iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Chen Guangcheng, Blind Chinese Activist, Leaves U.S. Embassy To Seek Medical Care In Beijing

By MATTHEW LEE 05/ 2/12 11:29 PM ET AP

BEIJING — Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton told China on Thursday that it must protect human rights, in remarks that rejected Beijing's criticism of the U.S. for getting involved in the case of a blind dissident whose fate overshadowed the opening of annual talks between the powerful countries.

Clinton said at the opening of the talks on foreign policy and economic issues that the U.S. believes "all governments have to answer our citizens' aspirations for dignity and the rule of law and that no nation can or should deny those rights."

Her comments came as the dissident, Chen Guangcheng, pleaded for more help from Washington. The blind, self-taught lawyer took refuge in the U.S. Embassy after escaping house arrest, but left Wednesday to get treatment for a leg injury at a Beijing hospital.

He initially said he had been assured that he would be safe in China, but hours later he said he fears for his family's safety unless they are all spirited abroad. He also claimed U.S. officials abandoned him at the hospital, which they denied.

China already demanded an apology from the U.S. even before Chen balked at a deal in which he would remain in his homeland. Now that he wants to leave, the case is looming over talks in which Clinton and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner are to discuss foreign policy and economic issues with their Chinese counterparts.

China's President Hu Jintao said at the opening of the talks that China and the United States "must know how to respect each other" even if they disagree.

"Given our different national conditions, it is impossible for both China and the United States to see eye to eye on every issue," he said in the only part of the opening ceremony that was broadcast on state television. "We should properly manage the differences by improving mutual understanding so these differences will not undermine the larger interests of China-U.S. relations."

Neither Hu nor Clinton specifically mentioned Chen, who had spent six days holed up in the U.S. Embassy as senior officials in Beijing and Washington tussled over his fate. He remained at the hospital Thursday, guarded by a handful of uniformed police and about 10 plainclothes officers.

A shaken Chen told The Associated Press from his hospital room Wednesday that Chinese authorities had warned he would lose his opportunity to be reunited with his family if he stayed longer in the embassy.

U.S. officials verified that account. But they adamantly denied his contention that one American diplomat had warned him of a threat from the Chinese that his wife would be beaten to death if he did not get out of the embassy.

"I think we'd like to rest in a place outside of China," Chen told the AP, appealing again for help from Washington. "Help my family and me leave safely."

Only hours earlier, U.S. officials said they had extracted from the Chinese government a promise that Chen would join his family and be allowed to start a new life in a university town in China, safe from the rural authorities who had abusively held him in prison and house arrest for nearly seven years.

Clinton spoke to Chen on the phone when he left the embassy and, in a statement, welcomed the resettlement agreement as one that "reflected his choices and our values."

The Chinese Foreign Ministry signaled its unhappiness with the entire affair, demanding that the U.S. apologize for giving Chen sanctuary at the embassy.

"What the U.S. side should do now is neither to continue misleading the public and making every excuse to shift responsibility and conceal its wrongdoing, nor to interfere in the domestic affairs of China," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Weimin said in a statement late Wednesday.

Clinton appears to have tried not to stir the controversy further Thursday by omitting in her speech part of her prepared remarks that read: "We continue to look to China to meet its international obligations to protect universal human rights and fundamental freedoms." Instead she said only that these issues are important and would be raised in the talks.

The murky circumstances of Chen's departure from the embassy, and his sudden appeal to leave China after declaring he wanted to stay, are hanging over talks that were to focus on the global economic crisis and hotspots such as North Korea, Iran, Syria and Sudan.

Clinton mentioned those problems in her speech, saying it was important that China and the United States work together to tackle problems from climate change to Syria.

Chen, 40, became an international human rights figure and inspiration to many ordinary Chinese after running afoul of local government officials for exposing forced abortions carried out as part of China's one-child policy. He served four years in prison on what supporters said were fabricated charges, then was kept under house arrest with his wife, daughter and mother, with the adults often being roughed up by officials and his daughter searched and harassed.

Blinded by childhood fever but intimately familiar with the terrain of his village, Chen slipped from his guarded farmhouse in eastern China's Shandong province at night on April 22. He made his way through fields and forest, along roads and across a narrow river to meet the first of several supporters who helped bring him to Beijing and the embassy. It took three days for his guards to realize he was gone.

Chen said he felt misled by U.S. officials after he went to the hospital to get treatment for a leg injury suffered during his escape.

"The embassy told me that they would have someone accompany me the whole time," he said. "But today when I got to the ward, I found that there was not a single embassy official here, and so I was very unsatisfied. I felt they did not tell me the truth on this issue."

In Washington, State Department spokesman Mark Toner disputed Chen's claim that he was left alone.

"There were U.S. officials in the building," Toner told reporters. "I believe some of his medical team was in fact with him at the hospital." He said U.S. officials would continue visiting Chen while he was there.

It is not clear how the U.S. could be party to an agreement on Chen's safety inside China when it has no power to enforce the conditions of his life there.

State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said no U.S. official said anything to Chen about physical or legal threats to his wife and children. Nor did the Chinese relay any such threats to American diplomats, she said. She did confirm that if he did not leave the embassy the Chinese intended to return his family to their home province of Shandong, where they had been detained and beaten by local officials, and that they would lose any chance of being reunited.

___

Associated Press writer Alexa Olesen contributed to this report.

FOLLOW WORLD

BEIJING — Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton told China on Thursday that it must protect human rights, in remarks that rejected Beijing's criticism of the U.S. for getting involved in the...
BEIJING — Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton told China on Thursday that it must protect human rights, in remarks that rejected Beijing's criticism of the U.S. for getting involved in the...
Filed by Jade Walker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 358
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:44 PM on 05/03/2012
The news today is very clear that Mr. Chen wishes to leave China for Political Asylum in the US. There has been a "Change of Heart" by Mr. Chen according to several newspapers I have read and of course this is a hot issue all over the world (Cable TV-International News, etc). Although this is a very delicate situation as the situation is taking place on Chinese Soil even if Mr. Chen fled to our Embassy in China which makes it "American Soil" of course, we should Most Definitely take another look at this situation-a Long and Hard Look at Mr. Chen's plight and that of his family. I know a thing or two about Congressman Chris Smith, formerly a Democrat and a member of Congress for over 30 years now, who clearly is in the corner of Mr. Chen. I respect what the Congressman has to say on this matter, and one of the reasons is that he Is Not the typical Republican Congressman of today (Tea Bag Variety). He is a former Democrat and is a Social Conservative or what used to be called a "Rockefeller Republican". I find it troubling that Congressman Smith was left hanging on the phone All Night when trying to speak with Mr. Chen after he called our embassy in Beijing. As stated earlier, it is a difficult situation but I believe a"Solomonic Decision" must be made here and in Mr. Chen's favor. That is my view on the matter.
10:11 AM on 05/03/2012
China should be glad to send all their criminals to the U. U. just like Castro did.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eclark1710
08:13 AM on 05/03/2012
I'm as liberal as the next person, and while I certainly can sympathize with Mr. Guangchong's plight, there are certain facts, however unpalatable, which are nonetheless facts:

1. For at least a dozen reasons, the US must maintain diplomatic ties with China. Their exports make up a large part of consumables purchased in America, we owe them money, they are one of two countries with the ability to exert influence over North Korea, and the list goes on.

2. They have the ability without firing a shot to bring the US to its knees by manipulating currency and/or demanding repayment of loans.

3. This guy chose a time when the Secretary of State is in China discussing foreign policy.

4. Mr. Guangchong's protest is against the one-child law. Frankly, since China is the second most overpopulated country in the world, with a citizenry that is far - far - outpacing its resources, the law is not only necessary, but responsible. Just as frankly, there are other countries which should do the same. The earth's resources are finite.

I'm sorry to say this, but the US has to do what's best for the citizenry of the US in this situation. There are millions of people in Syria, Darfur, Haiti, and Africa who are suffering injustice by their very existence, not because they're choosing to speak out against a communist government. The US can't be the world's police.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:35 PM on 05/03/2012
You are correct had Mr. Guangchong's protested anything other than China's one-child policy things might have been very different for him. I guess he was not politically acute enough to know that the left in this country is quite sympathetic to China in this regard.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eclark1710
01:08 AM on 05/04/2012
A generalization certainly, and one that, like most generalizations, is untrue. Regardless of what he was protesting, Mr. Guancheng, by his his continued communications to the US and other media outlets, has made it impossible for the Chinese government to allow him to leave at this time without his becoming a national hero.

Like it or not, the Chinese government is an authoritarian one with a long history of civil and human rights violations. There is a vast fundamental difference between the governing method of both countries -- and every American company who took their business over there knew that well ahead of time. The economies of both countries are now so interwoven that they are forced to establish some diplomatic terms to avoid financial disaster on either or both fronts.

The US cannot be the only cowboy in the white hat, riding in with a "to hell with it" attitude to rescue dissidents or others who are being repressed by their governments. We can't afford it diplomatically, we can't afford it financially and we would be quite (and rightfully) outraged if, for example, China airlifted and gave asylum to the political prisoners in Guantanemo Bay.
03:32 AM on 05/03/2012
Brave young man. He and his family are being prayed for.
10:13 AM on 05/03/2012
It has been proven thatprayers do not help a person.
02:31 AM on 05/03/2012
crickets
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NoNameDude
12:53 AM on 05/03/2012
I hope those poor men understand: the world belongs to elites. Don't try to change history.
12:10 AM on 05/03/2012
It has been reported that the man actually left the embassy when Chinese officials threatened to beat his wife to death if he didn't come out. Lets try to at least report the truth here???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jlshawaz
In the middle but looking both ways
11:35 PM on 05/02/2012
Obama, welcome to the world of can't win politics. I assume you will make a speech condemning China and their human rights stance. Then send a message to China's President saying not to worry about us getting involved because your speech was only election year rhetoric.
09:53 PM on 05/02/2012
....and the US kow-tows to China. We are the weakest "super power"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cherry5
it always is what it is
09:43 PM on 05/02/2012
clinton cooperating with communists, the blind leading the blind actually leading the blind
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
usa1alltheway
08:39 AM on 05/03/2012
No, our blind govt can't even find the blind, let alone follow the blind.
09:30 PM on 05/02/2012
Another FUBAR for Hillary Clinton and the U.S. State Department.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
usa1alltheway
08:40 AM on 05/03/2012
Not another, business as usual!
09:21 PM on 05/02/2012
hung out to dry by obama-clinton
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
luckycur
07:12 AM on 05/03/2012
As he would have been by Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, etc. If the reverse happened the the USA, they would have release an American Defector to our government. Had nothing to do with the party in power, everything to do with international law.
09:04 PM on 05/02/2012
What a bum O'Bummer is. Wonder who was driving this bus.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hammond72
08:11 PM on 05/02/2012
looks like the Harvard educated lawyer was outmaneuvered again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Garry Carlson
07:26 PM on 05/02/2012
I think he would make a great WalMart greeter but just not in this country!
09:22 PM on 05/02/2012
u r an a ho
03:24 AM on 05/03/2012
Very well crafted sentence.