iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

XNA, Synthetic DNA, Could Lead To New Life Forms, Scientists Say

Posted: 04/20/2012 12:33 pm Updated: 04/20/2012 12:33 pm

By: Charles Q. Choi, InnovationNewsDaily Contributor
Published: 04/19/2012 04:26 PM EDT on InnovationNewsDaily

Synthetic molecules resembling DNA can function and evolve just like the real thing, its developers say.

These new, unnatural building blocks could be more useful than DNA or its closely related biomolecule, RNA, in a variety of medical and biotechnology applications, researchers added. Other investigators noted they could even lead to novel forms of life.

DNA is essentially made of four different kinds of molecules known as nucleic acids, commonly referred to by their initials, A, G, C and T. These run along a backbone made of sugars and phosphate groups.

Scientists call their artificial nucleic-acidlike molecules XNA, in which the natural sugar component has been replaced by one of six alternative organic compounds. These XNA molecules all can bind to DNA and RNA.

The researchers also have developed enzymes that can synthesize XNA from a DNA template, plus others that can "reverse transcribe" XNA back into DNA. This means they can store and copy data just as DNA can — the basis of heredity for all life on Earth.

The investigators subjected an XNA molecule to artificial natural selection in the lab by introducing mutations into its genetic code. By allowing the different versions of the molecule to compete against each other for binding to another molecule, the team ended up with a shape that bound tightly and specifically to the target – just as one would expect of DNA under the same conditions. This makes XNA the only known molecules other than DNA and RNA capable of Darwinian evolution.

"Heredity — information storage and propagation — and evolution, two of the hallmarks of life, can be implemented in polymers other than DNA and RNA," researcher Philipp Holliger at the Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Cambridge, England, told InnovationNewsDaily.

One notable property of XNA molecules is they are not biodegradable: They are impervious to natural enzymes that degrade DNA and RNA. As such, they could find use in medical and biotechnology arenas where DNA and RNA could not go.

"People use RNA and DNA for biotechnology, therapeutics, diagnostics and biosensing applications, but these are very fragile in the face of biology — they degrade very rapidly if there's any contact with biological materials," said biochemist Gerald Joyce at the Scripps Research Institute, who did not take part in this work. "As such, chemists have to work to make them resistant to natural enzymes that degrade RNA and DNA, and then you have to worry about losing the good properties of those molecules. These XNAs, however, are resistant from the get-go."

These findings might also shed light on the origins of life — specifically, why DNA and RNA came to dominate Earth.

"It shows that there is no overwhelming functional imperative for life to use DNA and RNA for genetic information storage and propagation. More likely, this choice reflects a 'frozen accident' from the origin of life," Holliger suggested.

The construction of genetic systems based on alternative chemical platforms may ultimately lead to the synthesis of novel forms of life, if researchers can devise a system for XNA to replicate itself just as DNA has, Joyce said. However, he cautioned that synthetic biologists should take care to "not tread into areas that have the potential to harm our biology." For instance, the fact that XNA is not biodegradable suggests that life might not have any easy way of breaking it down.

"Do I think what these researchers have done is dangerous? Absolutely not. Do I think this is going to be dangerous in the near or even medium term? Absolutely not," Joyce said. "Still, are we treading into something risky here? It's synthetic biology, not a natural form of biology. Scientists have to pay attention here."

The scientists detailed their findings in the April 20 issue of the journal Science.

Copyright 2012 InnovationNewsDaily, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW SCIENCE

Filed by Melissa Cronin  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 65
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joshua Kramarenko
02:04 PM on 04/26/2012
Anyone want to deny evolution now? Maybe challenge the sky being blue while you're at it.
01:10 PM on 04/09/2013
People will deny evolution from the day we create life from scratch from inanimate materials. Even when it is demonstrated that it can be done naturally by processes which happens in nature.

The irrational cannot be made to think rational.
photo
Counterglow
Werner Heisenberg may have been right.
11:20 PM on 04/23/2012
So this could eventually lead to an intelligent Fox News viewer, or is that expecting too much?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Late Benny Hill
Do unto others, then run.
12:09 AM on 04/24/2012
The only way a Fox News viewer can be intelligent is if they change the channel.
photo
Counterglow
Werner Heisenberg may have been right.
09:43 AM on 04/24/2012
LMAO...That is SO true!
10:32 PM on 04/23/2012
This is going to be fantastic.. new understanding of the DNA/RNA paradigm.. but no need to panic, we'll have a great nucleic acid backup system (X-files).... it's all representational folks, and, besides, protein enzymes control everything anyway. We ourselves are gigantic enzyme macromolecules which live to manipulate our phenotypic "reality" and perpetuate ourselves through time at all cost. Let's ensure that it's for the good and have some fun with it. We humans should remember that we're not the only ones with consciousness. My Cheshire X-Cat will remind me.
03:49 PM on 04/23/2012
Creation of new life forms sounds interesting, but couldn't it also be incorporated into the human body to start production of new cells such as cells in the spinal cord thus repairing any spinal damage. Crazy thinking I know.
03:35 PM on 04/23/2012
Here's a thought:

DNA and RNA encode enzymes and proteins... the same ones that then must reverse-manipulate the template. If XNA ever forms the basis of actual life forms, it will have to encode its own form of enzyme and protein structures... which would then have to be able to back-influence the template itself. That's how life works.

If XNA leads to actual life forms, it will by definition have caused itself to become biodegradable (just within a different "bio" framework). That's really not even an issue at the macro organism level I would think.

Now form it into a genetically-engineered reverse-transcriptase virus (if technically possible) which can act on our genome without effectively being acted upon and that may be a whole different set of problems.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Akla
Leave No Trace, Just a Good Impression
01:05 PM on 04/23/2012
Be afraid, be very afraid.

BioBots are being developed and this makes them replicable.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
methodman
01:08 AM on 04/23/2012
Also when you talk about binding to me it is different than a loading or saving process and when you talk about loading and saving sculpting movements by creating a dna chef's salad and then examining each leaf with random chemistries. That is a complex topic. I don't know how I would formulate that. Just trying to build dumb analogies Oh well someone has to try it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
methodman
01:03 AM on 04/23/2012
Always relating back to 1 of 4 confuses me. Is there such a thing as Kant genetics. People should tailor an article that way. What would philosopher genetics be? This could get interesting?
11:53 PM on 04/22/2012
Now I would say this artificial DNA is dangerous stuff to play with.? I can think of several dangerous scenarios that could occur if strict lab controls are not practiced.
06:30 PM on 04/22/2012
This is "PERFECT", first artificial blood, and artificial cells, now this XNA, I have a feeling that biorobotics will advanced forward with this. Kevin Warwick is gonna be surprised if someone created a bioroid (like the eccerobot) with synthetic/artificial skin and artificial organs, I mean it's going to be crazy, and a lot of money.
06:16 PM on 04/22/2012
This is bad. It does not mean that we are now reaching the power of the creator, it means we are making a perfect doorway for our ultimate enemies. The created can not create life, they can only mock it.
11:56 PM on 04/22/2012
That is a silly statement. But I will say they are playing with a fire that has the possibility of being very dangerous.

PS -- mankind will create life forms and will recreate extinct life in the near future
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:55 PM on 04/22/2012
I guess this gives Casey Hudson's ME3 ending a bit more credibility.
11:38 AM on 04/22/2012
Scarey! A kid can in curiosity play with fire too, but that doesn't mean it's a GOOD idea!
We seem to think we have reached an evolutionary peak but........ Just maybe 1000 years from now our descendants will say... "What the hell were those idiots thinking?"
10:41 AM on 04/22/2012
I see a SciFi movie on its way.
photo
Wall Str33t
Science is not a liberal conspiracy.
09:22 PM on 04/21/2012
Life Ver. 2.0