iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

AT&T Q1 2012: New Wireless Subscribers Down Sharply

By PETER SVENSSON 04/24/12 08:28 PM ET AP

Att

NEW YORK — Hidden in AT&T Inc.'s financial statements is a story that runs counter to its optimistic profit projections: The company is generating less revenue from each new smartphone subscriber.

Calculations by The Associated Press, based on AT&T's public statements, indicate that the average monthly bill for its smartphone subscribers has fallen from $88 to $80 in the space of a year.

That number should be of great concern to Dallas-based AT&T, because like most big phone companies, it is struggling with a slowdown in new subscribers. Nearly all adults – and many kids – in the U.S. already have cellphones. AT&T's executives have been touting smartphones as the solution, since the devices require consumers to pay for data use in addition to voice calls. Smartphone subscribers, therefore, pay more. So moving customers from regular phones to smartphones will keep boosting revenue, AT&T has said.

But an analysis of AT&T's own figures indicates that smartphone bills have shrunk by 9 percent over a year, challenging the company's picture of long-term revenue growth.

The AP's calculations are based on various figures AT&T makes public – and a bit of basic algebra. The company doesn't disclose the average smartphone bill, but says it's 90 percent higher than the average non-smartphone bill. AT&T reveals the number of smartphone and non-smartphone subscribers, and the average monthly bill for a contract-based plan, which is $64.46. Together, these numbers allow for an approximate calculation of the average smartphone bill.

AT&T did not explicitly confirm the calculations, but its chief financial officer, John Stephens, said that the composition of new smartphone customers is changing. The early smartphone adopters were business people and others willing and able to pay high monthly fees. Now, AT&T and other phone companies are going after people who can't pay as much.

"We go after the biggest spenders at the start, that's natural economics," he said.

But even these lower-paying customers are profitable, he said, because they use the network less.

In a more typical projection, Ralph de la Vega, the head of AT&T's wireless division, told analysts Tuesday that demand for wireless data is going to continue to drive an increase in monthly bills.

"Quite frankly, it's hard for us to see a cap on that," de la Vega said.

Bills for non-smartphone subscribers on contract-based plans are shrinking at about the same rate. Only by shifting these subscribers to smartphone contracts has AT&T been able to keep its average monthly bill for all contract-based plans rising, by 1.7 percent from a year ago.

AT&T, the country's largest telecommunications company, reported first-quarter results Tuesday morning, showing that it essentially gained no phone subscribers on contract-based plans in the first quarter. That's only happened once before: a year ago, when Verizon launched its version of the iPhone.

Contract-based plans are by far the most lucrative for a phone company, and the number of new customers is an important measure of growth.

AT&T gained a net 187,000 customers on contract-based plans in the January to March period, but these were almost all tablet computer users, brought in by the launch of the new iPad in March.

In contrast, Verizon last week reported adding 501,000 subscribers on contract-based plans, of which about half were tablet users.

Over the last five quarters, Verizon has added nearly three times as many contract subscribers as AT&T. Over the previous two years, the rivals split new subscribers nearly evenly.

AT&T gained a net 726,000 subscribers of all kinds in the first quarter, counting ones on no-contract plans and ones on non-phone devices like e-readers and tablet computers. That was the lowest figure in eight years, and less than a third of the number of subscribers added in the same period last year.

De la Vega said a drop in sales of e-readers that connect to AT&T's network was behind much of the smaller increase in overall subscribers.

Amazon.com Inc. has been selling Kindle e-readers that use AT&T's network, but its new flagship device, the Kindle Fire, only uses Wi-Fi.

Weak subscriber figures are usually good for a phone company's earnings in the short term because it doesn't have to subsidize new devices.

The company's net income for the January-March period was $3.6 billion, or 60 cents per share, up 5 percent from $3.4 billion, or 57 cents per share, a year earlier.

Analysts polled by FactSet were on average expecting earnings of 57 cents per share for the latest quarter.

In particular, AT&T saved money by selling fewer iPhones than analysts expected. AT&T subsidizes each new iPhone by hundreds of dollars, hoping to make the money back over time in the form of service fees.

AT&T said it activated 4.3 million iPhones in the first quarter. That was down from 7.6 million in the fourth quarter, when AT&T began selling the iPhone 4S. However, the number was still up from the 3.6 million iPhones AT&T sold in the same quarter a year ago.

Revenue was $31.8 billion, up 2 percent from a year earlier. It matched analyst expectations.

AT&T shares rose $1.11, or 3.6 percent, to close at $31.72. The shares are close to the four-year high of $31.97 hit a month ago.

Macquarie Securities analyst Kevin Smithen said the strong first-quarter earnings could mislead investors. He said he believes AT&T's profits will shrink this year as it upgrades more handsets, even as it continues to lose market share to Verizon.

Craig Moffett, an analyst at Sanford Bernstein, was more optimistic, saying the first-quarter results demonstrated "the successful handoff from growth to profitability." It's possible, he said, that AT&T will be able to wring more money out of each wireless subscriber through data usage fees. It also looks like the company is getting better at reining in smartphone subsidies, he said.

___

Peter Svensson can be reached at http://www.twitter.com/petersvensson

FOLLOW TECH

From our partners


NEW YORK — Hidden in AT&T Inc.'s financial statements is a story that runs counter to its optimistic profit projections: The company is generating less revenue from each new smartphone subscribe...
NEW YORK — Hidden in AT&T Inc.'s financial statements is a story that runs counter to its optimistic profit projections: The company is generating less revenue from each new smartphone subscribe...
Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 141
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christy Sargent Anderson
Sheeple, wake up!
02:57 PM on 04/25/2012
Poor AT&T. Now their gonna have to lower their prices to get more subscribers.
photo
SeenItBefore
Ya want to super size that?
10:27 AM on 04/25/2012
AT&T is, by design, the most despicable telecom company we have ever had the opportunity to suffer. Elderly and loyalist by nature, we stayed with AT&T until the bitter end for both our personal and business services for over 45 years.

What we got was lie after lie and disgustingly poor to abysmal service to both our home and our offices. As a reward for rude customer reps and dishonest sales staff, our rates were raised by 50% in an 18 month time period, we were required to sign contracts, that AT&T violated the terms of and then told that multiple services in our area were not available.

Thanking the powers that be, I befriended a local AT&T service tech and they provided me with the straight skinny... none of AT&T's services were available because they hadn't upgraded the trunk lines into the community with optic technology.

Sadly, one of neighbors believed the lies served up, spent the money, contracted for the services and discovered the following... he had been lied to and AT&T, after admitting they had misrepresented the service available, refused to cancel his contract.

We dropped ALL AT&T services, both verbally and in writing, last November and are still receiving bills and dunning notices.

I would be "pleased as punch" to see AT&T go straight to h311!
08:02 AM on 04/25/2012
Frankly, I believe AT&T is losing it due to poor quality service. I just canceled my home DSL for Comcast cable internet, my home phone for a Net talk Duo, and I'm counting down the months until my cell contract expires in October. So fat Verizon looks like my next move.

You can't justify the high charges when customers constantly have dropped calls and their data service is spotty...especially in densely-populated areas.
photo
local21
Next to go is Scott Walker in 2014
06:47 AM on 04/25/2012
What is the deal with HP and att ?
photo
odelly
i don't lead,i don't follow,i go my own way
02:24 AM on 04/25/2012
they are just too damn expensive
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
X Williams
34 yrs old, college educated, african american. Re
01:47 AM on 04/25/2012
I have an iphone and I have never had a $60 dollar bill. What do these people have? My bill has always ran over $100.00 easily. So finally I got tired of paying so much and called AT&T tp get a better plan. I am at the bare bones minimum and I still have a $100.00 bill. AT&T has simply gotten GREEDY and they have manipulated the wireless contracts in very sophisticated ways. For instance, I can no longer get a small text messaging plan. I have to pay an extra $20.00 just to get text messaging. I am on the 450 minute plan and I pay around $45.00 monthly for that. Then I am grandfathered into the data plan and that is an extra $30 (getting the data plan is required for the iphone). It all comes up to around $100.00 per month.

AT&T is simply not competitve. At all. I have friends who are with local carriers and they are paying a total of $50.00 monthly for everything. Unlimited text and talk and data. But I love the Iphone that is why I stay. But when my contract is up I will take my iphone elsewhere.
12:45 AM on 04/25/2012
AT&T U-verse will also be causing the communications giant real problems in the very near future.

It appears AT&T may have launched this idea before the infrastructure can take the load.

U-Verse is supposed to allow AT&T customers to bundle internet, phone and television onto one bill. But, before you have this new service installed you better make sure the lines in your neighborhood have been upgraded to handle the extra load.

I am speaking from personal experience. When I bought a new home two months ago I called AT&T and asked for my service in Fort Lauderdale to be transferred to my new home; no problem say's the Rep. Two months later, I am still having trouble with my service. It seems the wires needed to handle the U-Verse work load haven't been updated in almost 30 years. This seems to be a common problem in every state that offers the service.

The only advise I can offer after my ordeal is to ask your inside tech to check for error messages on your system before he leaves your house even if the service appears to be working fine. You see, if the cables have not been upgraded, error messages will add up and block out your system. This requires an "out door" team to come and dig up half the neighborhood only to patch the outdated lines rather than replace them.

Good luck to anyone daring to use U-Verse.

Sparticus
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
X Williams
34 yrs old, college educated, african american. Re
01:52 AM on 04/25/2012
I use to be a Uverse Technician. I left the job to find other employment early this year. It was crazy working for AT&T. I felt so sorry for the customers. The sales people often sold the service to people who were too far away or to people who simply did not have the capacity, whether by wiring or something else, to support the Uverse Service. And the really crazy thing is this: We were told we could not let the customers know if they were too far away via loop length or if they were not able to get the service even when their service was degraded. Even when we saw in the notes that the customer could not get the service we could not suggest they cancel. I had one guy who had nothing but problems and the technicians had put in the notes that he was too far from the VRAD which is the main box. Neither the tech nor I could tell him this. All we could do is send out tech after tech after tech even though we know. Just to string him along so that he continued to pay.
12:19 AM on 04/25/2012
I've been with ATT since 2002 and have pretty happy since they own most of the towers in my area BUT...

Since they have decided to do away with our "unlimited" media I have decided to find a new carrier after my contract expires.

I had unlimited on both mine and my wifes phone. They have done everything they can to get us off that plan and finally did my wife due to her not understanding their system. They will NOT reverse it even if someone like the APPLE store unknowingly advised her to go with another plan (just a kids stupidity).

So now I'm ticked and eventually ATT and will lose a long time customer that faithfully has paid monthly for 10 years.

Greed will get you in the end.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
X Williams
34 yrs old, college educated, african american. Re
01:54 AM on 04/25/2012
You said the operative word: GREED.

AT&T is VERY Greedy. I was a UVerse Tier two techician up until I left the job for another earlier this year. Even when we could see the tech notes in the system that the customer could not get the service we were forbidden to even let the customer know. That always tripped me out. We simply dispatched tech after tech because as long as the customer paid that was all we wanted.

AT&T is very, very, very greedy....
12:10 AM on 04/25/2012
AT&T SUCKS!!!! Any part of that, that you don't understand???????
12:02 AM on 04/25/2012
I HATE AT&T!
11:19 PM on 04/24/2012
BTW to you ignorant libs know that wireless is only one small part of AT&T? They own over half the land lines in the US (think Bellsouth, SW Bell, Pacific Telesis and Ameritech since they are all now part of AT&T), are a major broadband distributer and have a competitive TV offering to cable or satellite. These are just the residential business and doesn't include their business offerings (huge provider of data circuits nationwide for example). You all are SO IGNORANT that you look at a company simply based on your perception of their cell phone coverage in your area!!! God how pathetic! Grow up and learn to evaluate a business from a total perspective then you may be able to actually make some money in the markets and join those of us that are part of the evil "rich"!
12:13 AM on 04/25/2012
Duh, What's a land line???? I think my great Grandfather had one! AT&T still SUCKS!!!!!
12:28 AM on 04/25/2012
So you are "part of the evil 'rich'"????
or just another member of the idiot nation constantly justifying corporate mis management in order to justify your paltry earnings....
and spouting your total 'ignorance' of the macro economic consequences of your paltry earnings on the total economy...
an 'ignorant lib....and PROUD of it compared to you.....
11:13 PM on 04/24/2012
Wow Huffpost you pulled something out of the financial results that all of Wall Street missed - just kidding of course! You may whine about the "bad news" but the fact the stock was up sharply tells you the market feels otherwise. It isn't about the number of subscribers but the type of subscribers and the overall profit and gross revenue (along with forward growth projections).

Of course I never thought anyone at Huffpost knew the first thing about business or economics anyway - most liberals don't. I'll continue to own my AT&T stock (along with quite a few others in my diversified portfolio) and make 4-5% dividends (try getting that in a bank) with a dominant company that have very little long term downside. Meanwhile you keep looking for shadows where they don't exist.
photo
odelly
i don't lead,i don't follow,i go my own way
02:34 AM on 04/25/2012
most if not all businesses and businessmen in this country are republican owned and are crooks,rather be a poor lib than a rich crook.
02:46 AM on 04/25/2012
Microsoft;Berkshire Hathaway; Oracle.....
Stockholders own businesses and many of those are Democrats. 16 of the top 20 Billionaires are Democrats. So are you implying that those Democrats are crooks?
09:06 PM on 06/17/2012
alancranford, companies can routinely manipulate the stock market. it isn't unusual for a company's stock to be selling high just before a financial collapse. The only people that were selling Enron stock before it collapsed were the top executives. You send out cheery stock projections to get the stock up, and you sell high. This doesn't mean that this is the situation with AT&T, but I there's a reason a smart investor buys low and sells high.
11:10 PM on 04/24/2012
I think that their right wing support has the most impact on why the growth has come to a halt and predict they will start going backwards as a result of their stand.
10:19 PM on 04/24/2012
a yr ago i was behind on my land line payment 45.00 they shut off my phone witch shut down my business. customer service im guessing (india) said i could not get back on for a couple weeks. I told them THAT I WOULD NEVER EVER USE THEM EVEN IF THEY WERE THE ONLY CO IN THE UNIVERSE.
verizon is a no brainer.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kamact
Market Observer
10:12 PM on 04/24/2012
Decades of bad service will do this to any bloated company....