Lucas Kavner
GET UPDATES FROM Lucas:

Tinkebell, Provocative Dutch Artist, Questions How We Look At Animals

Posted: 05/03/2012 6:35 am Updated: 05/03/2012 9:54 am

Mediummetjackcolor

Dutch artist Tinkebell has been provoking people and ticking off animal activists for years. From her controversial work involving dead animals, to the time she broke her own cat's neck and turned it into a handbag rather than having it euthanized -- she's an easy artist to hate, while admiring her for the risks she takes.

One of Tinkebell's principal aims is to shed light on the way millions of animals are killed behind closed doors, while others are treated as fashion accessories. And though she insists that the animals she uses for her projects had all previously died of natural causes, stories online and various petitions have alleged that she harms the animals herself.

Detractors have been aggressive with their criticisms. She has received so much vehement hate mail over the years -- hundreds of thousands of letters and emails, she says -- that she collected a lot of it into a book, "Dearest Tinkebell," which publicly reveals the senders' identities, the towns where they grew up, and various other public information that can be found online. In certain cases, she reveals their Facebook photos and Amazon wish lists.

"The senders came from all walks of life," she wrote in the Guardian. "I know this because many emails automatically included a signature with a link to a personal or company website. A combination of a false sense of anonymity and the idea that everything digital is 'not authentic' makes sending hate mail easy."

tinkebell book

No stranger to controversy, Tinkebell is currently in New York City working on a large project involving a "My Little Pony"-style taxidermied horse for the PULSE NY art fair. She spoke to The Huffington Post about animal rights and people's visceral reactions to her work.

There is, as you say, a lot of inaccurate information about you online. Why do you think this is? Have animal rights activists simply gotten it wrong or are they out to get you?

It's a mix of things. It all started I think seven or eight years ago. The thing is that [the stories] have all been translated so many times, and it's just like when you're in a group and someone tells someone else a secret and this person tells it to someone else. The story changes. People add stuff.

Are the rumors good for you as an artist? They certainly give you more attention.

I try to put the rumors away. Because still, I did make a purse out of my own cat. And people are angry about that, and that's fine -- because I actually did that. But when it's not about my work or about me anymore, it's just a story, it's made up, and it has nothing to do with me. And it gets bigger and bigger, the stories [spread] all around the world.

How do these rumors begin? Didn't you once threaten to put a bunch of baby chicks in a wood-chipper for an art project?

I once gave a lecture and in this lecture I explained how chicks are being killed in factory farms. And somebody took that lecture and translated it like I was killing those chicks. Which wasn't true. I did do a project in which I tried -- in the Netherlands, per year, 31 million baby chicks are killed right after they are born. I did a project where I wanted to let people be able to save a chick. And I told people that if they wouldn't save one, I would kill one anyway, right there. But I was still taken into custody by the police, went to jail for one night, because I planned to do it. But those chicks were killed anyway. Not by me, just a company who does it all the time.

I guess there's something about doing it out in the open, publicly, that makes people so uncomfortable.

In a broad way, I try to make people discuss the norms. In how we live, how we eat, how we behave. Most people eat meat from factory farms, and they really don't want to know how they are killed. So I just show them: this is what you do. And most people don't like it.

Do you address these things in your book, "Dearest Tinkebell?"

There are six essays in the book where I talk about that. People don't know the truth about my [work], they don't get it. But it's not just hate mail. I often get good emails from people who turned vegetarian or things like that. A lot of people do get it, but not all of course. But it's good! I think. It starts a discussion.

What do you want people to get out of your art?

I want people to think. I'm not going to tell you to go to church or to live your life like any way. But I give lectures, I'm a guest teacher at universities, and I write and I make my art. That's what I do.

Tinkebell's work can be seen from May 3-6 at PULSE New York.

FOLLOW CULTURE

Dutch artist Tinkebell has been provoking people and ticking off animal activists for years. From her controversial work involving dead animals, to the time she broke her own cat's neck and turned it ...
Dutch artist Tinkebell has been provoking people and ticking off animal activists for years. From her controversial work involving dead animals, to the time she broke her own cat's neck and turned it ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:13 AM on 05/06/2012
I think I like CLove's disturbing artwork better.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gregory57
Micro-bio, was one of my favorite classes.
12:30 PM on 05/05/2012
Talk about "exploitation of animals". I suppose if you call it art, it isn't wrong, it's an invitation to dialog about a serious issue.

In my opinion "tinkerbell" is just another exploiter of animals. This has nothing to do with art. It's all about "tinkerbell".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MexiChick67
Que? Que? Queee?
04:17 PM on 05/03/2012
Her art is disturbing, but at the same time she is shedding a light on a serious issue. I've met people who have taken their cat or dog to the vet to get them euthanized for the silliest reason. They leave the office before the deed is done. It's so clean and effortless. They don't think about the animal. The same way we buy meat at the market and it's all prepped and cleaned up for us to eat. I don't think that people would be so easy to eat a chicken if they had to wring it's neck. My brother is a vegetarian and he says "I won't eat it unless I can k ill it".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
torgman3
1 man's Founding Father is another's slaveowner
03:39 PM on 05/04/2012
"They leave the office before the deed is done. It's so clean and effortless." -- I'm not sure that those who love their pest leave the office for that reason. People just don't want to see their pets suffer anymore and the euthanizing process is not an easy one. I've euthanized two of my cats when there was nothing else that could've been done and I stay with them during the process. It's been a peaceful process, tho, as my vet explained, I know it can get gruesome. It's as much for them as it is for me because I would imagine that they would want their last touch from a human to be the one that cared for them.

As for this artist, I agree there is an issue about the way humans treat certain animals, but, between her work and the publishing of her hate mail with the contact info of her critics--an act I find as simply immature--I find her to be just a opportunistic sadist.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gregory57
Micro-bio, was one of my favorite classes.
12:30 PM on 05/05/2012
It isn't art at all.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Debbie338
What we manifest is before us
01:52 PM on 05/03/2012
She is correct that people get all squeamish about killing an animal for an art project, but are perfectly happy to buy meat from animals killed in private. I'm not sure what to think about her overall, but she has a point.
11:58 PM on 04/17/2013
I am a vegetarian (working towards vegan) and I am not perfectly happy to buy meat from animals killed in private. It is hard to take her, or her "point", seriously when she broke the neck of her own cat and turned it into a purse. Not quite the loving pet owner/animal lover, I think. It seems more likely that she is just trying to gain attention by shocking people. I think she is a hypocrite.
photo
star999
My coat is flat and my ears are purdy.
01:02 PM on 05/03/2012
There is a position of moral high ground that some aspire to, and some only pretend to. This artist's claims that natural causes kill the animals she uses is exposed as hypocrisy, not by our hate, but by hers. It is a testament to our how far we have gone down the path of self-indulgent navel gazing that we are willing to take the time to ask, "Does she have a point?" As if that could excuse her.

Most individuals who perform these kinds of acts are medicated. That this individual is not is a testimony not to her "art", but to her intelligence and sociopathic nature.

What part of 'she broke her own cat's neck to make a purse out of it' do people not understand? These are signs that are too close to the markers of young serial killers to be ignored. All pretentious psycho-babble art language aside, she's nuts and should never be allowed near another animal, living or dead. Or for that matter a child, or sharp objects.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Carol Smaldino
psychotherapist, discoverer of how to get to maybe
12:13 PM on 05/03/2012
A propos, of everything, this is so hard to watch...wish we could do a seminar discussing it all, with her, since she is savvy and thoughtful and exposes us to our own larger environoment...and perhaps ourselves....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joshua Kramarenko
02:01 PM on 11/26/2012
You must be a terrible psychotherapist if you can't identify the lack of empathy and self serving nature of her actions. Her book is further evidence of her psychotic nature taking pleasure in the in how she hurt so many people with her actions.

I serious yet hypothetical question you should asking yourself is would somone have the right to publicly beat you to a pulp in order to make a statment about eldarly abuse?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Carol Smaldino
psychotherapist, discoverer of how to get to maybe
12:09 PM on 05/03/2012
Thank you so much for this...I get completely that those of us who hate hate, still hate, and when we are exposed to our own hypocricy that is true food for thought...and just possibly, shifting...
09:54 AM on 05/03/2012
The bar for being an artist has been set way too low lately.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gregory57
Micro-bio, was one of my favorite classes.
12:31 PM on 05/05/2012
This isn't art. It's self-promotion, and exploitation of animals.
03:46 PM on 05/05/2012
right
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gilbert Albright
09:49 AM on 05/03/2012
She gets away with this because she is female. If this was a man, he would be called sick, disgusting and perverted. But women are Sacred Cows in western countries and no criticism of them is permitted under threat of being called a women hater, misogynist, or sexist.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MexiChick67
Que? Que? Queee?
04:14 PM on 05/03/2012
Did you not read the hate mail she gets? Really?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
torgman3
1 man's Founding Father is another's slaveowner
09:20 AM on 05/03/2012
So, she has turned her immature act of vengeance into and art book.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robin Terrace
daughter of a Union Ironworker
09:16 AM on 05/03/2012
Having known about Tinkerbell I have never read an interview with her. I am convinced more than ever that she is not an artists but someone with a mental illness who uses the excuse of 'art' to channel her cruelty to animals...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gregory57
Micro-bio, was one of my favorite classes.
12:32 PM on 05/05/2012
I think you're quite close to the truth here. In what way is she not exploiting animals, and human feelings toward them?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PlayTOE
Morals evolved due to cooperative group living
08:55 AM on 05/03/2012
If you are an artist, you go to jail for planning to kill a chick ... if you are a corporation, then killing millions of chicks is just a financial decision.
08:02 AM on 05/03/2012
Why would a company hatch chicks to kill them immediately? To make what kind of food? Doesn't make sense.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
gulopartisan
My micro-bio is still empty.
11:18 AM on 05/03/2012
The chicks are male. They are useless to breeders who want egg-laying females. Roughly 50% of chicks are male, which is nature's wastefulness, because one male can fertilize a hundred females without breaking into a sweat. The male chicks are fed into a device like a wood chipper because it kills them "instantly." Google "culling chickens."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
gulopartisan
My micro-bio is still empty.
11:21 AM on 05/03/2012
FYI: The same thing happens, in a less drastic way, to male calves born on dairy farms. Cows lactate because they have calves; the calves are killed so we can have the milk. Female calves at least have a chance to be selected to replace their mothers in the milking sheds. Males are "harvested" for veal. The sexes are "equal" in the beef, pork, and lamb industries. For chickens and dairy cows, not so much.