iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Laura Bassett
GET UPDATES FROM Laura:

Connecticut Repeals Death Penalty

Posted: 04/25/2012 4:08 pm

Dannel Malloy
Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy

Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy (D) signed a bill into law on Wednesday that repeals the death penalty, making Connecticut the 17th state to do so. The new law does not apply to the 11 inmates currently on death row in the state.

Connecticut has been paying about $5 million a year to maintain its death penalty system, according to the state's Office of Fiscal Analysis, despite the fact it is rarely used. The only person the state has executed since 1960 is serial killer Michael Ross, who raped and murdered eight young women in the 1980s.

The repeal of the death penalty is expected to save the state $850,000 per year in the next two fiscal years, and the OFA estimates that that number will grow to $5 million in subsequent years.

"With Governor Malloy's action, Connecticut joins sixteen other states that have already concluded that the death penalty is too risky, too expensive, and too arbitrary to continue," said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, an advocacy group that opposes capital punishment. "By replacing the death penalty with a sentence of life without parole, Connecticut officials have reduced the risk of executing the innocent and freed up taxpayer dollars for other programs that prevent crime more effectively and better serve victims' families."

A majority of voters in Connecticut oppose the death penalty ban. Sixty-two percent of respondents to a Quinnipiac University poll said they support the death penalty in general, compared to 30 percent who oppose it and 54 percent of voters who said it was a bad idea to replace the death penalty with a sentence of life without parole in Connecticut.

"We have tried to be consistent in not saying much about polls because ... what's there to say?" said Roy Occhiogrosso, senior adviser to the governor, in a statement on Wednesday. "Polls come and go, numbers go up and down. The governor always does what he thinks is best for the state and the right thing to do."

A number of cash-strapped states have been reevaluating their death penalty systems lately as a way to save taxpayers millions of dollars annually. Illinois got rid of capital punishment in 2011, and California has an initiative on the November 2012 ballot to replace its death penalty system, which is estimated to cost about $184 million a year, with a sentence of life without parole.

Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy (D) signed a bill into law on Wednesday that repeals the death penalty, making Connecticut the 17th state to do so. The new law does not apply to the 11 inmates currentl...
Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy (D) signed a bill into law on Wednesday that repeals the death penalty, making Connecticut the 17th state to do so. The new law does not apply to the 11 inmates currentl...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,658
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (27 total)
04:52 AM on 09/13/2012
King John1956 There not going to die next!!! i am studying there case here in england!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
allproinstall
03:29 AM on 05/01/2012
I live in CT and can tell you that before the repeal, the State only executed one person on death row. He was a serial killer named Michael Ross.
Ross wanted to be executed because he could no longer bear the conditions on death row in the State of CT. In 2005 he was given his wish and put to death.
I believe the rest of the death row inmates would have died naturally even if the repeal had not taken place.
I think the next thing will be to give the inmates softer bed and pillows next as the liberals in my state for reasons unknown, seem to coddle these monsters.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kingjohn1956
11:19 AM on 05/05/2012
Cheshire home invasion killers need to die next.
04:54 AM on 09/13/2012
Yo there not going to die next! i do not want them to die either! i am from England and we are studying there case! on all aspects! I think the Death penalty is ridiculous idea for punishment!
06:05 PM on 04/29/2012
'Into the Abyss': Thoughts on Abolishing the Death Penalty in CT - http://www.preludetotheendoftheworld.com/2012/04/into-abyss-thoughts-on-abolishing-death.html
01:38 AM on 04/28/2012
"...a sentence of life without parole..." Another lie of govt. What they don't say that as long as the killer lives, he can be pardoned, given a "humanitarian release" due to terminal illness (and still be alive years later), and any number of other releases.
photo
SelectaLeft
Hunter, Che, Marley, and Hitch.
05:23 PM on 04/26/2012
Has any lettered person noticed that the vast majority of the comments on this thread bemoaning the decision feature poor spelling, lack of punctuation, no sentence structure, and atrocious grammar?

It's almost like there's a correlation between supporting the death penalty and being ignorant.
photo
ProgressivesLoveAmerica
Former disciple of Mises, Hayek & Milton Friedman
12:57 PM on 04/26/2012
I've never favored the death penalty. It has less to do with the actual human rights violations (though that is also a concern) of those being marked for execution and more to do with the kind of sensibility that capital punishment promotes in our society.

The Death Penalty promotes the idea that people are entitled to having their bloodlust justified by the state. This promotes the wrong element in American society & then leads us to really embrace a savage mentality with regard to how we treat our fellow citizens -- whether they've committed crimes or not.

This is the sort of thing that leads us to accept tough-on-crime measures, which really serve to destroy the very fabric of country's society over the long term -- not to mention destroy the fabric of the democratic process through the privatePrison lobby.
11:35 AM on 04/26/2012
in 2009 13,732 innocent lives received the death penalty in connecticut alone. why are babies ok to snuff out but not murderers? how can you be for abortion but against the death penalty for murderers? seems kinda hypocritical
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dario Alvarez
12:50 PM on 04/26/2012
Welcome to the Civilized World, Connecticut.

33 more to go!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wojo Walter John Deptuch
08:28 PM on 04/26/2012
How can you be against abortion but for the the death penalty? That seems very hypocritical since those against abortion are the ones arguing sanctity of life.
11:15 AM on 04/26/2012
how about repealing the death penalty of the millions of babies that will not be born? that's ok, right?--but putting murderers to death--that's a big no no will never really understand how liberals think
01:54 PM on 04/26/2012
Itsa money thing, not a morality thing. Did you read it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wojo Walter John Deptuch
08:30 PM on 04/26/2012
Irony since most of the people who are against the death penalty never argue sanctity of life but those who are against abortion often do.

So really the real hypocrites are the ones against abortion but for the death penalty since life is so sacred.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Madtek
Beam me up Scotty...Scotty...SCOTTY!!!
10:51 AM on 04/26/2012
Call me heartless, but when I read about some of the violence done out there, people caught red-handed, there are some crimes so horrendous that some people should 'forfeit their breathing rights'...just read the crime page.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
octanehi5
red wine
10:21 AM on 04/26/2012
There goes the murder rate now we can watch it go up.Idiots this will add costs to the system
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dario Alvarez
12:49 PM on 04/26/2012
Countless studies show death penalty doesn't act as a deterrent, and murder rates are not related to whether or not it exists.

But don't let facts stop your prejudice.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
octanehi5
red wine
02:05 PM on 04/26/2012
This does not make me prejudice, I believe that in my oppinion that it is a deterrent,I believe I still have that right. Eye for an eye,tooth for a tooth It costs more to keep them alive longer with no chance of getting out. More % of people in this state want to keep the death penalty than do away with in Read the study Bud
09:45 AM on 04/26/2012
I wonder how Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy (D) would feel if his wife and children were brutally tortured and then murdered in Connecticut, and then they caught the killer with clear physical evidence. I wonder how he would feel about the death penalty then.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BreezyinVA
Be True!
03:00 PM on 04/26/2012
You are stuck in the old testament.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wojo Walter John Deptuch
08:32 PM on 04/26/2012
I wonder how he would feel if his son or brother was executed for a crime he didn't commit,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rlaura668
MS in HR
09:41 AM on 04/26/2012
The death penalty has not and will never achieve its purpose and only ignites the criminal to become even more destructive in their determination not to become the states victim. The death penalty ropes in innocent people to carry out the program thus contaminating them, the Doctor, the inmates, the prison employees. An expensive system that has outlived its usefulness; good riddance, all states should follow suit. Humans who commit crimes deserve punishment; imprisonment for life is sufficient punishment.
photo
robin360
dog is god spelled backwards
01:42 PM on 04/26/2012
Well said.
photo
Angrykitteh
You're on double secret probation....
09:37 AM on 04/26/2012
"Connecticut has been paying about $5 million a year to maintain its death penalty system..."

"The repeal of the death penalty is expected to save the state $850,000 per year in the next two fiscal years, and the OFA estimates that that number will grow to $5 million in subsequent years. "

But how much will it cost to sustain "lifers" in prison???
03:49 AM on 05/02/2012
Probably less than it costs to foot the bills for decades of appeals as they wait on death row - which taxpayers also pay.
photo
ebbjib75
Third Responder = Sling Bow
09:16 AM on 04/26/2012
All that is being done is allowing these *people* to live off the rest of society, haveing us pay for their living with 3 free meals aday, beds and roofs over their heads. Bullshavicky.... I bet if all the people that were sentenced to death and then changed to life were put to death - millions of $$$'s would have been saves to be used else where. Why should my and others taxes pay for these miscreants life in prison for their abhorrent behavior? This goes for all the states who have chosen to resend the death penalty.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:12 AM on 04/26/2012
All future murderers need to move to Connecticut. You're guaranteed FREE lodging...FREE meals...FREE cable TV...FREE health and dental care...and FREE internet for the rest of your lives.
photo
Angrykitteh
You're on double secret probation....
09:38 AM on 04/26/2012
To the tune of big bucks for the tax payers.