iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Senate Seeks Ways To Save Ailing US Postal Service

Postal Service Cuts Senate

HOPE YEN   04/17/12 12:36 PM ET  AP

WASHINGTON — With big postal cuts looming, the Senate is deciding whether to stabilize the ailing U.S. Postal Service with a short-term cash infusion while delaying most decisions on closing post offices and ending Saturday mail delivery by requiring further review.

The mail agency, teetering on the brink of bankruptcy, says it needs to begin closing thousands of low-revenue post offices and mail processing centers this year as part of a billion-dollar cost-cutting effort to become profitable again by 2015. But local communities are fretting about the economic impact and tens of thousands of layoffs, drawing the concerns of lawmakers in an election year.

Late last year, Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe agreed to delay closings until May 15 so that Congress would have time to pass legislation to shore up the agency's finances.

The bill being debated on the Senate floor this week was recently modified to take into account the concerns of mostly rural states. For instance, it would:

_Cut in half the number of mail processing centers the Postal Services currently wants to close – from 252 to 125 – allowing more U.S. areas to maintain overnight first-class mail delivery for at least three more years. Currently there are roughly 500 mail processing centers.

_Slow if not stop many post office closings by forcing the agency to consider the special needs of rural communities and undergo additional layers of regulatory approval. For instance, the Postal Service might have to downsize rather than close facilities, or factor in whether rural residents might have poor Internet service or have to travel longer road distances should a post office close.

_Require the Postal Service to wait at least two years before it could reduce mail delivery to five days a week, a cut that is being urged by the Obama administration and that could save between $2 billion and $3 billion a year.

In the meantime, the Postal Service would get a cash infusion of roughly $11 billion, basically a refund of overpayments it made in previous years to a federal retirement fund; the agency could use the money to pay down debt and offer buyouts to 100,000 postal employees. It would be allowed to make smaller annual payments into a future retiree health benefits account, which currently amounts to more than $5 billion a year; get more flexibility to cut worker compensation benefits; and be required to establish a chief innovation officer to find new ways to bring in postal revenue.

Left out of the bill was a proposal to raise the price of a first-class postage stamp by 5 cents, to 50 cents, to help pay for the added cost of keeping low-performing post offices and mail processing centers open. Estimated to bring in $1 billion, the rate increase was omitted due to concerns that a price increase would be counterproductive by pushing more consumers to cheaper alternatives of delivery, such as the Internet.

The Senate measure "does not rule out some cutbacks in services or post offices, but it would require USPS to exhaust all other options beforehand and ensure that its decisions are based on sound planning," said Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., a bill co-sponsor.

"We believe this approach offers the best hope for stabilizing the Postal Service and putting it on solid footing long-term, without dramatic and perhaps self-defeating cutbacks in service," he said.

The Senate planned to debate the measure for the next several days. The House has yet to begin consideration of a different version of a postal bill, which seeks in part to create a national commission that would make major decisions on postal cuts.

The measure comes as the mail agency has been rocked by steadily declining mail volume as people and businesses switch to the Internet in place of letters and paper bills.

Already $12 billion in debt, the mail agency says it could run out of money for day-to-day operations as soon as this fall, forcing it to shut down some of its services. The mail agency forecasts a record $14.1 billion loss by the end of this year; without changes, it says annual losses will rise to over $21 billion by 2016.

At stake are more than 100,000 jobs, part of a postal cost-cutting plan to save some $6.5 billion a year by closing up to 252 mail-processing centers and 3,700 post offices. In a report released last week, federal auditors stressed that "dramatic changes" were needed to stem the Postal Service's mounting debt and that the agency's proposal to close mail processing centers was an important part of accomplishing that goal.

The report by the Government Accountability Office also noted the challenges of making postal cuts due to community opposition. Hundreds of postal employees in cities around the nation in recent weeks have rallied to draw attention to the proposed cuts and urge lawmakers to oppose them.

Donahoe has said communities on the final closure list will be notified in July.

"The Postal Service is at a crossroads. Our business model is broken," Donahoe recently told a House hearing. He has previously criticized the Senate measure as offering only a short-term revenue fix. "We have insufficient revenue to cover our costs ... If the Postal Service were a private company, we would be engaged in Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings."

The Postal Service, an independent agency of government, is subject to congressional control on major aspects of its operations.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — With big postal cuts looming, the Senate is deciding whether to stabilize the ailing U.S. Postal Service with a short-term cash infusion while delaying most decisions on closing pos...
WASHINGTON — With big postal cuts looming, the Senate is deciding whether to stabilize the ailing U.S. Postal Service with a short-term cash infusion while delaying most decisions on closing pos...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,191
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (28 total)
cavek1
The needs of the 99% outweigh the needs of the 1%.
12:30 PM on 04/23/2012
The USPS is in this mess because CONGRESS (specifically ISSA of Ca) insists the postal service must have the money to pay for all of their retirees for the next 75 years so any profit they could be making is going to that cause. DO YOU KNOW OF ANY BUSINESS THAT MUST FUND ITS RETIREES 75 YEARS INTO THE FUTURE?

For those who would compare Fed Ex or UPS to our postal service--remember this--Fed Ex or UPS do not deliver to or pick up from every house in the United States 6 days a week like our postal employees do. Do you really believe if ISSA of California manages to get rid of our excellent post office that mail will be delivered in the same way for the same price while putting literally hundreds of thousands of people out of work?
THIS IS ABOUT UNION BUSTING AND PRIVITIZATION.
All privitization is EVER about is reducing jobs, raising costs and delivering an inferior service. Think about it.
06:39 PM on 04/21/2012
wow it's amazing how so many people have no clue wants going on here are some facts
1) the post office stopped getting tax dollars in 1972
2) in 2007 congress passed a law making the post office to prefund retirement money for 75 years in a 10 year span 5.5 billion dollars a year
3) the post office isn't trying to get a bailout it wants the over payment it has paid to congress back
these are the facts everything else is media hype and people not knowing what they are talking about
photo
woodrow2012
"An Independent Man of True Grit"
01:10 AM on 04/24/2012
You are exactly right James.
03:27 AM on 04/21/2012
cut Saturday now
06:00 PM on 04/18/2012
I like the idea of the Postal System. Seems very democratic and a true value for citizens. I must say, it needs some vision. I can't imagine FedEx or UPS saying that if business is dropping, they need to slow delivery times and cut services. I could be wrong of course. Anyway, I hope we don't leave a bunch of people in more rural areas without reliable mail or some decent form of higher speed Internet access. I would hate for the United States to be just 3 large cities in the future. (NYC, L.A., Chicago)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddstan1120
02:16 PM on 04/18/2012
The only trouble with the Postal Service is the fact that is is run by the federal government.
If it was turned over to a private enterprise, it would be streamlined, deadhead employees would be gotten rid of, and service would go on, uninterrupted, and much more efficiently.
If one looks back at ANY endevour that the US government has had a hand in, it has become overbloated with stupid regulations, too many employees and beaurocrats, and ineptness, in general.
If you get the federal government out of an enterprise, it has some chance of successs.
03:50 PM on 04/18/2012
I couldn't have said it better ddstan1120...so true!
06:13 PM on 04/18/2012
You have been lied to. The media manipulation and misinformation has been so expertly done that virtually no one is aware of the true magnitude of what is going on. There is no financial crisis. The USPS has always made a profit. This is nothing more than two private companies pulling congressional strings to kill an agency for trillions of dollars in profits. Please take some time to discover the facts on this. Ask yourself , how can the private carriers compete, with a tax exempt, non profit, 230 plus year old institution, congressionally mandated for the benefit of all Americans, and outright owns, the largest shipping infrastructure on earth. The answer is , they can't. Consider what happened in Florida. The Post Office in Palm Beach was forced to close down. They sold the large building and land which was owned free and clear, for a fraction of it's worth. They moved the Postal operations to a strip mall where the rent is 10,000.00 a month. Why would Patrick Donahoe be complicit with such mismanagement? Why would the poison pill legislation of 2006 include raising Donahoe's pay from 140,000.00 to over 300,000.00? Do a search on the New Deal Post Offices and see how they are quietly dismantling the infrastructure. If they get away with this, the quality of life for all of us will decline. The price of shipping and postage will know no limits. The sanctity of federally protected mail will be gone forever.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:01 PM on 04/18/2012
My dad worked for the post office from the middle 50's to the middle 70's. He used to brag about only having to work half of the day and spent the other half hiding out at the bowling alley with all the other letter carriers. That is the culture at the postal service. They are stealing way over 70% through wages, vacations, paid holidays, health insurance and the big one, the welfare and pension plan. Fire all of them! They can't operate on 30% of the revenue. Use Fed-EX or UPS and we can get rid of all of them.
02:35 PM on 04/19/2012
Why would I spend $8-10 to send a letter via FedEx rather than 45 cents?
03:30 AM on 04/21/2012
i don't even own a stamp
12:28 PM on 04/18/2012
A lot of the things you used to have to go to the post office to do, you can now do another way. Buy stamps at the grocery store or on line. Send emails instead of letters. There are just a lot of services technology has enhanced, making going to the Post Office almost obsolete.
12:02 PM on 04/18/2012
Now if we can ...................say create a teleportation device..............Whoops NO CARS

Scarry part is most people are ill equiped to be taken apart and reassembled every few hours. My ex-wife falls apart over almost nothing...........Thats not for her..............
11:57 AM on 04/18/2012
Had a great idea......................How about we send mail electronically and do away with the post office except for carrier parcels.......................Ut oh................I think that is already happening.

Major reorganization is required...................Parcels cost say $12.50 each.............Guess UPS has that one covered...................Time to shrink the post office out of existence.
11:11 AM on 04/18/2012
Fed Ex and UPS are designed to make a profit. The Fed. post office is not. Many, many years ago there were no Fed eX and Ups and no competition for the post office. They came along and the Post office could not compete or did not come up with a plan to compete. Now, they are in trouble. I like one post. Sell the post office to Fed eX and Ups. We may not like what it will cost to mail a letter at that point but that will be going by the wayside very soon. Paying bills and getting billed online is getting more polular.
03:51 PM on 04/18/2012
Every Federally run operation is an economic disaster...why? Because there is no bottom line....when they need more money they just take it form us....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rikkkipug
10:51 AM on 04/18/2012
Post office is getting more obsolete thanks to technology, email, and other ways to communicate, junk mail, catalogs, credit card junk mail plus all the other trash mail they deliver is a waste of time and resources, the post office needs to be revamped from top to bottom, techno progress has run away and left this agency behind.
photo
woodrow2012
"An Independent Man of True Grit"
01:17 AM on 04/24/2012
Very true, except that "junk mail" generates billions $$ of revenue for the post office.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
canon940
Christ is the Answer
10:45 AM on 04/18/2012
What is it with American government agencies going bankrupt left and right and needing taxpayer money to cover their losses. I believe that it has something to do with the pay and benefits that their employees make. Liberals gave away the store in dealing with their unions.

This was not the case with Fannie Mae and Fredddy Mac, they just had Congressmen like Barney Frank pushing banks to make upside down loans to unqualified buyers. So, how does the Post Office lose so much money. You tell me, I have told you what I believe.

Solution, split it in half and sell each half to UPS and FedeX. These two companies come to my business much more that the USPS does, so they know where I am located. Both companies make use of newer technologies and are efficient. I haven't heard of either of them teetering on the brink of bankruptcy lately.
12:04 PM on 04/18/2012
Nothing to split up...............Let the business flow where it wants................It will any way.
05:31 PM on 04/18/2012
One more time: a member of ALEC pushed a bill through Congress that forces the Post Office to fund the retirements of people they haven't even hired yet, several years in advance. It had nothing to do with unions, or any of the other culprits that Conservatives like to blame. It was, in fact, the direct result of intervention by Conservatives themselves. It was a con job, and you, canon940, have been played for a fool. (This is not to say that you ARE a fool, only that the right-wing noise machine has TREATED you like one. You can prove that they're wrong by researching the issue, finding out the truth, and giving them the shellacking at the voting box that they deserve for shenanigans like this.) Your "solution" is exactly the kind of thing that they want you to do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
canon940
Christ is the Answer
09:17 PM on 04/18/2012
JD, I know all about the funding of the retirements, my brother-in-law is an official in our local postal region. It may not have as much to do with the unions, but believe me, he tells me all about it. Oh, does he tell me all about it.....Maybe you would be a little more up to date if you knew someone first hand in the USPS.

I find it interesting though that you referred to unions as "culprits". I know what is going on in this country so, your stab about my being played for a fool is way off. I didn't appreciate it either, even though you kind of apologized right after. You guys never miss a chance to do that, do you? Just like your leaders "never let a good crisis go to waste".

As far as ALEC is concerned, lobbying is legal in American politics the last time I looked.
photo
woodrow2012
"An Independent Man of True Grit"
01:23 AM on 04/24/2012
The PAEA of 2006 was voted unanimously by Congress and the Senate. In fact, it was co-sponsored by 1 Republican and 2 Democrats. Henry Waxman (D, Ca) was a big supporter of it. The TV pundits have run this into the ground, because it's an election year. Plenty of blame to go around; Bush and ALL the Democrats and Republicans who voted for it.
10:28 AM on 04/18/2012
Now for the last time, 65% of the business the Post Office does comes from Bulk Mail(magazines, newspaers) and Direct Mail(credit card offers, etc). The business is down all most 50%, which has a direct effect on the profits of the Post Office, and has been for the last five years. We are very lucky, go overseas and see what is cost to mail a letter. Just look at some of the rediclous posts about how Conservatives want to get the Post Ofice, what in the hey has a person political stand have to do with the Post Office, the volume is down, and since Bulk Mail and Direct Mail have reduced thier volume, the profits from those companies have directly effect the bottom line. And while we are on the subject, how much do you think the internet has effect those companies and the Post Office?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Voivode Vlad
If life gives you melons, you're probably dyslexic
09:35 AM on 04/18/2012
I see lots of conservatives on this story bashing the postal service over being slow and costly. Seems they want it privatized. Nevermind that it delivers over 170 times what FedEx does and over 600 times what UPS does in a day at a significantly lower cost. These conservatives would much rather pay $6 to $10 to deliver a letter by a private company than to pay the less than 50 cents they now pay as long as public union employees suffer.

What was that line again? Oh yeah: Stupid is as stupid does.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
canon940
Christ is the Answer
12:26 PM on 04/18/2012
FedeX and UPS deal mainly with packages and overnight mail delivery. If you want the same service from USPS, you pay through the nose. I don't know if you have checked USPS prices lately. Actually, sending small packages through the private companies costs less than the USPS, becaue USPS has a higher one-price -fits-all deal.

To split USPS in half and sell it to the two aforementioned companies would save the taxpayer much more than then they do currently providing billions of additional bailout dollars to the USPS each year.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Voivode Vlad
If life gives you melons, you're probably dyslexic
09:00 PM on 04/18/2012
Hate to burst your bubble, but the post office has NEVER been bailed out. EVER
10:59 PM on 04/20/2012
1)wrong first you dont have to use flat rate all the time
2)shipping a 1lb package from east coast to west by fedex $34.94 cheapest price
3)usps price $6.30
4) learn the truth
5) yes i work for the postal service
03:53 PM on 04/18/2012
Wrong...Post office is yet another government operation that turns into a money pit of inefficiency...why...no bottom line....spend, spend, spend, days off, benefits, free health care, pensions......then ooopppppsss we are broke again...oh well, lets just take it from the tax payers again....government sucks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Voivode Vlad
If life gives you melons, you're probably dyslexic
09:01 PM on 04/18/2012
the post office has NEVER BEEN BAILED OUT!
11:00 PM on 04/20/2012
for the last time the post office receives NO TAX DOLLARS
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plfarrar
09:33 AM on 04/18/2012
I wish them luck. I seldom use the USPS any more, but would hate to see it go alltogether,even if it is mostly obsolete. .