iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Midwest Tornado Warnings Debated: Could They Cause Complacency? (PHOTOS)

Tornado Warning

First Posted: 04/17/2012 8:28 am Updated: 04/17/2012 8:28 am

OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — Forecasters who issued dire warnings ahead of last weekend's tornado outbreak in the Midwest deemed the effort a success Monday, largely because dozens of tornadoes hit yet caused only a handful of deaths. But they expressed concern about future public complacency.

The National Weather Service's Storm Prediction Center issued a rare high-risk warning days ahead of the storms, sternly urging residents across several states to prepare for "life-threatening" weather. State officials and residents in communities where tornadoes hit praised the effort, noting only six lives were lost.

But many of the tornadoes touched down in rural areas, mostly in Kansas. Forecasters worried that could result in people tuning out future warnings because they were not in this outbreak's path.

"The bottom line is there really is no such thing as a perfect forecast. There are always going to be areas that aren't struck, especially in tornado outbreaks," said Greg Carbin, the center's warning coordination meteorologist. "But the penalty function for missing a significant event is so high, that there's probably a tendency to err on the side of caution."

It was only the second time in the National Weather Service's history that the agency labeled an approaching storm system as "high risk" more than 24 hours in advance. The other time was in April 2006, when nearly 100 tornadoes raked across the southeastern U.S.

Both times, the early predictions were on target.

The storm center determined that 75 tornadoes touched down in Kansas, Oklahoma, Iowa and Nebraska during a 24-hour period beginning at 6 a.m. Saturday. Six people died as a result of an overnight tornado that hit Woodward, Okla., about 140 miles northwest of Oklahoma City. No other deaths were reported.

Residents said the warnings helped. Frank Owens and his wife, Treva, had packed their storm shelter with supplies in advance and spent the day watching local TV forecasts.

"I heard them say we had nine minutes, and that's when I hit the cellar," Owens said.

Meteorologist Rick Smith said he hopes that for residents who prepared and were spared, that their work doesn't lead to complacency.

"I don't want people to think preparedness efforts are ever wasted," Smith said. "The weather radios people bought, the plans people reviewed on Friday and Saturday, it's not like you're never going to use those again.

"If you didn't use them on Saturday, you should be thankful and glad."

In Kansas, the National Weather Service issued new warnings with strong language: "You could be killed if not underground or in a tornado shelter. Many well-built homes and businesses will be completely swept from their foundations."

Some experts cautioned that using language that is too strong could have the opposite of its intended effect. Jeff Lazo, director of the Societal Impacts Program at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Colorado, said people could actually go into "fear control."

"Instead of responding to a threat, they just kind of tune it out," Lazo said. "It's not necessarily a rational response. It's more of an emotional response. There comes a point where someone's just going to grab a six pack and go to the roof because they don't think they're going to survive it."

But the new warnings appear to have helped in Kansas. A tornado struck the Wichita, Kan., area at night and tore through a nearby mobile home park, yet no one was killed.

"It's moving into the south side of a major metropolitan area after dark. This is when we want to pull out all the stops to really get people to visualize the potential of what could happen so they take the action to protect themselves from that level of threat," said Mike Hudson, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service in Kansas City.

Hudson said researchers plan to study how people reacted to the heightened warnings and whether that was responsible for many of them leaving the mobile home park and taking shelter elsewhere.

"They key point of it was that in that mobile home park alone, people did go ahead and take the proper actions to protect themselves," he said.

1  of  32
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
A man listens for the sound of trapped people in the Pinaire Mobile Home Park in Wichita, Kan., after a tornado cause massive destruction in the area on Saturday night, April 14, 2012. Tornadoes were spotted across the Midwest and Plains on Saturday as an outbreak of unusually strong weather seized the region, and forecasters sternly warned that "life-threatening" weather could intensify overnight. (AP Photo/The Wichita Eagle, Travis Heying)
FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — Forecasters who issued dire warnings ahead of last weekend's tornado outbreak in the Midwest deemed the effort a success Monday, largely because dozens of tornadoes hit yet caus...
OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — Forecasters who issued dire warnings ahead of last weekend's tornado outbreak in the Midwest deemed the effort a success Monday, largely because dozens of tornadoes hit yet caus...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
weathergirl
loved politics as a little girl!
11:32 PM on 04/17/2012
I am glad that NWS is changing the warnings and that they were telling people in the plains that this would be a bad weekend. Furthermore, the forecasts I heard and saw said that there were be overnight tornadoes which are much harder to see and to get to safety. In fact one news anchor said that her family was going to be sleeping in their basement and she was telling her kids that they would be having a family campout in the basement that night! I am grateful that the people in the Wichita mobile home park had a shelter that they were able to go to because that tornado was at night too! I am sorry that the people of Woodward lost so many of their residents! I understand that the town's tornado warning sirens that had been working earlier in the day, took a lightning strike and were then out of commission. I am glad that the NWS will be doing research on how the new warnings were received! Just remember everyone, that the NWS is run by the government. NOAA, the parent agency of NWS has already been cut quite a bit. The Paul Ryan budget would decimate it since it is discretionary, non military spending. Doppler radar can give between 10 and 20 minutes warning of a tornado whereas before there was the Doppler network, the warning time was 3 minutes! Just remember these facts when you vote this year!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
westbygoddoug
the weird turn pro
09:07 PM on 04/17/2012
The choice of wording for these warnings was excellent. People become complacent because of the nature of tornadoes, in that they only strike a very small path of a warned area. Trusting yourself to think you will not be hit is beyond foolish. Even worse is thinking a storm is not "strong enough" to worry about. Tornadoes can form and change in intensity within minutes.

I personally am 100% for strongly worded warnings in certain circumstances. In the event of expected or sighted strong, long track tornadoes every effort should be made to inform the public that their lives are indeed in danger. While the official NWS wording is a project in just part of the nation, I have noticed that local TV forecasters have been using very strong language in live storm coverage for the past couple of years. I live near the area affected by the March 2 tornado that struck Henryville IN and nearby towns. That morning our local forecasters were telling everyone to be ready that afternoon. Once the tornado formed our local TV meteorologists went live on TV and radio, and all were very adamant that anyone in the path of that storm that did not take shelter would be injured or killed. People listened. That EF4 monster was on the ground for 49 miles, taking 11 lives; I have no doubt that the stern warnings issued on live TV and radio saved dozens of lives, if not more.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rory GibbensRolph
08:16 PM on 04/17/2012
If people want to grab a six pack and just go to the roof, then good for them, the world has too many people as it is. Dire warnings should continue to be broadcast when a tornado is eminent because that is the situation! People are stupid if they decide to disregard it just because the last time they got the warning nothing happened. All intelligent people know that tornadoes strike a given path, and not all places.

We should not forgo warnings for the sake of the stupid. People who live in tornado prone areas (and everyone really) should educate and understand the risks when bad storms arise. If they chose to act stupidly and not properly prepare, it is their fault, not the emergency broadcast.
04:55 PM on 04/17/2012
Just add 'Heed the warning at your own risk' so that the government doesn't get sued if people end up dying anyway. People have the right to ignore warnings and no matter how many labels and warning stickers you put on something, people will still die.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bmattix
03:39 PM on 04/17/2012
You also have to keep in mind that predicting where tornadoes will hit over a 3 state area is like trying to pinpoint where a dart will hit on a dartboard the size of three 2-car garages.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
missouriwatcher
military veteran, veteran teacher, father, grandpa
01:17 PM on 04/17/2012
If warnings like this had been issued early when Joplin was struck last year, many more lives might have been saved. But not everyone; entirely too many people seem disconnected to reality and ignore all warnings. For those of us who pay attention, these types of warnings might actually work.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
keep it solid
Have a great day :)
12:34 PM on 04/17/2012
"Hope for the best, prepare for the worst."
10:11 AM on 04/17/2012
At one point in the night, a confirmed tornado was on the ground within a fifty mile radius of my home on three sides, with the exception of East of us. Not to leave things on an odd note, a second one touched down to the west, so I am loving my NWS, and my weather radios, just fine, and am not going to get complacent, trust me....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
blurredmolly
Ipswich, Mass. 1641
08:52 AM on 04/17/2012
heed the warnings folks, even if nothing happens.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
missouriwatcher
military veteran, veteran teacher, father, grandpa
01:18 PM on 04/17/2012
Better safe than sorry. Right on!