iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Alleged Rape Victim Jailed For Testimony Released By Judge

By DON THOMPSON 04/16/12 07:25 PM ET AP

Rape Victim Jailed
A 17-year-old alleged rape victim was jailed to ensure her testimony against a serial rapist. Sacramento Judge Lawrence Brown has officially ordered her release.

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A California judge on Monday ordered the release of a 17-year-old girl who had been placed in juvenile hall last month because prosecutors feared she would flee rather than testify at the upcoming trial of a suspected rapist.

Superior Court Judge Lawrence Brown previously ordered the girl held because she has a history of running away. On Monday, he said she would be freed with a GPS ankle bracelet after prosecutors and the girl's attorneys agreed to the release.

The judge told the teen her case had charted rare legal territory because her detention was seen as victimizing the girl a second time.

"I am truly sorry for all that you've been through," he told the teenager. "You've demonstrated great courage for a young woman."

The Associated Press is not naming the girl because of her age and because she was the alleged victim of sexual assault.

Prosecutors took the unusual step of detaining the foster child in juvenile hall because they say her testimony is vital evidence against a man they believe is a serial rapist.

The teen previously failed to make two court appearances when the suspect, Frank William Rackley Sr., 37, was previously charged, forcing prosecutors to dismiss charges against him.

They obtained a material witness warrant allowing her to be detained after they refiled the charges.

The teen did not speak during Monday's brief court hearing, but smiled and laughed with one of her attorneys before the hearing began.

"It's a good day for my client," said one her attorneys, Amina Merritt, who represents the girl's interests as a foster child. "Obviously she was suffering in incarceration, and I'm glad that she's been released. She's holding up amazingly well for a young girl of her age."

The judge would not release the terms of the girl's release or say where she would be living.

Victims' rights advocates had said incarcerating the girl could discourage other victims from reporting sexual assaults, but prosecutors said the danger posed by Rackley outweighed the inconvenience to the teen.

Rackley is accused of raping the girl last July, when she was 16. She was abducted July 22 from a north Sacramento light-rail station where she was waiting for a friend to pick her up, according to court documents.

A man approached in a red pickup truck, told her his name was Frank and asked if she needed a ride and if she had a boyfriend. He got angry when she refused his advances, pulled her into the truck, then drove with her to a dark street and raped her, prosecutors say. He pushed her out of the truck and she ran, reporting the attack when she happened upon a sheriff's deputy.

Prosecutors say a rape examination found Rackley's DNA.

He also is charged with raping a 30-year-old suspected prostitute a month earlier, and prosecutors believe he is a serial rapist.

Rackley has pleaded not guilty to all charges. His attorney, Assistant Public Defender Richard Berson, was not available to comment.

Prosecutors attending Monday's hearing would not comment, and Shelly Orio, a spokeswoman for the Sacramento County district attorney, said the office would have no comment.

The girl's other attorney, Lisa Franco, had said her client was treated like a criminal after she was incarcerated with juvenile delinquents on March 23. Other girls wanted to fight her and she was inadvertently hit with pepper-spray used to break up a fight between two other juveniles, Franco said.

She said her client was inadvertently released from juvenile hall earlier this month, but proved she is not a flight risk by going immediately to a Sacramento group home. She was then sent back to custody.

Merritt, the other attorney, said she believed prosecutors could have taken less extreme measures to ensure the girl would show up and testify.

"This may be the first time I've heard of a minor being subjected to that process," she said. "I think it can be characterized ... as bullying."

The criminal case against Rackley is scheduled to go to trial April 23.

FOLLOW CRIME

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A California judge on Monday ordered the release of a 17-year-old girl who had been placed in juvenile hall last month because prosecutors feared she would flee rather than ...
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A California judge on Monday ordered the release of a 17-year-old girl who had been placed in juvenile hall last month because prosecutors feared she would flee rather than ...
Filed by Hilary Tuttle  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 69
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
04:23 PM on 04/26/2012
But the law did have a choice. The lawyer for the 17 year old rape victim proposed that a GPS device be used for her client instead of the alternative, juvenile prison. Instead the district attorney and judge decided to go along with placing her in juvenile prison. The law did not require the judge to imprison the 17 year old rape victim, a minor. He imprisoned her at his discretion. The proof that she did not have to be imprisoned is that she was released with a GPS device. So, even the judge agreed that she did not have to be imprisoned. Also, she is not the only witness in this rape trial. She is only the more credible witness since the other victim is a prostitute. The job of the prosecuting district attorney is to get a conviction, and any other assumption such as the district attorney or the judge considering the psychological state or stress on the victim is just that an assumption. The job of the prosecuting district attorney is to get a conviction, and any other assumption such as the district attorney or the judge considering the psychological state or stress on the victim is just that an assumption. The rape victim’s imprisonment was badly done and has resulted in very unfavorable (deservedly) national and international publicity. I agree with the other posters who have stated that her imprisonment would probably have a chilling effect on others reporting rape (Pyrrhic victory).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rewith85man
Expressing Who I Am
12:46 AM on 04/20/2012
Sometimes, you gotta do what you have to do even if it means creating enemies. I do not condone the law for holding the girl captive but it had no choice.
11:38 AM on 04/19/2012
"Superior Court Judge Lawrence Brown previously ordered the girl held because she has a history of running away... The teen previously failed to make two court appearances when the suspect, Frank William Rackley Sr., 37, was previously charged, forcing prosecutors to dismiss charges against him."

they didn't just hold her in a juvenile center to laughs and giggles. they're trying to charge a man that's done horrible things not only to the teen, but to other women also. they want this monster off the streets and they can't do it without her.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Meerkatx
01:48 AM on 04/19/2012
Raped by a man.
Raped by the system.
Any bets something goes horribly wrong in the near future for her?
photo
mariusvinchi
Saint Lucia is looking better and better every day
09:10 PM on 04/18/2012
Both this Judge AND the requesting Prosecutor should face sanctions for this gross abuse of power! From a pragmatic legal point of view, they've handed the defense an "ace in the hole" in that it could be argued, that the victims testimony is coerced.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:26 PM on 04/18/2012
Let's just treat the victims of violent crime like criminals why don't we. Geez. This is why ra pe is so under-reported, because the system is as keen to treat them as cruelly as their attackers did.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rewith85man
Expressing Who I Am
12:47 AM on 04/20/2012
The victim was reported on running away. So the people of the law had to keep her jail just so she won't escape and she would testify against the pervert.

Do you understand now?
01:46 PM on 05/01/2012
Except you can't force someone to testify.

Do *you* understand now?
04:40 PM on 04/18/2012
"Victims' rights advocates had said incarcerating the girl could discourage other victims from reporting sexual assaults, but prosecutors said the danger posed by Rackley outweighed the inconvenience to the teen." Presuming this statement is accurate, I have 2 major problems with it. 1) The danger of an infinite number of future assault victim's not coming forward far outweighs one man going free. The reason we don't negotiate with terrorists is because the needs of the many are greater than the needs of the few, this logic applies here too. 2) Spending a month in jail after being raped is much more than an "inconvenience". Put one of the prosecutors in jail for a month and then ask them if it's an "inconvenience". For a teen this is closer to a severe trauma that will effect the rest of her life.
Furthermore, isn't it her prerogative to testify or not testify? Even if she shows up at trial, isn't she allowed to take the 5th, "not remember", or whatever?
How much time do convicted serial rapists spend in prison in CA? If it's anything like what I've heard chances are this guy will be out in less than 10 years. Do the prosecutors even think about the well being of the vicitims or only their own conviction rates? Someone please let me know if I'm wrong.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:27 PM on 04/18/2012
You're wrong.
10:21 AM on 04/19/2012
Thanks for the response. I was honestly hoping for a more enlightening answer. Am I wrong on all counts? Or is there a specific point with which you take issue? Or are you just being unduly snarky?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Puzzlr
thegrouphugdotorg
04:15 PM on 04/18/2012
This is a hard case. On the one hand, he's a serial rapist who should be behind bars and will only get there with her testimony. On the other hand, she has been through a lot and putting her in jail may prove traumatic. Tough call.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:27 PM on 04/18/2012
Not really. Don't treat the victims of crime like criminals. Actually quite simple.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Puzzlr
thegrouphugdotorg
12:50 AM on 04/19/2012
But if they didn't, she would have run off like before and he would have gotten away with it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cobraxus
Defend The Innocent_Protect The Weak
12:17 PM on 04/18/2012
filing a material witness warrant on a rape victim is the last thing anyone involved with sexcrimes wants to do.for starters it places you in the crosshairs of victims advocacy groups and can prove problematic down the line.but putting a rape victim in jail is just beyond stupid.placing a material witness in protective custody is commonplace.the problem is it's expensive and California is broke.the cost is not from the accomodations.they usually stick them in some crummy econo-lodge.the money goes for the two armed police officers in the room and the other two outside 24/7.the reason this rape victim got put in jail is simply because it was cheaper.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:47 PM on 04/18/2012
I agree. There's no reason why other precautions couldn't have been taken if they really needed her. I somehow can't imagine that they considered this girl in the same way others are accomodated in order to secure testimony.
photo
Sheilah Davis
If it's broken, we must fix it.
07:50 PM on 04/17/2012
You know, in the city in which I lived we had a sex assault victim arrested for using a word describing her sexual organ in front of a cop. The officer was offended and she was arrested for verbal assault on a police officer. I argued with a lot of city councilpeople and a city attorney to no avail, they justified their revictimization of a young lady! It took a letter to the judge to have them drop the charges.

Arresting rape victims is only going to keep women from coming forward. Why is it that MEN don't understand that?

I'm hoping the DA gets replaced in Sacremento....this person is a complete idiot!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Dude67
Question the official narrative
10:23 AM on 04/18/2012
You're right, they should let her go, let this predator go and hopefully his next rape victim(s) will be more cooperative.  Hopefully it won't be you or someone you care about.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:41 PM on 04/18/2012
What does jailing a girl who's committed no crime have to do with prevention of future attacks? I think maybe jailing the rapist pending trial might be more effective.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Meerkatx
01:49 AM on 04/19/2012
Or they could have put her in protective custody. At least then she would be supervised without having to go to a jail like facility.
photo
stayingsaneinthemadness
The sun's not yellow, it's chicken!!!
04:27 PM on 04/17/2012
A girl in foster care is raped by a stranger after he kidnaps her off the street. She has no family to help her through such an ordeal, so the judge throws her into a place where she is targeted by kids who want to fight, is "accidentally" pepper sprayed, and there are no charges against the judge who put her through all of this unnecassary abuse? It's not right. They definitely took advantage of this poor kids situation. She definitely is brave, I hope she sticks by and gets to watch this slime be sentenced to a looooong time behind bars.
12:38 PM on 04/17/2012
You've demonstrated great courage for a young woman? Women of all ages, from very little girls to aged ladies exhibit great courage every minute of every day in this world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
be practical
I'll Never Understand the GOP Mind
12:16 PM on 04/17/2012
Jail the rape victim. Good job. Sure will want to make other victims to come forward and report being raped.
02:12 PM on 04/17/2012
Yea, makes no sense i agree
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
forestlady
05:44 PM on 04/17/2012
I"m almost afraid to say this but...that could have been their underlying motive all along. Whatever it is, it's sick and whoever is responsible should be put in jail for quite awhile.
11:04 AM on 04/17/2012
Many people are reading this article incorrectly. The younger victim was not the alleged prostitute; the 30 year old victim is alleged to be a prostitute (not sure why that matters at all!!!!). The judge who released her is the judge who put her in jail to begin with. He probably realized that he was treading on very thin, very dangerous ice by his actions. I think it's ridiculous that putting her in a detention center was the only recourse they could find to keep an eye on her. Is there a law that states that the victim has to give testimony against his/her attacker? I'm not sure, but this doesn't seem like the best way to ensure it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cobraxus
Defend The Innocent_Protect The Weak
12:27 PM on 04/18/2012
both the judge and the prosecutors know they're being watched by victims' rights groups.within their own circles I'm sure this hasn't registered much.but when the eyes of the world are on you that's a different matter.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:33 PM on 04/18/2012
Too bad we have to rely on victims' rights groups to keep authorities in line. Sick, sick, sick, this country's justice system.
10:58 AM on 04/17/2012
Look...if she won't show up to testify...then holding her won't help. If she won't help put the guy away...then what makes them think she will say anything at the time of trial to help the case? Let the guy go. When he rapes someone else...then they can prosecute him AND this girl for aiding him by refusing to help in this case!
09:40 PM on 04/17/2012
Yes criminalize the victim. Are you joking? She didn't refuse to testify because she wanted to go hang out at the mall. She was obviously terrified of this man and the chance he could be acquitted and come after her. She is a minor. The judge should have allowed her to testify from an undisclosed location and he didn't even offer that to her. If they wanted her in custody they could have placed her in protective custody NOT IN JAIL. Also, your thinking that she should be criminally liable for the future actions of this man because she doesn't want to put herself in further jeopardy is just as stupid as the judge and prosecutor thinking it was ok to lock her in the first place.