iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

EPA's Fracking Rules Are Limited And Delayed, Critics Charge

Posted: 04/20/2012 11:10 am

ProPublica's Lena Groeger reports:

 The Environmental Protection Agency issued the first-ever national air pollution regulations for fracking on Wednesday. First proposed in July 2011, the final rules have been welcomed by environmental groups as a much-needed initial move in reducing pollution and protecting public health from the toxic chemicals involved in the oil and natural gas drilling process. But many cautioned it was just a first step.

"It sets a floor for what the industry needs to do," said attorney Erik Schlenker-Goodrich of the Western Environmental Law Center. "The reality is we can do far better."

Over the past few years, more information has come out about fracking's potential harms to the environment and human health, particularly relating to the risk of groundwater contamination. In addition to the many potentially toxic components of the highly pressurized fluid injected into the ground during the natural gas drilling process, fracking can also release cancer-causing chemicals like benzene and greenhouse gases like methane into the air. The federal government has made moves to tighten regulations, and we've chronicled the history of those regulations.

The EPA's new rules don't cover most of those issues. Instead, they address a single problem with natural gas: air pollution.

"These rules do not resolve chronic water, public health and other problems associated with fracking and natural gas," Schlenker-Goodrich said.

The agency is actually barred from regulating the impact of fracking on groundwater because, in 2005, Congress exempted fracking from the Safe Water Drinking Act. Congressional proposals to give the EPA more oversight have so far failed.

With the new rules on air pollution, the EPA rejected an industry request to exempt some wells with low emissions of toxic compounds but did give drilling companies more time to comply. Notably, the final version provides a two-and-a-half-year transition period (rather than the 60 days in the original proposal) that gives drilling companies until 2015 to comply with the strictest regulations.

 

The industry lobbied hard for the delay, and its reaction to the rules have been mixed.

A spokesman for the American Petroleum Institute, the largest oil industry trade group, said it is still reviewing the new rules but said it's happy with changes from the original proposal that will allow companies to "continue reducing emissions while producing the oil and natural gas our country needs." Another industry group told The New York Times that the rules are too strict and could "make exploring in new areas cost-prohibitive."

A key rule targets one large source of air pollution 2014 the burst of gas released during the first few days after a well is first tapped but before production begins. The EPA requires that companies start using "green completions," a technology that captures the released gas and fumes in tanks and transports them via pipelines to be sold as fuel. (The Natural Resources Defense Council has a good breakdown of the process).

Many drilling companies already use green-completion systems. One natural-gas company recently told Bloomberg that the system doesn't cost the company "any more than just venting the gas into the atmosphere." The EPA says that once companies buy the necessary equipment to separate and collect the released gas, they could actually make up to $19 million a year selling the captured gas.

"By ensuring the capture of gases that were previously released to pollute our air and threaten our climate, these updated standards will not only protect our health, but also lead to more product for fuel suppliers to bring to market," EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson said in a statement.

For the next two and a half years, in addition to trapping the gas, companies are allowed to burn off, or "flare," the excess gas, which reduces air toxins but is wasteful because the gas can't be resold. Peter Zalzal of the Environmental Defense Fund said the EPA rules give companies an incentive to adopt the green-completion technology instead of flaring.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW GREEN

ProPublica's Lena Groeger reports:  The Environmental Protection Agency issued the first-ever national air pollution regulations for fracking on Wednesday. First proposed in July 2011, the final r...
ProPublica's Lena Groeger reports:  The Environmental Protection Agency issued the first-ever national air pollution regulations for fracking on Wednesday. First proposed in July 2011, the final r...
Filed by James Gerken  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 212
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
RSGmusic
Instrumental music is great
08:33 PM on 04/21/2012
Fracturing has been around a few decades now.

Even double steel cased drilling apparatus can be cracked on both sides and fracture and break Badly!
the reaction between the oil, fluids, water and sand vaporize an into oil mists. these are very good lubs.
Under very high presures they will rise to the surface, creating a good sized mess.
Drilling rigs are hundreds of yards apart up to a couiple of miles. the 5 to 10 people workiing the rig will need help fast to contain it.
It will take a good amount of time for other resouces to arrive and the spill could be Quite large before containment.
Almost all oil companies do not know exactly how to clean it up.

I am not against Fracturing completely, but it is a good idea to be a great deal safor!!

Other alternative such as spliting water to hydrogen using solar power and solar panels themselves are developing fast!!!
Electronics is getting more efficient!
High temperatur conductures are perhaps 5 years to 2 decades away.

America can wait 4 years to get the safety procedures and materials safer!

Plastics of c3 and c4 can be copolmerized and blended together to make it as strong and slightly bendable also.

Cross linking Perhaps?

Again America can wait 4 years!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
txpapa
12:46 PM on 04/21/2012
HP tells me when I try to answer some of these radical left wing posts that my profile has been removed! Typical of leftise that can't stand the truth so now aI have a new profile but not a new attitude about liars and deveivers that operate this site! I am one of the few that still pay for two AOL subscriptions so if you really wish to get rid of me then cancell my AOL subscriptions! I do still have the Emails so good luck!
03:58 PM on 04/21/2012
Well, you're obviously a fool. You PAY for AOL service? aaAHAhahahhHAAHAHHahhHaHAHHahHAahhhHh....

On a side note, your morally bankrupt party is finally heading down the hole. Have fun on the ride!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
txpapa
04:32 PM on 04/21/2012
Actually paying for the service gives me a few legal incentives that those that get the service for free don't get. You see I don't have to comply with arbitrary rules set up by the Huffington and Puffington Post unless I agree to do so and I have never done so and as long as I pay I don't have to! Every time their Moderators (Censors) delete one of my posts and in fact becuse I protested attempted to ban me they violated my Constitutional rights and we (There are many of us now) are in the process of formulating a class action lawsuit intended to put HP out of business forever!
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
12:13 AM on 04/21/2012
Only when the technology and common knowledge of using
electrolysis of water to split it into hydrogen and oxygen
becomes so rediculousy apparent to damned near everyone
will it be used.
Their is NO CORELATION between the energy it takes to split the two
and the energy it can produce They are two completely seperate
processes.
It takes much less to split water than the hydrogen energy that it makes.
Especially if solar energy is used to split it.
The ONLY REASON WE AREN'T DOING IT IS BECAUSE BIG OIL SAID NO.
When are the citizens going to get sick of this and say enough is enough?
madisgp
All we-we'd up.
02:32 PM on 04/21/2012
Totally agree. Clean fuel cells could be a long term answer to our energy needs. F&F.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ogledude
07:44 PM on 04/26/2012
It takes a lot of energy to do that
photo
jeviga
Truth at any cost
06:48 PM on 04/20/2012
99% of contamination of well water and environmental problems is not the process of fracking.
The problem are the drilling and frack pits which cause most if not all the problems.
Many of these pits leak and many pits full of drilling mud and frack fluids are not properly cleaned and many are left to evaporate into the environment.
These are the areas that OSHA and the EPA should be focusing on.
madisgp
All we-we'd up.
02:36 PM on 04/21/2012
I would first like to know what exactly is IN this fracking fluid. The oil companies aren't required to tell us, or the government. Who knows WHAT they are pumping down those holes? How can the EPA do it's job of regulating air and water polution if they aren't allowed to know what the oil companies are doing?
05:28 PM on 04/20/2012
These regulations while they are helpful are actually becoming more and more difficult to deal with. The issue of course is that these regulations actually are not only costly to deal with, but they also change to often for any sort of businesses to be able to keep up with (http://bit.ly/zIfsUf). We have got to get a handle on when and how these rules are implemented across the board or else we're going to run into the same problems we have been.
08:29 PM on 04/20/2012
Obviously you didn't read the story, These fracking companies are exempt from regulation, thus why they are polluting.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raybird
05:03 PM on 04/20/2012
God help us if the Republicans gain power in November. Most cmments here are analogous to the demand that stop signs on roads be eliminated because they impede trucks bringing goods to market hurting sales and profits.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roosevelt Democrat
11:01 AM on 04/21/2012
the Republicans have had complete control since the 80's be they Neo/Con Republicans or Rockefeller Republicans aka Clinton Democrats.

Both groups do Wall Street's bidding.
photo
mj1247
this comment approved by..me
04:50 PM on 04/20/2012
who needs clean water or air ..? not the 1% they can make there own..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
morninglry52
SICK OF THE FRAUD IN POLITICS
06:49 PM on 04/20/2012
Good God! You Liberals are something else! I have never seen a Liberal satisfied with anything but complete control over others, then they get so stupid, they think everyone thinks like them. Grow up!
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
12:22 AM on 04/21/2012
Using solar to split Hydrogen from water is pure science.

When politics is removed from the argument only then
Will we meke the hydrogen engines that have already been
proven to work just fine.

Nothing holding it back but politics and big oil money
madisgp
All we-we'd up.
02:41 PM on 04/21/2012
Ridiculous argument completly devoid of facts. Protecting clean air and drinking water is not control. It's common sence. Letting oil companies poison us for profit isn't.
01:54 PM on 04/21/2012
They're already full of hot air!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:38 PM on 04/20/2012
Boot the EPA out, along with the Empty Suit.
04:31 PM on 04/20/2012
>"...we can do far better."<

I've been saying this for 20 years now, and have yet to get a response:

IF "WE CAN DO FAR BETTER" WHY ISN'T THE EPA TAKING POSITIVE STEPS INSTEAD OF CONSTANTLY IMPEDING PROGRESS?????
05:30 PM on 04/20/2012
I think the reason for this is that one side is just simply not talking to the other. A development of a symbiotic relationship between both sides is what would be helpful here. The EPA is daunting because there's no one actually willing to look at what each of the sides needs from each other. does that make sense?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roman238
Telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
04:07 PM on 04/20/2012
The EPA is bought and paid for, just like the FDA & the DEC are. Corporations run (and ruin), everything thes days. Everything they touch, everything they see, turns to waste.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lance Manling
04:36 PM on 04/20/2012
The evil corporations?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roosevelt Democrat
11:15 AM on 04/21/2012
Evil Government Agencies???

Wonder which?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roosevelt Democrat
11:15 AM on 04/21/2012
I love Anti-Frackers.

They make Climate Change Deniers look smart!

If the science does not agree with your politics the science is wrong. If government agencies don't agree with your politics the agencies are bought or corrupt!

How do you argue with that kind of logic?

The term fanatics come to mind.
01:55 PM on 04/21/2012
Yaaawwwwn!
03:55 PM on 04/20/2012
Republicans can hardly wait to ruin the USA....use all resources...drain the swamp...
cheart our grandchildren...and, sell the gas/oil to China or India...not for USA...that
is the misrepresentation. Maybe more oil in their drinking water would be useful..?
Meanwhile,,USA will spend itself silly to protect the Musllims ...from Muslims!! go figure..
Must be the no bid contracts are doing just fine..
04:31 PM on 04/20/2012
Your hate-on is showing
04:54 PM on 04/20/2012
And dismantle the EPA ..........just a few more months .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Llib Noswad
aka: Bill, Conservative
03:38 PM on 04/20/2012
The EPA needs to go Frack itself.
03:52 PM on 04/20/2012
So simple yet so to the point. Thank you.
03:36 PM on 04/20/2012
LEAD IN TITLE CORRECTION:

Change: EPA on Fracking Rules: 'We Can Do Far Better'

To: American People on the EPA: "We Can Do Far Better"

Always glad to help the White House errand boys and girls who operate this site.
03:34 PM on 04/20/2012
Headline reads EPA Report: We san do much better, well it turns out the EPA said nothing of the sort the quote was from a lawyer advocating the environmentalist position. How can I take the enviromentalist/HuffPost position seriously when their first impulse is to mislead.
03:15 PM on 04/20/2012
The oil companies stop at nothing to make money. Despite how polluting fracking is, they continue un-regulated and unmomitored. Anything for the dollar. We only need the environment, say, until the end of my life. That's the sad attitude.
03:27 PM on 04/20/2012
The Obama administration will stop at nothing to pour money into failed alternative energy companies. Dsepite how desperated the people of America are for proven energy sources that work NOW, the oil producers and drillers continue to be harassed by the EPA. We only need the liberals, say, until early November. That's the sad attitude of liberalism.

"The parent company of an electric car battery maker that received more than $100 million in government funding from the Obama administration has filed for bankruptcy protection, the company announced Thursday. Alex Sorokin, the CEO for lithium-ion battery manufacturer Ener1, said the company suffered when demand for the batteries dropped as fewer Americans than expected opted for electric cars."
madisgp
All we-we'd up.
02:49 PM on 04/21/2012
So instead you'd just let the Chinese take the advantage in the future markets of solar, electric autos and many other emerging technologies? Yeah right. Lets just slip into third world status because the oil companies need more profit. Short sighted to say the least.
03:43 PM on 04/20/2012
I think there's a redwood in California that needs a hug.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roman238
Telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
04:18 PM on 04/20/2012
Really? Are there any redwoods left?