iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Titanic's Sinking: Was It More Than Human Folly?

By SETH BORENSTEIN 04/11/12 02:06 PM ET AP

Titanic Sinking
Members of the press view interactive exhibits during a media preview of a new exhibit 'Titanic: 100 Year Obsession' at the National Geographic Museum on March 28, 2012, in Washington, DC. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON -- After an entire century that included two high-profile government investigations and countless books and movies, we're still debating what really caused the Titanic to hit an iceberg and sink on that crystal-clear chilly night.

Maybe there's more to blame than human folly and hubris. Maybe we can fault freak atmospheric conditions that caused a mirage or an even rarer astronomical event that sent icebergs into shipping lanes. Those are two of the newer theories being proposed by a Titanic author and a team of astronomers.

But the effort to find natural causes that could have contributed to the sinking may also be a quest for an excuse – anything to avoid gazing critically into a mirror, say disaster experts and Titanic historians.

New theories and research are important "but at its most basic what happened is they failed to heed warnings and they hit the iceberg because they were going too fast," said James Delgado, director of maritime heritage at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

With this week's 100th anniversary of Titanic's sinking, the interest in all things Titanic is steaming faster than the doomed cruise ship on its maiden voyage.

One of the novel new theories says Titanic could have been the victim of a mirage that is similar to what people see in the desert. It's the brainchild of Tim Maltin, a historian who has written three books about Titanic. The latest, an e-book titled "A Very Deceiving Night" emphasizes how the atmosphere may have tricked the Titanic crew on a cloudless night.

"This was not avoidable human error," Maltin said in a telephone interview from London. "It's just about air density difference."

It was a beautiful clear night and for a couple of days, there had been something strange going on in the air over the North Atlantic, reported by all sorts of ships, including the crew on Titanic, Maltin said.

The unusually cold sea air caused light to bend abnormally downward, Maltin said. The Titanic's first officer, William McMaster Murdoch, saw what he described as a "haze on the horizon, and that iceberg came right out of the haze," Maltin said, quoting from the surviving second officer's testimony.

Other ships, including those rescuing survivors, reported similar strange visuals and had trouble navigating around the icebergs, he said.

British meteorologists later monitored the site for those freaky thermal inversions and said 60 percent of the time they checked, the inversions were present, Maltin said.

The same inversions could have made the Titanic's rescue rockets appear lower in the sky, giving a rescue ship the impression that the Titanic was smaller and farther away, Maltin said.

Physicists Donald Olson and Russell Doescher at Texas State University have another theory in Sky &Telescope magazine that fits nicely with Maltin's. Olson – who often comes up with astronomical quirks linked to historical events – said that a few months earlier, the moon, sun and Earth lined up in a way that added extra pull on Earth's tides. The Earth was closer to the moon than it had been in 1,400 years.

They based their work on historical and astronomical records and research in 1978 by a federal expert in tides.

The unusual tides caused glaciers to calve icebergs off Greenland. Those southbound icebergs got stuck near Labrador and Newfoundland but then slowly moved south again, floating into the shipping currents just in time to greet the Titanic, the astronomers theorized. Maltin said the icebergs also added a snaking river of super-cold water that magnified the mirage effect.

Tides and mirages may have happened, but blaming them for Titanic's sinking "misses the boat," said Lee Clarke, a Rutgers University disaster expert and author of the book "Worst Cases."

"The basic facts of Titanic are not in dispute: The boat was going too fast in dangerous waters," Clarke said. If Titanic had stopped for the night because of ice like the British steamship Californian did, "tides and mirages wouldn't have mattered."

On April 14, the day it hit the iceberg, the Titanic received seven heavy ice warnings, including one from the Californian less than an hour before the fateful collision. The message said: "We are stopped and surrounded by ice." Titanic sent back a message that said "Shut up. We are busy."

Clarke said people keep looking for additional causes "because if it's nature or God, then we're off the hook, morally and practically."

Yale disaster expert Charles Perrow said he found the mirage theory plausible, especially because cold air played visual tricks that were a factor in a 1979 airplane crash in Antarctica that was originally blamed on pilot error.

Steven Biel, who wrote "Down with the Old Canoe: A Cultural History of the Titanic Disaster," said he understands the search for other reasons.

"There's something appealing about retrospectively gaining control over an event that's centrally about uncertainty and contingency and lack of control," he said.

___

Photos: Titanic memorial cruise
1  of  15
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
Passengers pass time onboard the MS Balmoral Titanic memorial cruise ship, in the Atlantic Ocean, Wednesday, April 11, 2012. Nearly 100 years after the Titanic went down, the cruise with the same number of passengers aboard is setting sail to retrace the ship's voyage, including a visit to the location where it sank. The Titanic Memorial Cruise departed Sunday, April 8, from Southampton, England, where the Titanic left on its maiden voyage and the 12-night cruise will commemorate the 100th anniversary of the sinking of the White Star liner. With 1,309 passengers aboard, the MS Balmoral will follow the same route as the Titanic and organizers are trying to recreate the onboard experience (minus the disaster) from the food to a band playing music from that era. (AP Photo/Lefteris Pitarakis)
FOLLOW WORLD

WASHINGTON -- After an entire century that included two high-profile government investigations and countless books and movies, we're still debating what really caused the Titanic to hit an iceberg and...
WASHINGTON -- After an entire century that included two high-profile government investigations and countless books and movies, we're still debating what really caused the Titanic to hit an iceberg and...
Filed by Clare Richardson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 324
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carolab
Just another hostage of the poopy heads
04:36 AM on 04/16/2012
The History Channel has a great documentary running now.  It's clear the ship had design/material flaws much like the 35W bridge.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yinkadlb8
Having a glimpse of a sunny day.
10:08 AM on 04/13/2012
The Titanic disaster would have been prevented given the various warnings recieved on that fateful night. Apart from that, the Captain wasn't properly briefed by the radiomen of important messages recieved congruent to the situation at hand. Other factors included perhaps the speed of the ship that night was too much to prevent any accident should there be another ship in its pathway, talk less about the iceberg that 'suddenly' appeared on the horizon for the Captain to do anything else than to steer the huge ship away from it, which in any case was unpreventable.

What I see about the whole case is a potpourri of human errors most of which were done to endanger lives on the sea. Failure to heed warnings of danger is top of the list, which I believe everybody else will learn from.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fireslayer
01:58 AM on 04/13/2012
The negligence of the radio communications on the high seas focusing on high dollar radiograms and not having a separate feed for nautical warnings- like the ones sent the day before the collision warning of a flood of ice bergs coming into the main shipping lane path is the clearest error of that tragic day.

The other one that was glaring is the pilot in charge not completely reversing engines and setting course for a head on collision course upon first glimpse would also have saved the ship. It would have prevented the massive damage to the side of the hull, caused major damage to the bow ot the Titanic, perhaps a lot of injuries and a few deaths. But the breech of the hull would have been contained to the first compartment, saved the boiler room and left the ship afloat with its engines and steering intact.
photo
Rusty Bucket
Intensely interested in the human condition!
01:31 AM on 04/13/2012
What sank the Titanic was the coming to fruition of one or more of Murphy's Laws of Random Perversity, augmented with an unhealthy dose of ego. As you read the laws think each time of that event and then think of your own lives for they are subject to the same and their folly most assuredly could the yours. So saith the old Rusty Bucket!

1. Left to themselves - all things go from bad to worse.

2. Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong.

3. If there is a possibility of several things going wrong, the one that will go wrong is the one that will do the most damage.

4. If you play with a thing long enough, you will surely break it.

5. If everything appears to be going well, you have obviously overlooked something.

6. Nature always sides with the hidden flaw.

7. Mother nature is a bitch.
photo
one1byke
Easy no Man.
12:12 AM on 04/13/2012
must. market. dead. ship. like. .... Christ.

Was Christ really more than Human?.....

oh yeah, ........and there's a movie out..... "American Reunion."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brayne
GOP = Grumpy Old People
10:02 PM on 04/12/2012
"Titanic's Sinking: Was It More Than Human Folly?" - Yes it was. Some water became really really cold and became a solid and was floating in the path of the ship. Then the ship bumped into it, really hard.......
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loanshark
“He who knows best knows how little he knows”
07:47 PM on 04/12/2012
It had to be Gorbal warming.
07:40 PM on 04/12/2012
Bill Buckner missed the ground ball. What's done is done!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
keezze
07:16 PM on 04/12/2012
Did the ship do a first time practice run without passengers first?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
messy
artist, writer, adventurer
06:30 PM on 04/12/2012
I remember when the QE1 sank. Lots of fun. No one was hurt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ckesegi
07:37 AM on 04/15/2013
The QE1 sank at its moorings years after it had been decommissioned as a sailing vessel. It was functioning as a floating university in the harbor of Hong Kong. She was undergoing refurbishment, which, in turn happened to start a fire that got out of control. The fire boats pumped copious amounts onto the vessel, rendering it unstable, and causing it to capsize. Terrible shame to a great ship.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
messy
artist, writer, adventurer
06:22 PM on 04/12/2012
They built another ship, and they called it Mary S...Brittanic actually. It sank because when it hit a reef and started listing on one side, ALL THE PORTHOLES were OPEN!!!!! The lower decks only of course.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gaspar Ramsey
Licensed Curmudgeon, Hammer of Reason
08:34 PM on 04/12/2012
The Brittanic sank in 1916 while serving as a hospital ship during the Turkish campaign. It is thought that she struck a mine.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ckesegi
07:51 AM on 04/15/2013
The ship, Brittanic, was not built in response. They were all built in sequence by White Star Line simultaneously. First the Olympic, Titanic, and then the Brittanic.The building of the Titanic was delayed when the suction from the Olympic's draught pulled in British battle cruiser HMS Hawke into it's side causing significant damage to the Hawke's keel, as well as the Olympic's, disabling a number of it's propeller screws. The screws from the then dry-docked and under construction Titanic were then transferred to the Olympic so that it could stay in service and make money for the cruise line. UNGH!

Now regarding the Britannic? Do you even know what you are talking about? Reefs do not cause explosions, not even during the World War I Mediterranean Theater. It struck a mine. If you think you know about underwater explorers like Jacques Cousteau then please let me know. Sure the open portholes didn't help, but they were in no way the ultimate cause of the sinking.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
John Friedman
Helping companies live their values and tell their
04:23 PM on 04/12/2012
100 years after the Titanic's ill fated maiden voyage, it is still a common assumption that technological advances can save us from disaster. In 1912 double bottoms and water tight doors were supposed to prevent the unthinkable.

Titanic was originally designed for twice the number of lifeboats that she carried. That number of boats would have had space for every man, woman and child aboard, in all three classes and crew. Because no one was injured in the collision with the iceberg, there is no reason that Titanic had to become a lesson in hubris rather than proper planning.

By now we should have learned that we cannot build systems with enough redundancy to do the thinking for us, therefore we must rely on the human element, whether it be heeding ice reports on the wireless or the warnings that come from scientists about climate change, the Occupy movement decrying corporate corruption or a myriad of other concerns that we face.

Otherwise, my friends, we're sailing together through the darkness toward an uncertain future without a disaster plan. And this time, the math is even worse - Earth carries 7 billion passengers, and there is room for only 10 people on the International Space Station. And there is no Carpathia steaming to our aid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ckesegi
07:53 AM on 04/15/2013
If the builders didn't want the total 60 lifeboats to obscure the pristine view on the promenade deck as opposed to the 20 that they kept to preserve those views, then the Titanic disaster would've only amounted to a huge property loss, and probably a write off, right?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
John Friedman
Helping companies live their values and tell their
02:12 PM on 04/15/2013
And the abject lesson would not have been learned until or unless another situation happened. Walter Lord explained the thinking 'that what seems obvious now, in retrospect, was inconceivable before the Titanic disaster. Ships had hit icebergs before and floated, and other ships had been stricken and the passengers all ferried to other liners. The radio (which Titanic carried and kept on 24/7) was seen as a surefire way to summon help...but other ships did not keep the wireless staffed (like the Californian). The lessons had to be learned from the failure...and sadly that may be the state we are in as a planet. But there is no Carpathia rushing to our aid.
02:46 PM on 04/12/2012
... a three hour tour, a three hour tour...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rich3324
Likes: Chasing villagers. Dislikes: Fire
02:03 PM on 04/12/2012
I think Capt. Nemo sank her.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
UncleJimbo
BLANK!
09:11 PM on 04/12/2012
Then we should be about ...... Finding Nemo !!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moose Luck 99
GEOENGINEERINGWATCH DOT ORG
01:27 PM on 04/12/2012
Titanic's sinking: Was it more than human folly | timesfreepress.com

www.timesfreepress.com

10 hours ago – post a job ... With this week's 100th anniversary of Titanic's sinking, the interest in all things Titanic is steaming .... Insurance in Chattanooga