iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Federal Reserve: Volcker Rule Doesn't Kick In Until July 2014

Posted: 04/19/2012 4:09 pm Updated: 04/20/2012 8:31 am


* Fed clarifies 2-year compliance period for Volcker rule

* Fed has said may miss July deadline to finalize rule

* Delays made Wall Street uneasy about compliance date

* Critics have called Volcker rule proposal too complex

By Alexandra Alper

WASHINGTON, April 19 (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve on T hursday clarified that U.S. banks will have at least until July 21, 2014 to ease into the Volcker rule's trading and investing crackdown, as regulators sought to temper panic on Wall Street that the restrictions would be strictly enforced starting this summer.

The Fed also said it has the ability to extend the compliance period for the yet-to-be-finalized rule beyond that date if needed.

The Volcker rule, mandated by the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform law, bans banks from trading with their own funds and greatly limits their ability to invest in hedge and private equity funds. It seeks to limit risk-taking by banks that have government backstops like federal deposit insurance.

Regulators proposed a 300-page version of the rule in October, but have said they are unlikely to finalize it by the July 21, 2012, deadline.

Banks were given a 2-year "conformance period" under the law. But they have raised questions about how a phased implementation would work if regulators miss the July deadline.

They have warned there could be disruptions in markets because of a lack of clarity on how to comply with the crackdown.

Regulators sought to calm those fears on Thursday.

In its statement, the Fed said entities have "the full 2-year period provided by the statute to fully conform its activities and investments, unless the Board extends the conformance period."

The move was welcomed by the financial industry.

The guidance "is critically important because it alleviates concerns over potentially having to comply with a rule whose details had not yet been made clear," the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, a lobbying group, said in a statement.

But Republican Senator Bob Corker, who has expressed opposition to the rule, said the announcement itself is proof that the rule is "overly complex."

"While I am pleased that the regulators have recognized the need for this modest step, this flawed rule will need to be fixed by Congress so companies across our country will not have to incur higher costs of doing business," he said in a statement.

Some supporters of the crackdown have also asked regulators to proceed carefully.

Democratic Representative Barney Frank, who co-authored the law that bears his name, said last month that regulators should issue clear guidance on what they expect from banks in the period of time between the July deadline and when the final rule is released.

He also called the proposal "far too complex" and urged regulators to issue a simplified version of the Volcker rule by Sept. 3.

The Volcker rule is expected to have the most impact on Wall Street firms, including Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley , that have made significant profits betting with their own money.

Heralded by the some as a means to rein in the risk-taking that nearly toppled the financial system in 2007-2009, the Volcker rule has been excoriated by its critics, who warn it could take liquidity out of the market and make it hard for firms to raise capital.

FOLLOW BUSINESS

* Fed clarifies 2-year compliance period for Volcker rule * Fed has said may miss July deadline to finalize rule * Delays made Wall Street uneasy about compliance date ...
* Fed clarifies 2-year compliance period for Volcker rule * Fed has said may miss July deadline to finalize rule * Delays made Wall Street uneasy about compliance date ...
Filed by Reuters  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roosevelt Democrat
08:25 PM on 04/20/2012
Toss out the Volcker Rule!

Repeal both The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (IBBEA) & Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act!

The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (IBBEA) swept away all state barriers to interstate banking.

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), also referred to as the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, repealed part of Glass-Steagall, tearing down the walls between banking, insurance and investments.

We as a nation are in the position we are in because we have lost the values and principals of the Roosevelt Democrats who looked to aid Main Street not Wall Street.

A strong Main Street Means no Municipality budget deficits!

A strong Main Street Means no State budget deficits!

A Strong Main Street Means no Federal budget deficits!

And last but not least a Strong Main Street Means no Trade Deficit!

Is it not obvious that a Strong Wall Street means deficits as the 1% acquire all the money?”

Read more: The History of Bank Deregulation | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/about_5413083_history-bank-deregulation.html#ixzz1scZxFd9F
jokerdanny
my other bio is a macro
01:30 PM on 04/20/2012
2 years? what a bunch of whiny volckers
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
10:12 AM on 04/20/2012
The Federal Reserve aka Bank of England owned by the House of Rothchilds will squeeze every FIAT dollar they can with America paying these people 380 BILLION every year IN INTEREST, never anything o;n the principal
This groups motto TO SADDLE EVERY American with DEBT from CRADLE to GRAVE.
We have lost our freedom to the private banks that create money out of thin air and enslave the common man to a life of debt. If we are to be indebted let it be to our country and not the bankers.

"The States should be applied to, to transfer the right of issuing circulating paper to Congress exclusively, in perpetuum." Jefferson

" Bank of the United States... is one of the most deadly hostility existing, against the principles and form of our Constitution... An institution like this, penetrating by its branches every part of the Union, acting by command and in phalanx, may, in a critical moment, upset the government. I deem no government safe which is under the vassalage of any self-constituted authorities, or any other authority than that of the nation, or its regular functionaries. What an obstruction could not this bank of the United States, with all its branch banks, be in time of war! It might dictate to us the peace we should accept, or withdraw its aids. Ought we then to give further growth to an institution so powerful, so hostile?" --Jefferson
09:35 AM on 04/20/2012
Just bring back Glass-Steagall...word for word....it worked for 65 years....why was it ever replaced in the first place? Umm we know why don't we.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roosevelt Democrat
08:27 PM on 04/20/2012
The Volcker Rule 300 pages of Loopholes. It would make a Halliburton Lobbyist Proud if they wrote it!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank1946
Tell the Truth
08:56 AM on 04/20/2012
Thanks to Paul and DEMS for this one !

I am a Republican.

Bankers are not Investment Bankers ?