iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Michael McAuliff
GET UPDATES FROM Michael:

Tax Loophole Romney Made Famous Now In Crosshairs Of Democrats, White House

Posted: 04/ 9/2012 2:23 pm Updated: 04/ 9/2012 3:12 pm

Mitt Romney Carried Interest

WASHINGTON -- A tax dodge that millionaire hedge fund managers use to slash their income taxes could soon become a major election issue, as congressional Democrats and the White House gear up for a fight to close the loophole.

What makes it a real hot-button issue is that presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney is this particular loophole's poster child.

Under current tax law, certain kinds of financiers, including private equity investors and some managers of hedge funds, are allowed to treat bonuses like long-term investment income, called carried interest, taxable at the maximum 15 percent capital gains rate. Others have to pay up to 35 percent taxes on their labor income. The cost to the U.S. Treasury is more than $1 billion a year.

One of the main reasons Romney paid 13.9 percent in taxes on his $21.7 million income in 2010 is that a big chunk of that income came from performance bonuses still trickling in from private-equity investments he managed during his career at his former firm, Bain Capital.

Each of President Barack Obama's proposed budgets has called for eliminating this sweetheart deal, but no measure has managed to make it past Republican-led Senate filibusters. The legislation was reintroduced in January by House Ways and Means Committee ranking Democrat Sander Levin and his brother, Sen. Carl Levin, both of Michigan.

Republicans control the House, and the Democrats' edge in the Senate is smaller than when the attempts failed. But the White House and Democratic congressional candidates think it's worth another shot.

A Democratic Capitol Hill aide who was not cleared to discuss legislative strategy told HuffPost the new legislation was developed in talks with the White House, and acknowledged that it would provide an opportune contrast with Romney.

White House chief economic adviser Gene Sperling told The Huffington Post that closing the loophole is "a no-brainer."

The White House pushes the repeal almost every time there's a budget discussion, he said, and it remains one of the items in the forefront of lawmakers' minds.

"It's been very close to being in different pay-fors before," he said, using the Washington slang for measures that raise revenue to pay for other desired programs.

Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.) is already talking about the issue in her Senate race against former Gov. Tommy Thompson.

"It's just another example of fundamental unfairness in our tax code," Baldwin told HuffPost. "It's tax season in Wisconsin and everywhere, and as I travel around the state, I'm hearing more than just a few people speak out about that.

"They are pulling all their receipts together and filling out their returns and coming up with their calculations, and they're paying at a higher rate than MItt Romney -- a multi-millionaire running for president of the United States," said Baldwin. "They feel that the system is rigged against them, and I think in this respect it is."

Several other Democratic candidates are prepared to weigh in, including Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown.

"Wealthy hedge fund managers can make more than $2 billion each year, yet pay a lower tax rate than most middle class Ohioans because of a special tax break," Brown told HuffPost. "If hedge fund managers paid the regular income tax rate, we could reduce the deficit by $23 billion over the next decade."

Carried interest is just one of Democrats' targets Democrats. They've also begun a major push for the Buffett Rule, a law named after investor Warren Buffett, aimed at ensuring that billionaires like him don't pay Romney-like rates. Under it, anyone earning $2 million and up would have to pay a 30 percent rate

Baldwin is the sponsor of that legislation in the House, and she said she intends it to cover carried interest, as well.

"The Buffet Rule would address that, but at this time especially when middle class families are taking it on the chin in so many ways, this is adding insult to injury," she said.

What happens next isn’t clear. Democrats in the House cannot move legislation on their own, but could try to attach it to another measure. In the Senate, Majority Leader Harry Reid could move a bill, but his office was not prepared to comment. A Democratic aide said the issue was "definitely on the table."

Make your voice heard:

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- A tax dodge that millionaire hedge fund managers use to slash their income taxes could soon become a major election issue, as congressional Democrats and the White House gear up for a fi...
WASHINGTON -- A tax dodge that millionaire hedge fund managers use to slash their income taxes could soon become a major election issue, as congressional Democrats and the White House gear up for a fi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 650
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
11:10 PM on 06/23/2012
The first President of the US that proposed lowering the taxes on the rich was the Democrat JFK. Previously, the rich were taxed at up to 90% rates. Funny thing is, when these rates were lowered, revenue actually shot way up. Now, why was that? When Reagan lowered the tax rate further, revenues went up even MORE. Kind of the opposite of what you would expect, but there is a logical explanation to it. If you want to "punish the rich", then fine raise their tax rate. But this will NOT get you more tax revenue.
11:02 PM on 06/23/2012
Unfortunately, it's more complicated than what this article makes it out to be. If you do away with the loophole or raise the capital gains rate, tax revenues could actually go DOWN. The rich can move to another country and take their money with them, just like the billionaire Facebook co-founder just did. I would rather get 15% of their income than 0%. Besides, if it's capital gains, a 15% rate is really effectively equivalent to almost a 100% tax rate because of the devaluation of the dollar.
01:03 AM on 04/11/2012
Ten percent, everyone, no loopholes. It's only fair. I don't see why the rich should pay more, any more than I see why the Feds should have any more than one percent of the gross, the rest should stay in the states, and everything to do with life should be a State concern. In war, once it is constitutionally declared, the states should anti up. We'll see how many we fight then!
The reason we have a deficit is the stupid war, and the costly unrest the whole neighborhood is suffering as a result. To reduce this deficit, we should have a national lottery called 'One in a Million', in which 100,000 dollars is won by one of a million ticket holders, tax-free. That should clear it up, fifteen years tops.
What should be taxed is foreign investment, money that might be spent creating industry at home.
12:49 AM on 04/11/2012
Ten percent for everyone, no loopholes.
11:08 PM on 04/10/2012
An Alternative to Capitalism (if the people knew about it, they would demand it)

Several decades ago, Margaret Thatcher claimed: "There is no alternative".
She was referring to capitalism. Today, this negative attitude still persists.

I would like to offer an alternative to capitalism for the American people to consider.
Please click on the following link. It will take you to an essay titled: "Home of the Brave?"
which was published by the Athenaeum Library of Philosophy:

http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/steinsvold.htm

John Steinsvold

“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."
~ Albert Einstein
05:46 PM on 04/10/2012
It is about time that all of Congress and the Senate address these monumental tax breaks that affect only a few people, but add up to very large sums. Those of us who have to pay a larger percentage of taxes because we are not eligible for these big breaks, resent that the wealthier, do not have to pay at least the % that we do.
03:01 PM on 04/10/2012
Does anyone know the total number of Americans who would qualify for these tax breaks?
photo
NRMLUNIT
BOLD AS LOVE
08:27 AM on 04/10/2012
Romney says he is going to close tax loopholes. Even the one he used to line his pockets. He has a new focus to line his pockets (capital gains)and he intends to eliminate that tax so he pays ZERO. Let the little people pay taxes. He says he is for us,Mitt,I don't believe you.
photo
MarcDel
thank G they'll blame you for everything
07:53 AM on 04/10/2012
Same ole view we've had since the 70's when income disparity began to rise. It's all been "trickle down" in one form or another. It has placed us second in the industrial world in income disparity.
Consumption does not matter to corporate Amercia as they now have consumers elsewhere in growing markets. The investor class is doing very well. It's high time we tax higher incomes more to invest in growth that helps more people become consumers to improve our economy. Ryan wants to cut food assistance saying the program has grown drastically in the last decade. Duh. Yeah more people are eligible because incomes have been flat and unemployment high. With this kind of disinvestment we're headed for third world country status
photo
clarkesantacruz
sunshine daydreams
12:56 PM on 04/10/2012
food stamps go to the local grocery store helping keep locals employed.
seems like a far better trickle down than tax cuts to billionaires who tend to speculate, buy stocks, buy real estate and outsource instead of creating jobs.
the gop are enemies of the people.
photo
MarcDel
thank G they'll blame you for everything
02:32 PM on 04/10/2012
Yeah and they won't support government employment programs because those are "make work" jobs. They just somehow think people can make work on their own. FDR with all he did for working people did not favor relief programs without work. He rather favored work relief knowing people would feel better about themselves and their spirits and self images would be better. If the GOP said that I'd agree. But instead they want to demean those who need food assistance while opposing any work programs. They favor capitalism yet under capitalism there will never be full employment as supply and demand force at least a 4% unemployment rate. Rather than see that structural problem of capitalism they say "let the people starve". They have no shame
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
07:39 AM on 04/10/2012
So Republicans tax the hell of the working poors income but will not tax what the wealthy steal ?
When you get to decide how much your pay check is and how much your bonus is and the taxes are not the same what do you think will happen ?
Like many Small Business Owners who only pay themselves miniumn wage in pay check to pay Social Security and Medicare taxes then they take Draws from the Businesses Profits and that is taxced at a lower rate.
07:01 AM on 04/10/2012
Democrats had their chance in 2008 to fix the tax code and they didn't. The fact is the Democrats are just playing the same old game. Democrats are Republicans. There is really only one party.

And the health insurance reform (Affordable Care Act) the Democrats are so proud of...that is the old Republicans privatization plan!
10:43 AM on 04/10/2012
Nice try but in 08 as we fought wars dealt with other crisis there was no way Bush would sign that bill. I love how you all want the Dems to be seen as bad as the Rep how about telling the truth. This stinks time to change for everyone Dems and Reps. This is all accounting, what you se is Romney structured these deals with teh sole purpose of TAX Avoidance . Real American Leader material
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
the99pct
06:43 AM on 04/10/2012
I guess this Mitt Romney can be brought down in November on just one hot issue. His Swiss Bank Accounts and his (Paul Ryan) Budget proposal.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
the99pct
06:40 AM on 04/10/2012
We don't need tax dodgers in the White House. The country has a big revenue problem following Bush tax cuts.
07:04 AM on 04/10/2012
You mean Obama's tax cuts. Obama extended and EXPANDED the taxcuts! He owns them now.

And if you are concerned about working folks look carefully at how Democrats expanded the taxcuts. They didn't cut working folks income taxes...No way. Instead Democrats cut your payroll taxes which means they are defunding Social Security and making Social Security an entitlement by taking money from general funds to cover losses.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
07:50 AM on 04/10/2012
What do you think is happening when they keep the interest rate BELOW 6 % ??
When the interest rate is 6 % or more the Social Security Trust Funds actually makes money ! The Trustfund can withstand all kinds of blows but when the interest rate is below 6 % for a long period of time it get weaker and weaker.
President Obama is NOT going to let them steal the money fo hard working people he cut the taxes in their income just like Republicans cut the income on the wealthy.
Now the Republicans are cornered to come up with funding for the HUGE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX they have created !
The Republicans think they can rule the world by force when the rest of the world can just say "NO" to trade with the USA and win. Not one shot fired in anger just say No.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ndm85
Walking all over that coiled snake
08:17 AM on 04/10/2012
Obama kept those tax cuts in order to deal with Republicans when they were trying to come in agreement on (temporary) deficit cuts. Republicans wouldn't take or pass anything without getting something in return, and that was extend the Tax Cuts. That was when the House had Obama by the throat, and could force him to do anything, but this time around they shouldn't count it can be so simple
11:15 PM on 06/23/2012
Romney wasn't dodging taxes. He was paying what was required by law fair and square.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
the99pct
06:39 AM on 04/10/2012
During Bush Presidency, his company Bain Capital led a $million dollar lobbying effort to keep that tax rate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fredpa
I will try again tomorrow.
06:30 AM on 04/10/2012
Mitt, you don't care about us or the country, and we don't care about you. Please let November get here so you can go away permanently.
07:05 AM on 04/10/2012
I agree Romney doesn't care but neither does Obama. Republican == Democrat. And only a stooge would think otherwise at this point.