iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Public Sector Layoffs Continue Despite Economy's Signs Of Life

Posted: 04/ 8/2012 6:59 am Updated: 04/ 8/2012 10:37 am


By Lisa Lambert

April 8 (Reuters) - Since 2009, the city of Chesapeake, tucked up against the Great Dismal Swamp in southern Virginia, has cut its workforce twice. This summer, nearly three years after the recession ended, the city of 222,209 has plans for a third round of layoffs.

"We're not seeing the recovery we want to see," said Budget Director Steven Jenkins, who is hoping many of the 20 people will move into other jobs.

The city's revenues are still feeling the concussions from the housing market downturn, which started in 2006, even as overall growth in the United States has improved.

"We are heavily reliant on the residential real estate market," said Jenkins. In a recent assessment the average property value dropped 3.7 percent, which hits property taxes, and hurts government budgets. "The reassessment we just had was as big as any we've seen since the recession started."

While Friday's report of weak growth in U.S. March payrolls raised concerns about the pace of private-sector hiring, local government jobs remain a drag on the recovery, one that is not anticipated to end soon.

State and local governments for a time were able to shield public safety and education workforces from harmful cuts as the recession deepened. The 2009 federal stimulus fund helped offset lost tax revenue, but that money is gone.

Now, many cities and counties nationwide are facing the same dilemma as Chesapeake. Squeezed by depressed property tax revenues and cuts in state aid, they are chipping away at their workforces.

The result? The last three years of job losses at the state and local government level has been the most dramatic since Labor Department records began in 1955, according to a Reuters analysis.

Public-sector employees tended to have more job security, which in some ways helps during weak economic climates, as their steady demand for goods and services spread through the economy. The recent trend, conversely, can make things worse.

"If public-sector employment had grown since June 2009 by the average amount it grew in the three previous recoveries (2.8 percent) instead of shrinking by 2.5 percent, there would be 1.2 million more public-sector jobs in the U.S. economy today," said the Economic Policy Institute in a recent report, which included federal employees in the calculation.

Local governments have cut 482,000 jobs since the beginning of 2009. They added jobs in just two months since 2011 started. Previously, states only had two consecutive years of layoffs, 1995 and 1996, when they scrapped about 57,000 jobs, or about one-third of the 150,000 cut since the beginning of 2009.

"The current recovery is the only one that has seen public-sector losses over its first 31 months," the report said.

As of March, 14.1 million people worked for local governments and 5.1 million for states. Public employees outnumber those in manufacturing, construction, and other areas typically considered engines of the economy.

HIT BY HOUSING, LOW DEMAND

Three weeks ago, firefighters in Scranton, Pennsylvania, took 10 minutes to respond to a fire, instead of the usual four minutes or less. Lighter staffing was blamed, as the city had laid off 29 firefighters in January.

"We had been telling them ... there's a catastrophe that's going to happen here," said John J. Judge IV, president of the International Association of Fire Fighters Local 60.

After the delay, 12 of the firefighters were rehired, but that's still a reduction of 17 workers.

In March, local governments shed 3,000 jobs after gaining 1,000 in February, according to the Labor Department. State governments added 2,000 jobs. However, states employ 39,000 fewer people than a year ago, and the slight recent improvement is unlikely to be confirmed.

"The rate of decline is slower," said Christopher Hoene, research director at the National League of Cities. "But I don't think the curve is shifting upward. I don't think we're going to see hiring in the local government sector."

Meanwhile, the private sector is creating jobs. Friday's employment report showed private payrolls gained 121,000 jobs in March, while public payrolls lost 1,000.

Moody's expects states to lose at least another 15,000 jobs through 2012 and local governments between 150,000 and 175,000.

"It's going to continue to be a drag on overall employment," said Moody's Investors Services Economist Daniel White.


STATES VS. LOCALS

Des Moines, Iowa, weathered the recession better than many other cities. Its unemployment rate is 6.1 percent, more than two percentage points below the national average.

Nonetheless, it recently eliminated more than 40 full-time positions after property valuations dropped 3.5 percent. It too wants to put those workers into other jobs, said Deputy City Manager Allen McKinley, a former finance director and budget officer for the Iowa capital.

Des Moines also has fewer dollars to spend as the state recently mandated bigger contributions to police and fire pensions, McKinley said.

As public pensions attempt to close total shortfalls of at least $600 billion, many state and local governments are having to pitch in more money to retirement systems, taking dollars away from other departments. Also, with fewer employees on the payrolls, the smaller the worker contributions to pension systems that must send retirees fixed amounts each month.

A new threat has emerged in Iowa. Both parties in the legislature, along with the governor, hope to boost growth by cutting commercial property taxes, which make up around half of Des Moines revenues, by about 40 percent. Cities across the state are protesting the three proposals.

All states except Vermont must end their fiscal years with balanced budgets.

For its upcoming fiscal year, Florida cut 4,000 state jobs and reduced higher education and healthcare funds. Spending cuts in the $70 billion budget are so bad that Palm Beach County Clerk and Comptroller Sharon Bock said constituents might sue.

Florida's new budget means Bock must find $2.5 million in savings and still "keep the courts open," she said.

The office has already laid off 111 employees to cope with four years of budget cuts. Now, it will not fill 40 vacancies or replace departing employees - its annual turnover rate is about 10 percent. The staff size is currently around 430 people.

The worker shortage will result in 10 hours of backlog each week, Bock said.

"Here is the dilemma that I am in: I take an oath as a constitutional officer to provide services to the public," she said about her duties, which include keeping vital records and operating court systems.

"Do I get sued by the public because I can't open a branch office or because I have to close one day a week? Or do I lay off people, and e n d up in the same scenario?"

FOLLOW BUSINESS

By Lisa Lambert April 8 (Reuters) - Since 2009, the city of Chesapeake, tucked up against the Great Dismal Swamp in southern Virginia, has cut its workforce twice. This summer, nearly...
By Lisa Lambert April 8 (Reuters) - Since 2009, the city of Chesapeake, tucked up against the Great Dismal Swamp in southern Virginia, has cut its workforce twice. This summer, nearly...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 356
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
both parties are worthless
05:51 AM on 04/23/2012
There is a recovery?

Where ?

Tell me I go there !
Helloise
Healthy skeptic admires reason, trusts intuition
04:39 PM on 04/09/2012
This is hardly a surprise given that on top of the wipeout of pension funds and other state monies due to the economic collapse, the class of 2010 and their rw backers have done a smashing job of helping their followers to transfer their rage at the perpetrators to their fellow citizens employed in the public sector, allowing the gop governors in particular, to come into office, take whatever money was in place to give to corporations and fire as many public workers as possible, along with various other punitive measures. Unquestionably belts had to be tightened, which would affect the public sector notwithstanding, which most union members understood, but the outright demonization of anyone other than themselves in the public sector has been reprehensible.
photo
DismayedRepub
300Mm/s Not just common sense, it’s the law
03:21 PM on 04/09/2012
In my state the public employees are guaranteed an 8% growth rate in their retirement funds. Since the market crash in 2009 local governments and school districts have been making catch up payments into these funds. The irony in all of this is that the largest school district in the state can’t afford all this and is budgeting for 100 less teachers next year.
MrStat1
I believe in the rule of law
04:53 PM on 04/09/2012
Then someone made a bad bargain with the union. But it has the effect of an enforceable contract.
photo
Levonsky
a fan of enlightened self interest
02:45 PM on 04/09/2012
connies are one trick ponies- cut taxes on the rich and corporations and cut gov't spending and everything will be alright.
well, we have been cutting taxes on the rich and the corps and have been cutting gov't spending (except for defense) and things are worse and they will continue to get worse until this nonsense stops.
thirty years of right wing policies have brought us to where we are now and unless things change and the rich and the corps pay their fair share things will continue to get worse. thirty yeares of trickle down and nafta, cafta, union busting and deregulation.
definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect differnent results.
photo
graffitijoe
snowballs chance n SoCal
12:39 PM on 04/09/2012
There are way too many "public sector" workers in the first place - we need this segment of the economy to shrink. It is overpriced and underperforming.
photo
Levonsky
a fan of enlightened self interest
03:04 PM on 04/09/2012
couldn't possibly be all those over priced banker execs and ceos, who crashed the economy and got huge bonuses for being abject failures, it has to be those public sector workers. well, no one can accuse you of clear thinking.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MekhongKurt
08:26 PM on 04/20/2012
graffitijoe, I guess you don't believe that those 482,000 "too many" public-sector employees spend, you know, *MONEY* every day for their food, clothing, educating their children, paying rent or mortgages, paying taxes, etc. etc. etc. -- just like "normal" people.

You might notice a hit in your own business, if you have one, especially a small local one. if your local government decimates its work force in response to careless calls to "get rid of those leeches!"

You also might notice if you need the police, like *right now* -- and it takes them 45 minutes to respond.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
11:14 AM on 04/09/2012
Peggy Fikac, in the Houston Chronicle of Sunday August 14, 2011 quotes Texas Governor Rick Perry with saying,

“As Americans, we realize that there is no taxpayer money that wasn’t first earned by the sweat and toil of one of its citizens. That’s why we reject this president’s unbridled fixation on taking more money out of the wallets and pocketbooks of American families and employers and giving it to a central government.”

I like that statement.

The same is true for all levels of government!

Only the private sector businesses and corporations generate and create JOBS for US citizens to create new NATIONAL WEALTH for those same US businesses, and that new NATIONAL WEALTH is then available as business profits, private personal income, property taxes and personal inheritance to be CONFISCATED through taxation TO PAY FOR GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRATIC EMPLOYEE PAYROLLS, GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS, OTHER GOVERNMENT EXPENSES, at every federal, state, county, and local level.
11:57 AM on 04/09/2012
Well put!! Fanned.
03:06 PM on 04/09/2012
So please tell all of us the government services you will eliminate and show us the ROI on each one.

How about we cut DOD, HLS, TSA, DOT, FDA, the list goes on and on,......pick one and go after it.
11:09 AM on 04/09/2012
Technology means we need fewer workers. With automated systems and IT we can cut departments in half. Which is fine but IT used to be relatively expensive. Except the Democrats had a plan to make IT less expensive: issue millions of work visas to foreigners to come to the US. And they did it. H-1b work visas have made IT spending an efficiency multiplier. And government programs like H-1b have helped to drive efficiency in unnatural ways.

Enjoy! And Obama talks a lot about efficiency which is another way of saying "I want you unemployed".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MekhongKurt
08:35 PM on 04/20/2012
mashtoe, I was with you -- until your closing sentence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackAS12
Citizen
10:58 AM on 04/09/2012
Cut some of those outsized retirement benefits and free up some money to hire younger workers. The percent of budgets which go to fund retirement plans and retiree health care take away from on going needed public employer jobs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MekhongKurt
08:42 PM on 04/20/2012
JackAS12, yeah, those retirement benefits for public employees sure are "outsized."

My Mother worked for many years as a teacher in public schools. In our state, teachers have to make a one-time choice when they start work: sign up for Social Security, or sign up for the state's retirement plan for teachers. She opted for the latter. She's been retired upwards of 20 years now, and her current retirement income is a princely $1,000-1,100 per month or so. And that's including COLA's, which she hasn't received every year. Further, her salary maxed out at about $30,000, despite her being an honors graduate at both the BA and MA levels. And a Summer Fulbright Recipient early in her career.

Yeah, greedy, lecherous woman. That's my Mom. She ought to have her pension slashed at least 50% right now!!!
10:50 AM on 04/09/2012
Governments should stay small, and run budget surpluses for the lean years. They are experiencing the pain now as a result of their profligacy during good times. What's not fair though, is innocent people are suffering as a result. They took people out of the private economy and put them in government, probably at a higher wage, but the private economy suffered as a result. Now those people are out of a job. Why can't people get it. Every person that is taken out of the economy into government is a double whammy to the real economy.

I blame it on the Keynesians and their stupid inaccurate formula for GDP = Consumer spending + Investments +GOVERNMENT SPENDING +(Current account deficit or surplus). They are fooling themselves.
11:59 AM on 04/09/2012
On-point! Fanned.
photo
Levonsky
a fan of enlightened self interest
02:46 PM on 04/09/2012
right wing nonsense!
10:39 AM on 04/09/2012
With free trade we don't fund government from tariff. We used to. When the US was strong and doing well we had high tariffs. Now we tax working people more and more and offshore jobs to communist slave labor China. Democrats fully support this too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MekhongKurt
08:49 PM on 04/20/2012
'Course, Republicans don't support it, do they? Except they want for American companies that have sent a gazillion jobs offshore to have their taxes waived on the gazillions of dollars they made in those slave-labor places. Yep, let 'em bring home billions each -- paying nary a penny. On top of the money we paid them to send the jobs offshore in the FIRST place.

Yep, the good ol' NeoCon Repub way: "Bend over, grab your ankles, smile real big -- and humbly thank me afterwards."
10:26 AM on 04/09/2012
Sad. There is plenty of work that needs to be done around this country. We all see it everyday, crumbling roads and bridges, lack of child care providers (at any price, much less an affordable one), research into technologies that could make our air and water cleaner or our health better...so many things we could accomplish if we just put all our hands and brains to work. There just seems to not be enough money to pay people to do work that is actually important to our society, while others earn high salaries doing things that have little lasting benefit. Sad.
09:55 AM on 04/09/2012
Can we please shut down the EEOC? Was there ever an agency that was more useless, thuggish and downright counterproductive?
09:57 AM on 04/09/2012
Ya, the EPA. The EEOC is just government run discrimination and is a pain, the EPA actually destroys jobs
03:08 PM on 04/09/2012
Please show us all unbiased research that show how EPA destroys jobs all the while protecting the air and water we need for life. Our entire economy is based on the wise use of our natural resources. We only have one planet. Do you want us to turn into China?
08:39 AM on 04/09/2012
The ginormous US federal government is running the country broke. The only thing that's needed from the national government is nation defense (not offense). Everything else can but let go. Virtually every national program should be nixed. The states are big enough to handle themselves and if they mess it up...at least they're bringing down just their state instead one mess up bringing down the entire country. And every federal employee should be promptly canned.
photo
Levonsky
a fan of enlightened self interest
08:44 AM on 04/09/2012
thank you for that randian and ryan talking point
now can the adults please write something serious?
10:05 AM on 04/09/2012
Why is shrinking the government workforce bad??? Why are government jobs sacrosanct?? And yes there are functions that we need government workers - like food safety, the FBI, the FAA, etc. But why must government be a growth industry? If you have ever dealt with the government, you know there is quite a bit of waste and overlap. Hell, we have 19 different departments dealing with poverty. That is very inefficient, and we could easily eliminate a good portion of the current workforce and still maintain services.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ashok Hegde
11:20 AM on 04/09/2012
It's not just 'randian'...government has grown too large.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:29 AM on 04/09/2012
If you ever spend much time around a government office you'll see that a good portion of government employment is pretty much white collar welfare.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
10:08 AM on 04/09/2012
This site is nothing but propaganda. It's like sending someone to the Tobacco Institute's site to 'prove' smoking isn't really that bad. Or the NRA's site to 'prove' owning a gun is the best way to prevent crime. Its all industry funded propaganda - and yes even clean-tech does this! lol. Please only post REPUTABLE and unbiased links on this site
photo
Levonsky
a fan of enlightened self interest
02:51 PM on 04/09/2012
go to drudge they'll tell you what y ou want to hear.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
03:08 PM on 04/09/2012
You've spewed nothing but propaganda. The site is well researched and copiously substantiated.
Typing in caps does not make it true. Neither do you have any authority to give any orders.
I expect to hear more bull sheet and blather from you. Have some more tea.