iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Coleen And Jerusha Goodwin, Idaho Midwives, Suspended By State, Case Shows Tension With Hospitals

By JOHN MILLER 05/ 1/12 03:31 AM ET AP

Idaho Midwife Case

MERIDIAN, Idaho -- Midwives and doctors are longtime rivals in the politics governing where women should give birth: Home or hospital.

But that tension, typically played out privately between pregnant women and their health care providers, was laid bare this month in the case of two Idaho midwives suspended by the state after three babies died during a 14-month period between 2010 and 2011.

The Baby Place in Meridian remains open, but its midwife owner, Coleen Goodwin, and her daughter, Jerusha Goodwin, are barred for now from practicing, in part over decisions allegedly influenced by their distrust and frayed relationships with doctors in hospitals where they felt mistreated or disrespected.

A former employee who trained at The Baby Place said hostility the Goodwins developed for doctors ultimately led to delays in emergency transports to hospitals.

Dani Kennedy told The Associated Press this antagonism caused them to make decisions against the best interests of mothers and babies, broadening the historic midwife-doctor divide to a wide gulf – with tragic consequences.

Coleen Goodwin "did hesitate to transport, and that was really upsetting to me," said Kennedy, who trained at The Baby Place between 2007 and 2010. She left to open a practice in Hawaii, in part over these concerns.

"I wanted to work in an environment where I was able to make my own decisions about the care of my clients," she said.

Kennedy was interviewed by Idaho investigators who began scrutinizing the Goodwins after one of the three mothers who lost babies lodged a complaint with the state.

The Goodwins, whose website indicates they've helped 1,400 women give birth, declined interviews, including on Monday. A receptionist who answered the phone declined to say who is providing services to women following the Goodwins' March 23 suspensions.

St. Luke's Health System spokesman Ken Dey in Boise declined to comment specifically about the Goodwins' interactions with doctors at the hospital's facilities in Meridian or Boise.

"The message we want to get across is, we're not anti-midwife," Dey said. "Women have the option to choose where they have their babies. But we want to make sure all the safety regulations are in place."

OB/GYN Associates, the Idaho business that provides doctors to St. Luke's, didn't return phone calls seeking comment.

Though more than 99 percent of U.S. women give birth in hospitals, home births are increasing, accounting for 0.72 percent of deliveries in 2009, up from 0.56 percent in 2004, according to the National Center for Health Statistics. Significantly more Idaho women have a midwife-assisted birth or home birth than the national average. About 3.2 percent of the 92,000 total births between 2008 and 2011 were midwife-assisted, either at birthing centers or home birth.

Given that, remedying feuds like the one Kennedy said influenced the Goodwins' decision-making is growing more important, said Oregon State University professor Melissa Cheyney, a medical anthropologist and certified midwife.

Midwives often feel disrespected by the medical establishment, Cheyney said, while doctors' objections to out-of-hospital births may harden with every traumatic transport.

This comes on top of the already-existing divide between the two views of childbirth, with midwives emphasizing the safety of natural births in a familiar, comfortable setting, while the American Medical Association contends women are best off in a hospital, where life-saving technology is nearby if something goes awry.

"You're having this compulsory interaction between two value systems," Cheyney said. "A transport means these two systems have to come together – and work together."

The Idaho Board of Midwifery probe that preceded the Goodwins' suspensions highlights numerous instances where investigators said that didn't happen.

In August 2011, Jerusha Goodwin waited 11 minutes to call paramedics after a baby was born "limp, unresponsive and pale," investigators wrote. The mother labored for more than 48 hours, prompting the Meridian Police Department to launch an ongoing criminal negligence investigation after the baby died.

"There were some questions about the length of labor," Deputy Chief Tracy Basterrechea told the AP.

On Oct. 11, 2010, a student midwife improperly cut an infant's umbilical cord, resulting in significant blood loss before the baby died. Jerusha Goodwin failed to provide medical personnel at St. Luke's Meridian Medical Center with relevant records, investigators wrote.

And on June 30, 2010, Coleen Goodwin delayed paramedics from entering The Baby Place for four minutes. When they were finally allowed in, Coleen Goodwin instructed them to drive past two nearby hospitals to St. Luke's in Boise, adding precious minutes to a journey that ended in the infant boy's death.

The mother, Rachel Rabey, said in an interview Coleen Goodwin whispered to her, "If we go to Meridian, they won't let me stay with you." Rabey said she was perplexed.

"I didn't care where I went, or if Coleen could stay with me," remembers Rabey, who recently had her third child, a girl, at St. Luke's in Boise. "All I cared about was getting to a hospital."

The Baby Place's web site does indicate negative feelings toward hospitals, with one employee writing in a testimonial to prospective clients that she began her midwife studies after a hospital birth where she felt "cheated out of the birth experience."

The Goodwins do have troubled relationships with doctors, said Alison Hunter Stucki, who planned her eighth child's delivery at The Baby Place in 2007 but was forced by complications to transfer to nearby St. Luke's Meridian Medical Center.

Stucki said her family witnessed hostile doctors force Coleen Goodwin from the delivery room.

Still, Stucki, an ardent Baby Place supporter, doesn't believe those experiences led Goodwin to endanger women or their babies.

"What I've experienced is nothing but professionalism," said Stucki, who gave birth to her ninth baby at The Baby Place in 2009. "I do believe the doctors are upset with her. Every baby she delivers in her birthing center is one baby they don't get."

In addition to the three babies that died, the Goodwins were hit by a separate 2010 lawsuit, filed by the parents of a baby that suffered permanent brain damage. Last week, the midwives agreed to pay $5 million to Adam and Victoria Nielson, the couple that sued.

The Nielson's attorney, Eric Rossman in Boise, said he pursued the case pro bono because he couldn't "in good conscience dismiss the case as long as they continue to practice in this facility."

Objective measures of Idaho's midwife-doctor relationships – and their impacts on babies – are difficult to come by, because the state doesn't keep comprehensive records of the outcomes of midwife-assisted births requiring hospital transports.

A private effort, the Idaho Perinatal Project run by St. Luke's, documented 138 instances between 2005 and 2011 where mothers who planned a home birth were transported to a hospital.

Though its records are also incomplete – reporting is voluntary; there are no reports for 2012 – they do point to the trauma that accompanies a planned out-of-hospital birth where something goes wrong. There were at least nine cases where infants died at or before arriving at the hospital and several instances of birth asphyxia, fractures, post-partum hemorrhage and unexpected twins.

For many doctors who don't see the cases of successful home births, these tense interactions add to already deep misgivings about midwifery.

"There were also 34 cases which had no infant outcome listed," said Dr. Scott Snyder, medical director of St. Luke's Newborn Intensive Care Units. "The data is not an overestimation of what we're seeing. It's an underestimation."

Snyder does believe standards set by Idaho's midwife licensing that took effect in 2010 have fostered communication between most midwives and doctors, despite problems investigators found at The Baby Place. Midwives now visit St. Luke's, attending some staff meetings. Doctors' appreciation for midwives' services has grown, he said.

Snyder is also hopeful when the Idaho Legislature reviews the state's midwife rules in 2014, when the existing licensing law expires, they'll make it mandatory for midwives and doctors to track outcomes of transfers.

FOLLOW PARENTS

MERIDIAN, Idaho -- Midwives and doctors are longtime rivals in the politics governing where women should give birth: Home or hospital. But that tension, typically played out privately between pregnan...
MERIDIAN, Idaho -- Midwives and doctors are longtime rivals in the politics governing where women should give birth: Home or hospital. But that tension, typically played out privately between pregnan...
Filed by Jessica Samakow  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 21
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
shortguy54
Short, balding, brilliant... (well, maybe not so)
09:58 AM on 05/02/2012
Wow, more American wierdness. Sounds to me like a fight over the rice bowl.

Here in Germany physicians and midwives work very closely together. Both consult intensively during the weeks prior to birth and they advise jointly on whether hospital or home birth are appropriate, given the circumstances. And Germany has one of the lowest infant death rates in the world (4.2 per thousand compared with 7.1 per thousand in the US).
10:11 PM on 05/01/2012
What this article highlights is the need for better inter-professional collaboration. This was emphasized at the recent Homebirth Summit last October (http://www.homebirthsummit.org), which brought together diverse stakeholders including physicians, midwives, nurses, parents, pediatricians, policy makers, researchers and many other contributors. Participants arrived at 10 consensus statements, two of which explicitly addressed this issue, stating that “all women and families planning a home or birth center birth have a right to respectful, safe and seamless consultation, referral, transport and transfer of care when necessary. When ongoing inter-professional dialogue and cooperation occur, everyone benefits.” Every stakeholder at this Summit recognized this as an issue.

In countries where midwives are well-integrated into the maternity care system, high-quality research has proven over and over again that there are excellent outcomes for mothers and babies, increased maternal satisfaction and much lower costs. As more and more women in the U.S. choose to have their babies at home or in freestanding birth centers with trained & experienced midwives, effective communication and collaboration between maternity care providers on both sides is becoming increasingly important to maintain safe outcomes.
06:18 PM on 05/01/2012
I didn't see any mention in the article of the professional training these midwives had. Certified Nurse Midwives have extensive advanced training and tend to be very safe; lay midwives, well, you get what you get.

The best option for most people is probably to find a CNM who practices in or near a hospital, because, like it or not, childbirth can go bad very quickly. There's nothing like having an operating room down the hall in case it's really needed. And if you find a good midwife, they won't do a crash C-section unless it's medically indicated (e.g., your baby is going to die. Unfortunately, they do that sometimes, and if you're at home all you have is a dead baby and a lifetime of heartache.)
05:42 PM on 05/01/2012
It's a shame these women were allowed to be in a profession where they are supposed to help women and their babies. Truly despicable.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:33 PM on 05/01/2012
I don't think this is a case of hospital doctors versus midwives in the grand scheme of things. Like in every single career on this planet, there are people that are good at their job with honest intentions and people that are bad at their job for which other people suffer. The same argument could be made with lawyers, CEOs, dentists, teacher, repairmen, plumbers, trash collectors, accountants, etc. This is ONE bad midwife out of a whole nation. Let's not paint with such broad strokes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Antidiot
03:04 PM on 05/01/2012
Exactly, I would only hope that by weeding out someone who was obviously a bad one, they accomplish something positive instead of fueling the fire on the negativity. (It may be that is happened as a reaction to how she and her patients were treated by the hospitals in the past, but it is her responsibility to have a plan for dealing with emergencies in a way that is safe for her patients)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:26 PM on 05/01/2012
Even though as a midwife, she might not personally like the doctors and the way that they go about treating pregnant women, but at the end of the day (or the end of the pregnancy as it might be) the number one issue that the midwife should care about is the health and well being of the mother and the child. She must be able to put aside her own personal beliefs and misgivings about institutionalized healthcare and do what is best for those women and babies....in the cases where medical intervention is necessary.

And this is spoken from a woman who was perfectly content with my completely traditional pregnancy and delivery in a hospital with an OB. I don't discriminate - do whatcha wanna do baby mommas.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Phoebe917
old hermit who lives in the woods
02:09 PM on 05/01/2012
i would never give birth outside of a hospital. in a hospital one has help close by if something goes wrong. and sometimes it does. and as far as one being "cheated out of the birth experience", i find that ridiculous. most women want to be in a safe environment, with an OR, skilled nurses and ancillary staff close by. i guess i am old school, as i see giving birth as something that is going to be hard, painful and then you get the epidural (if one chooses to do), and then you have your sweet little baby. labor and delivery isn't fun and there is no amount of cute curtains, cute bedspreads etc that will make it pleasant. of course this is my personal opinion. and as a disclaimer, i was a critical care RN for twenty years at a major metropolitan hospital so perhaps i am biased. i forgot to mention that i had two children who weighed almost 10 pounds. they had to use forceps aka the "salad spoons" to get my son out.
05:46 PM on 05/01/2012
Same here. I know of a few people who went into severe distress while delivering. If their emergency care had been delayed for even a couple of minutes, they and their babies would not have made it. Both of them had perfect pregnancies until that point, too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marianproletarian
12:11 PM on 05/02/2012
A midwife in a hospital (or birthing center) would be the way to go. I wish I'd had at least a doula when my son was born in a hospital.
01:20 PM on 05/02/2012
As I understand it, here in NE you can have a midwife but they have to deliver in the hospital with doctor supervision.
01:31 PM on 05/01/2012
What this article fails to mention is that the US is 41st in the world for infant mortality, behind Cuba, Poland, and Estonia. The vast majority of those deaths occur in hospitals.
Is it terrible that these babies died, and is it perhaps due to midwife negligence? Yes, it could be. However, it does not shine badly on home birth. Countries with very low infant mortality rates also encourage home birth, because for low-risk mothers, it has proven to be safer. The reason our country does not support it is because of the loss of profit the hospitals will face. So they have to continue smear campaigns against midwives and home births in order to protect their business.
01:48 PM on 05/01/2012
Infant mortality rates encompass the time period from birth to one year. It is not the number of babies that die during the birth stage. Therefore a baby that dies at home of SIDS at 6 months old is included in this number as is a baby that dies at the hospital of pneumonia at 9 months old. Using infant mortality rates to compare birth centers/home births and hospital births is misleading.
11:38 AM on 05/29/2012
If you were to look at studies done in the US and in Europe, you will see some meticulously done work comparing newborn mortality and morbidity and also maternal mortality/morbidity rates between birthing centers, home births, and hospitals. If I remember correctly, the time period was the last 6 weeks of pregnancy to 10 or 30 days after birth. All of the studies only include low-risk mothers, some only primiparas. The statistics prove birthing centers to OVERALL be safer. No matter where you birth you have to use your brain and be your own advocate. I've had two babies in a hospital and one baby at a birthing center with a CNM...across the street from a hospital should we need help.
FYI: Many cases of morbidity and mortality in hospitals have nothing to do with the actual birth, but actually from infection contracted while in the hospital.
05:57 PM on 05/01/2012
The vast majority of deaths occur hospitals because the vast majority of births take place in hospitals. There's no denying that there are certain critical situations where women and/or their babies wouldn't survive had they not received emergency care immediately. I personally know of two people, my cousin and a friend, who fall into this category (and they were low-risk and had perfect pregnancies until that point). To each his own, of course, but I wouldn't take the risk.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Proserpina Libera
06:29 PM on 05/01/2012
You're right, most birth's take place at the hospital; that's what makes our country's infant mortality rate even more egregious.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sabelmouse
i love to tumble , ask me why .
01:23 PM on 05/01/2012
'' Midwives and doctors are longtime rivals in the politics governing where women should give birth: Home or hospital.''

so much longer than most people think. doctors or what went for them have tried to get women out of the business for centuries. casing a lot of harm along the way.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
03:12 PM on 05/01/2012
That should be changing then because there are already (at least in the US) about as many male as female OBs.

http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/fulltext/1999/11000/characteristics_of_female.4.aspx

Though that doesn't rule out a continued professional bias.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dancerctry
I love Gardening and Decorating
11:06 AM on 05/01/2012
I have had 3 miscarriages so my son's pregnancy was high risk meaning I didn't have options. I had a great experience in the hospital. This counters what I read about midwives, at least in Northern NJ, and hospitals. There aren't many birthing centers here but there are midwives that practice out of hospitals with the same core mentalities as birthing centers. From what I learned, an ambulance is always outside the center and at least local to me, the midwives have access at the hospitals so they won't be kicked out. A couple of neaby hospitals have birthing pools and birthing chairs built in where the midwives usually practice. You never know when complications will hit and that quick run to the hospital may be important. If you felt "robbed of the birthing experience" at the hospital it's probably because you never experienced complications at a Birthing Center. Complications in either play ruin the enjoyment of birth. You would have felt the same at a birthing center with that particular birth. The next birth that may have gone well at a birthing center would have gone well in a hospital too. Make sure if you do use a birthing center they have privledges at the nearest hospital (meaning they can practice out of there) and an ambulance right outside the door in case of emergancy.
01:20 AM on 05/02/2012
The midwives you are referring to (that have access to hospitals but work at birthing centers) are most likely CNMs.