iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Sudan-South Sudan Conflict: Sudan Launches Border Attacks, Says Official

By MICHAEL ONYIEGO 04/19/12 05:23 PM ET AP

Sudan South Sudan Conflict
SPLA (South Sudan People's Liberation Army) vehicles drive on the road from Bentiu to Heglig, on April 17, 2012. (ADRIANE OHANESIAN/AFP/Getty Images)

JUBA, South Sudan — U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon urged Sudan and South Sudan on Thursday to step back from the brink of war and return to the negotiating table.

Ban called on South Sudan to immediately withdraw its forces from the oil-rich Heglig area, calling their invasion "an infringement on the sovereignty of Sudan and a clearly illegal act." He called on the government of Sudan to immediately stop shelling and bombing South Sudanese territory and withdraw its forces from disputed territories including Abyei.

The secretary-general said both countries "must stop supporting proxy forces against each other."

He spoke to reporters in New York Thursday as the Arab League announced it would hold an emergency meeting over the increasing violence between the two countries.

On the ground, the south reported new skirmishes and Sudan's President Omar al-Bashir increased his threats of war toward the south.

Al-Bashir said the recent violence has "revived the spirit of jihad" in Sudan. South Sudan said it had repulsed four attacks from Sudan over a 24-hour period as fighting on the border showed no signs of slowing.

"This is not the time for war," the U.N. secretary-general told reporters at U.N. headquarters in New York. "This is a time for leadership, for engagement, for negotiation – in the name of humanity, and in the interests of the people of both countries and the region."

"The last thing the people of these two countries need is another war – a war that could claim countless lives, destroy hope and ruin the prospects of peace and stability and prosperity of all Sudanese people," Ban said.

Acting on a request by Sudan, the Arab League scheduled an emergency meeting of foreign ministers in Cairo next week to discuss the violence, Deputy Arab League Secretary-General Ahmed bin Helli said. The league earlier called on South Sudan to withdraw from the Heglig area that southern troops invaded and took over last week.

Despite the threats from Sudan, a southern government spokesman said South Sudan was only defending its territory and considers Sudan a "friendly nation."

South Sudan military spokesman Col. Philip Aguer said three of the attacks were on Wednesday and one was on Thursday. He did not give a death toll.

South Sudan broke away from Sudan last year after a self-determination vote for independence. That vote was guaranteed in a mediated end to decades of civil war between the two sides. But the sides never fully agreed where their shared border lay, nor did they reach agreement on how to share oil wealth that is pumped from the border region.

Instead, the two countries have seen a sharp increase in violence in recent weeks, especially around the oil-producing town of Heglig. Both sides claim Heglig as their own. It lies in a region where the border was never clearly defined.

Aguer said southern troops repulsed one attack by Sudanese troops near Heglig on Wednesday and two attacks in Northern Bahr el Ghazal state. One was repulsed in Western Bahr el Ghazal state early Thursday, he said.

Al-Bashir on Wednesday threatened to topple the South Sudan government after accusing the south of trying to take down his Khartoum-based government.

He continued his hardline rhetoric on Thursday in an address to a "popular defense" brigade headed to the Heglig area. The ceremony was held in al-Obeid, in northern Kordofan.

"Sudan will cut off the hand that harms it," said al-Bashir, a career army officer who fought against the southern army, the Sudan People's Liberation Army, during the 1983-2005 civil war. Al-Bashir seized power in a 1989 military coup.

The capture of Heglig by the South Sudanese "has revived the spirit of jihad and martyrdom among the Sudanese people," he told the brigade's 2,300 men, according to the official Sudan News Agency.

In Khartoum, the pro-government Sudanese Media Center said late Wednesday that fighting broke out between the two nations in the Al-Meram area in South Kordofan, with northern troops driving away what it called "remaining elements" of the SPLA. It said northern troops chased away SPLA fighters who fled across the border into South Sudan.

It said the fighting left an unspecified number of dead and wounded among the SPLA forces but gave no precise figures.

South Sudan government spokesman Barnaba Marial Benjamin said South Sudan does not consider itself at war with Sudan, but he said the south is defending territory it believes it owns based on borders outlined in 1956 by British colonialists.

"Up to now we have not crossed even an inch into Sudan," Benjamin said. He added: "The Republic of South Sudan considers the Republic of Sudan to be a neighbor and a friendly nation."

Benjamin said that southern forces would withdraw from Heglig if the African Union guarantees a cessation of hostilities, an agreement on border demarcation, and the withdrawal of Sudanese forces from the nearby border region of Abyei, with Ethiopian troops moving in as peacekeepers.

Benjamin said that al-Bashir is carrying out "genocide" against Sudanese people in the Darfur, South Kordofan and Blue Nile regions of Sudan. He said al-Bashir's words Wednesday were a warning that he would like to do the same in South Sudan.

"Can they quote one war fought by the Republic of Sudan fought with any foreign country? They have always used their military artillery to kill the innocent people of Sudan as well as South Sudan," Benjamin said.

The International Crisis Group said in a new analysis on Thursday that Sudan and South Sudan are "teetering on the brink of all-out war from which neither would benefit." It said an immediate cease-fire is needed, then solutions to the unresolved post-referendum issues.

"Increasingly angry rhetoric, support for each other's rebels, poor command and control, and brinkmanship, risk escalating limited and contained conflict into a full-scale confrontation," the group said. "Diplomatic pressure to cease hostilities and return to negotiations must be exerted on both governments by the region and the United Nations Security Council, as well as such partners as the U.S., China and key Gulf states."

U.S. special envoy to Sudan and South Sudan Princeton Lyman called the situation "a very, very serious crisis between Sudan and South Sudan" that "affects international peace and security," but said it was not yet an all-out war and expressed hope that one could be prevented.

"It's not going to be easy," Lyman said on a conference call from Khartoum, where he is having meetings after spending several days in Juba talking to officials there. "Emotions are running very, very high."

The U.S. played a large role in brokering the 2005 peace accord between the two sides. China is a big player in the two countries' oil industry.

___

Associated Press reporters Edith M. Lederer at the United Nations, Mohamed Saeed in Khartoum, Sudan, and Matthew Lee in Washington, contributed to this report.

WARNING: Images below contain graphic content.
1  of  10
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
A SPLA (South Sudan People's Liberation Army) soldier sits next toe a machine gun on a vehicle outside an old Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) compound in Heglig, on April 17, 2012. (ADRIANE OHANESIAN/AFP/Getty Images)
FOLLOW WORLD

JUBA, South Sudan — U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon urged Sudan and South Sudan on Thursday to step back from the brink of war and return to the negotiating table. Ban called on South Sudan ...
JUBA, South Sudan — U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon urged Sudan and South Sudan on Thursday to step back from the brink of war and return to the negotiating table. Ban called on South Sudan ...
Filed by Ryan Craggs  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 43
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Red Leaves
Well, well, what matters it? Believe that too.
02:23 PM on 04/20/2012
My, the way Huffington Post reports this, one would think that South Sudan just decided to attack Sudan out of the blue without any provocation at all.

But it seems that the Sudanese military has been busy:

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2012/03/20123189523528780.html
11:52 AM on 04/20/2012
So the victims of genocide are attacking the perpetrators of genocide?
photo
Red Leaves
Well, well, what matters it? Believe that too.
02:02 PM on 04/20/2012
I know, it's outrageous!
11:50 AM on 04/20/2012
To the victor goes the oil, I mean spoils.
Pauline Jaing
Artist, worker, mother
07:16 AM on 04/20/2012
Eh, from what I'm reading internationally, "South Sudan" invaded Sudan and took over an oil field.

Yet you liers in the media present this as some sort of wanton "Islamist" attack.

Washington should stay out of it.

Just imagine if England had come in on the side of the Confederates in our civil war, which the South expected since England had economic interests -- what a catastrophy that would have been for the world, a slave empire?

P.S. A slave empire would never have stabilized, however, since it would have blown to pieces from within, and an existing world power, probably France or Russia would have taken the continent from the west or east.

.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
roch1234caputo
12:47 PM on 04/20/2012
England was giving it serious thought. The cotton was very important to them, and they weren't the unexpected friends they have turn into.
07:34 PM on 04/19/2012
Poor south Sudan.... I guess 80% of the oil is not enough.I also believe they don`t have enough common sense to run or have a country by their own.Just another Somalia ...
photo
esblofeld
A magical pansexual non-threatening spokesthing!
10:50 AM on 04/20/2012
They have no oil refineries and all of their pipelines go to the north, into Sudan.
06:16 PM on 04/20/2012
how is this north Sudan 's problem ...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
roch1234caputo
12:51 PM on 04/20/2012
It's like Italy attacking Ethiopia at the begining of WWII, They could do it ,and their was going to be much resistance, etc., etc.. The Saudia's have a great army, not.
01:59 PM on 04/20/2012
What the hell are you talking about? You don`t make any sense.....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:29 PM on 04/19/2012
The UN is a toothless debate club. Clearly if military intervention is to take place, it must be with the subsidized mercenary armies of the African Union. Such proxy wars supported by NATO logistical support and intel are the model for future small conflict in the developing world.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
roch1234caputo
12:56 PM on 04/20/2012
Well the subsidized Mercenay of Israel are going to help, it not of their interst, and can't beatach there mainland. If it could, they be there in a flash. ha ha , I don't like whats happen to my opion to that Goverment, but they brought it on themself.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:53 PM on 04/19/2012
My god people, the South attacked the North first. Though they were legitimatly following militants that are likely to be connected to the Sudanese government, they crossed into Sudanese territory and took one of the LAST oil towns that Sudan has. In the seperation deal, the South got the vast majority of Sudanese oil reserves and this place is of high importance for Sudan's economy.
And unlike Israel going into Sinai to go after militants, South Sudan then fortified the town they've captured and set up a military base in Sudan.

While I dislike the Sudanese government and the horrors of genocide in the South and in Darfur is all too real, the South has really screwed up here and every moment they stay in Heglig is going to put them in a worse and worse situation.
photo
tallen
panem et circenses
01:41 PM on 04/19/2012
There is no better example of Islamic imperialism and religious cleansing than Sudan's genocide in Darfur and now its attack on South Sudan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Heso
11:26 AM on 04/19/2012
""The capture of Heglig by the South Sudanese "has revived the spirit of jihad and martyrdom among the Sudanese people," he told the brigade's 2,300 men""

What Bashir actually means to say is, this city has oil, we need that oil, to fill our pockets with money, go die in the name of jihad and martyrdom so i can be even wealthier than i am.
12:15 PM on 04/19/2012
It's also a disguised call to all Muslims around the world to help attack South Sudan.
photo
crankyCrackPot
My imaginary friend says that you need a therapist
12:19 PM on 04/19/2012
Yup... My filters revealed the same.
I may have been born at night but it wasn't last night
photo
LogicalMathMan
Math, Finance, English, Business Instructor
11:19 AM on 04/19/2012
Oil-rich South Sudan wants its own country and the current government will have nothing of it. Sudan, unlike Syria had clearly defined boundaries of those who support the existing government and those who don't. Unfortunately, the world seems to be ignoring this as they have been prone to do in other countries where it is not economically-, or, politically-expedient.
12:24 PM on 04/19/2012
There are so many problems. On the one hand many of us would like the West to get out completely from military involvement with Muslim nations. On the other hand there are calls for more intervention daily.

And if the West makes any move to support South Sudan, there will be cries of ''neo-imperialism.''
photo
crankyCrackPot
My imaginary friend says that you need a therapist
12:28 PM on 04/19/2012
Main African tribes in South Sudan also want to be free from the Arab yolk so that they can raid and kill each other.

As far as the "world" doing anything, Libya proved to the world again that EUROPE is incapable of projecting military strength. They needed our help, required it, couldn't have gotten it done without us.
The world yells and moans when the US acts and the world moans when the US does act.

Frankly, if failing Europe is incapable of meeting their military spending needs than NATO needs to be disbanded.
Europe's children get free medical care and free upper level education and we get F-35's and Iraq.

If the US is as broke as the disaster capitalists would have us believe and if Europe and the rest of the world wants us to continue protecting Europe and all the major shipping lanes in the world then they can pay for it.

All US foreign debt should be forgiven or paid for us or we need to get out of NATO.
photo
LogicalMathMan
Math, Finance, English, Business Instructor
07:54 PM on 04/19/2012
Or, we could cease trying to be the world's policeman. Surely you do not believe the Arab Spring was engineered by her indigent citizens alone?
10:30 AM on 04/19/2012
You asked for this south sudan....
12:14 PM on 04/19/2012
I guess you jihadists think the whole have asked for your terrorism.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:55 PM on 04/19/2012
The South Sudanese crossed into Sudanese territory and captured one of the last oil rich areas of Sudan, and you are telling me that that was NOT a mistake?
04:30 PM on 04/19/2012
Dear Neymar,
Please explain how South Sudan (capitalized because it is a country) "asked for this." Sudan occupied Abyei last May, suspended the referendum required by the CPA (a legally binding document signed by the NCP), and has been attacking South Sudan since independence last July. South Sudan, understandably, asked to be independent from a government that has dealt with its people in a manner reflecting nothing other than ill-will, bad faith, condescension and the desire to oppress. But it did not ask for a war. That was President Bashir, the SAF, and now the Sudanese Parliament, which should know better because they are supposedly representing the people of Sudan, who will not benefit from the government's recklessness. South Sudan refused war for a long time. Let us hope that the current war does not escalate into something even worse.
10:07 AM on 04/19/2012
All the borders of the Islamic world are at war.  The Sahara, Israel, the Balkans, the Caucasus, and Pakistan are constantly in conflict.  Islam is the religion of war.
photo
LogicalMathMan
Math, Finance, English, Business Instructor
11:16 AM on 04/19/2012
Who's waging the wars? Surely you do not believe it was all a social media uprising especially after CIA agents were busted trying to foment government overthrows in Syria and Libya?
12:05 PM on 04/19/2012
I'm not talking about the Arab Spring.  I'm talking about the conflicts in the Islamic world that have been going on for a long time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Heso
11:18 AM on 04/19/2012
I won't argue that many Muslim countries have been at war lately, but your statement is full of generalization and inaccuracies, Not all borders of Islamic world are at war, not even the majority, and each conflict of those have its reasons, and constantly ? how long is that in term of time, By your logic, America is the nation of war, USA has been at war longer and with more countries than any other country, and caused more deaths and destruction than any other country Muslim or not, so by your logic, American is a war loving person by definition...

And Also by your logic, since USA waged wars in the name of democracy and caused deaths and destruction, then Also Democracy is the "system" of war.
12:07 PM on 04/19/2012
Your facts are totally wrong.  China, Russia and Germany are by far the most murderous nations in history.  Nobody has killed on the scale that those nations have, both with in their nations and around the world.  Not only do you ignore the facts, but you don't know the meaning of the word "logic".