iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Elise Foley
GET UPDATES FROM Elise:

Defense Of Marriage Act Challenged By Binational Same-Sex Couples

Posted: 04/ 2/2012 6:29 pm

Immigration Doma
Santiago Ortiz (left) and Pablo Garcia (right) on their wedding day in May 2011.

WASHINGTON -- Five same-sex couples that are unable to obtain green cards for a foreign-born partner filed a lawsuit on Monday against the Defense of Marriage Act, which prohibits gay couples from petitioning for legal status for their partners.

Whether or not they are legally married, Americans in same-sex relationships have no legal options to help their partners become legal residents of the United States. For Santiago Ortiz, who was born in the U.S., and his husband Pablo Garcia, born in Venezuela, this means being unable to leave the country or receive full rights because Garcia cannot obtain a green card.

"We really believe that we are family. I really want to be with Pablo," Ortiz said. "We're being denied our rights, because we are a family."

Ortiz and Garcia have been together for more than two decades and married for nearly a year. They are confident that the Defense of Marriage Act will be repealed eventually, particularly after seeing society evolve on gay rights -- 20 years ago, they had to keep their relationship under wraps, but now they are able to be open, Ortiz said.

But Garcia, who first entered the country on a tourist visa and then stayed, can't get a green card despite his marriage to Ortiz, even though a partner in a heterosexual marriage would be able to do so. The couple applied for a green card but expect the application to be rejected, as others have been under the law.

They join five other couples in similar circumstances on the lawsuit, which was filed on their behalf by advocacy organization Immigration Equality and the law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP.

"Solely because of DOMA and its unconstitutional discrimination against same-sex couples, these Plaintiffs are being denied the immigration rights afforded to other similarly situated binational couples," the lawsuit states.

One of the other couples named in the suit, Kelli Ryan and Lucy Truman, was denied a green card on March 27, despite a push by Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Immigration Equality. Truman, who was born in the United Kingdom, is in the country on a visa but could be forced to leave if she lost her job.

Tim Smulian, a 65-year-old South African who is married to 71-year-old American citizen Edwin Blesch, was granted a year of relief beginning in February, meaning he will not immediately be required to leave the country for six months out of every year. Still, he cannot receive a green card because of the Defense of Marriage Act. Smulian and Blesch are also named in the suit.

Victoria Neilson, legal director for Immigration Equality, said Monday that the lawsuit is the final option in pushing for fair treatment of same-sex couples under immigration law. The group already asked the administration to change its policies and to, at the very least, suspend green card applications rather than rejecting them until challenges to the Defense of Marriage Act are resolved.

"We have recently gotten a definitive no from the administration on that request, so we sort of feel like we're at the end of the line on advocacy," she said. "Our next step is to take it to the courts."

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Five same-sex couples that are unable to obtain green cards for a foreign-born partner filed a lawsuit on Monday against the Defense of Marriage Act, which prohibits gay couples from pet...
WASHINGTON -- Five same-sex couples that are unable to obtain green cards for a foreign-born partner filed a lawsuit on Monday against the Defense of Marriage Act, which prohibits gay couples from pet...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 567
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Diana Scrimger
06:09 PM on 05/02/2013
We think that DOMA will be upheld. Marriage should only be between a man and a woman. The majority of voters passed Yes on Prop 8. When the couple is not American born or in a Hetrosexual marriage therefore both will not be recognized by the Government. They will be deported instead.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lambdin1
What's this?
11:21 AM on 04/08/2012
Marriage is a secular thing! The government sanctions marraige by licensing and taxes. When the federal government created the DOMA law it was unconstitutional. Now in another election year and with this Supreme Court, no government official will challenge it! By not having term limits of both houses and public funding of campaigns, we have created a government of cowards! Who only agenda is to stay in office! DOMA will be overturned time and again in the courts. But until we have a Congress with fortitude it will remain!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Callaio
Pay No Attention To That Man Behind The Curtain!
09:55 PM on 04/04/2012
Hopefully this will further the pressure to repeal.....DOMA......... which is blatantly UnAmerican and Unconstitutional as well!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Contact1972
BigGayInc
11:10 PM on 04/04/2012
I hope so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Callaio
Pay No Attention To That Man Behind The Curtain!
11:37 PM on 04/04/2012
I do too.....I for one am running out of patience with all the hate in our society.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
02:24 PM on 04/04/2012
Now all we can do is hope, pray, and continue to fight for the rights of our disenfranchised brothers and sisters!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Contact1972
BigGayInc
02:45 AM on 04/10/2012
Agreed. Though I'm done with praying personally. I'm almost done with hope as well. But I'm not done with pushing and fighting and I will never stop until this inhumane, unjust law known as DOMA is dead and buried.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
juanjo
Plaudite, amici, comedia finita est.
11:19 PM on 04/03/2012
DOMA or at least a portion of it dealing with federal benefits, is unconstitutional. It denies one class of married persons the same benefits granted to another group of married persons based upon gender of their spouse.
photo
Cantinflas
My micro-bio is not empty.
12:42 PM on 04/04/2012
As soon as it's tested in court the righties will start screaming about judicial activism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
02:26 PM on 04/04/2012
And I'm going to LOVE throwing back in their faces the claims they're making about the ACA when they say "But it was passed by Congress!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
02:25 PM on 04/04/2012
Personally I think the whole thing is, because of the fact that the Full Faith and Credit clause says that ALL states and the federal government must accept the legal dealings from other states, but DOMA says that states may and the federal government will ignore those legal dealings if they involve a same sex marriage!
09:33 PM on 04/03/2012
Yet another example of exactly how un-Constitutional this mis-named "Defense" of Marriage Act is.

These couples are legally married and yet not entitled to the 1,176 Federal "effects that flow from marriage" (to use the 'legaleze').

Shame on America.
08:24 PM on 04/03/2012
Some day this will be a free country. We all know that in twenty years it will be perfectly legal for people to marry as they chose. Ask a twenty year old if gay marriage should be prohibited. Their answer is a glimpse of what the future holds.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Contact1972
BigGayInc
09:34 PM on 04/03/2012
It better not take 20 years!
12:58 AM on 04/04/2012
No, won't - or at least it shouldn't - what's the point of wasting money on something that doesn't concern you? Or anybody else for that matter?

I feel this topic has been debated for ever; it's been a loosing topic - for those who for ever strange reason oppose it - and still gay people can't get the same rights as eveybody else?

It just doesn't make sense!!?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Al91206
Educating the right on why they are wrong.
03:38 PM on 04/03/2012
Christianity is no different than believing the Sun is driven across the sky in a chariot. Unbelievable we treat it as if it were absolute truth.

If Jesus knew how his name were being used (abused) he would have purged his existence from our history.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaureenMillarHolt
TheConservativeCurmudgeon can cure your liberalism
02:09 PM on 04/03/2012
DoMA is NOT "unconstitutional" if only because marriage is not a civil "right."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erin84
02:43 PM on 04/03/2012
DOMA violates the 10th and 14th amendments and your ignorance violates the sanity of those aren't already used to it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaureenMillarHolt
TheConservativeCurmudgeon can cure your liberalism
07:50 PM on 04/03/2012
Can't help you with that. Psychologists & psychiatrists have a habit of dealing w/insanity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BooBoo Bob
Snark is my life.
03:28 PM on 04/03/2012
Oh, I'm sorry... I have three Supreme Court cases, MINIMUM, over the past 50 years that firmly declare marriage a human right that prove you wrong.

Here's a little taste: Loving v. Virginia.

Care to try again?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mindy Czech
Cindy's wife for life.
04:33 PM on 04/03/2012
Oh, Bob. You know better than to try to confuse these people with facts and truth. Their brains can't handle this information. They're wholly incapable and it's not in their nature.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaureenMillarHolt
TheConservativeCurmudgeon can cure your liberalism
07:52 PM on 04/03/2012
O, here we go AAAAAGAIN!!!!!

That case has 0 to do w/homosexuals & their agenda.
Has to do with ONE WOMAN & ONE MAN in marriage. The definition of marriage in DoMA & elsewhere. Homosexuals don't meet that definition/qualification.
01:17 PM on 04/03/2012
I am yet another one of those Americans in a same-sex, bi-national relationship. My partner and I have played by the rules, and we've been punished as a result. My partner is Filipino and is still in the Philippines. He has no money, and I have only a part-time job, although I had a full-time job here as a teacher when I first met him. It's so hard to get a teaching job here these days, and I'm also always unsure of whether I should keep myself anchored here, anyway. I've tried figuring out ways to bring him over here, but I've finally given up on it. We haven't been able to see each other in person now for two and a half years. So I'll just try to scrape together enough money to move over there to the Philippines instead. At least I'm lucky enough to work online. That's definitely a blessing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Al91206
Educating the right on why they are wrong.
03:35 PM on 04/03/2012
Me as well - my partner is Mexican - contact me if you want same username as my huffingtonpost username at gmail
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Contact1972
BigGayInc
03:39 PM on 04/03/2012
I feel your pain.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rex Hungus
Intelligently Designed Atheist
12:40 PM on 04/03/2012
Lets just get rid of religion and then none of this would be an issue.
photo
duckpuddle
Coexist, it's easier.
01:06 PM on 04/03/2012
Sure. We can do that right after I find my plane tickets to Shangri-La.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rex Hungus
Intelligently Designed Atheist
12:37 PM on 04/03/2012
Hey the people in this country who pay taxes and obey the laws should be able to enjoy all the benefits that come with it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaureenMillarHolt
TheConservativeCurmudgeon can cure your liberalism
02:12 PM on 04/03/2012
And they do. Nothing's beiong denied them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erin84
02:45 PM on 04/03/2012
Except the right to marry one unrelated consenting adult of their choice, a right straight people have. Maybe you should try telling the truth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Contact1972
BigGayInc
03:42 PM on 04/03/2012
Try 1138 Federal rights and protections.

You are entitled to your own opinion, not your own facts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DrMaxChartrand
Resisting the tyranny of ObamaCare
12:18 PM on 04/03/2012
Obama is sounding more and more like a character out Dr. Zhivago, when the masses were stirred into thinking that if the wealthy's homes could be confiscated that a dozen families could live there comfortably, that food would be free for all, and the people would never want for anything. It is pitiful to see this class warfare language, this intellectual dishonesty fall from the lips of a sitting president. The masses will always want to "soak the rich", thinking that bringing down others it elevates them. His is a dangerous game and will only work if he has enough people on the dole to vote for him. Just keep us unemployed, keep business desparate from over regulation, keep us poor at the gas pump, and get enough people thinking that the world owes them a living it may just do to us what it did in early twentieth century Russia. Shame of the president for stooping so low.
photo
FantasticFourFan
Fred Phelps represents all gay marriage opponents
01:04 PM on 04/03/2012
It was the right who declared "class warfare" on the rest of us. Those evil "regulations" are the reason why we no longer have rat feces in our food supply and why you can drink the water without getting sick. Or perhaps you'd like to return to the days of child labor and losing limbs on the job. Last year the Tommy Hilfiger factory in Indonesia burned down. You know how much the workers there were being payed? Twenty one cents an hour. You don't get to blame taxes and regulation for why you left the country if all you're going to pay your workers is twenty one cents an hour.

Regulations, BTW, that could have prevented the fire in the first place. Those Chinese workers that build iPads? They couldn't afford one themselves. At some point, you can't blame the big bad government for why you left the country if you aren't even going to pay your workers enough to buy the products they make. Even Henry Ford understood that.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
andnojusticeforanyone
Forever free! Forever forward! Progressive vet
01:20 PM on 04/03/2012
Max, you are a fox programmed fool, you repeated every single talking point, not one based in fact. The only people who should feel shame are ignorant robots like you who work against their own best interests and the interests of this nation as a whole.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
paroxario
is in need of a micro bio.
11:48 AM on 04/03/2012
It's about time we got equality for all Americans!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DrMaxChartrand
Resisting the tyranny of ObamaCare
12:18 PM on 04/03/2012
You mean like under communism?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
too young but old enough
I already know how this is going to turn out...
12:46 PM on 04/03/2012
Were you not aware of guarantees of equal protections under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution? Perhaps you should read that document that you pretend to hold so dear.

Here's a great spot to start your refresher:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Protection_Clause
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BooBoo Bob
Snark is my life.
01:27 PM on 04/03/2012
No, like under the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. You know... those documents that form the basis of our government.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaureenMillarHolt
TheConservativeCurmudgeon can cure your liberalism
02:53 PM on 04/03/2012
You already have it--EQUAL OPPORTUNITY. I guess that's not good enough for you?
Not equal results--that's never been promised, as well it shouldn't.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BooBoo Bob
Snark is my life.
05:29 PM on 04/03/2012
And I don't have the "equal opportunity" to marry my same-gender partner and participate in the 1000-ish benefits that are provided for married couples in this country.

TA-DAH! Unconstitutional.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Contact1972
BigGayInc
07:48 PM on 04/03/2012
Don't use big words like equal opportunity when you don't understand what they mean.
11:45 AM on 04/03/2012
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]

Seems dissenting opinions are against the guidelines....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BooBoo Bob
Snark is my life.
12:26 PM on 04/03/2012
So... have you READ the guidelines or are you just going to kvetch?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lauren Rossnan
02:27 PM on 04/03/2012
ha kvetch. love it :)
photo
duckpuddle
Coexist, it's easier.
12:57 PM on 04/03/2012
Only if the are offensive to someone. It is easy to have a dissenting opinion without being offensive.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaureenMillarHolt
TheConservativeCurmudgeon can cure your liberalism
02:56 PM on 04/03/2012
Not when there's so many thin-skinned people on this board, who can take "offense" to the term "boo-hoo."