iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

EPA Fracking Rules On Emissions To Be Finalized

Reuters  |  Posted: 04/18/2012 11:23 am Updated: 04/19/2012 12:50 am


WASHINGTON, April 18 (Reuters) - U.S. environment regulators are expected to finalize long-delayed rules Wednesday that aim to slash smog-forming emissions from hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, at oil and natural gas wells.

The Environmental Protection Agency is under court order to finalize the rules that have been delayed four times since September. It said Wednesday it will hold a press conference call at 1 p.m. EDT (1700 GMT) to discuss an announcement on clean air.

The Obama administration is attempting to balance its support for an industry that could help the United States become a major exporter of natural gas with how to address concerns about its safety.

Environmentalists and health groups have complained that fracking operations near schools and homes can harm air and water supplies.

A draft rule the agency issued last July sought to cut emissions of so-called volatile organic compounds that contribute to smog by nearly 25 percent across the oil and gas industry and by 95 percent from wells using the controversial technique of fracking.

The standards have caused a dispute among environmentalists, who say equipment that could be added to drilling rigs would only add minor costs to drilling, and energy companies who say the costs are much higher and the equipment is not yet fully available.

The American Petroleum Institute, an industry group, has said the equipment to capture emissions in the first few days after fracking is completed could cost about $180,000 per well.

Environmentalists say the number is much less. In addition, some methane is also captured by the so-called green completion systems that could be sold to help pay for the equipment, even with natural gas at very low prices, they said.

Companies including Chesapeake Energy and Exxon Mobil could be forced by the rules to invest in pollution control technologies.

The EPA said in July the standards would rely on existing technologies to cut emissions that can also cause cancer, while supporting the expansion of oil and gas production.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW GREEN

WASHINGTON, April 18 (Reuters) - U.S. environment regulators are expected to finalize long-delayed rules Wednesday that aim to slash smog-forming emissions from hydraulic fracturing, or fracking,...
WASHINGTON, April 18 (Reuters) - U.S. environment regulators are expected to finalize long-delayed rules Wednesday that aim to slash smog-forming emissions from hydraulic fracturing, or fracking,...
Filed by James Gerken  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:57 PM on 04/19/2012
Another nail in the fractivist coffin. Obama's EPA comes out with rules so friendly even the Wall Street Journal endorses them!

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303513404577353892948803190.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
02:13 PM on 04/18/2012
its so destructive! It needs to be regulated until safe and as clean as possible. This push for nonrenewable energy is getting pathetic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
powder chowder
☮ Peace: the final frontier...
01:51 PM on 04/18/2012
fracking unbelievable. exporting natural gas probably doesn't employ many people and really benefits only a few rich people while destroying our water and air.
photo
julieintx
End the Hollywood tax cuts
03:37 PM on 04/18/2012
Thousands of well paying blue collar and white collar jobs. It employs far more people than "green" energy does, and middle class people are cashing in jobs and gas leases.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
powder chowder
☮ Peace: the final frontier...
05:01 PM on 04/30/2012
I think you missed my point.
12:49 PM on 04/18/2012
The only rule will be there are no rules...
Mike Block
Mikeology (mycology)- the study of Fun Guy (fungi)
12:43 PM on 04/18/2012
The best rule: Don't fracking do it! I'd rather pay a few cents more for my natural gas bill - which is already the cheapest bill I have - than suffer through the dogmatic hypocrisy that is the fracking debate. Tapwater that lights on fire should be enough to convince you that this is a bad idea.

PLEASE people, let's end this debate, stop it completely, and have a nice glass of water.
02:14 PM on 04/18/2012
I would too!
photo
julieintx
End the Hollywood tax cuts
03:39 PM on 04/18/2012
Oops--you cited the tap water on fire myth. Only in the movies is that caused by fracking.
Mike Block
Mikeology (mycology)- the study of Fun Guy (fungi)
04:06 PM on 04/18/2012
...And in studies by Duke University and in NYS Assembly bill #A7013 and in the National Academy of Sciences and in the Tyndall Center for the Cooperative in the U.K. and according to the National Association of Certified Home Inspectors. Yeah, sorry. OOPS!

What was I thinking. I should do more research. It's not like I was looking to buy real estate in upstate NY or anything. Oh wait! I was. That's why I read about the drinking water in the area that I was looking to move to.

Sorry, but the emoticon " : P " just doesn't sum up how I feel.

Seriously, charge me more and frack up the planet less.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vegasyankee
Making Energy for a Strong America!
12:21 PM on 04/18/2012
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency rules for gas drilling will delay a requirement to capture air pollution at the well until 2015, Howard Feldman, research director of the American Petroleum Institute, said.