Lucas Kavner
GET UPDATES FROM Lucas:

Habima, Israeli Theater Company, Comes Under Scrutiny In London's Cultural Olympiad

Posted: 04/19/2012 8:12 am Updated: 04/19/2012 7:06 pm

Habima

When Shakespeare's Globe Theatre in London invited the prominent Israeli theater company Habima to perform at their nonpartisan "Globe to Globe" festival in advance of the 2012 Olympic Games, they likely weren't expecting such an intense backlash.

Tapped to present "The Merchant of Venice" at the bilingual festival, which also features 37 other productions of Shakespeare performed by companies around the world -- part of the UK's "Cultural Olympiad" -- Habima has recently come under scrutiny for some of its past performances in disputed West Bank settlements.

On March 29, a group of prominent writers, actors, and directors, including Emma Thompson, Mike Leigh, Mark Rylance, and other prominent members of the UK's artistic community, called attention to Habima's inclusion in the festival. They authored a letter, published in the Guardian and elsewhere, calling on the Globe to withdraw their invitation to the Israeli company.

The artists' objection to Habima, the letter states, stems from the Israeli company's past performances at "halls of culture" in "illegal Israeli settlements" along the disputed West Bank.

"The Globe says it wants to 'include' the Hebrew language in its festival – we have no problem with that," the letter stated. "But by inviting Habima, the Globe is associating itself with policies of exclusion practised by the Israeli state and endorsed by its national theatre company."

Many artists responded negatively to the letter, including the the Man Booker Prize-winning novelist Howard Jacobson, who authored a much cited piece in the Sunday Observer (not published online), lamenting the content of the letter as an affront to art in general.

"With last week's letter to the Guardian, McCarthyism came to Britain," he wrote. "You can hear the minds of people in whom we vest our sense of creative freedom snapping shut."

The Habima company has a long and storied history, dating back to its founding in Moscow in the early 1900s. Early incarnations of the company performed extensively in the Soviet Union and toured Western countries before becoming the national theater of Israel in 1958. Its main theater center is now located in Tel Aviv.

Habima's website states that the company's mission is to give "the Israeli public, from anywhere at any age, the opportunity to participate in theater - Jews and Arabs, secular and religious, young and old, from the central region to the periphery."

The company's artistic director Ilan Ronen was not available for comment, but he recently told the Guardian that he thought the letter was a "disgrace," and that a proposed boycott hinders "artistic dialogue" between European companies.

"We don't see ourselves as collaborators with the Israeli government over its West Bank policy," Ronen said. "We don't remember artists boycotting other artists."

Ronen noted that Habima is financially supported to perform all over the country, similar to other state-supported dance and theater companies. If the company didn't perform where it was asked to perform, Ronen said, it would be breaking the law. "We have to go, otherwise there is no financial support."

Out of 1,500 performances the company participates in every year, Ronen told the Guardian, only "four or five" were given in the disputed West Bank settlement. He added that company members who preferred not to perform in those productions were excused.

James Ivens, a theater artist and artistic director of the Flood Theatre in England, was one of the 37 signatories to the letter against Habima. Ivens said that Habima did not need to perform in the "occupied Palestinian territory" if the company chose not to do so. Other Israeli artists have refused paychecks and opportunities rather than perform in disputed settlements, he said, and it is "cant" for the company's artistic director to say that Habima "had no choice in the matter."

"That's absolutely spineless," he said. "The company accepting money from the government, if anything, is more damning. People find ways of funding theater otherwise. No amount of money is acceptable recompense."

Ivens said that he and others will continue fighting to boycott Habima, no matter how heated the dialogue becomes. "We're not about to let it drop," he said.

"The Globe's position is that if you boycott one company, then where would the boycotts stop? Would you boycott American companies because they launched a war in Iraq?" he noted. "But this [Habima] situation is different, being part of a company from a country whose government is complicit in these atrocities and becoming an instrument specifically of Israeli foreign policy."

The South Korean company Yohangza is also a part of the festival. One wonders what the international response would be to a North Korean theater company participating in the festival, if such a touring company existed. Despite disagreements with its home country's politics, would we be curious to see what kind of art they'd put out into the world?

Ivens suggested a comparison like that is false. "There is much more freedom in Israel than there is in North Korea," he said. "If North Koreans didn't participate they might be put in a prison camp. In Israel it's a different situation."

Ironically, "The Merchant of Venice," which Habima is set to perform at the festival, is considered by some to be anti-semitic. Writing in the Telegraph in 2008, Daniel Hannan suggested that the character of Shylock is "the most dangerous archetype of the malevolent Jew ever created."

"I feel awkward every time I watch the play, as many gentiles do," he wrote then. "I can only imagine how much more uneasy I would feel if I were Jewish."

Other notable performances at the festival include a production of "King Lear" from the Belarus Free Theatre -- an acclaimed underground company banned in its home country -- and a production of "A Comedy of Errors" from a troupe out of Kabul, Afghanistan. Another young company out of South Sudan wrote a 20-page pitch letter outlining how much Shakespeare meant to those involved in the Sudanese civil war. That company will present its version of "Cymbeline."

On May 4 and 5, the Palestinian Ashtar Theatre troupe will perform its "Richard II" in Arabic.

See the full schedule for the "Globe to Globe" festival here.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW CULTURE

When Shakespeare's Globe Theatre in London invited the prominent Israeli theater company Habima to perform at their nonpartisan "Globe to Globe" festival in advance of the 2012 Olympic Games, they lik...
When Shakespeare's Globe Theatre in London invited the prominent Israeli theater company Habima to perform at their nonpartisan "Globe to Globe" festival in advance of the 2012 Olympic Games, they lik...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,037
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
07:34 PM on 05/17/2012
Yes boycott Israel! Start with drip irrigation, developed in Israel. And heart stents. Don't want the Zionists meddling with your insides. And your computer. Many of the components were designed in Israel.

The number of medical and environmental scientific breakthroughs that have come from Israel far outpaces anything the Brits have given back to the world.

Oh, I'm sorry. I said something positive about Israel. I must be "against" a Palestinian state. Not. I'd love to have seen the Occupation end years ago. But this ain't the way.
photo
Geo80
Truth. Reality. Smart, sane people agree with me
02:57 PM on 05/12/2012
Pathetic, antisemitic hatemongers come up with every excuse they can to single Israel out and boycott Jews for stuff they would never, ever boycott anyone else on Earth over.

That's what this is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BigWillyG
08:41 PM on 05/01/2012
How does boycotting actors do anything to help get rid of settlements or help Palestinians?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Nwo2012
Sue me, I boycott products from the settlements
05:21 AM on 05/05/2012
Isolation of israel and its greedy, destructive and disgusting policies of occupation have been rejected by the entire world.

This is about sending a message to israel that the world simply wont accept it anymore. Change your policies or we'll isolate you further.
11:23 AM on 05/05/2012
If you read the story and the letter written by the members of the UK film and theatre community, you'd see that this is specifically about objections to the invitation to Habima in support of the Israeli-Jewish actors and actresses who refuse to perform at the illegal settlements. It isn't a boycott of actors.

Another Israeli theatre group that didn't perform at the illegal settlements would not have been objectionable.

How it helps is to highlight the fact that both the world community and prominent Israelis object strongly to the illegal West Bank settlements and it supports both morally and politically the significant percentage of Israelis who also object to them.

This isn't very different from the anti-war movement in the USA that eventually led to the USA pulling out of Vietnam.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BigWillyG
03:43 PM on 05/07/2012
But these are actors not politicians. As much as actors like to pretend they matter politically at the end of the day they're just entertainers and nobody actually cares about their politics. These actors played a gig they didn't make a political statement. If not for the stupid politicos dividing both sides they'd be playing gigs for Palestinians to.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Json
Cynical dreamer, sarcastic idealist...
11:43 AM on 05/17/2012
"Another Israeli theatre group that didn't perform at the illegal settlements would not have been objectionable."

Maybe, but I wouldn't bet heavily on it.
04:50 AM on 05/01/2012
ā€œThe below statement is from Jewish Israeli actors who refuse to perform at the West Bank settlements:

"...We will refuse to appear in Ariel and in any other settlement. We call upon the management to restrict their theatrical activity to the sovereign borders of the State of Israel....ā€

http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2010/08/27/israeli-actors-refuse-to-perform-in-settlements/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
JacksonJones
Absit iniuria verbis!
05:13 AM on 05/01/2012
Why are you re-posting a comment that was taken down below?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/WarrenCarey/habima-israel-theater-london-globe-to-globe_n_1435659_150742824.html

In any event, they are certainly entitled to their opinions. After all, Israel is a free country.
06:55 AM on 05/01/2012
Obviously a mistake. It is the subject of article this thread is all about.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
12:11 AM on 04/26/2012
Habima’s critics – including many eminent Jewish theatre professionals – simply point to the company’s enthusiastic agreement to perform in the illegal settlements, on Palestinian territory from which the Palestinians have been driven. Meanwhile, most Habima defenders don’t acknowledge the Palestinians’ interest in this matter at all. Even those asserting opposition to the occupation (David Edgar, Howard Brenton), are silent about the elephant in the room – that Habima’s settlement audiences are exclusively Jewish. No Palestinians can get within miles of a settlement theatre, much less buy tickets.

http://jfjfp.com/?p=29982
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
JacksonJones
Absit iniuria verbis!
02:26 AM on 04/26/2012
Should we boycott people who work with Hamas on account of them being terrorists?
03:47 AM on 04/26/2012
That's gibberish and a deflection.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trollstein
Once you go Schwartz, you never go back baby
04:16 PM on 04/25/2012
If a Jewish doctor-crew treated children in the so called "settlements" in W.B, are they thus "stained" and should be barred from treating children in London?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Nwo2012
Sue me, I boycott products from the settlements
07:41 AM on 04/26/2012
israeli children dont belong in the West Bank. It kis under israeli military occupation. israeli children belong in israel not Palestine.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trollstein
Once you go Schwartz, you never go back baby
08:55 AM on 04/26/2012
Aside from the fact that I disagree with your for reasons that we have debated in the past, you have not started to answer the question. My entire post was composed of one question only. [YES] or [NO]
Since international law favors the rights of human populations over territorial sovereigns, the Jewish inhabatants of WB could legally and legitimately declare their independance as a nation (same as Kosovo). There is no function within international law that could force them to leave. You have critically failed to play the chess board out a few more moves. Even if the Hebrews moved there unlawfully (which I do NOT concede) they are now living there and aren't going anywhere else without their own permission. Unless, as Israeli citizens, Israel forces them (not likely at all) or, if by some fluke of luck or nature, they become Palestinian citizens, the Palestinian Authority would still be VIOLATING international law by displacing them. Amazing how few of you guys have figured this out. Its essentially the same game that the Arab immigrants played against Jewish Mandated Palestine from 1920 to1947 (only in reverse). Payback is fair more often then it is pretty.
05:43 PM on 04/26/2012
This has nothing to do with anyone being Jewish.

The letter requesting that the invitation to Habima to perform at the festival was in support of the Jewish Israeli actors and directors who refused to perform at the illegal West Bank settlements and in objection to the settlements.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trollstein
Once you go Schwartz, you never go back baby
06:11 PM on 04/26/2012
OK. So take the one word out of my question. Now will you answer it?
If a doctor team from outside th WB (say they were Hindus) treated children of so called "settlers" in the WB, should they therefore be excluded from treating children in London?
Something tells me you are British? Can you confirm?
Something also tells me that you won't provide any direct answers. Perhapos its the same something.
07:18 PM on 04/24/2012
EU report calls for action against Israeli settlements
By Yolande Knell BBC News, Jerusalem

The European Commission is being urged to consider drafting legislation to ensure financial transactions by EU member states do not support Jewish settlements in East Jerusalem.

The proposal is made in a confidential report by top EU diplomats in the area.

The report says "the systematic increase in settlement activity" undermines a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-16612274
A Jew with a View
Act justly, love mercy, walk humbly
11:52 PM on 04/23/2012
For those that believe that the settlements are illegal and consider them Palestinian territories rather than disputed territories that need to be negotiated between Israel and the Palestinians, do you hold the same view for all areas controlled by Israel outside of what was originally partitioned for the Jewish state? If you differentiate, please explain the difference as you understand it. If not, then your issue is not just the WB settlements but a much larger issue and the WB settlements is being used just as a smoke screen for larger goal.

I thank you in advance for your responses.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:36 PM on 04/24/2012
The fact that Israeli settlements on Palestinian land is unanimous. Every country on the planet is in agreement that Israel has no legitimacy there.
04:37 PM on 04/24/2012
Explain how the ethnic cleansing of Jews from the WB and Gaza is legal? There are no Jews in both areas and many Muslims in Israel. Can you say two faced BS? I can.
07:08 PM on 04/24/2012
"United Nations Security Council Resolution 446 (1979)

"1. Determines that the policy and practices of Israel in establishing settlements in the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967 have no legal validity and constitute a serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East;..."ā€
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
JacksonJones
Absit iniuria verbis!
02:31 AM on 04/26/2012
As do the violent rejectionist policies of the Palestinian parties, but those don't seem to ruffle your feathers much.

Why is that? It's hard to take your concerns about the former seriusly when you appear to be unconcerned about the latter.
photo
Geo80
Truth. Reality. Smart, sane people agree with me
02:39 PM on 04/23/2012
One of the things I've learned in the internet: Jew-bashers and Israel-bashers are mouthy. Their gums flap relentlessly, as do their typing fingers. It's almost like they have a lot of free time in life. As if they have nothing else to focus on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sonic hedgehog
A true word needs no oath
04:44 PM on 04/23/2012
Look who is talking. It looks like you wrote more than 100 comments in the last 5 days and most of them are either attacking other comments or deflecting from the article or the thread at hand. You need to look at the mirror.
07:11 PM on 04/24/2012
This has nothing to do with "Jew-bashing". This about the illegal settlements in the West Bank. That's why there is a protest by prominent members of the UK film and theatre against Habima performing at the UK festival.

Your deflection is obvious.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
JacksonJones
Absit iniuria verbis!
02:50 AM on 04/26/2012
You attempt to limit the conversation to your narrow POV is obvious, and while the initial comment on the thread was far from topical, it does speak to the cynical avoidance of discussing any Palestinian/Arab responsibility for the current situation that you are engaged in and seeking to enforce on others.

I.e., settlements are certainly a valid topic of discussion, but if one is to discuss the merits of a boycott based thereon, it is certainly not something that one can credibly discuss without reference to, e.g., the Arab motives in the 67 war that resulted in Israel's control of the WB and the rejectionist Arab policies, like those expressed in the original PLO Charter, Khartoum Resolutions and the Hamas Charter, that have precluded the settlement of the conflict and concomitant withdrawal of Israeli control over the territories, not to mention the ethnic cleansing of Jewish communities by Arab parties in and following the 48 war in places on the WB like Gush Etzion.

Cheers
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trollstein
Once you go Schwartz, you never go back baby
11:13 AM on 04/23/2012
""illegal Israeli settlements" along the disputed West Bank."
If the territory is DISPUTED, then, the housing is NOT "illegal"
The statement is an oxymoron. Being thankful for small blessings however, they at least acknoledge the disputed nature of the territory.
11:42 AM on 04/23/2012
Israel is the only nation on the planet which calls the them "disputed". each and every other nation of organization calls them "occupied".
Each and every other nation also calls settlements "illegal".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gui Montag
Former Palestinian Supporter
12:15 PM on 04/23/2012
"Each and every other nation also calls settlements "illegal"."

America doesn't.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trollstein
Once you go Schwartz, you never go back baby
12:20 PM on 04/23/2012
I think that a small number do not refer to the disputed territories as "occupied". Others have flip~flopped over time, including the USA:
"Secretary of State Madeleine Albright told the U.N. Security Council: "We simply do not support the description of the territories occupied by Israel in 1967 as 'Occupied Palestinian Territory'."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_242
A slightly larger number of nations do NOT refer to the housing projects as "illegal". "On February 2, 1981, President Reagan stated that the settlements were ā€œnot illegalā€"
But assuming that your statement was factual (which I do NOT concede), the question of "legal" versus "illegal" is NOT a matter of popularity (even universal popularity), it is strictly a matter of law and law can ONLY be decided by a COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION. The United Nations can't substitute for a court, nor even can the Security Council. That is NOT the job of either. You know, this territorial dispute goes back 90+ years and guys like you think that a bumper~sticker can suffice as a judicial decision. Maybe you should review these links:
http://www.the-american-interest.com/article.cfm?piece=782 (This one outlines the legal issues, without producing any conclusion).
http://www.mideastoutpost.com/archives/misconceptions-regarding-israels-legal-foundation-under-international-lawhoward-grief.html (This one does draw conclusions)
http://daledamos.blogspot.com/2011/01/video-dr-jacques-gauthier-whose.html (see embedded video)
http://www.jcpa.org/jl/vp470.htm (Commentary)
02:28 PM on 04/23/2012
Maybe you're not aware of "United Nations Security Council Resolution 446 (1979)

".....Affirming once more that the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 12 August 1949 1/ is applicable to the Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem,

"1. Determines that the policy and practices of Israel in establishing settlements in the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967 have no legal validity and constitute a serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East;..."ā€
photo
tmm77625
The winner is the one who stops first
03:26 PM on 04/23/2012
Right up until Israel annexes the territories. Annexation of parts of the West Bank will doubtless be a feature of any actual peace deal with the Palestinians. Until that happens, 446 is just another impotent and meaningless pronouncement of the Useless Nations.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trollstein
Once you go Schwartz, you never go back baby
05:30 PM on 04/23/2012
Except for one incurable and seminal flaw: The United Nations is neither a legislative body or a court of competent jurisdiction over this border dispute. The UN Charter does NOT provide for the arbitrary creation or deletion of nations. It is really that simple but still beyond the grasp of the Israel-bashers. Did it never strike you as (minimally) odd that the various UN resolutions regarding Israel have changed in their content so frequently and so often? Originally, (UNGA 181) Jerusalem was proposed as an international city. From there, over the years, it became described as "Occupied Territory" and then "Occupied Palestinian Territory" . How in the world did that happen? The answer is: It does not matter. Because the UN has NO AUTHORITY to create, delete or modify sovereign national borders, period. Never did and still does not. The only thing it can pretend to do is RECOGNIZE borders that it PURPORTS to already exist. This is a very tricky problem because in reality, such actions of the UN are popularity contests. We do NOT live in a "one world government". Only a court of competent jurisdiction can issue a ruling of LAW. BTW: An under noticed LEGAL solution could be for the Israelis in the West Bank to declare their own independent nation. Since international LAW favors local inhabitants over territorial sovereigns, this would come as a rude awakening to the Arab leadership. And, it would be both legitimate and LEGAL.
A Jew with a View
Act justly, love mercy, walk humbly
08:40 AM on 04/23/2012
Also from Habima's web-siteThe Impossible Dream?ā€

Du-Drama Festival 2010

Habima National Theatre Hosts Peace Child Israel

July 5, 2010 17:30 * Arison Theatre, Tel Aviv

On a backdrop of racism and growing violence among youth , 100 Arab and Jewish actors from around the nation will be hosted by the Habima National Theatre at the Arison Theatre on July 5th for an evening of scenes from the plays they have been performing in schools all around the country for over 10,000 Arab and Jewish students since March.

The show includes scenes that are ā€œthe best ofā€ Peace Child Israel’s 22nd season and are performed by ā€œthe best ofā€ Arab and Jewish youth, who are looking for a better shared society for themselves and the future generations. An impossible dream? The actors in Peace Child Israel’s ā€œDu-Dramaā€ leadership program are dreamers. They go against the tide in a stubborn effort to keep channels open – despite the stigma and boos - between the Arab and Jewish communities in Israel and using the power of theatre to do it.

Sounds like the boycotters and thoses that would offer "boos" to such a progam have a lot in common. Intollerance.
A Jew with a View
Act justly, love mercy, walk humbly
08:36 AM on 04/23/2012
This is from Habima's web-site:

HaBima has performances throughout the country, giving the Israeli public, from anywhere at any age, the opportunity to participate in theater - Jews and Arabs, secular and religious, young and old, from the central region to the periphery.

With its continued look towards the future and its brand new home, The HaBima National Theater
Will expand and deepen its commitment to Israeli culture and the Hebrew language, continue to address social issues and promote and strengthen the dialogue between ALL Israelis.

Will perpetuate its role as a mirror for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and as an arena for DIALOGUE between Jews and Arabs, based on joint projects which will emphasize similarities rather than differences.

This is the type of oganization that should be boycotted? I don't think so.
05:23 AM on 04/26/2012
The protest relates to their performing at the illegal settlements and is in support of prominent Israelis in film and theatre who refuse to perform at the illegal settlements where Arabs have been displaced and can't even view Habima's performances.
Rosin the Bow
Palestine doesn't want peace. Meshaal said so
08:33 AM on 04/23/2012
Attacking one side isn't a "peacemaking action," it's just fighting on behalf of the other side. These boycotters cloak their hatred for Israel in the language of "human rights" and "justice".
02:31 PM on 04/23/2012
Do the Jewish Israeli actors and writers who refuse to perform at the illegal settlements hate Israel?

How about the 60% of the Israeli public that opposes the illegal settlements? Do they hate Israel?
Rosin the Bow
Palestine doesn't want peace. Meshaal said so
03:04 PM on 04/23/2012
"Do the Jewish Israeli actors and writers who refuse to perform at the illegal settlements hate Israel?"

They don't want to boycott Israel, just the settlements. Apples and oranges.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
humaneisfact
Filibuster and outsourcing reform NOW
11:33 PM on 04/22/2012
kudos for the letter.May there be justice and peace for both Palestine and Israel someday..