iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Bradley Manning Wikileaks Case: Military Judge Refuses To Dismiss Charges

By DAVID DISHNEAU 04/25/12 10:09 PM ET AP

Bradley Manning Wikileaks

FORT MEADE, Md. — A military judge refused on Wednesday to throw out the case against an Army private accused of providing reams of sensitive documents to WikiLeaks in the biggest leak of government secrets in U.S. history.

Army Col. Denise Lind said she will rule Thursday on whether to dismiss any of the individual charges against Pfc. Bradley Manning, including the most serious count of aiding the enemy – which carries a maximum penalty of life in prison. Prosecutors argue that the leak helped al-Qaida and that Manning knew its members regularly viewed the anti-secrecy website.

Manning hasn't entered a plea to the charges. He also hasn't yet decided whether he will be tried by a judge or a jury. Lind scheduled Manning's trial for Sept. 21 through Oct. 12.

He is accused of sending hundreds of thousands of classified documents to WikiLeaks, a website founded by Julian Assange, in late 2009 and early 2010.

Manning's lawyers had sought dismissal of all 22 charges, contending prosecutors had failed their duty to share information that could be helpful to the defense, a legal process called discovery.

Lind agreed that prosecutors had wrongly assumed the discovery rules didn't pertain to classified information but she found no evidence of prosecutorial misconduct, turning down the motion to throw out the case.

She heard arguments later on defense motions seeking dismissal of individual charges.

Defense attorney David Coombs said a conviction for aiding the enemy would require the government to show that Manning sent WikiLeaks the material with a "genuine evil intent" that it be seen by al-Qaida.

Manning's alleged motive, as he stated in his online chat logs with a confidant-turned-informant, was "I want people to see the truth."

Absent an evil intent, Coombs said sending intelligence information to WikiLeaks without authorization was no different than giving it to The New York Times or The Washington Post – a punishable offense, perhaps, but not as serious a crime as the government alleges.

"What the government's really trying to say is, `He should have known better,'" Coombs said.

He said it wouldn't be surprising if al-Qaida saw the material.

"Anyone can find anything if it's posted on the Internet. Everyone knows that," he said.

But prosecutor Capt. Joe Morrow said the government needs only to show that Manning knew that the enemy would see the material and that he sent it without authorization.

"I could have the purest motives in the world. But if do something knowingly and without proper authority in terms of interacting with the enemy, that's a violation," he said.

Lind also ruled Wednesday that Army prosecutors don't have to provide the defense with transcripts of federal grand jury testimony about the WikiLeaks disclosures.

Manning's lawyers were seeking transcripts from a federal investigation into whether Assange can be prosecuted for the disclosure of information that authorities say was provided by Manning. Lind said that while the FBI and the Army have jointly pursued a WikiLeaks investigation, military prosecutors have no authority to release FBI documents.

The 24-year-old Oklahoma native was ordered court-martialed after he was accused of downloading the documents, diplomatic cables and video clips, then sending them to WikiLeaks. He was working as an intelligence analyst in Baghdad when authorities say he copied classified material from government computers in late 2009 and early 2010.

The material WikiLeaks published included cockpit video of a 2007 U.S. Apache helicopter attack that killed a number of civilians, including a Reuters news photographer and his driver. The U.S. government says the civilian deaths were accidental.

Morrow acknowledged in court Wednesday that the video was not classified, although Manning allegedly got it from a Defense Department computer network intended for classified material. He is charged with "having unauthorized possession" of the video clip.

Manning has been in pretrial confinement since he was charged in May 2010. His treatment at a Marine Corps base caused support for him to swell. The Quantico, Va., brig commander kept Manning confined 23 hours a day in a single-bed cell, citing safety and security concerns. For several days in March 2011, he was forced to sleep naked, purportedly for injury prevention, before he was issued a suicide-prevention smock.

Manning's supporters have raised funds to place posters in the Washington Metro subway system this week portraying him as a whistleblower, patriot and hero.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
FORT MEADE, Md. — A military judge refused on Wednesday to throw out the case against an Army private accused of providing reams of sensitive documents to WikiLeaks in the biggest leak of govern...
FORT MEADE, Md. — A military judge refused on Wednesday to throw out the case against an Army private accused of providing reams of sensitive documents to WikiLeaks in the biggest leak of govern...
Filed by Nick Wing  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 455
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
01:21 PM on 04/27/2012
The issue that none of these "Fry Him" folks seem to get is this.

1. None of the docs he released caused harm to our troops.

HOWEVER...

2. Multiple docs that WERE released showed that our govt. KNEW that Pakistan was passing info to the Taliban and yet our Military CONTINUED to give them information leading to many of our troops getting shot. He exposed information that our own soldiers were being harmed with they didn't need to be.

Additionally docs he leaked showed that the Japanese govt. KNEW that nuclear reactor was dangerous and should have been secured but that they didn't etc...

Your automatic defense of "Fry Him" is idiotic when he exposed that the Military was working with a country KNOWING they were giving information to the enemy. That is the DEFINITION of what the Whistleblower protections were created for.
09:24 AM on 04/26/2012
Manning is an American hero. He exposed the lies our military and civilian leaders we telling us about the war in Afghanistan - especially civilians being killed without cause by U.S troops with impunity. Manning did a great service by releasing documents that should not have been classified in the first place. We live in a democracy where information our government hides should be accessible to the public. The charges against him should be dismissed.
09:54 AM on 04/29/2012
You have to wonder if some people are just parroting what they have heard, or taken the time to review some of the documents. It should be known that the documents that did not "expose the lies" will be used by the prosecution against Manning. If Manning took the diligence to actually read the documents he would have a defense.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:24 AM on 04/26/2012
I dont know what to think anymore. He's "guilty" of espionage but he's NOT guilty of treason, or at least not in his heart. He's VERY naive, but this very issue shows how compromised our ideals have become. I'm not wise enough to decide this one.
photo
KC-CAJUN
Nobody goes there anymore--it's too crowded. -YB
09:22 AM on 04/26/2012
".......But prosecutor Capt. Joe Morrow said the government needs only to show that Manning knew that the enemy would see the material and that he sent it without authorization..."

He's bright enough to download all the materials without getting caught, but not bright enough to realize that the enemy would see it.... ON THE INTERNET??? Dream on.

His intentions may have been honorable, but Manning stole the rights of all Americans when he decided to publish classified material that is rightfully ours. I, personally, didn't want the materials made public to the world, especially to those who wish to destroy me and my country, but Manning acted alone for all of us and put American lives in danger without our consent or vote.

Thankfully, the materials released weren't nearly as damaging as feared. But what about the next dude who decides that the world should be informed of our military secrets and strategies, technology, operatives, etc.? What if he decides that the rogue governments of Africa really have a right to nuclear technology and weaponry? Will we get to vote on what we are willing to release and what we want to remain classified? No.

I don't like to see anyone harshly punished solely as a lesson to all would-be thieves, but in this case, the punishment fits the crime. If the harsh punishment serves as a deterrent to anyone else planning on stealing information, well, that's just gravy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
starchildjg24
Balance, Logic and Humor Rule
02:42 PM on 04/26/2012
Brilliant post. I agree with every word. I'm not big on capital punishment, but we cannot become lackadaisical about such things. His intentions don't really matter, especially when we have troops in harm's way. We are at war, and do any of us really want one soldier to make the decision as to what effect releasing hundreds of thousands classified war documents? He couldn't possibly know what information was contained in those documents, and he obviously didn't care. This is treason, no other word for it. There are other arenas in which to express your political opinions, but betraying your fellow soldiers is about as evil as you can get.
09:14 AM on 04/26/2012
As an old VET I will volunteer to be on his firing squad. NO CHARGE for doing my duty again
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
prawn259
Take no prisoners, suffer no fools
08:30 AM on 04/26/2012
Gee... what a surprise.
07:35 AM on 04/26/2012
CAPTURE ASSANGE AND EXECUTE THESE TWO TOGETHER OR MAKE ONE OF THEM EXECUTE THE OTHER AND THEN HIMSELF
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
prawn259
Take no prisoners, suffer no fools
08:31 AM on 04/26/2012
Just one problem, brain giant, Assange committed no crime in the United States. Maybe you'd be happier living in Iran.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donns
06:41 AM on 04/26/2012
This guy will get a 100% fair Military tril. He's toast, was from the begining.
02:06 AM on 04/26/2012
The world needs to see the truth about America. I would personally like to see our government run with complete transparency: we should know what they are doing, who is donating to them, etc at all times. No cover-ups. If we make a mistake, admit it and compensate the people! If some soldiers break the law in another country, then they should be tried in that country. Attacking innocent people and covering it up should have those people involved locked up for concealing a crime!
07:56 AM on 04/26/2012
Courts martial can be tried anywhere in the world where there's a large US military base. In this case of blatant treason, it should tried close to home, This private committed the ultimate crime against his country and should be duly sentenced. The supervisor who was in charge should also be brought on charges for failure to supervise.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SusanElizabeth1949
My micro-bio may be empty but my head isn't.
05:17 PM on 04/26/2012
Considering that Manning was awaiting return to the US and involuntary separation from the Army, he should have not been allowed NEAR those computers. His immediate supervisor etc had their heads well and throughly up their a$$es.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
prawn259
Take no prisoners, suffer no fools
08:46 AM on 04/26/2012
pretty naive, aren't you?
09:11 AM on 04/26/2012
You sound like another BENEDICT ARNOLD. Does you mother know you are playing on the computer
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gmjonn
Laughing at the Loopy Left
11:12 PM on 04/25/2012
A life time of making small rocks out of big ones one rock at a time is what he needs
10:49 PM on 04/25/2012
Good for him. Now thats what I'm talkin "bout. Justice for them too!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:01 PM on 04/25/2012
Once they sentence this piece of cr##. hopefully it will be firing squad, but if its life, the next hope would be to set him loose in the population area and that will suffice. Death before dishonor.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LouGots
10:53 PM on 04/25/2012
Calm down. Manning is probably headed for a Duck Dinner and about Five.Big Ones. He may not do much more than time served,

I can't figure the Ft. Meade angle, however. I don't know that community, and that's a bit of a wild card for me. It is possible that MI types might react to what Manning did like pilots reacting to sabotage of an aircraft.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:32 PM on 04/25/2012
During my time, Meade was a commo school all tech, has to be his origin when shipped out. Wherever they send him, he will live in fear, nothing lower than anyone who sells out his country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
prawn259
Take no prisoners, suffer no fools
08:47 AM on 04/26/2012
You don't appear to have a real firm grasp on reality there...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:26 PM on 04/26/2012
Of course, you do....get a grip.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Turukano
In 20 years, everyone will say they voted Obama
07:35 PM on 04/25/2012
Yet again, a misleadingheadline ... Manning will get his day in court for leaking thousands of secret documents to a foreign group.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe3245
Now thinking outside of THE BOX.
06:09 PM on 04/25/2012
Honestly, I can't help but see the parallels between this and the Pentagon Papers case.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Turukano
In 20 years, everyone will say they voted Obama
07:35 PM on 04/25/2012
LMAO? Oh, you are serious?
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
KC-CAJUN
Nobody goes there anymore--it's too crowded. -YB
09:30 AM on 04/26/2012
The release of the Pentagon Papers didn't put lives in imminent danger.