iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Brittany Gibbons, SUNY Undergraduate Student, Maps Cape Cod-New Jersey Offshore Wind Corridor

Posted: 04/17/2012 12:38 pm Updated: 04/17/2012 12:44 pm

By Earth Techling's Beth Buczynski:

The onshore wind power industry is growing rapidly. In fact, many of the largest operational onshore wind farms are located right in the United States. Offshore wind power, whereby turbines are installed at sea to capture relentless breezes, is off to a slower start, however. The offshore industry faces cost challenges, in addition to opposition from activists on a range of issues, including fishing, navigation, endangered species, scenic views and tribal rights.

Brittany Gibbons, a senior at SUNY Oswego, thinks that there is a happy medium to be found between preserving the environment and taking advantage of offshore wind’s potential for clean energy generation. The meteorology student has spent the last academic year collecting data and building computer-generated maps that could help create an offshore wind power corridor from Cape Cod to New Jersey.

Gibbons’ honors thesis project, completed under the mentorship of Robert Ballentine of the meteorology department, has not only reinforced her theory that offshore wind is a solution for growing energy demand, but illuminated interesting facts about how to make offshore wind farms profitable, according to the university.

Using a meteorological numerical prediction model called WRF (Weather Research and Forecasting), Gibbons has collected data on offshore wind direction, speed, sustainability and more. She then used the information to create digital maps—in vivid colors—showing such features as optimum distance from shore and tower height for the familiar wind-driven power generators. (Her work appears to be broadly similar to new research from a team of engineers at Stanford University, who recently published a study in Geophysical Research Letters that describes a complicated weather model that can determine optimal placement of wind farms.)

“So far with a mini-tab analysis we have found specific distances in the spring where sustainable winds are seen to level off at 10 meters per second,” she said. “Beyond that distance, it doesn’t make economic sense, because the tower foundations would have to be built in much deeper water for relatively the same amount of energy as in shallower waters.”

This knowledge will come in handy for wind speculators, who will always want to position offshore turbines so that they can operate at highest levels of efficiency, providing clean power to the Eastern sea board at a cost that will be attractive to consumers.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW GREEN

By Earth Techling's Beth Buczynski: The onshore wind power industry is growing rapidly. In fact, many of the largest operational onshore wind farms are located right in the United States. ...
By Earth Techling's Beth Buczynski: The onshore wind power industry is growing rapidly. In fact, many of the largest operational onshore wind farms are located right in the United States. ...
Filed by Jessica Leader  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 76
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:42 AM on 04/23/2012
An article from Germany, states that wind power will soon produce more energy world-wide than nuclear.

http://www.dw.de/dw/article/0,,15903703,00.html?maca=en-rss-en-all-1573-rdf
02:55 PM on 04/28/2012
Good article. Wind power is growing more every day and the cost continues to fall.
12:47 AM on 04/22/2012
A smart student making a difference in clean energy.

Wind and solar have dropped in price by over 50% in the past few years and continue to get better every year.

Research like this will help to make wind power even cheaper to produce.
04:50 AM on 04/20/2012
Has she mapped the cost? Offshore wind is very, very expensive
09:18 AM on 04/20/2012
Yes I have. If you would like to see more get in contact with me and I can describe my research.
09:02 AM on 04/22/2012
Sorry if this is repeated but something weird happened when I hit Post Comment. I don't give my personal information to anyone on these sites and you should be careful. Some weird people demand to know where you work and who you are because you disagree with their views, no matter how ill informed they are.

There is, as I am sure you know, research underway to improve capacity factors of onshore wind, including improving wind prediction. Nevertheless, offshore wind remains very expensive and it is not the competitor for offshore wind, all other generation is.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
03:25 AM on 04/22/2012
Offshore wind is about the same as onshore wind because of the better capacity offshore. Wind is one of the cheaper sources of electric.
02:34 PM on 04/19/2012
New Zealand gets 75% of its electricity from renewables now. This is a winner in the clean energy arena. Seems like we should be doing more to move to safe, clean alternative energy sources.
02:25 PM on 04/19/2012
Continued technological advancements will make wind and solar more competitive every year.

Studies such as this will improve the efficiency of wind power and reduce the cost.

That is a good thing. Our Universities and this student are working to advance our technology.
ItsGettingWeird
(or is it just me?)
06:35 PM on 04/18/2012
This young lady is really doing a service to her country by studying the viability of wind corridors. Good for her, and for all of us.

Thanks to Ms. Gibbons, the cost/benefit analysis will be much easier for investors, who need to be confident in the profitability of their investments in wind energy. I hope that her study will speed up the installation of wind farms wherever they make sound economic sense.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bio-man
An advocate for the middle class
10:07 PM on 04/18/2012
Amen, Amen and Amen. As one who works in the Electric Utility, I'm very impressed with her work. I just had to echo your statement.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bio-man
An advocate for the middle class
04:35 PM on 04/18/2012
Your link proves nothing Sir! It is importatant to remember that fossil fuel subsidies are written permantly into the tax code while the meager subsidies from renewable sources on only granted on a temporary basis and subject to the political whims of the dominant polical party. This article is about off shore wind, which has a great deal of potential off the eastern seaboard to meet the future power needs of the east coast population centers. As for renewable energy in general, it really is possible, the only obstacals are political in nature. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=a-path-to-sustainable-energy-by-2030
10:21 PM on 04/17/2012
Alternative energy investments are outpacing gas, oil and coal.

The cost of wind and solar have dropped by over 50% in the last few years. The cost of oil, coal and nuclear keep rising. The future is in safe, clean alternative energy.

Wind energy, solar energy, wave energy and biomass drew $187 billion last year compared with $157 billion for natural gas, oil and coal, according to Bloomberg
10:12 PM on 04/23/2012
"Drew $187 billion" in what? i don't know what your numbers refer to. The problem with wind and solar (in spite of drops in costs) is not only that they remain expensive -- I know, I know, onshore wind on a per kwh is competitive -- but this is the wrong metric. When you factor in the cost of the backup generation (it fundamentally needs to be natural gas generation) that is required to firm wind because of the intermittency issues, add in the low capacity factors because of intermittency, top it off with investments required to finance the infrastructure required to move the power from prime wind resources to demand centers, you have high prices and reliability issues. We need massive investments in research to lower these costs but sustained subsidies are, well, not sustainable. Thinking all of this is going to happen tomorrow is not realistic.
12:44 PM on 05/01/2012
very great post
10:18 PM on 04/17/2012
The cost of wind and solar keep dropping while the price of oil, coal and nuclear are rising.

Models such as this will help improve the economics even more.

Wind, solar, wave energy, geothermal and second generation biofuels made from algae, cellulose and waste are the future.
RSGmusic
Instrumental music is great
08:17 PM on 04/17/2012
Thanks huff post mods

Must be the delay in the system.

thanks again
RSGmusic
Instrumental music is great
08:10 PM on 04/17/2012
Huff post moderators

Why do you get not posting oil comments I make and solar power collect.
Many Hp arcticles state the same thing

pipine vointing by R's and D's, was also and article of yours.
05:55 PM on 04/17/2012
Futile at best. Here's the real story:

A recent lengthy report by Reuters confirms what many conservatives have long known: President Obama's promise to create millions of so-called "green jobs" has been a colossal and expensive failure.

A few highlights from the report:

1) Since 2009, the wind industry has lost 10,000 jobs, even as the energy capacity of wind farms has almost doubled. By contrast, the oil and gas industry have created 75,000 jobs since Mr. Obama took office.

2) "A $500 million job-training program has so far helped fewer than 20,000 people find work, far short of its goal." The program was so bad that "the Labor Department's inspector general recommended last fall that the agency should return the $327 million that remained unspent." They didn't. And now, the department "remains far short of its goal of placing 80,000 workers into green jobs by 2013."

3) According to the Labor Department's own figures, the push for so-called "green jobs" has been an abysmal failure. "By the end of 2011, some 16,092 participants had found new work in a "green" field, according to the Labor Department - roughly one-fifth of its target."
04:06 PM on 04/18/2012
This post is plagiarized from the following sites:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/04/15/reuters-obamas-green-collar-jobs-have-been-a-bust

http://nation.foxnews.com/wind-energy/2012/04/17/wind-industry-has-lost-10000-jobs-under-obama

If I cared what FOX news or Breitbart.com had to say about clean energy jobs, I would visit those sites. Cross posting from another site without attribution is an offense that should get you banned from the site!
04:47 PM on 04/17/2012
Perhaps this naive college student is interested in some real data -

1) Since 2009, the wind industry has lost 10,000 jobs, even as the energy capacity of wind farms has almost doubled. By contrast, the oil and gas industry have created 75,000 jobs since Mr. Obama took office.

2) "A $500 million job-training program has so far helped fewer than 20,000 people find work, far short of its goal." The program was so bad that "the Labor Department's inspector general recommended last fall that the agency should return the $327 million that remained unspent." They didn't. And now, the department "remains far short of its goal of placing 80,000 workers into green jobs by 2013."

3) According to the Labor Department's own figures, the push for so-called "green jobs" has been an abysmal failure. "By the end of 2011, some 16,092 participants had found new work in a "green" field, according to the Labor Department - roughly one-fifth of its target."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Mo
05:58 PM on 04/17/2012
It's abysmal because the GOP keeps blocking every effort to move to clean energy so that the pockets of the oil industry are kept full.
We need to manufacture solar and wind turbines here on a larger scale before we have to purchase everything from China.
We have subsidized the oil industry for far too long. Time to move on and move forward. We simply can't continue to destroy our planet because of our stubborness and ignorance.
10:29 PM on 04/17/2012
Subsidize? The oil and gas industry pay $100 billion in excise taxes. Add to that all the personal taxes paid by their employees and the corporate taxes and you complain about $5 billion in exploration credits? You have a twisted sense of doing math.
07:53 AM on 04/18/2012
THe GOP has not blocked any move to "clean" energy (and oxymoron by the way).

Every company in the country, and I do mean exactly EVERY company can go ahead and participate in your beloved "clean" energy ideas - but they use their personal liberty and common sense to realize they cannot make money or save money in the "clean" energy sector - it's really remarkably simple.
12:15 PM on 04/18/2012
Hi, I am that "naive college student." I appreciate the reality check. But I, myself, have educated myself on the topic for the past four years that I have been studying it. I understand that the wind industry has taken many hits lately, but I am still very interested in the topic and have enjoyed the research that I have done. I was not in any way studying the growth of the industry. I was simply the potential of offshore wind turbines. If you would like to tell me any more information that I do not know about it send me an email at gibbons@oswego.edu. Before you judge my research, actually understand what I have researched. You're argument has absolutely nothing to do with my research, it has to do with your bias about the industry itself. Thanks for your input.

Brittany Gibbons
Designated Naive College Student
12:34 PM on 04/18/2012
I apologize for my spelling errors. But I wrote that quickly because I have more research and work to complete today.
03:07 PM on 04/18/2012
Brittany, this has nothing to do with you personally, nor about the importance of the work you are doing. It's about Obama and his cronies trying to sell us on the fact the green energy is working and it clearly is not. Will it work in the future, maybe. But as of now, it's been a dismal failure. Keep up your work and prove us wrong but until then it has to be drill baby drill. we have no alternative.
03:27 PM on 04/17/2012
This is awesome! Good for you! What a good experience for an undergrad. I would loved to be a part of this.!
12:17 PM on 04/18/2012
Thanks :)
01:36 PM on 04/17/2012
Perhaps this student should do some more research - because the government says so doesn't make it true - case in point.
http://azdailysun.com/news/local/wind-power-sagging/article_22a8e94a-65a3-50a6-b973-47638f9b814d.html
01:50 PM on 04/17/2012
Regardless of whether or not you trust the research, it is hard for me to see anything wrong with further investigating renewable energy opportunities. We need solutions, and maybe in the future offshore wind will power be one of them.
01:59 PM on 04/17/2012
If the electric utilities and private companies saw they could make a buck doing it, they would. I object to government bureaucrats using our tax dollars for unproven things.
photo
French Toast
MAPLE SYRUP
07:26 PM on 04/17/2012
"because the government says so doesn't make it true"

Okay. What research have you done that shows things counter to what she has? None? Okay then. Snotty little pretend know it all then. Gotcha.
03:04 PM on 04/18/2012
So true. Plus, I am not associated with the government. This is my independent study for my honors thesis. I don't know where and what the government said to begin with.