iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

IRS Chief: Congress Not Acting Risks 'Real Disaster'

Taxes

First Posted: 04/ 5/2012 4:36 pm Updated: 04/ 6/2012 12:14 am


(Refiles to delete extraneous letters in slug)

* Tax filing delays possible-IRS Commissioner Shulman

* $650 billion of provisions expire end of 2011

* Shulman defends IRS Tea Party questioning

WASHINGTON, April 5 (Reuters) - The commissioner of the U.S. tax-collecting Internal Revenue Service warned on Thursday of "a real disaster" for taxpayers next year should Congress miss a Dec. 31 deadline to decide on billions in major tax provisions.

Congress is expected to wait until after Election Day, Nov. 6, to take up whether to extend the individual income tax cuts passed under former president George W. Bush that expire at the end of 2012.

Most Democrats and President Barack Obama want to extend all but the top two tax brackets, allowing taxes to increase for high-income earners. Republicans want to extend the lower rates for all income groups.

A 2010 "lame duck" session deadlock to extend the Bush tax cuts delayed the start of the tax filing season in early 2011.

Allowing the pending tax decisions to lapse into 2013 will cause confusion for taxpayers, said Douglas Shulman, IRS commissioner, speaking at the National Press Club in Washington.

"We're going to have real risk in the system" if Congress delays, Shulman said.

"You could have a real disaster in the filing season where there's total confusion," especially for the alternative minimum tax "patch," he said.

The alternative minimum tax is a parallel tax system that applies to higher-income taxpayers. A legislative fix to index it for inflation must be approved before year's end to prevent the tax from hitting taxpayers in lower income brackets.

In the absence of congressional action by Jan. 1, the IRS might be forced to delay the tax-filing season, which begins promptly with the new year, Shulman said.

As it is, Congress faces a huge workload for the two-month lame-duck period after the elections when about $650 billion of tax and spending provisions expire.

Shulman, appointed by President George W. Bush and now in the last year of a five-year term, defended IRS's regulation of 501(c)4 groups, including Tea Party organizations, which have received IRS letters asking questions about their political work.

For any non-profit groups that raise red flags, the IRS will "go out and do an audit and gather more facts," Shulman said in response to a question about IRS investigations into the non-profit groups.

Shulman also touted stronger IRS international enforcement efforts for businesses and individuals.

The agency has hired private-sector experts to better catch businesses that aggressively shift assets and profits offshore.

The new enforcers will help the IRS keep pace with corporations' evolving tax strategies, Shulman said.

Tax professionals have doubted whether the IRS has the muscle to enforce these "transfer pricing" disputes.

Transfer pricing is a booming field of global tax law. It involves multinational corporations moving goods, services and assets from one subsidiary to another in different countries and how they account for these "transfers."

For a summary of expiring tax provisions see: . (Reporting by Patrick Temple-West; Editing by Howard Goller and Philip Barbara)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

(Refiles to delete extraneous letters in slug) * Tax filing delays possible-IRS Commissioner Shulman * $650 billion of provisions expire end of 2011 * Shul...
(Refiles to delete extraneous letters in slug) * Tax filing delays possible-IRS Commissioner Shulman * $650 billion of provisions expire end of 2011 * Shul...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 992
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
Linda from Deerfield
Paying attention
02:22 PM on 04/06/2012
I doubt that many people "get" the alternative minimum tax (AMT) or the patch. Here is my completely non-professional interpretation.

The AMT was promoted as a means of insuring that loopholes do not allow higher earners to get by with paying an extra low tax rate, but rather to require them to pay at least a "minimum" amount. The astonishing thing is that most of the things that the ruling paints as loopholes are the traditional deductions that have supported homes and children. None of the things that make Warren Buffet or Mitt Romney pay a lower rate are treated as loopholes. Further, the rules were not indexed to inflation, so when wages went up with the cost of living -- the way they used to do until the last decade or so -- eventually, some rather modest earners with a lot of children or an expensive mortgage were about to be treated as undeserving of their tax breaks. In order to avoid this, Congress has to temporarily patch the rule over and over again.

As best I can tell, the whole AMT thing was a ruse. Its effect is (1) making taxes more complex than they need to be, (2) allowing Congress to appear to be heroic for the middle class once every year, (3) fooling some people into thinking that the rich are required to pay a minimum amount of taxes, and (4) providing a cudgel or threat for Congress to use when they are not getting their
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bill Roth
I wrote it so it must be true....
11:32 AM on 04/06/2012
Boy, I can hardly wait for what the government; who works for me tells me what to do next... Finger pointing across the aisle only says you disagree with what my wealthy check writing supporter pays me to mandate for their small group. Wealthy they are, sympathetic they need not be. The power of money will never be for the peoples best interest. Remove money interest from elections to open the door for those who would make a deference for the masses. Tax without representation is the mantra masked in loopholes of IRS engineered laws written by Congress and collected by the IRS. We send our children to war to defend the interest of the few who do not play or pay by the same rules. It is hard to deny the malfeasance that dwells in the House of Congress and Senate and even harder to prove in the web of the "law of the land". A systemic problem that is in desperate need of cleaning. Taxes are necessary in running government. Income tax is a penalty for saving. No savings, then borrow and pay interest. We should only be taxed on our consumption not our sweat. It is that sweat taxation that allows others not to sweat. We all replace in our lives that which is broken. It is time to replace that which has broken us all. Peace.
martman1
retired business owner
09:52 AM on 04/06/2012
Here's a tax plan that would increase revenues from personal income taxes by a third ($300 billion yearly increase);
Zero taxes on any income from any source on incomes of $50,000 or less and a 30% tax on all income from all sources (including capital gains and dividends) above $50,000. No deductions whatsoever but retain the capital gains exclusion for sales of primary residences.

In general, your income would have to get close to $150,000 before you'd have to start paying more than currently.

If the 30% were applied to corporate profits also, it would have raised an additional $90 billion last year from corporations (the top 500 companies paid 17% on $700 billion profit last year).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Neil Murphy3111
08:08 AM on 04/07/2012
What would 90 billion do when we are bleeding 1.3 trillion a year?
martman1
retired business owner
08:28 AM on 04/07/2012
ok then, let's reduce the rate to 4% and increase the deficit by $90 billion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hcbrand
Before the Flood
09:29 AM on 04/06/2012
Oh, just borrow some money.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:26 AM on 04/06/2012
How about a national sales tax (fair tax) & eliminate the IRS?
Eliminate all loop holes.
The fair tax would put all in the mix.
This is a great way to begin paring down the debt.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:42 AM on 04/06/2012
So pretty much your suggestion is to make the system "fair"? :)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:44 AM on 04/06/2012
The Fair Tax makes too much sense. The majority of the people can't even explain how the Fair Tax works. They are more comfortable with a system that requires them to pay someone else their hard-earned money to figure out how to work the system to minimize their taxes.

Besides, many feel we need a tax system that punishes success and the Fair Tax only helps create more success.
09:26 AM on 04/06/2012
The 'Real Disaster' is the IRS.
09:28 AM on 04/06/2012
abolish the IRS. Ron Paul for President.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
builder101
VOTE!
09:24 AM on 04/06/2012
End all of the so called Bush Tax reductions for everyone. This will end the rich/poor debate.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDog79
12:04 PM on 04/06/2012
no not really. the rich still have enough money that tax cuts or not they aren't affected. those living day to day - and that is a large majority of people - would feel the effects immediately.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mgrant33301
09:19 AM on 04/06/2012
they want to wait until after the elections to enact laws that might affect the outcomes of the votes if enacted prior to the elections. hmmmmm.
what are they afraid of? i say enact now and let the voters decide if congress is worthy of an extension themselves.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
yeti7
don't need no stink'n badges
08:22 AM on 04/06/2012
Start a flat tax for all. Use a 2% to 10% sales tax on all new items with a few exemptions, set the sales tax rate to expire every four years (not during an election year) so it can be adjusted as needed. Good years less, problematic years more.
A minimal flat rate for all business and corporations.
We could get rid of most of the IRS employees and scale back the bureaucratic nightmare that is presently there.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:47 AM on 04/06/2012
I'll go out on a limb here and guess every four years the tax will go up because we need more money for the chhhiilllllldddrrren.
No-name-plz
He meant spatula ready.
08:15 AM on 04/06/2012
In other words... the IRS is saying: If you people play games, your revenue will be delayed. My bet is they will play games.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mrmyfld1
The phantom
07:47 AM on 04/06/2012
The Republicans will use the middle class as their pawn to keep the wealthy in the green.

Play up the image of the struggling middle class (but in reality, the Republican party could care less).

Reminds me of the aristocrats of France during the French Revolution..."Let them eat cake"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:50 AM on 04/06/2012
And the Democrats will act like they hate the Republicans for it but in the end, they'll go along with it.

Democrats and Republicans play good cop/bad cop on the people while they figure out how to take our freedoms and our money, save Ron Paul.
02:48 AM on 04/06/2012
Yup, gotta decide if the 1% gets the big tax breaks or not. Those tax cuts given to the 1% by dubya sure do add up to a large amount of lost revenue that the federal govt could really use right now. Would rather see them end tax breaks for the 1% than gut SS and medicare/medicaid. The 1% won't miss the $, they already have so much it won't make any difference to their families survival.
09:45 AM on 04/06/2012
What you say is true but understand the 1% are not interested in the 99% families having enough to survive. They are interested in perpetuating the advantage they have been able to acquire for their offspring and future descendants. They are creating a de facto hereditary plutocracy and that is fine by them. They justify this on Social Darwinist Principles that the "strong" - translated "the smart, well connected and already entitled" - should inherit the earth. They also justify this on biblical principles that "to those who have more shall be given" and the Calvinist credo that you demonstrate you are saved by being prosperous. They justify it on the biblical injunctions that " You will pay for the sins of the fathers unto the 7th generation.
They justify it on trickle down economics and the job creation power of the rich. Take your pick. We need a new American Revolution to change this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Neil Murphy3111
08:14 AM on 04/07/2012
Bleeding out 1.3 trillion a year...You CANT tax that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Supernatoir
i will shove my foot up your micro-bio
02:38 AM on 04/06/2012
I thought America started so there would be no taxes
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
philszed
less disgruntled more sad
04:30 AM on 04/06/2012
You thought wrong, Bubby, it's "No Taxation without Representation"
photo
Rosewren
The power of kindness is infinite
09:07 AM on 04/06/2012
Too many people don't really know US history. I would guess that most probably believe it was "no taxes" instead of the "without representation" as the whole story.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Supernatoir
i will shove my foot up your micro-bio
09:15 PM on 04/06/2012
@philszed Thought that if i say something everybody would realize it was a joke but guess not.....just fly over you guys head
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vicla1942
07:16 AM on 04/06/2012
Do you drive roads constructed by the federal highway program?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
yeti7
don't need no stink'n badges
08:23 AM on 04/06/2012
yes and where did they get that money from?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Supernatoir
i will shove my foot up your micro-bio
09:13 PM on 04/06/2012
Joke... same to you and no i don't drive. I would like a for profit gov , that makes money for its citizen instead of tax them
photo
Davest
6' 9" with the afro......
02:29 AM on 04/06/2012
Our *wealth* has been transferred alright....
photo
M33TBallz
IMHO, SYPH
09:31 AM on 04/06/2012
Redistributed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDog79
12:05 PM on 04/06/2012
no true. if it was redistributed as you claim - there would be no income disparity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
W L Simpson
02:00 AM on 04/06/2012
We need a fair, honest,simple, & short ! ------tax code. I,m not holding my breath.