iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Connecticut Poised To Abolish Death Penalty After Senate Vote

The Huffington Post  |  By Posted: 04/ 5/2012 11:50 am Updated: 04/ 5/2012 12:22 pm

After a marathon session of debate, the Connecticut Senate passed a bill early on Thursday morning abolishing the death penalty, making the state all but certain to end capital punishment within weeks.

Connecticut would be the 17th state to repeal the death penalty and the first since Illinois ended the practice in August 2011.

The vote, which ended 20-16 in favor of repeal, was the largest remaining hurdle for the new law. According to the Hartford Courant, the bill has wide backing in the House of Representatives, while Gov. Daniel Malloy's support of repeal has been unequivocal.

"I want to be very clear that if such a bill was to come to me, I will sign it," Malloy said, according to The Day last month. "We do not have a workable death penalty in the state of Connecticut today. Period."

Connecticut currently has 11 death row inmates. The bill passed by the Senate would only apply to future convictions, a compromise that allowed several previously opposed lawmakers to back to the repeal. But Chief Public Defender Susan O. Storey and Chief State’s Attorney Kevin Kane stated in a hearing last month that the repeal would make execution of the current inmates unlikely.

In response to that reality, the Senate passed an amendment to the bill that will impose tougher punishments on inmates sentenced to life without the possibility of parole. Such restrictions, including near-solitary confinement, frequent cell moves and strict monitoring, were designed to "essentially replicate life on death row."

The vote occurred largely along party lines, with two Democratic senators joining all the chamber's 12 Republicans in opposing the bill. Minority Leader John McKinney argued that life imprisonment, even with the tougher restrictions, was not sufficient justice for some crimes. "The Democrat amendment gives Connecticut murderers an escape hatch to avoid the harsher conditions of incarceration that the proponents claim and that current death-row inmates experience,'' he said during the debate.

McKinney also said there was no proven need to overturn the death penalty, saying that "there is no evidence that anyone currently on death row is innocent."

Democratic Sen. Eric Coleman, meanwhile, disagreed that capital punishment in Connecticut has been just. Repeal, he said, was "an opportunity to correct the arbitrariness, the discrimination, the random haphazard approach to the application of our death penalty in this state."

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
After a marathon session of debate, the Connecticut Senate passed a bill early on Thursday morning abolishing the death penalty, making the state all but certain to end capital punishment within weeks...
After a marathon session of debate, the Connecticut Senate passed a bill early on Thursday morning abolishing the death penalty, making the state all but certain to end capital punishment within weeks...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,890
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (24 total)
03:10 AM on 04/09/2012
The goal of the state was to protect its people, not to carry out vengeance. Thankfully there's some people who support this notion.

Welcome to the 21st Century, Connecticut, and I hope the rest of the country follows!
03:36 PM on 04/06/2012
When I say I believe in the death penalty I meant that I believe in the basic principle of it! That when it is carried out, justice is being served! I do not believe in it being dragged out! It should be reinstated and reformed in every state to where it is carried out within a year of the sentence! Studies showed the average time on death row, for those executed from 1973-1994, was 8 years. An average of about one million dollars LESS per case than those who were given life without parole! As to the morality issue? To me, a person who commits this heinous act is no longer a person. They are no different than a rabid animal that needs to be out down to protect society. Lethal injection is much more humane than they deserve! It is the price they pay for taking an innocent life. It is the justice that the victim(s) and although it does little to ease the pain they will have to endure for the rest of their lives, their relatives and friends deserve! As to someone wrongly convicted? That is mostly a thing of the past! You’ll notice in the VERY few cases where this happened. it was from many years before DNA and other advanced technology existed. In a case like that where they were convicted without overwhelming evidence, then by all means investigate it. But only as long as it is not on the tax payers dime!
03:06 AM on 04/09/2012
You are promoting a sick, demented society where one man deserves to see another man die. As if the revenge killing should be presented to a victims friends/family as a gift. I can't fathom how people actually defend this barbaric "death penalty".
11:59 AM on 04/06/2012
I am so upset as to the signing of the no death penalty law. So these murderers get to live out their lives, watching tv, access to computers, gyms and three squares a day while we pay for them to have all that.These murderers are mindless people with no heart and don't mind being housed.

The men and women on death row get to live out their lives anyway with all the appeals. That law should have been changed along time ago regarding this and a limit should have been put in place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnBryansFontaine
Liberal Democrat
12:26 PM on 04/06/2012
The Death Penalty is more expensive
02:05 PM on 04/06/2012
use a bullet is cheap
photo
toxicshock
Sassy, snarky, smart
09:53 PM on 04/06/2012
"The men and women on death row get to live out their lives anyway with all the appeals."

Oh yeah, prison is totally awesome. It's like a resort, really. I don't know why more people don't go there!
10:34 PM on 04/06/2012
for the people who commit these horrible acts of murder, yes, jail (at least most of our jails) are to good for them. And I repeat, they are mindless, heartless and spineless animals ( case in point, the Petit family) who don't deserve to be on this earth.

And for all the helpless babies who were murdered and thrown away like trash in landfills, or dumpsters at the hands of some evil doer.. And young teenage girls, molested, raped and murdered, what kind of sentence should the monsters that did this get??
11:37 AM on 04/06/2012
I wonder,if it was a family member who was killed so horrible,would these people still think the death penelity was so bad.?Personally,i would want to be the one who fliped the switch
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnBryansFontaine
Liberal Democrat
12:33 PM on 04/06/2012
This is the threadbare, emotionalist 'how would you feel if some family member were murdered' argument. The trouble with this argument is that some members of families of those killed by drunk drivers might also want the same penalty inflicted on the guilty party.

Or some of the family of Trayvon Martin for that matter.
10:48 AM on 04/06/2012
so those two guys who raped, murdered and then torched a mother and two daughters, should get to live out their lives? WHY? there ARE crimes for which death for the criminal is the only fitting punishment.
11:43 AM on 04/06/2012
They're not getting reduced sentences. They are getting grandfathered in with the other death row inmates. This bill means there are no more executions.

And it isn't punishment. What is punishment if the person isn't around to understand what they did. "Oh you sure got me, now I'm dead'. All it is is government sponsored revenge which makes you no better then the person being put to death.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnBryansFontaine
Liberal Democrat
10:18 AM on 04/06/2012
As I commented earlier, I believe that a semi-lobotomy performed on the killer, one which would leave this individual with cognitive abilities, but with drastically decreased tendencies towards violence, combined with a life sentence, would preferable to the death penalty.

I believe that society has an absolute right to be protected, but also that executions give the state too much power.

Also, modern psychosurgery is far advanced from the barbaric methods employed in the 1950’s and before. Perhaps even gamma knives could be used on the anesthetized murderer’s brain.
septsong
noonesbusiness
09:58 AM on 04/06/2012
just think... a 12x12 cell or less..for the rest of your life.. no hope of getting out..the mental stress is priceless... I think I like this ruling....your whole life to dwell on what you did...knowing every day will be the same as yesterday... a whole lifetime missed... better then death.. its a living death.. think of it..
photo
jpfmtka
Life is tough.. it's tougher when you're stupid..
08:58 AM on 04/06/2012
The only thing wrong with the death penalty is that there is no "express line".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smevic
06:22 AM on 04/06/2012
The only ones being punished when the death penalty is carried out is the family of the executed...It is revenge and has no place in our justice system. The difference between us, normal people, and those who kill is supposed to be our ability to stop short of murder.
photo
Johnsteed
Mrs Peel, we're needed
09:05 AM on 04/06/2012
If we want to enjoy an effective system of law then the punishment we give must be proportional to the crime,'' .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smevic
09:30 AM on 04/06/2012
Yes, incarceration for life without parole...that is proportional to the crime...unless you are suggesting the family of the murderer SHOULD be punished?
01:30 PM on 04/09/2012
The guidelines for the punishment is that whatever it may be, it should deter crimes and prevent future ones. The idea that the punishment HAS to be harsh on a fundamental basis is severely flawed. Punishment should never be the goal, safety and deterrence should be!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
henryptnm
06:19 AM on 04/06/2012
What the state senators did, just cut their political throats. And if the state house goes along and Malloy signs it, their opponents are going to use this as an issue if they should decide to run for re-election.
05:45 AM on 04/06/2012
Hope they like taxes in Conn. Because they are goingto get them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnBryansFontaine
Liberal Democrat
08:52 AM on 04/06/2012
The Death Penalty is more expensive than alternatives :

http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/costs-death-penalty
08:07 AM on 04/07/2012
How so? I heard it is $42,000 a year to incarcerate.
05:27 AM on 04/06/2012
An eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth,the only way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smevic
06:18 AM on 04/06/2012
You are quoting the "Mount of Olives" speech incorrectly...read it again and see if you get the true meaning.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnBryansFontaine
Liberal Democrat
08:49 AM on 04/06/2012
'And forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us.'

To forgive is the opposite of to condemn. And no I don't believe that killers should go free.
05:21 AM on 04/06/2012
Oh yeah.
And what do the people of Connecticut want?
Polls show they overwhelming support the death penalty.
Why not do what the people want?
Get rid of the Senate and let the people run the State.
Kinda like 'American Idol.'
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smevic
06:19 AM on 04/06/2012
Because America is better than that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Snakefeather
05:46 PM on 04/06/2012
Says who? You? What the people of Connecticut feel doesn't matter, it's your personal idea of American morality that charts our course? The people want the death penalty. Period. My friend was murdered by thugs in CT and I want those killers to be put to death, not given heaps of street cred in prison.
03:45 AM on 04/06/2012
Why don't we just get rid of prison altogether since there are probably innocent people in every prison. Making conditions harder in prison for someone who would have gotten the death penalty, is not really a replacement for the death penalty. They will get rid of the death penalty and then they will move on to whining about conditions being too harsh. Every person on death row deserves an appeal, if needed, and maybe an independent review of their case, but they still need to be put to death and not ten years after being sentenced. Death penalty cases today are not like death penalty cases twenty years ago, where there was a greater chance of someone being innocent.
The argument that life in prison is harder than being put to death is ridiculous. Doing time in prison obviously is not that hard, as most criminals are more than happy to return again by committing further crimes.
03:40 AM on 04/06/2012
This makes me so happy! No.1--It galls me when I hear of some murderer who has brutally beaten to death or worse~ an innocent person & get the Death Penalty [Just like putting an animal to sleep peacefully} Well the victims did not die peacefully.. They should be forced to live in a cruel prison where the Big boys will handle them for life...It is just to light of a sentence.. No.2--We have perfected DNA now--we do have Death Row inmates who are innocent--victims of some hot shot DA who needs to win a case---buys a "witness". They should be tested and released at once & our Govt. should generously compensate them for the hell they have endured. I hope every state will follow the 17 States who have wised up~