iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

House Passes Transportation Extension Bill Including Keystone XL Pipeline Provision

Transportation Bill Keystone Xl

JOAN LOWY   04/18/12 05:51 PM ET  AP

WASHINGTON — The House on Wednesday approved a Republican bill aimed at keeping alive prospects for enacting an overhaul of federal transportation programs and continuing the flow of highway and transit aid to states.

The bill would also allow the Keystone XL pipeline to proceed. The pipeline, which would transport oil produced from Canadian tar sands to Port Arthur, Texas, was previously blocked by President Barack Obama. The White House has threatened to veto the GOP bill, which it says bypasses longstanding practices for the approval of cross-border pipelines. The veto statement noted that a final pipeline route has yet to be decided.

The bill, passed by a 293 to 127 vote, technically extends the government's authority to spend money from the federal Highway Trust Fund through Sept. 30. That authority now is due to expire on June 30. But the real intent of the measure is to provide a parliamentary rationale for formal negotiations with the Senate on a more comprehensive transportation plan. Both parties have made passage of a transportation bill their top job-creation priority for the year.

House Republican leaders decided on the strategy after repeatedly trying and failing to garner enough votes to pass their own, long-term transportation plan. That effort ran into opposition from tea-party conservatives, who say transportation programs should be paid for entirely by user fees such as federal gas and diesel taxes, even though revenue from those taxes isn't enough to cover current transportation spending. Conservatives also would like to see the federal role in transportation dramatically reduced, with states picking up those responsibilities. However, moderate Republicans from suburban districts don't want transportation spending cut and complained about the bill's treatment of transit programs.

Democrats have solidly opposed the GOP transportation plan, saying it undermines environmental protections, penalizes union workers and doesn't spend enough money to meet highway and transit construction needs. Instead, Democrats have unsuccessfully pressed House Republicans to bring up a bipartisan, $109 billion transportation bill passed by the Senate earlier this year.

Lawmakers in both parties said the Senate bill would likely pass the House, but possibly with more Democratic than Republican votes, an awkward prospect for House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio. That gave rise to the House GOP's newest tactic – trying to trigger a formal legislative conference with the Senate without actually having passed their own long-term legislation.

But there is concern in Republican ranks that by using what is effectively a shell bill, the Senate will have the advantage in negotiations on a broad array of transportation policies.

"Are we going to support the Senate bill? Absolutely not," Rep. Bill Johnson, R-Ohio, said at a conservative gathering the day before the House vote.

The Senate is unlikely to go along with a final bill that requires approval of the Keystone XL pipeline, but Republicans said it was appropriate to tie to transportation programs a project they believe will increase the amount of oil available to the U.S. market and lower gas prices.

"If anyone has not felt the pain at the pump, all they have to do is go to a local gas station," Rep. John Mica, R-Fla., chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, said. "This pipeline has been studied to death."

But Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., called the pipeline a scheme to export oil to China that will do little or nothing to lower gas prices in the U.S. He said most of the oil that arrives in Port Arthur winds up being exported.

"That oil is American oil," Markey said. "It should stay in the United States."

Sixty-nine Democrats joined Republicans in supporting the extension, partly in the hope of keeping prospects for a long-term transportation plan alive.

"A long-term bill will provide the certainty that states need to invest and proceed with their plans long on the books," said Rep. Nick Rahall, D-W.Va., the senior Democrat on the transportation committee. "It will provide the certainty that highway and transit contractors desperately need to give them the confidence to hire that one more worker."

___

Associated Press writer Alan Fram contributed to this report.

___

Follow Joan Lowy at http://www.twitter.com/AP_Joan_Lowy

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The House on Wednesday approved a Republican bill aimed at keeping alive prospects for enacting an overhaul of federal transportation programs and continuing the flow of highway and...
WASHINGTON — The House on Wednesday approved a Republican bill aimed at keeping alive prospects for enacting an overhaul of federal transportation programs and continuing the flow of highway and...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 150
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
02:12 PM on 04/20/2012
Hey Greenies, Keystone will be built - deal with it :)

http://www.cnbc.com/id/47115420
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
I'd Love To Change The World..
05:26 AM on 04/22/2012
Can you read?
07:48 AM on 04/23/2012
Yep and It will be built this year
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
09:25 AM on 04/20/2012
"Democrats have solidly opposed the GOP transportation plan, saying it undermines environmental protections, penalizes union workers and doesn't spend enough money to meet highway and transit construction needs."

Meanwhile, when Canada wants to pay for American infrastructure, the Democrats block it. Makes sense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
I'd Love To Change The World..
05:28 AM on 04/22/2012
Canada isn't paying for anything. It will raise the price of gas in the US. Stop lying.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
03:02 PM on 04/22/2012
The State Department clearly disagrees with you.

http://keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/documents/organization/181184.pdf

"TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP (Keystone) filed an application in 2008 for a Presidential Permit with the Department of State to build and operate the Keystone XL Project. ... The proposed project could transport up to 830,000 barrels per day and is estimated to cost $7 billion."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
09:48 PM on 04/22/2012
“We are paying; at the "pump". Canadians are not paying for anything.”

TransCanada, a Canadian company, is paying for the infrastructure (i.e., the pipeline). That is what the $7B is for.

http://keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/documents/organization/181184.pdf
07:02 AM on 04/25/2012
Is this the same plan that 69 Democrats cast solid votes FOR? Including the Keystone XL provision? Starting to wobble guys?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
09:15 AM on 04/25/2012
Yeah, 113 Noes on a transportation bill is fairly solid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
09:24 AM on 04/20/2012
"The White House has threatened to veto the GOP bill, which it says bypasses longstanding practices for the approval of cross-border pipelines."

Right, we are waiting for approval from the Executive. He's creating his own argument.
09:22 AM on 04/20/2012
OK so you want a user paid transportation system. GREAT - with the CAFE standards reducing taxes for users over time, we could balance that with transitional user fee increases to balance the budget. Two to three cents per gallon per year will do it and it can be imbalanced to urban (3 cents) to rural (1 cent) if you fret about rural/urban issues. Want more state control - fine - take the increase and let states dictate the allocation to modes on the federal system - they do it anyway and short cut the cost of shipping $$$ to the DC sausage feed - consolidate the US DOT (10% trimming) - call it good. GET ON WITH something and cut out the non-sense amendments and backward thinking. Time to move forward.
12:32 AM on 04/20/2012
I was just saying yesterday, I wonder how long before the GOP torpedoes the new XLPipeline permit application by trying to short cut the permit process. And here they are doing it. I don't think they want the pipeline to get approved because it makes such a good talking point.
02:15 PM on 04/20/2012
They will make the Democrats vote again and again on this issue. Many Democrats are facing tremendous pressure from voters and construction unions (the ones that are actually legitimate as opposed to government and teacher ones) back home. My senator Casey, has said he will vote for the Keystone and he is not alone in the Dem caucus. Lets see Obama try to veto it for his liberal friends in California, only to see 20 house members and 10 senators fall because of it. I love the republicans - Brilliant!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
I'd Love To Change The World..
05:29 AM on 04/22/2012
Republicans are going down in Nov.
photo
JudMiller
Truth Telling is All I Know
10:50 PM on 04/19/2012
Looks like they are a vote or two shy of passing this in the Senate. I dare you to Veto it you skinny boy...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
I'd Love To Change The World..
05:30 AM on 04/22/2012
Watch
07:07 AM on 04/25/2012
If he does veto this bill, it'll be delayed not gone. Let him play the bad cop while his Dem buddies can point to the bill and say, see I voted for it. It's not going to help Obama in November. And those Dems are going to stay as far away from his very shrinking coat-tails.
02:05 PM on 04/19/2012
Will someone please tell these guys that US oil production has increased greatly under Obama, and it has not magically decreased the price of oil? Until the oil speculators that have no direct interest in oil are forced out, the price of oil will remain artificially high.
photo
JudMiller
Truth Telling is All I Know
10:49 PM on 04/19/2012
Production has increased on private land despite our anit-energy pres. It has decreased on public lands.
02:17 PM on 04/20/2012
Yes and as someone who works in the industry, I will tell you policy trails production by up to a decade. Most of the gains we see know are because of Mr. Clinton's policies. Obama's policies will hurt the future.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmanuel kalu
information is knowledge, knowledge in power
12:31 PM on 04/19/2012
here comes the terrorist again, taking hostage of a transportation bill that is really needed to advance their huge give away to oil companies. a few months ago, dems put forward a bill that required a good portion of the oil from the pipeline would stay in the country for domestic use and sale. what did the republicans do, the voted against that. that clearly show the public that this pipeline is a pure skim to give big oil more giveaway. if this oil is truly for domestic use, then make a law that says a portion of it has to be sold in this country and use for domestic usage. also it should be open for taxation instead of going to a duty free port. republicans have completely replace common sense capitalism, with pure greed. i really hope the dems begin to call this out, i hope that dems deny them this huge give away. if they the republicans want this oil, they would either have to agreed to using most of it for domestic use, agree to have it taxes and for the oil and gas companies to give up their tax subs to use to fund any spill. they also have to agree to use only america union labor and american material made and produce by small national companies not multinational.
02:20 PM on 04/20/2012
Oil is an international commodity so it doesn't matter where the oil is from or where it ends up, the price is set by GLOBAL supply and demand. The dems bill was just a small jingoistic and xenophobic stunt
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
commentary42
12:24 PM on 04/19/2012
The GOP is not listening!! Pass the flipping JOBS bill and quit playing around with poison pills you KNOW will get voted down in the Senate.
07:11 AM on 04/25/2012
So why do you think that 69 Democrats in the House voted for the bill? Just curious. Couldn't be politics or anything right? Before they are above that sort of thing. Uh-huh.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seven Teenatheart
Tolerance, peace, and sanity. Be your own person.
12:05 PM on 04/19/2012
A short list of information on Keystone XL.
http://17atheart.wordpress.com/2012/04/19/keystone-xl/

This would not affect US fuel prices at all. It doesn't belong to the US.
It doesn't bring jobs.
Transcanada has an awful record thus far.

We would assume all risks, and minimal (if any) benefit.
02:22 PM on 04/20/2012
Oh, thanks for including that cheap blog - yes blog - as your proof for your position. You know I believe men can have babies. that's right, I wrote it on my blog so it must be truth! You are dumb!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seven Teenatheart
Tolerance, peace, and sanity. Be your own person.
02:34 PM on 04/20/2012
If you don't like something, you call it cheap?

Interesting. That speaks volumes for your ethical capacity.
photo
Gestas
Mountain Man
12:01 PM on 04/19/2012
I like the Picture...The White House with nobody in front of it...Must be the the Herman Cain Event.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HST
Conservatism = selfishness
11:38 AM on 04/19/2012
"House Republican leaders decided on the strategy after repeatedly trying and failing to garner enough votes to pass their own, long-term transportation plan"

"Lawmakers in both parties said the Senate bill would likely pass the House, but possibly with more Democratic than Republican votes, an awkward prospect for House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio. That gave rise to the House GOP's newest tactic – trying to trigger a formal legislative conference with the Senate without actually having passed their own long-term legislation."

Republicans can't agree on their own transportation bill they just know they want to make sure the terrible idea that is the Keystone pipeline is forced in there somewhere.

Maybe house repubs should go back to doing what they do best-passing laws limiting a woman's right to contreception, trying to defund planned parenthood and making sure all money has "in God we trust" written on it.


"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:25 AM on 04/19/2012
Yet again do the repubs kneel to their corporate masters! This pipeline will do NOTHING to the price of oil and it DOES NOT go to the U.S., it goes on the world market and won't lower the price of gas by 1 penny! The repubs lie! Don't fall for this republican BS!!! If you want to see how much worse a tar sands spill is, look up Enbridge tar sand spill in Michigan! Two years later and they are still trying to clean it up! You think the gulf was bad, you have NO IDEA!
10:48 AM on 04/19/2012
The House seems to be peopled by idiots on both sides of the aisle. If our current Congress doesn't tell us that we need to improve our educational system, nothing will.
10:38 AM on 04/19/2012
How is it that one statement says: "That oil is American oil," Markey said. "It should stay in the United States."
Still another statement that claims: "The pipeline, which would transport oil produced from Canadian tar sands".

So the oil company is paying Canada for the tar sands?
Taking the oil from the sand in Canada?
Needs to find a way to get all that oil from Canada to Texas to export out of the country, and wants the American Taxpayer to pay for the pipeline that connects them?
Again the oil game of .... They profit, we pay so they can profit again when they export it out of the country.

I see how its works. I say no...if all Texas is gonna do is export it out of the country....let them take their oil processed in Canada, truck it (create jobs if they have to) to Texas so they can haul it off to some country. And we the taxpayer won't have to spend a dime on oil they send out of the country.

And while trucking it let the oil company pay for the continued repair of the roads they use. And then again we the taxpayer won't have to pay for the oil found in Canada, processed in Canada, claimed American, and sent out of the country.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kathy smelser
11:32 AM on 04/19/2012
agree finally a voice of reason
02:26 PM on 04/20/2012
No it is not. It is someone who has no understanding of the industry what so ever! It is like my auto mechanic giving me medical advice. The reason gas is high now is gas is based on Brent oil - a more expensive grade of oil. Our oil WTI sells for a lower amount. So by adding this oil into the international market, more refiners can use the lower WTI oil to make gas , thus lowering worldwide process. This 'to ship it overseas' is ridiculous because oil is an international commodity and the only way we can effect oil prices is by adding ours to the international market. So by shipping it out, we actually lower domestic gas prices.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmanuel kalu
information is knowledge, knowledge in power
12:59 PM on 04/19/2012
totally agreed. what the republicans are pushing for, is to build this pipeline quickly, so the oil companies can take advantage of this high prices. the question i seriously continue to ask is this. why doesn't canada pipe this oil to either of their coast. Then they can ship to where ever they want.
07:28 PM on 04/19/2012
like Markey said...its American oil, it just happened to be in Canada.....HAHAHA like were stupid and can't figure this out.

So how much taxpayer money did Texas promise Canada for the sand oil? hummmm it could happen.
12:28 AM on 04/20/2012
They have plans for a West coast oil port, but don't want to proceed with it because of the harsh environmental impacts.