iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Earthquakes Linked To Oil, Gas Production In New Study

First Posted: 04/ 6/2012 6:32 pm Updated: 04/ 7/2012 11:26 am

NEW YORK (AP) — Oil and gas production may explain a sharp increase in small earthquakes in the nation's midsection, a new study from the U.S. Geological Survey suggests.

The rate has jumped six-fold from the late 20th century through last year, the team reports, and the changes are "almost certainly man-made."

Outside experts were split in their opinions about the report, which is not yet published but is due to be presented at a meeting later this month.

The study said a relatively mild increase starting in 2001 comes from increased quake activity in a methane production area along the state line between Colorado and New Mexico. The increase began about the time that methane production began there, so there's a "clear possibility" of a link, says lead author William Ellsworth of the USGS.

The increase over the nation's midsection has gotten steeper since 2009, due to more quakes in a variety of oil and gas production areas, including some in Arkansas and Oklahoma, the researchers say.

It's not clear how the earthquake rates might be related to oil and gas production, the study authors said. They note that others have linked earthquakes to injecting huge amounts of leftover wastewater deep into the earth.

There has been concern about potential earthquakes from a smaller-scale injection of fluids during a process known as hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, which is used to recover gas. But Ellsworth said Friday he is confident that fracking is not responsible for the earthquake trends his study found, based on prior studies.

The study covers a swath of the United States that lies roughly west of Ohio and east of Utah. It counted earthquakes of magnitude 3 and above.

Magnitude 3 quakes are mild, and may be felt by only a few people in the upper floors of buildings, or may cause parked cars to rock slightly. The biggest counted in the study was a magnitude-5.6 quake that hit Oklahoma last Nov. 5, damaging dozens of homes. Experts said it was too strong to be linked to oil and gas production.

The researchers reported that from 1970 to 2000, the region they studied averaged about 21 quakes a year. That rose to about 29 a year for 2001 through 2008, they wrote, and the three following years produced totals of 50, 87 and 134, respectively.

The study results make sense and are likely due to man-made stress in the ground, said Rowena Lohman, a Cornell University geophysicist.

"The key thing to remember is magnitude 3s are really small," Lohman said. "We've seen this sort of behavior in the western United States for a long time."

Usually, it's with geothermal energy, dams or prospecting. With magnitude 4 quakes, a person standing on top of them would at most feel like a sharp jolt, but mostly don't last long enough to be a problem for buildings, she said.

The idea is to understand how the man-made activity triggers quakes, she said. One possibility is that the injected fluids change the friction and stickiness of minerals on fault lines. Another concept is that they change the below-surface pressure because the fluid is trapped and builds, and then "sets off something that's about ready to go anyway," Lohman said.

But another expert was not convinced of a link to oil and gas operations.

Austin Holland, the Oklahoma state seismologist, said the new work presents an "interesting hypothesis" but that the increase in earthquake rates could simply be the result of natural processes.

Holland said clusters of quakes can occur naturally, and that scientists do not yet fully understand the natural cycles of seismic activity in the central United States. Comprehensive earthquake records for the region go back only a few decades, he said, while natural cycles stretch for tens of thousands of years. So too little is known to rule out natural processes for causing the increase, he said.

___

Online:

Study abstract: http://bit.ly/HmqAxx

___

Science writer Seth Borenstein in Washington contributed to this report.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

NEW YORK (AP) — Oil and gas production may explain a sharp increase in small earthquakes in the nation's midsection, a new study from the U.S. Geological Survey suggests. The rate has...
NEW YORK (AP) — Oil and gas production may explain a sharp increase in small earthquakes in the nation's midsection, a new study from the U.S. Geological Survey suggests. The rate has...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 88
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
07:52 AM on 04/11/2012
Don't you just love the way these stories go?

"Oil and gas production may explain a sharp increase in small earthquakes in the nation's midsection, a new study from the U.S. Geological Survey suggests." NOTE -"MAY"

and them at the end,

"So too little is known to rule out natural processes for causing the increase, he said."

Make your mind up!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oldwolf49
Religion is a tool of the evil.
02:51 AM on 04/10/2012
I don't find this aas new news, do you find this as new news?
09:22 PM on 04/09/2012
Does it matter?Not as if there are plans to stop fracking.They don't live in the quake zones.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floridan56
Irony: it's what's for dinner.
09:57 PM on 04/08/2012
the defense is that the quakes are: "too strong to be linked to oil and gas production"? -so reassuring. It's reminds me of Leslie Neilsen in Naked Gun with all hell breaking loose around him while declaring to the public: "nothing to see here!"

My money is on the geophysicist.
06:12 PM on 04/08/2012
Since 2000, when fracturing became widespread in the US, the annual number of quakes per year have progressively increased. The total number of quakes in 2000 was 2,342. In 2010 the total increased by 6,154 OVER the 2000 total. In 2011, the total increased by 2,894 OVER the 2000 total.
07:54 AM on 04/11/2012
And 95% of them were in California where there is LITTLE 'fraccing' activity.

Details, Details.
10:17 AM on 04/11/2012
I will check that out. Thanks. I don't think that's true for at least the last couple of years.
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
02:49 PM on 04/08/2012
Coal and natural gas have air pollution damages that exceed their value added:

http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2011/10/13/332882/economics-coal-fired-power-plants-air-pollution-damages/

'There are some very important points to take home from these economic studies. The first is that while these assessments involve significant uncertainties, they agree that the true cost of coal is not accurately reflected in its market price. In fact, the true cost lies somewhere between ~50% and 300% more than Americans are currently paying. The two largest contributors to this discrepancy are SO2 emissions (impacting air quality and public health) and CO2 emissions (impacting climate change). Therefore, regulating SO2 emissions more strictly, and putting a price on CO2 emissions, would benefit the US economy. As Paul Krugman put it, it’s “Econ 101.”'

Fracked natural gas may be WORSE for the climate than coal:

http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2011/09/09/315845/natural-gas-switching-from-coal-to-gas-increases-warming-for-decades/

'In summary, our results show that the substitution of gas for coal as an energy source results in increased rather than decreased global warming for many decades — out to the mid 22nd century for the 10% leakage case. This is in accord with Hayhoe et al. (2002) and with the less well established claims of Howarth et al. (2011) who base their analysis on Global Warming Potentials rather than direct modeling of the climate….'
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bradley Scott Roon
not left or right: think for yourself
12:17 PM on 04/08/2012
Uhhhh. This is why they stopped doing this extraction and injection around Denver some time back. Duhh.

Nothing new here except the people in the US don't have memory or intelligence anymore.
07:10 PM on 04/08/2012
And that's why they have to hear it, again and again.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bradley Scott Roon
not left or right: think for yourself
09:57 AM on 04/09/2012
Yet it is always presented as new, disturbing developments. One would almost think that the powers that be manipulate media, the educational system, and govt to ignore these things so that they can again do something stupid to make a profit before they are forced to stop and hold the profits for another cycle.
But, that line between cynicism and reality is somewhat non-existent anymore.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:21 AM on 04/08/2012
"It's not clear how the earthquake rates might be related to oil and gas production, the study authors said"............lol. The whole article is summed up in that one line.
Kommonman
Blame it on Dyslexic fingers..next question
01:45 AM on 04/08/2012
Pump fluid into the ground at high pressure and rates and something has to give...only and idiot would say otherwise...but then we got lots of those haunting the forums and nation nowadays
07:57 AM on 04/11/2012
What gives is the oil and Gas reservoir thousands of feet below the surface. That 'give' allows the companies to recover the oil and gas from that reservoir.
Kommonman
Blame it on Dyslexic fingers..next question
01:33 PM on 04/11/2012
No the govt gives the rights to those resources...and thru the govt the people give that right....thus those industires owe WE THE PEOPLE adequate safety and reasonable pricing of said resources should WE allow them access to said resources...and by reasonable safety that means we are not poisoned or harmed by their activities...If they can not produce these resources without harm to us or our lands waters and air then they should not have access to the resources
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
11:41 PM on 04/07/2012
The repub voters could care less about any consequences of their actions as long as there is money to be made for their 1% idols.
06:15 PM on 04/08/2012
Apparently there are quite a few aside from the 1% who are willing to make an easy buck regardless of the consequences or cost to many others.
07:00 PM on 04/07/2012
It's not nice to fool with Mother Nature.
photo
Son of Liberty 1765
Exposing Government Lies.
06:58 PM on 04/07/2012
Wow. What a steaming pile of leftist bureaucrat stink. Every report the government produces is suspect. THe government is never to be trusted. EVER.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trepasky
Sanity is neither free nor easy
08:03 PM on 04/07/2012
At least you have a place to rant thanks to the GOV (the Internet)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tjconkster
Occupy the Voting Booth 2014
08:27 PM on 04/07/2012
Ufortunately..he will never make the connection that you laid out in front of him...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tjconkster
Occupy the Voting Booth 2014
08:28 PM on 04/07/2012
Pssst...the Gov't is coming for your Freedom...better bug out to your prepper bunker...we'll let you know when its safe to come out!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
06:18 PM on 04/07/2012
"sets off something that's about ready to go anyway," Lohman said

If it avoids the big one, maybe the small quakes are a blessing in disquise. I'll take lots of 3's over one 7.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:22 PM on 04/07/2012
That is the interesting legal question. If the "small" triggered earthquakes kills people, who pays? What if the big one is already primed?

How could you possibly set it up to work?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
03:38 PM on 04/08/2012
I think the hope is that 3.0s won't hurt people. Right, if the triggering releases a big one, lots of people could/would die. I think that is why fracking is much more restricted near the New Madrid fault. Everyone is scared of that one because it is due to go off. Memphis could be flat after that one goes off.
06:17 PM on 04/08/2012
You like playing Russian Roulette, do you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
07:46 PM on 04/08/2012
Avoiding the big one would be avoiding Russian Roulette. Did you mean the opposite?
06:01 PM on 04/07/2012
Since earthquakes are very rare (unheard of possibly?) in Alberta and Saskatchewan, Canada where oil and gas extraction uses these fracing and water injection methods, I think before jumping to this type of conclusion these areas should be studied as well.
I dont understand why everyone is so quick to try and blame oil and gas companies for all of this environmental stuff but the same people are complaining about high at the pump gas prices...
I am all for the environment but my car, that gets me from point a to point b uses oil extracted from the earth, we are all just as responsible for this mess as the ones who decided to make a big buck off it. We need to continue studying all of this but instead of focusing all the efforts on whats so negative, more efforts should be focused on how to reduce the damage and cleaner alternatives. Why dont we see articles about those developments??
06:20 PM on 04/08/2012
The price you pay at the pump has nothing to do with any drilling anywhere. Gas prices are manipulated at will.

Geologically, you might not have a worry in Canada from fracturing. But, apparently, that's not the case everywhere.
photo
Deep Thinking Man
Always Remember, A Wet Bird Never Flies At Night !
04:59 PM on 04/07/2012
remember the Earthquakes on Ok., Ark., Mo., Kans., and Neb., those quakes opened a sink-hole under the oil derricks and fields in Ok...a friend of mine who lives in Ok saw it !!!!!!