iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Hunting Bill Ensuring Continued Use Of Lead Ammunition, More Access To Public Lands Passes House

By JIM ABRAMS 04/17/12 07:34 PM ET AP

Hunting Bil

WASHINGTON — A hunting bill passed by the House on Tuesday makes it harder to restrict hunting and fishing on public lands and ensures that the hunter's arsenal will continue to include lead bullets.

The legislation, which passed 274-146, also allows those who have legally hunted polar bears in Canada to bring their trophies home.

Republican sponsors said the bill, which faces an uncertain future in the Senate, protects sportsmen from bureaucratic restrictions. Democratic opponents said it was unneeded because 85 percent of federal land is open to hunting and called it a sop to the gun lobby.

The measure requires federal land managers to support hunting and fishing on Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management land. The BLM can only close public lands to recreational shooting for specific reasons such as national security and fire safety. It must also submit a report to Congress detailing the location and evidence justifying any closure.

The lead issue refers to efforts by environmentalists to ban the use of lead in ammunition and fishing tackle. They say lead poisoning kills 10 million to 20 million birds and other animals every year and that hunters who eat what they hunt have also been shown to have higher levels of lead in their bloodstreams.

The Environmental Protection Agency, in 2010 and again this year, rejected petitions from conservation and some hunting groups to ban lead bullets, shotgun pellets and fishing tackle under the Toxic Substances Control Act, saying the issue was not within the agency's jurisdiction.

The House bill would give legal backing to that position, by clearly limiting the EPA's authority under the Toxic Substances Control Act. It amends that act to allow for the sales of traditional ammunition and fishing tackle.

Congress in 1976 banned the EPA from regulating ammunition, but anti-lead groups have argued that that ban does not prohibit the agency from regulating the components of ammunition.

Bill Snape, senior counsel for the Center for Biological Diversity, one of the petitioners, said there are many commercially available alternatives to lead ammunition. "No one wants to take away hunting by those who hunt by the rules," he said. "What we are trying to do is stop hunting with ammunition that harms everything in sight."

The American Bird Conservancy, which did not participate in the most recent petition, said 3,000 tons of lead are shot into the environment by hunting every year, 4,000 tons are lost in ponds and streams and 80,000 tons released at shooting ranges. At least 75 wild bird species are poisoned by spent lead ammunition, including bald eagles and endangered California condors, it said.

Rep. Jeff Miller, R-Fla., a main sponsor of the bill, countered that "with very limited exceptions, there is simply no sound evidence that the use of traditional ammunition is causing harm to wildlife or their population." He added that, according to the Centers for Disease Control, "there has never, never been a case where lead poisoning has been traced to wild game meat."

The polar bear provision allows the import of a limited number of hunting trophies legally taken in Canada. Trophy hunting of polar bears has been banned in Alaska since 1972, but Canada does permit some restricted hunting of the bear. The bill addresses past import disputes and does not open the door to unlimited future imports.

Lawmakers also approved an amendment by Rep. Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., to limit the president's authority to set aside historic and culturally important federal lands under the 1906 Antiquities Act. Critics say presidents have usurped legislative rights in using the act, and Foxx's amendment would require that state legislatures and governors approve such designations.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — A hunting bill passed by the House on Tuesday makes it harder to restrict hunting and fishing on public lands and ensures that the hunter's arsenal will continue to include lead bul...
WASHINGTON — A hunting bill passed by the House on Tuesday makes it harder to restrict hunting and fishing on public lands and ensures that the hunter's arsenal will continue to include lead bul...
Filed by Nick Wing  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 266
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
12:43 PM on 05/09/2012
Waterfowl shoed the only real need for this and it is the law. Oppose any further attempt to ban or limit hunter access or ammo or firearms. .They are but trojan horses that chip away at our hunting rights and OUR 2nd Amendment INDIVIDUAL RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS.
THREE CHEERS FOR CONGRESS FOR THIS ACTION
12:36 PM on 05/09/2012
hrt
12:34 PM on 05/09/2012
Three cheers to Congress for stopping the erosion of our hunting rights. This lead bullet angle is just another attempt to ban or delete a portion of our 2nd Amendment Rights. Do not be fooled hunters . This is another trojan horse from those who would ban every gun and cartrige you own or might want to own.,
Any substitute for lead is 2 to 4 times more expensive and aside from waterfowl there is no legitimate reason to even consider such a ban.
It is their favorite tact - divide and conquer -any little piece of our freedom they can increase the cost of or delegitimize is a victory to them. Any access to hunting land they can limit is a win for them that oppose hunting in any form.
Do not be fooled by their platitudes and "consern" for the envoirment. They do not waiver from their real goal to Ban all guns and stop all hunting.
This is a wolf in sheeps clothing. I urge you to oppose these kinds of initiatives banning , bullets, hunter access,or firearms, in any form , from any quarter, for any reason.
04:47 PM on 04/19/2012
As a hunter, I also support banning lead shot and bullets...providing the cost is in line with lead and the density/weight of the shot provides for the ethical dispatch of the game.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:16 PM on 04/19/2012
I am not opposed to the eating of meat or the hunting of food, but I think it is common sense to get rid of lead bullets for most hunting.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snewell
01:52 PM on 04/19/2012
I AM A HUNTER (NON SPORT) AND I SUPPORT BANNING LEAD AMMO
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snewell
01:51 PM on 04/19/2012
IT IS THE STRATEGY OF CORPORATE AMERICA TO RENDER THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH TOTALLY USELESS. THIS IS BECAUSE THE LEGISLATIVE IS THE MOST DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTION IN GOVERNMENT.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Berettasskeeter
For what we are about to receive, may we be truly
03:31 PM on 04/19/2012
So, you support the Legislature in this effort then?!
Semper fi
11:45 AM on 04/19/2012
Another jobs bill?
photo
Welease Wodewick
What's her name? Virginia Plain!
11:30 AM on 04/19/2012
Is there anything - ANYTHING at all, for which Republicans/Wingers, have respect?

They really do seem determined to destroy every wild creature - destroy habitats - pollute land, and poison water systems.

How ANY of these people can claim to be 'Pro Life', is beyond me.

If the Democrats let this legislation pass the Senate, and/or if President Obama does not veto it, they should hang all their heads in shame.

VP
11:21 AM on 04/19/2012
Rep. Jeff Miller, R-Fla., a main sponsor of the bill, countered that "with very limited exceptions, there is simply no sound evidence that the use of traditional ammunition is causing harm to wildlife or their population."

Here in California scientists found plenty of sound evidence the ingesting of lead ammunition was killing the wild condors in the state.
11:11 AM on 04/19/2012
What is the point of polar bear hunting and using lead bullets? What good does this do anybody? It's shameful that this kind of bill passes through the house in 2012.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kirby Smith
11:11 AM on 04/19/2012
I understand hunting for food, I will never understand hunting for sport, especially hunting an animal that's not doing very well.
11:08 AM on 04/19/2012
The GOP backrooms must be all atwitter as they try to concoct the most egregious, inhumane, irrelevant nonsense immaginable . Folks, we REALLY have to vote these people out.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:18 PM on 05/11/2012
Amen!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hannibal55
Misrey luvs company but company doesn't reciprocat
10:37 AM on 04/19/2012
Only a rich, greedy, Republican would turn his back on a struggling species that is vital to the health of the entire Arctic ecosystem like the polar bear, in order to cozy up with the gun nuts and the Great White Hunter!

Killing a beautiful animal like the polar bear is disgusting. To do so to prove ones self as to his manliness is an act of cowardice!
10:34 AM on 04/19/2012
Americans worry about foreign terrorists yet choose to install domestic terrorists in their government with full knowledge of how harmful they are to humanity. How did Americans become so insensitive towards life after birth and the futures of their children?