PM on 04/02/2012
Well less folk perish now than they used to with the national/state alert systems....Is it perfect...nope...but it is a dang sight better than it was in the past. If the alerts were not there folks would be screaming why did no one warn us..so keep the system as is as some warning is better than no warning...if the ones who feel this is a crying wolf scenario get caught up in calamity they have no one to blame but themselves for ignoring the warning
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ecolke
Judge a man's character by how he treats animals.
11:11 AM on 04/02/2012
I'm in Oklahoma. Good luck with the new system. We're so acclimated to the watches and warnings that most of us don't react much. The increased hysteria in the warnings might increase people heeding the warning in the beginning, but we'll see.

I once tried to get my dad to go to the basement during one bad approaching storm. He said, "eeh, this house has been here since 1907. I think it'll be okay." And it was okay. The house I'm in now has been here since 1921; here in tornado ally. It'll most likely still be standing, but it won't hurt to hang out in the basement for a while.

A mobile home? No way I would stay put in a mobile home. No way.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:14 AM on 04/02/2012
It is about time something was done to save people who would have died listening to extremist media outlets. For example, “From a hurricane-safe bunker ... I'm struck, you know, the hype of these things is incredible ... even if it does hit, or when it does hit, it's not going to be as bad as it was forecast to be” (“Rush Reacts to Soaring Bush Speech, and Disastrous Kerry Midnight Response”; 9/3/04) (the old, ugly and evil Rush “looting” Limbaugh whistlesucker perfuming the stink at rushlimbaugh.com).
07:01 PM on 04/01/2012
We are in the Miami Valley in OH and I use the NWS Radar system out of Wilmington to keep an eye on things. Weather Channel has morphed into entertainment and sometimes takes too long to show whats going on. The Wilmington Radar breaks into all channels on Cable and has done very well with keeping us informed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ms Liann
F&F Feedback Appreciated
08:09 PM on 04/01/2012
The Weather Channel gets it's warnings from the NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE. The Tea-Klan has cut every govt protective serviced, including NWS satellites, tsunami early warnings and even FEMA after you have been creamed. But don't worry, billionaires and million-dollar generals in the pentagon are well protected.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:57 AM on 04/03/2012
Lol! You folks see the tea-party in everything you read.
photo
crydespite
no-one is ever 'just saying'
10:55 AM on 04/01/2012
this sounds just plain wrong to me. the solution cannot, surely, be to just cry "wolf" louder. you may have a short-term gain but in the long term, they will disbelieve you even more. better would be to state the probability of a tornado as well as you know it, and work as hard as possible to improve the accuracy. the approach described just doesn't seem well thought through at all.
10:30 AM on 04/01/2012
Three out of four warnings are for tornadoes that don't appear? I disagree. Just because most don't touch down and create a visible column of debris doesn't mean that it won't in the next 5 seconds. You can watch a field of grass on a windy day and see vortice patterns all day long.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
06:47 PM on 04/01/2012
One in four is a pretty good ratio.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patililac
heaven forbid!
04:36 AM on 04/01/2012
I don't have a basement. There is no community shelter nearby. I usually look out the window and lean over and...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:20 AM on 04/01/2012
Do you live on your own land? Buy a section of concrete pipe. Hire someone to dig a hole in your yard with a backhoe and bury the pipe, leaving both ends exposed like it was a culvert. Then, at your convenience, build a frame for a door at one end and block off the other and bury it.

Put in a "cellar door" and stuff a foam mattress inside, with a flashlight, a water bottle, and a few tools so you can dig out if needed. Storm shelter.
03:43 PM on 04/01/2012
A good idea, but many are in trailer parks because they are already living hand to mouth or are retired on fixed incomes. Would be smart to require trailer parks with more than 5 residents to install an underground facility. Give them a 5 year window to get it done. Would create some jobs for contractors too. People on their own land might require something like a tax rebate to get it done. Might be cheaper in the long run than more sirens.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AltoProfunda
when the going gets tough, the tough get weird.
10:09 AM on 04/01/2012
And I live in a trailer park - there are no shelters for us here.
06:16 PM on 04/01/2012
There SHOULD be . . Any community like a trailer park should be required to at least install a simple concrete vault shelter. It can be done for a few thousand dollars.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lyredragon
Obey My Dog!
02:10 AM on 04/01/2012
People are just not going to take shelter until it's too late. I don't. There needs to be better and shelter for people that are not in homes with basements and who live in multi family dwellings. In our apartment the only established shelter is the furnace room which is only 8' x 12, and somehow a max of 12 people and their pets must fit in, cramming up between the washer and dryer and the water heater and the electric meters and the room always reeks of gas despite them telling us that it is not leaking. It's not ventilated in a way that matters to living things. not to mention that the whole building is a walk out basement with only 3 doors standing between us and the weather. Yeah, I'm totally sure that the place would not rapidly be a death trap in an emergency.. Also, I've got a spouse with a fear of crowds and enclosed places. He's not going in there. It's a tragedy waiting to happen, so we watch the clouds and stick to the TV reports. We've been here long enough to know what rotation looks like.
photo
southingtonian
"I'm a Capricorn and you can't make me do sh*t.."
03:26 AM on 04/01/2012
Tornadoes happen in the dead of night, too. They also come at you from odd angles. The old rule of 'Watch to the southwest' doesn't help when the weather patterns are in such flux. The Scouts had it right. Be prepared. Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst. We have duplicate 'bug-out' kits in the basement and by the main door. Here in NE Ohio, the emergency could be anything from tornadoes to flooding to ice storms to six feet of snow in one day to earthquake (rare but not impossible). We're even basically downwind of Yellowstone. Perhaps the only thing we can rule out is a tsunami (unless a meteor lands in the Atlantic, in which case......).
11:27 PM on 03/31/2012
Rain, Snow, Hurricane or Tornado these weather reporters embellish everything. Any group of people who have to stand out in the weather to report it are not going to be taken seriously by me.I no longer listen to these people I only visit graphic radar weather sites.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ecolke
Judge a man's character by how he treats animals.
11:19 AM on 04/02/2012
I don't know about where you live, but here in Oklahoma those 'weather reporters' are meteorologists, and the best in the nation. They had the cognitive capacity for the science and math. Plus, the University of Oklahoma has one of the top ranked schools of meteorology in the nation. It's ranked in the top three.
11:19 PM on 03/31/2012
Whether it's coming Rain, Snow, Hurricane or Tornado these so-called meteorologists embellish everything. I no longer listen to these fools. I check graphic weather sites only. The Weather Channel is the worst. They have forgotten that it is their job to tell us the weather and let us determine what we should do with that information. Any fools that have to stand outside in a hurricane to give a report are not the kinds of people I am going to take seriously
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alexis Elizabeth Drob
There's no intelligent life down here
01:15 PM on 04/01/2012
The weather channel has lost it's ability to forecast a windy day let alone a tornado. They are now an ambulance chasing channel and just like all the other useless channels we have. More for entertainment and they really don't care that they have become so commercialized!!! The weather channel is joke!!!
photo
William A
Oh Lord, save me from your followers!
10:45 PM on 03/31/2012
The only people crying wolf are alarmists, using tradgedy to spread their religion. Scare tactics? Isn't that a form of political terrorism, by the way?

This has all happened before, and it will all happen again. Stop making houses out of plywood.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:09 PM on 03/31/2012
Should not drink and comment.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:43 AM on 04/01/2012
Oh yes. How silly to try to warn people of impending deadly tornadoes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pepper1311
POGS are dirt
06:06 AM on 04/01/2012
Why warn anyone, kind of funny the next day, those who survive have a great look on there faces.