iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

U.S. GDP Growth Q1 2012: Economic Growth Slowed To 2.2 Percent On Cutbacks In Government, Business Spending

By PAUL WISEMAN and CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER 04/27/12 06:02 PM ET AP

Us Gdp Growth Q1 2012

WASHINGTON — Don't panic yet. The government reported Friday that the economy got off to a tepid start this year, but that doesn't foreshadow a repeat of the near-standstill that happened in 2011.

"The economy is firmly on a growth trajectory," said Sung Won Sohn, an economics professor at California State University's Smith School of Business. "The first-quarter slowdown will be temporary."

Still, the January-March report was discouraging.

Economists had expected gross domestic product – the broadest gauge of economic output – to expand at a 2.5 percent annual rate for the first three months of the year. Instead, the Commerce Department said it was 2.2 percent, mainly because of government budget-cutting and a slowdown in business investment.

And some of the January-March growth, meager as it was, probably came at the expense of the current quarter. An unseasonably warm winter pulled car buyers into showrooms earlier than usual.

The same was true for housing construction. That's one reason it jumped at a 19 percent pace from January through March.

Economists doubt consumers can keep spending as freely as they did in the first three months of this year: an annual pace that was 2.9 percent faster than in the previous quarter and the fastest in more than a year. They probably can't afford to. Americans' after-tax income rose just 0.6 percent in the first three months compared with a year earlier. That was the puniest pay increase in two years.

People spent more in part because they socked away less. The savings rate fell to 3.9 percent of after-tax income. That was down from 4.5 percent. Economists worry that people won't keep spending more unless their income grows.

Stock prices rose Friday despite the report of weaker growth. David Rosenberg, chief economist at Gluskin Sheff, said investors might have bid up stocks because they think the Federal Reserve is more likely to pursue another round of bond buying to stimulate the economy.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke "has created the impression that if the economy stumbles, he'll be there to hold your hand," Rosenberg said.

The lackluster first-quarter growth follows government reports that hiring slowed sharply in March and the number of people seeking unemployment benefits reached a three-month high.

With 12.7 million people unemployed, today's economy needs much faster growth to boost hiring. Growth would have to be roughly 4 percent for a full year to lower the unemployment rate, now 8.2 percent, by 1 percentage point.

In 2011, a series of setbacks struck the economy. Gas prices rose sharply. An earthquake in Japan shuttered factories there and cut off supplies to U.S. manufacturers. A standoff in Washington brought the federal government to the brink of default, rattling investors and consumer confidence. And Europe's debt crisis threatened to diminish U.S. exports and further spook investors.

The economy slowed to an annual rate of just 0.4 percent in the first quarter of 2011. Unemployment, which had been falling, rose again last summer.

But most economists think the U.S. economy is more resilient this year.

The job market, household finances and businesses are all in better shape than they were a year ago. Supplies are flowing freely. Political bickering has eased. And the fears about Europe have subsided at least temporarily.

"People are less concerned that the eurozone crisis could engulf the whole world," says Nigel Gault, an economist with IHS Global Insight.

A 55-cent run-up in gasoline prices (to an average $3.83 a gallon) isn't hurting as much this year. In part, that's because drivers are getting used to paying more. And families' finances are sturdier after another year of paying down debts.

In addition, some factors that held back growth in the first quarter aren't expected to last. Businesses splurged on software and equipment at the end of 2011 because of an expiring tax break. That stole economic activity, in effect, from the first quarter. Companies will probably resume spending again later this year.

And economists say government spending will probably rebound – or at least stop falling – because state and local governments are collecting more tax revenue as their economies slowly recover.

"Their budget holes are getting a lot smaller," says Jay Bryson, global economist for Wells Fargo.

Most of all, the job market is stronger than it was last year. Unemployment has fallen from 9.1 percent in August to 8.2 percent in March. The economy has added nearly 1.9 million jobs over the past year. More hiring is creating more pay and more spending – a cycle in which hiring and consumer spending reinforce each other and grow.

Economists note that Friday's report isn't the final word on first-quarter growth. It is just an initial estimate. The government will revise the figures in May and again in June.

Then in July, the growth figures will be tweaked yet again. That's when the government will revise its estimates of growth from 2009 through the first quarter of this year.

The picture could look brighter after the revisions. Two months ago, the government revised income and savings for the second half of last year. It showed Americans had earned and saved more than previously thought. That meant they had more money to spend.

Some economists expect a similar revision this year because job gains suggest that incomes might be higher.

This was the 11th quarter since the Great Recession officially ended in June 2009. The fastest rate of economic growth has been 3.9 percent in the first quarter of 2010. Normally, a much bigger bounce would follow a deep recession like the one the United States sank into in December 2007.

When the economy emerged from the recession of 1981-1982, for instance, growth hit an 8 percent annual pace for four straight quarters in 1983 and 1984.

The gross domestic product measures the output of all goods and services produced in the United States, from cars to electricity to manicures. GDP growth drives job creation, pay, corporate profits and stock prices.

As disappointing as the first-quarter numbers were, the U.S. economy still looks a lot stronger than most of the rest of the developed world. It's expected to grow perhaps 2.5 percent for the full year.

By contrast, Britain's economy will only grow 0.8 percent and Japan's about 2 percent, according to forecasts from the International Monetary Fund. Things are even worse in Europe. The 17 countries that use the euro as their currency are expected to see growth shrink 0.3 percent.

"Growth is an increasingly rare commodity in the global economy," says Jason Conibear of Cambridge Mercantile, which specializes in trading currencies. "But the US has got it."

___

AP Economics Writer Martin Crutsinger contributed to this report.

FOLLOW BUSINESS

WASHINGTON — Don't panic yet. The government reported Friday that the economy got off to a tepid start this year, but that doesn't foreshadow a repeat of the near-standstill that happened in 201...
WASHINGTON — Don't panic yet. The government reported Friday that the economy got off to a tepid start this year, but that doesn't foreshadow a repeat of the near-standstill that happened in 201...
Filed by Jillian Berman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,220
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (42 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Hall 2
07:56 PM on 04/29/2012
If a certain party didn't keep on insisting on government cutbacks (except for military and rich-favorable tax cuts) and blocking any job growth maybe economic growth would be better. But why would the "liberal media" hold the Republicans responsible for anything?
photo
Iamrebelriser
iamrebelriser
07:11 PM on 04/29/2012
You're full of baloney. How can you folks compare this worst ever recession to Reagan's "on purpose recession" or any other recession of a different time in the world? The whole economy is more dependant on the global markets & circumstances. I think the Republicans who want to take our budget back to the 80's had better go back to the pay of the 80's also. I'm pretty sick of the dumbed down Republican, shock jock followers repeating the lies of the Republicans whcih they gladly spread through Limbaugh, Beck, O'Reilly, Hanity, Coulter and the rest of them. You can NOT compare these time to the past, since so many of the manufactoring jobs have been moved off shore and the jobs that are coming up now need completely different skills. Let's have some truth instead of Romney Republican lies. For you who think Romney can fix anything in regard to jobs for the poor & middle class, you'd better remember that it took Susan Anthony to help get women's rights and it took Martin Luther King to help with rights for blacks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
08:11 AM on 04/29/2012
What a B.S. article. Any growth is better than no growth, and besides, what was growth during the Bush years? I seem to remember Bush saying that 2.5% was terrific because it was "slow and easy, not wanting things to overheat" or something like that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert SF
07:54 PM on 04/28/2012
"People spent more in part because they socked away less. The savings rate fell to 3.9 percent of after-tax income. That was down from 4.5 percent."
===

That's sheer insanity. If you don't save at least 10% of your income your entire life, you WILL eat dog food in your old age. The way things are going, there is no way around that.

Mind you, saving that 10% is no guarantee that you will retire in comfort. Oh, no, the market could crash or anything could happen. But without saving that 10%, you are virtually guaranteed to end a pauper, gumming stew for lunch down at the soup kitchen, if you're lucky.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
08:14 AM on 04/29/2012
Try saving 10% when you've got two mortgages and one lease payment plus everything else on your plate. Don't ask me to explain how a responsible person ended up with two mortgages and a lease payment. It's called trying to stay working and having to move to do so, then having to deal with a near depression.
05:42 PM on 04/28/2012
The GOP at work.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:15 PM on 04/28/2012
Oh my gosh, I forgot to proof. .so sorry! =/
photo
Iamrebelriser
iamrebelriser
07:15 PM on 04/29/2012
Don't worry, we all get in a hurry at times or we're tired or we're very anoyed, so neglect to edit our comment before hitting "Post Comment."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:26 PM on 04/29/2012
Thanks. . .also, what I like to call the "Gremlin Excitation" also applies, never post after midnight! ;) LOL Nice to meet you!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:14 PM on 04/28/2012
What is not explained is the criteria they use to determine the unemployemnt rate; despite many loud and and numerous objections taht the method is flawed becuase it counts ONLY those as unemplouyed receiveing benefits, and not those that have exhausted funding.

In Oregon for example (pop. 3,825,657) 8,000 people were cut from extended benefits 4/7 because, supposedly, the economy improved. Those 8,000 pople should be added to unemployed tally but they were NOT! There is now a false pictrure of how employment stands in this state. Bad math compounds an already intolerable situation by giving false assurance.

"Figures often beguile me, particularly when I have the arranging of them myself; in which case the remark attributed to Disraeli would often apply with justice and force: 'There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics.'"
- Mark Twain, Autobiography, from chapter printed in the North American Review
08:59 AM on 04/28/2012
another stupid misleading just plain wrong headline -- sigh

will no one rid me of the Huffpo headline writer?
08:26 AM on 04/28/2012
Don't worry....there is still time...for what? More of this depression? Of course it's not Obama's fault....it never is. And 3 years later all the papers will still have you believe it's not Obama's fault, but Bush's. Funny. Bush never stood a chance with the papers and now it seems they use teflon ink when talking or writing about Obama. Are you really better off? I would say 99% of you are NOT.
photo
Iamrebelriser
iamrebelriser
07:22 PM on 04/29/2012
How come you dumbed down Limbaugh, FOX listeners don't seem to know that for three & a half years now, Republicans have been keeping to their promise to block all possible recovery & jobs bills? WELL, of cource, FOX & Limbaugh don't tell you these things, because they're so busy spreading lies that they know you will be dumb enough to believe. I'll remind you also of the Republican's plan as found on papers they left behind in a hotel room, to spread lots of lies because they know their supporter are DUMB.
07:13 AM on 04/30/2012
Did I mention Fox news, Limbaugh? You jumped to what you want to read instead of
reading what I wrote. I did not mention FOX, I did NOT mention Limbaugh, I did not even mention being Democratic or Republican. Funny that you believe you can't have an opinion against Obama unless you are Republican. Now that I believe is DUMB. Besides for the past 3 years (prior to this January) the DEMOCRATS have had control over the senate and House and could have, if wanted, passed any bill with their majority. That they failed to do so does NOT point to the republicans voting no, but to their own
political party disagreeing with the bills before them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
08:23 AM on 04/28/2012
"Hope for the best but expect the worst" - but I really, really want some of those rose-colored glasses some of the "expert economists" are wearing or some of that wacky tobacky they are smoking.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:10 AM on 04/28/2012
""he economy is firmly on a growth trajectory," said Sung Won Sohn, an economics professor at California State University's Smith School of Business. "The first-quarter slowdown will be temporary."

Problem 1: This is a 'Professor' from California State......(think liberal)...
Problem 2: They were all grossly wrong with their predictions for this quarter, great record to stand on. This guy must think he's Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andman0121
09:47 AM on 04/28/2012
"He's a liberal". Sigh, you are ten years old.
02:53 AM on 04/28/2012
Sentences like "government spending cuts are weighing on the U.S. economy in a way that hasn't been seen in generations" and "without autos, growth would have been about 1.5 percent" are the real story here, and how anyone can read this article as anything other than validation of the Keynesian economic model is a mystery to me. Check out how countries that decided to embrace austerity have fared during this recession. The UK cut nearly 20% of their budget back in 2010 and now have the pleasure of reaping a measly .8% growth rate.
photo
K August
Research Alec Exposed
06:01 AM on 04/28/2012
"The UK cut nearly 20% of their budget back in 2010 and now have the pleasure of reaping a measly .8% growth rate."

As long as one side cries that all we have to do is cut deficits, we too will have stagnant growth. The people falling for it are basically asking for slow recovery without knowing they are being bamboozled.

What we need is investment...... more stimulus to really kick the economy in gear and once unemployment drops and more taxes are coming in....then the deficit spending will decline naturally as government has more revenue.
01:42 AM on 04/28/2012
The growth is an illusion anyway, just like it was the last two decades.

When we export jobs to slaves and children, actually export whole factories to almost slaves in Mexico, give all our money - and all the money our children might have had - to parasites, let the same parasites out of paying any taxs, pay for an empire thrugh hundreds of thousands of soldiers in 50 nations - most of yll we call allies, and have the biggest growth in an "industry" that does nothing but shift money around withut producing anything of value (you know - the things that give money its value) we do not have growth. We have financial fascism.

There are only two ways this can end: in WWIII - that we already started - or in Americans waking up and starting to fight FOR themselves and not against themselves. Because today that is what we do. Almost the only Americans fighting who are recognized by the ones owning the press and everything else - because they work for them - are Tea Baggers. When was the last time You heard something about OWS? - Exactly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:11 AM on 04/28/2012
It's only an illusion if the President is a Dem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andman0121
09:48 AM on 04/28/2012
Again, you have the political acumen of a ten year old
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JudgeMoonbox
10:05 AM on 04/28/2012
"It's only an illusion if the President is a Dem."

When I first saw this, I hougt you were being sarcastic. Now that I've read your other posts, it seems you really believe that the same data is to be interpreted differently depending on who's in the White House.
photo
HMDMSR
Workers of the world, unite!
12:35 AM on 04/28/2012
8% growth? Only due to inflation.
12:05 AM on 04/28/2012
With the revised GDP numbers, our us debt now exceeds GDP. CONGRATS TO ALL WHO HELPED US SITUATION GET WORSE. You think things are bad now just wait until all the fed's liquidity drys up.