iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Georgetown To Continue Denying Full Contraception Coverage To Students, Announcement Says

Posted: 04/26/2012 4:19 pm Updated: 04/26/2012 10:33 pm

Sandra Fluke

WASHINGTON -- Georgetown University's health insurance received national attention after Georgetown Law student Sandra Fluke attempted to testify about it in front of a congressional committee.

But despite the uproar that resulted -- Fluke was denied a chance to speak, then called a "slut" by radio show host Rush Limbaugh -- Georgetown announced Thursday that it wouldn't make any changes to its contraception coverage.

"After thoughtful and careful consideration, we will continue our current practice for contraceptive coverage in our student health insurance for the coming year, as allowed for under the current rules issued by the United States Department of Health and Human Services," wrote Georgetown President John DeGioia in a release to the university.

Under its current practice, Georgetown, which is a Jesuit university, denies students coverage for contraception if it is used for birth control. DeGioia said that Thursday's decision was "consistent with our Catholic and Jesuit identity," echoing commentary by conservatives who have termed the battle over contraception coverage a religious freedom issue.

The statement mentioned that the current policy "does provide coverage for these prescriptions for students who require them for health reasons unrelated to birth control, as determined by a physician." But much of Fluke's testimony centered around the difficulties of Georgetown students in receiving such exemptions even when medical needs demanded they use birth control.

Speaking about a friend with ovarian cysts who required birth control, Fluke said that "for my friend and 20 percent of the women in her situation, she never got the insurance company to cover her prescription. Despite verifications of her illness from her doctor, her claim was denied repeatedly on the assumption that she really wanted birth control to prevent pregnancy."

The Department of Health and Human Services has mandated that student health plans cover all FDA-approved forms of contraception by August 2012, but religious institutions like Georgetown were granted a one-year delay. DeGioia's letter, which confirmed that Georgetown would take that delay, came a week after 780 Georgetown law students, including Fluke, urged the university not to wait until 2013 to offer full coverage.

A university spokeswoman told The Huffington Post that Georgetown's announcement was not in response to the letter, and that the school had been hearing from organizations "on all sides of the issue."

But while students are prevented from receiving full contraception coverage, university employees are not. DeGioia noted in his statement that there was "no change to the University’s approach to contraceptive coverage for employees."

Kayleen Hartman, a Georgetown law graduate and current fellow at the school's Human Rights Institute, questioned the divide between students and employees. "I spent three years as a student at Georgetown Law and then transitioned immediately to a job there. How is it possible that it became less of a sin and a violation of moral conscience to provide me with contraception coverage the moment I started drawing a salary?," asked Hartman.

Georgetown's Student Bar Association asked for a clarification on the issue in February, but received no response from the university.

UPDATE 7:19 p.m EST: Law Students for Reproductive Justice, a student group at Georgetown, issued a statement on Thursday condemning the university's decision. "Georgetown LSRJ is deeply disturbed to learn that Georgetown University President John DeGioia has decided not to comply with the final rule of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) requiring comprehensive contraceptive coverage in 2012 student insurance," they wrote. "We believe President DeGioia’s decision is an affront to the health concerns of the Georgetown student body. Georgetown LSRJ has extensively documented that Georgetown’s current policy does not adequately meet students’ medical needs for contraception."

Fluke, a past president of the group, also issued her own statement. "I think many current and future alumni like myself, when contacted for alumni donations, will remember this decision, and remember that President DeGioia didn't meet with students to even discuss our concerns," she said.

An earlier version of this story incorrectly identified Kayleen Hartman's religious preference.

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Georgetown University's health insurance received national attention after Georgetown Law student Sandra Fluke attempted to testify about it in front of a congressional committee. Bu...
WASHINGTON -- Georgetown University's health insurance received national attention after Georgetown Law student Sandra Fluke attempted to testify about it in front of a congressional committee. Bu...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,611
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Sesame2009 09:11 PM on 04/26/2012
Fine Georgetown.  If you wish to discriminate against the healthcare needs of women you need to do the following.  

-Women of reproductive age should have their health insurance premiums decreased since their basic health care needs are not included.  

-People, including the married ones, who make the lifestyle decision to have sex, but NOT have children shouldn't have to pay  Read More...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SylvreWolfe
06:30 PM on 04/29/2012
If the Catholic Church wants to continue discriminating against women and other minorities, while providing such things as Viagra to men, then they can give up ALL public funding. No more tax payer dollars should go to any Catholic institution, religious or not, and no more tax exempt status.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SylvreWolfe
02:29 PM on 04/29/2012
Fine, lower the premiums for women and quit covering ED drugs.
01:20 PM on 04/29/2012
A disappointing decision in that they did not eliminate all coverage of contracceptives, but, then again, Georgetown has not been Catholic in a long time.

Many people are puzzled by the Catholic Church's teaching against contraception.

But, in a lot of ways the teaching makes sense.

For those who wish to learn more about the Church's teaching on contraception, an excellent commentary and further resource links can be found here:

http://allhands-ondeck.blogspot.com/2012/02/why-catholic-church-opposes.html
01:15 PM on 04/29/2012
...And some bad news on contraception:

Today's news story from Reuters: "Women overestimate effectiveness of Pill, condoms."

Story here:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/27/us-women-pill-condom-idUSBRE83Q11Q20120427

Given this bad news, here is a very relevant and thought-provoking piece on the subject of women, sexuality, contraception, and abortion written by Jennifer Fulwiler.

Here is the link:

http://www.ncregister.com/blog/jennifer-fulwiler/the-contraception-trap/#ixzz1sixRqAcS
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
09:24 PM on 04/28/2012
There ought to be a law....

Since public shaming of Georgetown University didn't work I guess we will have to make a law and FORCE them to treat their female students like human beings. I'm sure their health insurance provides Viagra to anyone who needs it free of charge...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SimianNation
Progressive NOT Regressive
05:29 PM on 04/28/2012
When I get that call this fall, I will make sure that I let them know that this year I am not going to give because of this decision. With the great number of Alum that we lost in the world trade center buildings on 9/11, our alumni base has not fully recovered, and our yearly alum donations are far from being to where they were.

On second thought, I think I will just give the money straight to Law Students for Reproductive Justice. I urge others, especially fellow alum, to do the same ( http://lsrj.org/donate/ ).
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
09:25 PM on 04/28/2012
You should tell them that in a recession year you aren't going to donate to them until they start treating female students like human beings. There are just too many great causes out there and a university with a bigoted policy like theirs just isn't making my list or that of any thinking persons.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SimianNation
Progressive NOT Regressive
10:29 PM on 04/28/2012
I would not call it bigoted.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
WTH 2012
Tell Vlad I'm flexible
07:56 PM on 04/27/2012
Since "current policy does provide coverage for these prescriptions for students who require them for health reasons," Fluke either lied or needs verification to back up her story.
Her "friend's" story makes no sense since she was in fact covered.

And if this "friend" had a billing problem but chose to lose an ovary instead of paying $10/month for doctor prescribed _medication it is not the university's fault.
bipolarbears60
common sense isn't so common
11:00 PM on 04/27/2012
It shouldn't surprise me you call her a liar. First you're ignorant to believe the bargain basement generic is what she needed. Since she didn't need it for contraception, but rather for cysts, she couldn't take just anything. And, if your insurance won't cover it, you pay full price, not the co-pay amount. Even the $10 stuff turns into $60. Do you even understand how insurance works? Apparently, you've never had an insurance company deny a justifiable claim? Ever? This practice is completely unheard of to you?

Who are you trying to convince? Women? Do you think repeating talking points from a drug addled misogynist will win us over? Really?
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
09:27 PM on 04/28/2012
Nice. You win. Bipolarbears60 2012!
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
09:26 PM on 04/28/2012
You're misreading it. The current policy does NOT provide coverage for these prescriptions and that policy has not changed despite public outcry.
07:01 PM on 04/27/2012
As a gay man, I oppose the pill. It's simply an extension of the privilege notion that women have adopted in the last 50 years. If I had the power, I would ban the pill.

I've noticed this really interesting trend. Women seem to want to be like men. They want to be as promiscuous as men. They want to be as sexual as men. They want to curse like men. They want men's jobs. It's reflective of the inferiority complex that women have. They think they are inferior as women and, therefore, they must be like men. This is also reflected in their desire for contraception and abortion.

Well, girls, I've got news for you. You're fakes. You will never have the sexual power and promiscuity of men. Deal with it and get on with your lives as nature intended.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
retromoderne
Born right the first time
06:57 PM on 04/28/2012
Wow. Good thing you're gay. I doubt if you'd be having much success with women with that boulder on your shoulder.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
09:32 PM on 04/28/2012
Yeah, no fooling. I've known lots of gays and lesbians over the years because here in the great state of Idaho the con-men try to turn them into non-citizens every few years or so. Since I'm friend to many gay people and because I'm a fair-minded person, I've marched with them several times over the years because I figure one more head in the crowd is one more head in the crowd and I can show support without being gay myself. I have NEVER heard a gay man talk that way about women. I've heard a couple of lesbians talk that way about men (they'd usually make a point of ensuring I know they're not talking about me, but about their abusive former-husbands/boyfriends/etc). It makes me think John77 isn't really gay but is just posturing as a gay man thinking that his supposed gayness will somehow make his point more convincing to us libruls. I think that he's the one who's a fake.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SylvreWolfe
05:30 PM on 04/29/2012
So sayeth the gay man....
06:56 PM on 04/27/2012
The pill is unnatural. It contains chemicals that may increase the risk of cancer in my view. The increase of cancers in women in recent decades suggests this may be the case.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
goku7675
Writer, News-Junkie,Values an informed intellect
10:12 PM on 04/27/2012
OMG, you are kidding, right? Women have been using the birth control pill safely for 40 years and the Birth control pill has NOTHING to do with the rise in cancers among women. Certain hormone pills that have been prescribed for menopausal women have been suspected of possibly increasing breast cancers and you are confusing this data with birth control. Get your facts.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
retromoderne
Born right the first time
06:58 PM on 04/28/2012
Bearing a large number of children is proven to have a lot of negative health effects.
04:37 AM on 04/29/2012
then please don't reproduce.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
greysells2
grey cells matter
02:52 PM on 04/27/2012
Moderators, please check: [Ablecynic has replied to your comment on Fri, 27 at 11:50:57] for an insulting and libelous attack on me that is completely outside of your posting guidelines and that nothing to do with my posted comment Ablecynic claims to be responding to. I think Ablecynic should be banned for her behavior.
04:38 AM on 04/29/2012
on the playground, we use to call this "tattle tale"
12:14 PM on 04/27/2012
Georgetown should simply refund the exact amount needed to purchase contraceptives.

Then, the women can make their own decision.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bryan broome
Am. The land of the homeless free of the brave.
10:46 AM on 04/28/2012
HP has no room for common sense. ;)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Just My Thoughts 2011
Life's but a walking shadow
10:22 AM on 04/30/2012
Ohhh, I've said that for years, now.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
09:37 PM on 04/28/2012
They cost different amounts. The kind her friend needed isn't the generic bargain kind. That stuff is great for birth control but it won't do anything for cysts which is why she needed the medicine in the first place. Finding some medicine that duplicates one of the side effects (preventing birth) isn't good enough. She needs medicine that will treat her cyst. Apparently religious universities are too squeamish to treat a disease if it strikes you in the privates.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gloriaswanson43
Ask and you will get more info.
11:39 AM on 04/27/2012
It sounds like the University is entitled to take the delay if they wish.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gloriaswanson43
Ask and you will get more info.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
tuliehowller
Sunny days are here again.
11:09 AM on 04/27/2012
......in other words....women need not apply.
bipolarbears60
common sense isn't so common
11:05 PM on 04/27/2012
Sounds like it to me.
pernthursday
freedom!!! yeah, right!?
10:19 AM on 04/27/2012
If this was such a bfd to Fluke, why didn't she attend a different university?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stape45
It IS what it IS!
10:47 AM on 04/27/2012
That's what I would have done. I would give the self-righteous their space, do my research and go elsewhere. Effectively-speaking, a boycott.
bipolarbears60
common sense isn't so common
11:25 PM on 04/27/2012
Why should a person be forced to choose an education based on available health care as opposed to academic rank?

Note I said person. People already take or don't take or keep or don't keep jobs based on the health insurance available. It's a major expense for business and prices American workers higher than workers of those "socialist" countries we compete with for jobs.

Since Republicans hate "Obama Care" I wish they'd solve that problem.

I once had a co-worker whose 1st born was born with a terrible defect. From that point on the company owned her. She knew, they knew she couldn't ever quit. Her child had a pre-existing condition. If she left that job and got another, no new insurance co. would take on her child's pre-existing condition. Eventually they sold the business. That's when she lost her insurance.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
tuliehowller
Sunny days are here again.
11:10 AM on 04/27/2012
You can bet women will chose a different University now!
InLosAngeles
Speaking Truth to Groupthink
04:16 PM on 04/27/2012
Perhaps womyn will, most likely women will not. We'll see. PP has it down the road for $25-30 a month.
10:17 AM on 04/27/2012
The catholic colleges,churches and republicans are beginning to irritate the sister hood and bishops.I sense uprisings in the future they already have their sights set on Ryans budget and are not happy with it or him.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
09:43 PM on 04/28/2012
They should have chosen their political allies better.