iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Japan's Greenhouse Gas Emissions Efforts Eroded By Fukushima Nuclear Disaster

AP  |  By Posted: 05/04/2012 2:46 am Updated: 05/04/2012 3:45 pm

TOKYO (AP) — The Fukushima crisis is eroding years of Japanese efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions blamed for global warming, as power plants running on oil and natural gas fill the electricity gap left by now-shuttered nuclear reactors.

Before last year's devastating tsunami triggered meltdowns at the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant, Japan had planned to meet its carbon emissions reduction targets on the assumption that it would rely on nuclear power, long considered a steady, low-emissions source of energy.

But now it's unclear to what extent nuclear energy will even be part of the electricity mix.

Japan will be free of atomic power for the first time since 1966 on Saturday, when the last of its 50 usable reactors is switched off for regular inspections. The central government would like to restart them at some point, but it is running into strong opposition from local citizens and governments.

With the loss of nuclear energy, the Ministry of Environment projects that Japan will produce about 15 percent more greenhouse gas emissions this fiscal year than it did in 1990, the baseline year for measuring progress in reducing emissions. In fiscal 2010, Japan's actual emissions were close to 1990 levels. It also raises doubts about whether it will be able to meet a pledge made in Copenhagen in 2009 to slash emissions by 25 percent from 1990 levels by 2020.

For years, nuclear power was a pillar in Japan's energy and climate policies. Until the Fukushima disaster last year, it accounted for about a third of Japan's power generation, and Tokyo had planned to expand that to half by 2030.

Now Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda has pledged to reduce reliance on nuclear power, although his government is eager to restart some reactors to meet a looming power crunch during the hot summer months.

"The big open question is whether and when the nuclear plants will come back on line, and what that implies for Japan's long-term emissions trajectory," said Elliot Diringer, executive vice president at the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, formerly the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, in Arlington, Virginia.

"If nuclear will no longer be a part of the energy mix, Japan is going to have a much tougher time reducing emissions," he said.

Japan is a world leader improving energy efficiency, one important method of reining in emissions. But it has done less to expand renewable energy than several other nations, including Germany, which is phasing out nuclear power.

Renewable energy accounts for about 9 percent of Japan's power generation — similar to the U.S. Most of that energy is hydroelectric power from dams; and some experts say solar and wind power are too intermittent to be a reliable source of base-load energy.

As an incentive, the government will require utilities to buy power from renewable energy producers for a fixed price called "feed-in tariffs" starting in July. But the higher cost to produce renewable energy will mean higher prices for consumers.

The 28-nation International Energy Agency maintains that nuclear power remains an important tool to battle global warming.

"If you want to have something at a reasonable cost in terms of low carbon-emissions, then nuclear has to play a role," said Ulrich Benterbusch, director of the Paris-based group's Directorate for Global Energy Dialogue. "If you have more renewables in the mix, it's going to be more expensive."

The government plans to announce a new energy strategy this summer with targets for renewables, nuclear and conventional power generation. In the meantime, Japan is spending billions importing extra oil and gas to meet demand — which is spewing more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.

Without nuclear power, Japan is projected to produce an additional 180 million-210 million tons of emissions this fiscal year compared to the base year of 1990, when emissions totaled 1.261 billion tons.

That wipes out a significant chunk of reductions Japan achieved during 2008-2010 through energy efficiency, credits for helping developing countries devise cleaner technologies and planting trees to absorb carbon dioxide. Officials believe Japan can still barely meet its commitment under the Kyoto Protocol to reduce emissions during the five-year period through 2012 by an average of 6 percent from 1990 levels.

Some experts see a model in Germany, which turned decisively against nuclear power after the Fukushima crisis, shutting down eight reactors and planning to close the remaining nine nuclear power plants by 2022. Yet its greenhouse gas emissions decreased 2 percent last year from 2010, and by 26.5 percent compared to 1990.

While a mild winter seems to have helped, Germany's growing renewable energy sector, which now accounts for over 20 percent of power generation, played a key role in that emissions decline, experts say. The German government has been actively promoting green energy for more than a decade, and aims to boost the share of renewables to 35 percent by 2020 — and 80 percent by 2050.

"If the government puts in place the right set of policies and incentives, then Germany is an example that you can reduce nuclear and greenhouse gases at the same time," said Jennifer Morgan, director of climate and energy program at the World Resources Institute in Washington.

Germany, however, has a safety net that Japan lacks. If it has shortfalls or blackouts, Germany can buy electricity from neighboring countries through the European power grid. The island nation of Japan has no such fallback.

Japanese politics, with its high leadership turnover, internal power battles and gridlock, is another obstacle. Its track record in recent years has been marked with indecision.

If Japan can put its collective mind to expand renewable energy, it too can achieve similar levels as Germany, said Sei Kato, deputy director at Environment Ministry's Low Carbon Society Promotion Office.

"We have the technological know-how. Japan can do anything Germany can," Kato said.

__

Associated Press Writer Juergen Baetz in Berlin contributed to this report.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW GREEN

TOKYO (AP) — The Fukushima crisis is eroding years of Japanese efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions blamed for global warming, as power plants running on oil and natural gas fill the electrici...
TOKYO (AP) — The Fukushima crisis is eroding years of Japanese efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions blamed for global warming, as power plants running on oil and natural gas fill the electrici...
Filed by Jessica Leader  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 201
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
strangiato
Ha Ha...Charade You Are
09:06 AM on 05/07/2012
One of the truly ironic aspects of nuclear power's claim to low carbon emissions is the amount of carbon used to mine and process uranium, the amount of carbon needed to construct monstrous power plants, the amount of carbon needed to decommission/dismantle the monstrous plants, and the enormous amount of carbon to safely dispose of hazardous nuclear waste FOREVER. It's that FOREVER word that makes the concept of assessing a finite cost and carbon involvement utterly ridiculous. Current state of the art plans for high level waste containment involve monitoring and retrieval of storage casks to deal with inevitable containment degradation and failure. Uranium mining at the beginning was just the tip of the iceberg. Building huge underground storage facilities, transporting hazardous materials to the site(s), then inspecting/monitoring them FOREVER probably has a carbon footprint associated with it - YOU THINK?
01:34 PM on 05/07/2012
Actaully all in nukes have the lowest lifetime carbon input of all power sources less that 5% of the wind/gas backup scam.
strangiato
Ha Ha...Charade You Are
07:25 PM on 05/07/2012
Because you said so, of course.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
09:51 PM on 05/08/2012
And Nuclear causes the biggest Eco disasters...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Mann
Nuclear Educator
09:16 AM on 05/08/2012
Don't forget to include the fact that per megawatt, wind generation requires twice as much concrete as nuclear energy, requires "back-up" generation for the 70% of the rated power, (usually natural gas) and has no plan for disposal after the 20 year expected lifespan..
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
08:58 AM on 05/09/2012
Don't forget it's half the cost of nukes, and it won't be radioactive.
08:32 AM on 05/07/2012
The fact that someone could even write this headline shows the utter myopia and monomania of the global warming alarmists.

In the worst case scenario of global warming, IF it's true (for the purpose of argument, let's assume it is) would be massive economic harm, dislocation of millions of people, extreme weather events, etc.

But Mother Nature? Gaia? The plants and animals? They wouldn't mind a bit. The plants would thrive. The animals wouldn't care much.

Earth has in the distant past had significantly higher carbon levels, and higher temperatures. She turned out all right.

Perhaps, PERHAPS, millions of people would die. And that's a HUGE perhaps.

Compare this to the effects of a massive uranium/plutonium release, as may happen RIGHT NOW from a collapse at spent fuel pool #4 or a massive failure at any of the 100s of similar sites around the world.

What would happen to life on earth in the long term if 100s of tons of Uranium/Plutonium enter the atmosphere?

Eventually, BILLIONS would die.

They have a half life of 10,000s of thousands of years.

Result? Humans would probably go EXTINCT. Most animals would probably go EXTINCT.

It would produce the absurd doomsday scenarios that the AGW crowd disseminate.

The downside of an event like this would be 1,000,000 times worse than the VERY WORST case scenarios of AGW.

And the scientific certainty of this is 100%, there are no dissidents whatsoever.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
09:47 AM on 05/07/2012
I believe you're right to dismiss the environmental benefits of nuclear power, but the idea that throwing even more junk from Fukushima into the air and ocean would have an impact more than a few extra tens of thousands of cancer deaths is not correct.

Many hundreds of kg of plutonium was put into the air by atmospheric nuclear weapons testing, and by the Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents.
07:42 AM on 05/07/2012
Shame on you Elliot Diringer and your board at http://www.c2es.org/about/board. You were quoted:
"The big open question is whether and when the nuclear plants will come back on line, and what that implies for Japan's long-term emissions trajectory," said Elliot Diringer, executive vice president at the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions,

Excuse me? If you lived in Japan would you agree THAT is the big question? What about nuclear safety and successful decommissioning?

I am as concerned as you about climate change and leaving coal and tar sands undisturbed, but I am a mother who cannot bear the thought of watching all those people, especially children suffer the gross externalities of nuclear corporate greed. How much funding do you get from the nuclear industry? If you are not sure, perhaps your board member Mr. Leonard, CEO of Entergy, can tell you. After all, his company manages Indian Point, with 17 MILLION people living in its 50 mile radius.
01:36 PM on 05/07/2012
Actually Entergy is a titanic user of Big Oil/Coals product. When you look for corruption look follow the money - Big Oil is where it lies.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
12:50 AM on 05/07/2012
Wrong! Japan is becoming the poster country for going green in the biggest way you have every seen!
01:37 PM on 05/07/2012
Nope it is a poster child of the costs of a corrupt society where a few bribe carefully placed has destroyed an entire nations economy.
02:59 PM on 05/06/2012
Note how the call went out to Koch bros that folks were actually able to exchange views about nuke power in two articles with folks going back and forth with well thought out comments

With that call the Koch Bros team of cut and pasting trolls MDinoregon, Capnd, and WeMustDoBetter09 got on the thread and proceeded to drown out all discussion, with a flurry of irrelevant and randomly picked news stories, drowning out all legitimate comment.

Note to Huffpo - this is a typical dirty trick of the paid Climate Denier teams drowning out all discussion with rapid posting of cut and pasted news stories from a vast collection they keep for just this reason.

If you want to keep your publication relevant you need to cut this nonsense out.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:49 PM on 05/06/2012
Liar. We are all against coal and fossil and for solar wind and waste.
01:41 PM on 05/07/2012
You can be dealt with easily but cut n'pastes from the trolls every hour cannot.

Doesn't it bother you that all the work you do on your posts gets buried in a few hours by these malefactors - wasting your time and hard work.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jared Jentzsch
Let the nonsense commence.
09:43 AM on 05/06/2012
I saw a commercial about 'Clean Coal'. I mean, its clean, right? Although the only coal I have ever seen is quite dirty, I am wondering where this 'Clean Coal' is. Not in my barbeque, I can tell you that.
05:46 PM on 05/06/2012
google "ultra super-critical coal.
Basics are if you burn it really hot, the efficency goes way up.
For the energy you used to get from 1 pound of coal now only take 0.65 pounds.
Then Canada has a unit the catches not only all the particulates but also caught a lot of the CO2.

China likes it because the cost of building the plants are the same as old grandpas coal plants.
And they really want to save their resources, cleaner is just bonus.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jared Jentzsch
Let the nonsense commence.
08:10 PM on 05/06/2012
To me, coal will always be the thing you want to fall back on, not use as a primary. Even the mining of it is super destructive.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
07:26 AM on 05/07/2012
You turn it into gas, you burn it, and you capture the CO2 and stick it underground.
If all that works, and it stays underground, then it's clean.

The problem is, the methane that escapes when you mine, the very high cost of the plant compared with anything else but nuclear and solar PV, and the lack of a demonstrated capability to do it. You also still have a lot of ash to get rid of.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Mann
Nuclear Educator
07:59 AM on 05/06/2012
Nuclear energy saves lives by avoiding air pollution, we need to build more and re-start the ones that have been checked and found to be safe from a similar accident.
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/air-pollution-deaths-united-kingdom-0420.html
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
07:28 AM on 05/07/2012
It saves almost as many lives as simple emissions filters....
but then you have to add on all the extra deaths, so it comes out pretty badly in the end.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Mann
Nuclear Educator
08:28 AM on 05/07/2012
Let's treat our environment with respect, our air should not be a dumping ground for particulates and gasses...What "extra deaths"? The thousands from lung cancer and other respiratory ailments? Or the mercury poisoning in the water?
08:19 AM on 05/07/2012
Fukishima is threatening world mass extinction if we can't sort out this pool#4 issue ASAP.

The odds aren't worth it.

Get bent, shill.
04:56 PM on 05/08/2012
The reports of the demise of the SFP are greatly exaggerated. Remember, the fuel has been decaying for over a year.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:34 PM on 05/05/2012
Japan had dedicated it'self to rooftop solar, offshore wind and waste bio fuels.

That is the future.

24/7, carbon negative, clean safe and forever.

Cheaper than nukes too.,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
10:14 PM on 05/05/2012
Much cheaper, instead of a Trillion Dollar Eco-Disaster,

Japan could have been the poster Country for Solar (of all flavors)!

What a Nuclear Waste!

See Ya on the new thread...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeMustDoBetter09
04:18 PM on 05/05/2012
Experts: NRC letting threat fester at Unit 4 because acknowledging it would call into question safety at dozens of USA PLANTS @genpatsu @BBC @PBS @maddow @LAW @HumanRight @BetteMidler @johncusack @erinbrockovich1 @MSNBC @CBS http://enenews.com/experts-charge-nrc-letting-fukushima-unit-4-threat-fester-because-acknowledging-call-question-safety-dozens-identically-designed-nuclear-plants
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeMustDoBetter09
01:16 PM on 05/05/2012
#Fukushima: SPEAK UP!! @genpatsu @BBC @PBS @maddow @LAW @HumanRight @BetteMidler @johncusack @erinbrockovich1 @MSNBC @CBS Concern that a subsidence in the earth under unit 4 could cause its collapse http://enenews.com/report-concern-subsidence-earth-unit-4-could-collapse
12:59 PM on 05/05/2012
Anybody ever heard of Oak Ridge National Lab? Well, the "smart" nuclear boys have just added some new biomass gasification units, joining the "smart" nuclear boys at Savannah River Site who have this year turned off their coal plant for biomass.
I wonder why they don't use nukes, too smart?


Wood chips - tons of them - to power lab's new heating system

Smoldering wood chips in oxygen-starved chambers will be used to generate steam heat for most of the buildings at Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
The new energy-efficient process also provides a market for low-grade wood that loggers would otherwise leave on the forest floor, officials said.
The cutting-edge biomass gasification plant replaces four worn-out boilers that were 64 years old and were first powered by coal and later, natural gas.
The new $60 million system will create enough steam heat to power the equivalent of 18,000 homes, said Bob Baugh, director of the lab's utilities division.
At the lab, it'll heat about 100 buildings and serve other uses such as sterilizing autoclaves.
The conversion from boilers to the gasification plant will save an estimated $3.8 million a year in energy costs, Baugh said.
"The gasification process is very clean-burning," he said. "It's cleaner than natural gas."

They have had biomass electric generation since 2008.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/top-earth-day-champions-slash-carbon-emissions-equal-to-45000-acres-of-pine-forests-2012-04-23
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeMustDoBetter09
04:19 PM on 05/05/2012
SHUT THEM ALL DOWN!! GOOD GRIEF...WHAT ARE WE WAITING FOR!??!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeMustDoBetter09
11:59 AM on 05/05/2012
#Fukushima: DOOMSDAY POSSIBLE - SPEAK UP!! #NY #Times #genpatsu #BBC #PBS @maddow #LAW #HumanRight @BetteMidler @johncusack @erinbrockovich1 http://enenews.com/doomsday-like-radiation-release-if-fukushima-no-4-catches-fire-it-would-be-a-global-catastrophe-it-already-has-been-but-it-would-dwarf-whats-already-happened-nuclear-waste-expert
11:24 AM on 05/05/2012
Entergy workers authorize strike

Contract expires May 15

Members of the Utility Workers Union of America Local 369 voted overwhelmingly to authorize leadership to call a strike at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station as workers remain far apart with plant owner Entergy Corp. on healthcare, safety and staffing issues.

According to a union press release,, Entergy is trying to replace more than a dozen workers with outside contractors, who, the union argues, often have less experience and knowledge, to operate several areas in the plant that are located outside of the most sensitive protected zones.

http://plymouthdailynews.com/entergy-workers-authorize-strike-16540

What's the worst that could happen??
Fukushima caused by a Homer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
11:36 AM on 05/05/2012
Salute and Faved, already fanned!

The Nuclear Utilities are being shown to be GREEDY,
They cut corners on SAFETY while increasing their Exec's Pay and benefits...
strangiato
Ha Ha...Charade You Are
10:27 AM on 05/05/2012
Apparently in Japan, just like in Amerika, you can buy your way out of jail. Over a year since the devastating 3 way melt down and no criminal charges.

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2011/06/tepco-will-someone-turn-lights/39364/

However, by the looks of the Japanese street right now, I'm guessing the political hacks are looking for some scapegoat meat to throw to the wolves.

"The Tokyo Prosecutor Office Special Investigative Division has begun a preliminary investigation into TEPCO on charges of criminal negligence resulting in death and/or injury"