iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Sam Stein
GET UPDATES FROM Sam:

Friends Of Democracy, PAC-Super PAC Hybrid, Launched To Go After Other Super PACs

Posted: 04/30/2012 12:54 pm Updated: 04/30/2012 1:13 pm

Super Pac Friends Of Democracy

WASHINGTON -- Hoping to put a harsh spotlight on the coercive effect super PACs are having on the political process, a prominent progressive activist and a long-time good government watchdog are joining forces to start one of their own.

Ilyse Hogue, a former top official at MoveOn and Media Matters, along with David Donnelly, the Executive Director of the Public Campaign Action Fund, will file paperwork with the FEC on Monday to formally create an entity called Friends of Democracy.

A hybrid PAC and super PAC, Friends of Democracy will have the power to make contributions to federal candidates (with a $5,000 limit) and raise unlimited sums of money from individuals and corporations. But it will do it all with the aim of demonstrating the need for campaign finance reform.

"The truth is we want to preserve options and use every tool possible to make sure that money and politics remains an issue in the campaign, and that we have the option of creating political accountability around it," said Hogue.

"Most people can see that money in politics in this election is out of control," Donnelly said. "More than 80 percent of Americans want some sensible limits on the way money flows in politics. We felt there needed to be more champions for reform and that opponents of reform needed to be defeated."

Neither Donnelly nor Hogue would discuss how much money Friends of Democracy has on hand, likely because the push to recruit donors will ramp up as the July deadline for reporting contributions approaches. But the purpose of the hybrid PAC is not to match other entities dollar for dollar. To date, super PACs have spent more than $94 million on independent expenditures, according to data from the Sunlight Foundation. The largest portion of that has come from Restore Our Future, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney's allied super PAC, which has spent $42 million.

Rather, Friends of Democracy will use its more limited resources to shame the biggest donors and their major recipients, among other objectives. Within the confines of the often-staid campaign finance world, Donnelly is considered one of the more aggressive political tacticians. Hogue, meanwhile, has direct experience working on grassroots oriented and social-media focused campaigns targeting special interests, including a successful effort against the retail giant Target for making a $150,000 donation to a group backing an anti-gay rights gubernatorial candidate in Minnesota.

"There are perverse incentives for candidates to step out [in favor of campaign finance reform]," Hogue explained. "We want to make sure there is a political cost associated with opposing reform and accountability."

According to Donnelly, Friends of Democracy will explore a number of different mechanisms for supporting and opposing candidates, including running independent expenditures, making direct contributions, bundling donations and providing in-kind support for candidates. The hybrid PAC, he explained, will have more operational flexibility than a traditional PAC established as an arm of an existing campaign finance non-profit.

"David and I have a long history of working together, and I think it is not a bad combo of the issue expertise and the political skills to know what matters to candidates," Hogue said.

Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Hoping to put a harsh spotlight on the coercive effect super PACs are having on the political process, a prominent progressive activist and a long-time good government watchdog are joini...
WASHINGTON -- Hoping to put a harsh spotlight on the coercive effect super PACs are having on the political process, a prominent progressive activist and a long-time good government watchdog are joini...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 287
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
UnknownSolider 03:11 PM on 04/30/2012
We need to amend the Constitution not only to reverse the Supreme Court Decision, but to hold members of Congress and the Senate more accountable for their performance.......... Why should a Senator or Congress person be allowed to hold on to a seat when the district or state they represent gets worse as the years go by. We have some members of the Congress who represent districts where the schools are  Read More...
03:43 PM on 05/01/2012
Have a super duper commie holiday, comrades. Be sure to enjoy it while you can because at this time next year we will be dismantling your fascist welfare state. We will dump the Hype and remove the Chains and freedom will return to this once great land absent the misery that your envy provides. You will be the 99% that was denied your socialist goals because only 1% of you ever favored freedom.
06:26 PM on 07/12/2012
Who is "we"?

How can the state be "commie," "fascist," and "socialist" all at the same time?

And how can you dismantle a "fascist... state" when it is controlled by both Fascist Democrats and Fascist Republicans, both of whom bow to the same Gilded Fascist Elite Bilderberg masters?
12:05 PM on 07/13/2012
Hitler was a socialist. Stalin was a socialist. Mussolini was a socialist. Obama is a socialist. Socialist come in many forms of misery but all seek to control and limit freedom. That is what socialist do afterall.
12:03 PM on 05/01/2012
Robber: "Give me your money"!
Victim: "All I have is the money in my wallet"
Robber:"You can keep your wallet"
Victim: "Thank you"
Robber: "I have just given you a wallet"
And that is how liberals view tax cuts. When they don't take what you have they have given you something. How very nice of them.
06:28 PM on 07/12/2012
I'm curious as to how that explains how the Wall Street robber barons stole the wealth of the middle class.
12:07 PM on 07/13/2012
Sorry, comrade, you have confused Wall St. with Obama and his generational theft.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Louis Ruoti
Prejudices are what fools use for reason
12:48 AM on 05/01/2012
In theory this is a marvelous step towards campaign reform. My first impression is "this would be a worthy cause to get behind".

Still, I'm going to wait to see them in action before I can support them wholeheartedly...

I don't want to back something and find that down the road, " it seemed like a good idea at the time".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnnyCypher
Rational thinkers unite.
11:35 PM on 04/30/2012
What a miserable cesspool of corruption and stupidity this nation has become.
AveragePatriot
god is imaginary
10:04 PM on 04/30/2012
Cool! It sounds like the Colbert PAC on steroids!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Twohill
12:42 AM on 05/01/2012
We should all strive for making a better tomorrow... tomorrow.
09:33 PM on 04/30/2012
Absitively worth a contribution!
photo
ClubStyle DJ
Hey, pretty girl want something to drink?
09:14 PM on 04/30/2012
Let me guess is it called a "Super DUPER" pac?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oopsiepoo
tippytoedancer
07:55 PM on 04/30/2012
is there no end to the massive amounts of money being spent on politicians? It just continues to get worse and worse - meanwhile, if any of these contributors were asked to contribute to a homeless shelter, a shelter for abused women and children, provide food for those in desperate need - they would be outraged to think that the government was 'giving these people other people's money,' and refuse to help. Really, really sad and scary as hell to think of the amounts of money collected and given and it's just the beginning of the campaign - months to go yet.
iflew
Pro Publiae Bonae
08:36 PM on 04/30/2012
Personally I see merit in not having sick people around. When people's needs can be served it can allow someone else to be a productive contributing worker. The other side of the coin is what it looks like to the selfish, self serving, greedy person: "Giving to someone else? Why? Just as soon have another drink and barf it up. Have another and barf it up. Have another and barf it up.".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shirley thomas
we have no friends in dc
07:41 PM on 04/30/2012
it's a shame that moneymuch of it "dirty" may determine the next pres/senator/congressmen
07:25 PM on 04/30/2012
You know in 2008 Obama agreed to accept public funding(lie #1 in his long list of lies) then he decideded to go for the big bucks. He spent more than double what McCain spent to get the highest office money could buy. Funny how I don't remember any lefties complaining then. He has had more campaign fundraisers in his first term than every president since Nixon COMBINED and is set to spend a billion dollars on a job that only pays $400,000 a year. It cost $35,000 a plate just to have dinner with him and you can see him riding around in his favorite form of transportation(his golf cart) with his Swiss banker/bundler buddy but we can expect his supporters to get the "money out of politics"? Excuse me if I don't hold my breath.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oopsiepoo
tippytoedancer
07:57 PM on 04/30/2012
don't you worry your pointed little GOP head - Karl Rove will be there with all the money's that's needed and so will the Koch Brothers, and other assorted 'patriotic americans,' so it's okay. I wonder if the swiss banker you mention might know mittens, since he has swiss bank accounts.
11:07 AM on 05/01/2012
What, me worry? Hardly, I see Hope as soon as we Change from the usurper to an actual president
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Michaela19801
Dante's Inferno aka GOP
08:34 PM on 04/30/2012
Yes O raised a lot of money but there were STILL limits on what people could give. There was tracking as to where the money came from.

That is the issue with Superpacks.. UNLIMITED AMOUNTS FROM ANYONE INCLUDING FOREIGN COUNTRIES>
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Twohill
12:45 AM on 05/01/2012
And crap loads of that money came from average citizens. Not just big business.
I say crap loads because I'm not sure the actual figure but I do know it was a much higher percentage than most candidates get from private citizens. AND, the average amount per donor was fairly low as well. That is to say, a lot of people gave a few bucks each. It was amazing.
07:14 PM on 04/30/2012
"A progressive activist and a long-time good government watchdog" talk about your diametrically opposed doctrines... Why don't you just say two wolves and a lamb got together to decide whats for dinner? Makes about as much sense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
Question Authority!
06:57 PM on 04/30/2012
The right wing Roberts court will go down in American history as the court that dealt the death blow to Democracy in America. And anyone who beleives this was not planned more than a decade ago is living in a dream world.

"Fascism is Capitalism in decline."

Republicans and thier constituency of 1% have every intension of buying our democracy out from under us and installing Romney as THIER puppet....a position Romney feels he is "entitled " to!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oopsiepoo
tippytoedancer
07:59 PM on 04/30/2012
norquist has all ready told them the only part romeny, as president, would play would be to sign the bills that are written for him to sign, and to just sit there in the oval office and keep his mouth shut - others have plans for running the government.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Twohill
12:53 AM on 05/01/2012
What I don't understand about Norquist is why he claims he has to mask his real agenda through an anti tax pledge. He says that his pledge is against extra taxes because if you put raising taxes on the table, then government will take the easy way out and raise taxes. They won't even begin to talk about efficiency and streamlining. It's a noble cause, and I believe he's right. Why would politicians work hard to try and lower costs if all they have to do is raise taxes? There's definitely a lot of ways the government can save money without hurting their employees and at the same time still give the same services at the same or better levels. Everybody wants efficiency, so why not have an efficiency pledge?
Because it doesn't put extra money in the pockets of the rich, is my answer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
Question Authority!
11:04 AM on 05/01/2012
Why is that not surprizing?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:31 PM on 04/30/2012
For several years now I have been obsessively writing various organizations about a well-developed approach along these lines but the replies have always been patronizing and dismissive. I could save them 10 years of blundering trial-and-error.
photo
souix55
By your actions you will be known
06:19 PM on 04/30/2012
I love this idea!
Also, everyone needs to write letters to the editor. From now until the Election Day we have the change to correct some of this false information. No matter how much money is spent, it is our votes that elect our government. So if we do some investigating and find false information, then we need to step up and correct the information. Our newspaper allows on letter a month, and I will not waste a month without writing a letter.
06:11 PM on 04/30/2012
This sounds like one good solution to the issue of money in politics. CleanSlateNow.org is also working to get money out of politics by supporting candidates who don't take special interest money. There is a list on the website of national and state candidates running on individual contributions only.