iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Lauren and David Perkins, Texas Sextuplets' Parents: 1 Sick Baby A 'Fighter'

By JUAN A. LOZANO 05/ 2/12 07:29 PM ET AP

Texas Sextuplets

HOUSTON — The parents of Houston-area sextuplets born last month said Wednesday one of their daughters continues to battle some health problems but is a "fighter," and they are looking forward to the day she and her siblings can go home, possibly in a couple of months.

Lauren and David Perkins said their three boys – Andrew, Benjamin and Levi – and two of their girls – Allison and Caroline – are doing well. One daughter, Leah, still is catching up to her siblings. She had surgery Monday to repair a portion of her bowel.

Lauren Perkins, 28, said it has been upsetting to watch Leah struggle.

"Leah is just a roller coaster for sure," she said. "We get excited for all of her gains and then it's heartbreaking when she has a big setback. She's been able to recover from everything so far. We are just confident she will be able to pull through."

David Perkins, 29, said dealing with Leah's health issues has helped the couple be more patient and "appreciate the small victories."

"We are just thanking God every day for our babies and we are looking forward to bringing them home," said Lauren Perkins, who worked as a school psychologist. She and her husband live in the Houston suburb of Pearland.

Health problems Leah was experiencing in utero prompted doctors to deliver the babies April 23, about 10 weeks premature, said Dr. Charles Hankins, a neonatologist at Texas Children's Hospital in Houston.

"In a way, Leah is the boss. She continues to drive a lot of the decisions," Hankins said. "All of the babies for their age are doing pretty much as expected. Five of 6 are following a very rapid path. Leah is catching up, slowly but surely."

Leah is the only baby who remains on a ventilator. The others are using a tube in their nose and mouth that partially inflates their lungs so their bodies don't have to work as hard, he said. Some of them could stop using this tube later this week.

Four of the babies will have their central lines, which are used to support their nutrition, removed Wednesday. Levi will have it removed Thursday. Leah will continue being fed through an IV line.

"Every time we withdraw something and it gets to stay off, that's a good thing," Hankins said.

When the children were born, the heaviest of them weighed 2 pounds, 15 ounces. Hankins said the babies should weigh 4 to 5 pounds by the time they can go home. Doctors are hopeful that will be in about two months.

Lauren Perkins conceived the sextuplets after undergoing fertility treatment. She said when she and her husband first talked about starting a family, they thought about having two children. But they are ready to raise six children and grateful for the support received from family, friends, even strangers, she said.

"We are just an ordinary couple chosen by God with an extraordinary responsibility and an extraordinary blessing," said David Perkins, who works as an IT analyst.

WATCH: Meet America's Newest Sextuplets

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

FOLLOW PARENTS

HOUSTON — The parents of Houston-area sextuplets born last month said Wednesday one of their daughters continues to battle some health problems but is a "fighter," and they are looking forward t...
HOUSTON — The parents of Houston-area sextuplets born last month said Wednesday one of their daughters continues to battle some health problems but is a "fighter," and they are looking forward t...
Filed by Jessica Samakow  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 39
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nomad1
What soever you do unto the least of these.....
01:09 PM on 05/07/2012
Wow, udderly overwhelming. But their choice, not ours. Hopefully, they are responsible enough to support this choice. In cases like Octomom, that responsibility is likely to fall to the taxpayers because who among us is willing to see children suffer becaus of the irresponsibility of the parents. Not sure of the insurance issues surrounding this, but the costs must be staggering. It appears these parents are able to meet this financial burden and good luck to them in the difficult and challenging task they have chosen to take on.
photo
OhioSpeaks
Ohio #1 in profanity, #5 in rudeness !!!
07:10 PM on 05/03/2012
congrats 6X's : )
06:16 PM on 05/03/2012
Wow! Six of them!
I wish them well. Especially with the financial stuff.
04:22 PM on 05/03/2012
Congratulations on your new arrivals.
03:38 PM on 05/03/2012
WHY do women keep having fertility treatments resulting in so many babies?? I really think they're hoping for another Kate Goesslin Reality show -- and look how well THAT turned out. Created a friggin MONSTER with Kate!!!!! Please, if you want children and need fertility treatments, two at once is REALLY enough!
08:13 PM on 05/03/2012
They implant multiple embryos because it's not likely all of them will take. How would you feel if you couldn't have kids, and the doctors just kept implanting one at at time, and they never took? It takes a lot of money to pay for these fertility treatments, so they try to make sure they get at least one pregnancy from them.

My question is ... why is it so important to have a child with "your" genes? There are plenty of kids that are waiting to be adopted, why not pick one of them?
05:28 PM on 05/05/2012
I agree, two is enough. Even though the treatments are costly, two is enough. It would be better for insurance companies to make the implanting of two cheaper than it is than to have 6 kids needing 35 doctors to deliver them early... then to have to put them all on vents and tubes for months at a time. Then there are the statistics that show premies have lots of health problems in life.. because they did not gestate the right amount of time. So, I'm totally with you on this one.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:11 PM on 05/03/2012
Natural selection = Evolution
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
websailor
02:45 PM on 05/03/2012
This has been stated before but the number embryos should be limited to 3 at the most ,considering the danger for both mother and babies. It is great that we have advanced enough to help couples that are unable to have children. Lets be ethical about the number embryos are used at one time. It hard enough to raise one child or even two but 6 is insane.
06:59 PM on 05/03/2012
Not all of these cases are as the result of embryos being implanted though IVF. Sometimes all the mom has to do is take meds to stimulate a pregnancy and it results in many eggs being released. In this case you don't get to choose how many. I don't think many doctors (if any) are still actually implanting more than 3 embryos.
02:33 PM on 05/03/2012
congratulations and I hope the babies continue to do well.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:06 PM on 05/03/2012
Before people engage in baby-making they should have to agree with their doctor that they will selectively reduce the number of embryos that stick to 1 or 2. Society is not going to benefit from these huge litters of chronically ill and defective children being thrown into it. Look at Octomom...some ridiculously high number of her 14 kids have problems. Yippee.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shannon Zeno Lewis
06:07 PM on 05/03/2012
Did I really just read "defective children"? Wow.
10:05 AM on 05/09/2012
Defective????? Sounds like someone else who only wanted blonde, blue eyed people. And we all know how that turned out.....shame on you...would you be able to pick from the "litter" and chose which to keep.........
01:01 PM on 05/03/2012
What we think or don't think does not matter a pile of beans. This was a decision that this couple reached and frankly, not any of our business. Some posting here seem to think that they are being asked to pitch in and help out this family. I did not read that in the article at all. They were not the first and won't be the last to have a large number of children born at one time. Why not just wish them well? Perhaps an I am glad that it is not me would be enough of a negative remark to make. I don't rely on what others think to make my decisions, why should they and why should anyone think that they have the right to preach, even if that is just what I have done here?
05:53 PM on 05/05/2012
No doubt what we think makes no difference to the parents of these premature disabled children. The parents also didn't care when the doctor warned them that they could bring disabled children into the world by insisting on an unnaturally big pregnancy, or they would have just gone with two children... not six.

And, it isn't my business how they plan to pay for it all unless it will fall to the taxpayer to foot the bill.... because that would be me paying for the 35 doctors, months on ventilators, the surgeries, home-care attendants, special nurses etc. ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scoobe2
12:06 PM on 05/03/2012
god bless these people and their babies. hopefully they do not try and get a reality show, this never ends well
12:05 PM on 05/03/2012
GOOD LUCK AND CONGRATS but to be seriuosly honest there is thing out there called adoption if you can't have children naturally. I have nothing against IUI, IVF, or AI but i think its time for doctors to stop putting more embroyos in.
12:22 PM on 05/03/2012
She didn't have IVF, she had IUI so the doctor did not put embryos in. With IVF, doctor's generally place 1 to 2 embyros. With IUI, they just inject the semen. This is how the couple in AZ and John and Kate had their sextuplets. Most physicians will stop the IUI cycle if they woman creates more than 3 follicles. So more than likely, this woman had more than 3 and they didn't stop the cycle.

Don't bag on those of us who choose the fertility route. Adoption is just as expensive as fertility treatments and with adoption there are also no guarantees. While I understand there are children out there who need homes, while not physically invasive, it is just as psychologically invasive as fertility treatments. Plus, with fertility treatments I didn't have to worry about a birth mother changing her mind at the time of delivery or even a couple of years down the road.

Different roads for different folks.
01:44 PM on 05/03/2012
So you are saying that all of the issues surrouning infertilty treatments are similar to those in adopting and I would agree on some level, but in reality it can be so much more expensive with infertility treatments if they don't work the first, second, third time. More miscarrages, more premature births, more ongoing health issues and well, even if it goes well, there are deserving children who go without loving parents and the comforts of a good home. Yeah, both have risks, but one is playing with bringing new life into the world when mother nature says it should not, or that it is not time. I know the desire to have a child can be overwhelming but I do think the risk of adoption makes so much more sense than playing God and risking a mother and babies lives in the process. Also with all the issues surrounding the extreme numbers of premature births in this country and considering we have the highest infant mortality rates, I think efforts should be put elsewhere to work toward healthier alternativies to these treatments.
01:59 PM on 05/03/2012
The last paragraph of your coment I agree with you 100%
12:55 PM on 05/03/2012
AS an adoptive and a birth mother I can tell you that adoption is not for everyone. Adoption is not like the media stories. It is a long, hard and sometimes very expenseive procedure. Havae been there and done that so I do know.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
twinpossible
11:31 AM on 05/03/2012
I can't begin to imagine 6 babies at once. God bless them, and I wish Leah nothing but the best. Babies are tough..I think she'll be alright. I hope they have a lot of family support. I have twins and can't picture 4 more at the same age. If I had no other children..triplets MAYBE, but man that would be very difficult, but x's two. May God give them the strength they need to parent these children the best that they can. I'm sure that they will.

http://www.twinpossible.com/blog
This comment has been removed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mspat44417
Rock it if ya got it...Music
10:47 AM on 05/03/2012
Yeah yeah...Waiting for the next reality show to begin....Why do people always feel the need to have to have their biological kids at the risk of having more then they need like this....There's nothing wrong with adoption...If you can't have your own with out having a litter..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lisa Tomlin
10:59 AM on 05/03/2012
Not to mention that having a huge litter like this actually puts the children at risk of having birth defects or issues do to being born early. These children may have issues all their lives due to this. So parents need to think here, you have a choice the children don't. Do you really want to dump on them all the health issues that issues that comes to being born early or born in a litter like this. Such things as, blindness, issues with walking, learning problems, hearing problems and health problems such as feeding yourself and so forth and brain problems.
01:36 PM on 05/03/2012
For people with infertility, going through infertility treatments like IVF is just as much a right as for a person without to have a baby on their own. When treatments don't work, and particularly because they are expensive, people do want to "up their odds" so to say that one of the fertilizations will work. And sometimes, it works too well.

With news media today we hear a lot more about higher order multiples (and for the record, there are animals that have a "litter" of one) when they are born, and while yes twins and to some degree triplets are increasing, i don't think that higher order multiples are actually increasing all that much more, its just that we hear about them more.