iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Bank Bailout Now Hated More Than Ever: Study

The Huffington Post  |  By Posted: 04/10/2012 3:41 pm Updated: 04/10/2012 3:41 pm

Bank Bailout
Protesters march on downtown banks on October 6, 2011 in Los Angeles, California. The bank bailout is more unpopular than ever.

Americans have always kind of hated bank bailouts, but that hatred seems to be getting hotter with time -- which is a headache for President Obama, who gets blamed for them, fairly or not.

A new poll by Harris Interactive finds people still dislike the bailouts the U.S. banks got during the financial crisis, as they have pretty much consistently for the past few years.

What's striking is that the few remaining bailout fans are a dying breed.

Just 23 percent of Americans think bailing out the banks in the crisis helped the economy, according to the poll, and even fewer, just 15 percent, think bailing out insurance companies helped. In contrast, a slightly larger 45 percent think bailing out the auto sector helped the economy.

The appetite for future bailouts is almost universally gone, with 84 percent of respondents opposing another bank bailout, 86 percent opposing another insurance-company bailout and 70 percent opposing another automobile bailout.

In 2009, in contrast, only 65 percent of Americans opposed another bank bailout, compared with 69 percent opposition to another car bailout and 77 percent against another insurance bailout.

The disgust is bipartisan, with 87 percent of Republicans and Independents opposing future bank bailouts, along with 81 percent of Democrats. There's a bigger split between the parties on the subject of future auto-sector bailouts, with just 54 percent of Democrats opposed, compared with 84 percent of Republicans and 72 percent of independents.

Americans have registered their distaste for bailouts repeatedly in recent years, even at the depths of the crisis. A Rasmussen poll in February 2009, when the recession was still raging and the stock market still crumbling, found that just 56 percent of Americans opposed funneling more government cash to the banks.

Keep in mind that the American public is not exactly razor-sharp when it comes to understanding the bailouts or their implications. Other polls have shown that most Americans think President Obama was responsible for the bank bailout, when in fact it happened on the watch of President Bush.

For what it's worth, most experts think the bailout prevented an even deeper crash and economic depression. Then-Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson tested the counterfactual by letting Lehman Brothers croak, and the result was a face-peeling market firestorm that nearly took down AIG -- the massive insurance company whose bailout is so unpopular now.

But the public's attitude will make it tougher for policy makers dealing with future financial crises. You can bet they're going to want to bail stuff out again, and the sell is going to be harder.

It's also a challenge for President Obama, whose re-election campaign depends in part on convincing Americans that the bailouts they think he cooked up have prevented far worse outcomes.

Then again, maybe the president could have insulated himself a little better from association with the distasteful bailout by not seeming to cater to the banks as much as he has: Among other things, he gave bank apologists like Larry Summers and Tim Geithner big jobs in his administration and has let the too-big-to-fail banks get even bigger.

FOLLOW BUSINESS

Americans have always kind of hated bank bailouts, but that hatred seems to be getting hotter with time -- which is a headache for President Obama, who gets blamed for them, fairly or not. A new po...
Americans have always kind of hated bank bailouts, but that hatred seems to be getting hotter with time -- which is a headache for President Obama, who gets blamed for them, fairly or not. A new po...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:45 PM on 05/21/2012
Stay with me on this: When I was 6 years, or so, my two sisters (one 5 or so, the other 4 or so) decided to use the bed for a trampoline. Boy, did we have fun despite the yelled and repeated warnings downstairs from our father. For some reason I just decided enough was enough and I jumped off the bed and made my way to my bedroom across the hall. As I passed the top of the stairs and was about to enter my room I heard the door at the foot of the stairs open and footsteps on the stairs. I quietly and quickly got into the bedroom and slid under the covers on the bed. I then heard the cries of two girls getting their behind swatted with the hand of a 6'3" angry father.

The reason I tell this story is that it sounded in a way like the story that I heard one of the "bright" young bank financers tell a PBS documentarian. (According to her, she was one of a handful of people who invented the financial schemes that got our country in the mess it is in.) She said "they", meaning her bank, got out early but she felt the other bankers were GREEDY and didn't get out in time.

I should have been punished right along with my sisters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olerealist
retired trial attorney; former member of VA abd Wa
11:27 AM on 04/20/2012
BANK BAILOUTS HATED?
The posted article is distressing for what it reveals about the illiteracy of much of the public about the economics of finance and banking.

I do not consider myself even a slight expert on the subject. However, when I open the newspaper every a.m. the first thing I read is the financial news. I would challenge anyone to name one single prominent and respected economist who does not believe that recent financial industry bailouts worked.

Jared Bernstein is a senior fellow at the Center On Budget and Policy priorities who has written an article seen on April 20 Wash. Post op ed. I humbly submit that anyone who fails to read this may relegate himself to financial illiteracy

“The Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) worked a lot better and at a much lower cost than is commonly recognized.”

“A Treasury analysis published last week using current market values found that if the federal government were to cash out its remaining holdings, such as its stake in AIG, it would at least break even and probably turn a small profit.”

“But banks began to ease lending standards as TARP was implimented, and accounting for the fact that underwriting is tighter than it was during the bubble, credit access is about back to pre-crisis levels.”

"General Moters and Chrysler would have faced certain LIQUIDATION had TARP not rescued them.” In that context, GM has again become the world's largest manufacturer of motor vehicles.
08:05 PM on 10/21/2012
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2011/11/key-lesson-from-iceland-crisis-%E2%80%9Clet-banks-fail%E2%80%9D/
Iceland let the banks fail, and now they are recovered more than the US. You are such an expert in how these things work. Or have you just been doing it so long that you can't think outside the box?

If a company can't manage their money properly they deserve liquidation, and another more fiscally responsible company can rebuild with the pieces. Chrysler is currently owned by an Italian company. What would really be different?
05:11 PM on 04/11/2012
stop given the money to business/bank without making a deal that helps the people. For example pay off everyone's morgages. This way you fix two problems. Banks will get their money and people will get to keep their homes and have more money to spend each month.
Common sense people or does the solution seem to easy…..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NHGUY2
11:10 AM on 12/26/2012
What about taxpayers who are renters? Your plan would simply make houses even more unaffordable while making those without them pay twice--once to bailout your mortgage and then a second time to pay you a higher price for your house.
08:50 AM on 04/11/2012
We should have let the banks crash and burn, we could have reset and been out of this mess my now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roger Cottrell
05:39 AM on 04/11/2012
Good job the Occupy MOvement's back in business.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
03:20 AM on 04/11/2012
it will still happen. We just wont be told about it anymore.
02:53 AM on 04/11/2012
GM has more factories and more workers in communist China than in the US. If GM collapsed it would have allowed Honda or one of the real American car makers like Tesla to fill the gap. GM IS NOT an America company. They have fully embraced communist China and they have MORE investments in the communist than in the US!

So why did Obama bail out a Chinese company? I guess he wanted to help GM finish building its latest factory in China which they are doing thanks to US taxpayers.

And notice that Obama and the Democrat still call it free trade.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
03:22 AM on 04/11/2012
it is free trade. The money that finances their profitable trade, is free as it comes from the tax payers. Its just as if the Republicans never lost control. There is no difference in other words between the political puppets of the plutocratic elitist
08:51 AM on 04/11/2012
He had tom paid back his unions supporters by giving them the company.