iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Ex-Im Bank's Future Caught Up In Congressional Fight

By JIM ABRAMS 05/04/12 07:26 PM ET AP

Exportimport Bank

WASHINGTON -- Since the Export-Import Bank was founded in 1934, Congress has methodically renewed its charter two dozen times with little or no controversy, attesting to the independent federal agency's low-key, generally well-regarded mission of helping finance American companies' overseas sales.

This year, however, with Congress at its dysfunctional worst, it's different.

In the Senate, reauthorization of the Ex-Im Bank enjoys wide bipartisan support, but Democrats and Republicans can't agree on a voting process. In the House, Republicans are torn between their business allies who are strong Ex-Im backers and conservative groups which say the agency should be eliminated. Add to that a dispute between Boeing Co., a major beneficiary of Ex-Im financing, and Delta Air Lines, which says such financing has hurt its bottom line.

House leaders said Friday they had come up with a plan that could, if it satisfies House critics and Senate supporters, keep the bank in business.

The bank's current charter expires at the end of this month. At about the same time, the institution will hit its statutory lending cap of $100 billion.

In March, Senate Democrats proposed renewing the bank's charter for four years and raising the lending cap to $140 billion. But when they tried to attach that to a bill promoting small business investment, Republicans rebelled and shot it down.

Republicans said they were happy to take up the bank's renewal as a separate measure subject to a few amendments, but didn't want it slowing down passage of the small business bill, a GOP favorite. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., insisted, saying the renewal needed to be attached to the small business measure, or another bill heading for passage, to have a chance of getting through the House.

That moved the action to the House, where Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., who originally sought a shorter and more restrictive reauthorization, and the House's second-ranked Democrat, Steny Hoyer of Maryland, have been working for weeks on a compromise.

Their proposal would extend the life of the bank for three years, gradually raising its ceiling cap to $140 billion. It also, in a gesture to Delta, directs the treasury secretary to initiate multilateral talks on reducing, and eventually eliminating, federal export subsidies for aircraft.

The agreement, Hoyer said, "ends the uncertainty so many of our businesses have faced as the deadline for Congress to act approaches." It is slated for a House vote next week.

Earlier, U.S. Chamber of Commerce executive vice president Bruce Josten wrote lawmakers that failure to find a solution and extend the bank's life "would amount to unilateral disarmament in the face of other nations' aggressive trade finance programs."

"Whether you like it or not, other countries are Export-Import Bank on steroids," said Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, whose state of South Carolina is manufacturing Boeing's new 787 Dreamliner. "If we just get out of this business, companies like Boeing will be unable to sell their airplanes."

Graham and others point out that while the Ex-Im Bank provided $32 billion in financing last year, its counterpart agency in Canada financed three times that amount and China backed up its exports with some $300 billion in financing.

The Export-Import Bank provides financing support for about 2 percent of U.S. exports, stepping in when private banks leery of more risky foreign sales are reluctant to offer the credit the U.S. company needs for working capital or the foreign buyer needs to secure a loan. Most of its support comes in the form of loan guarantees, but it also offers direct loans and credit insurance.

The bank says that its transactions supported some 290,000 American jobs at no cost to taxpayers. It operates through fees and interest charged its customers and over the past five years has paid $1.9 billion into the Treasury.

Still, conservative groups such as the Club for Growth and Heritage Action for America are urging lawmakers to reject Ex-Im Bank reauthorization and have made it a "key vote" in how they rate lawmakers' records. The groups say the bank distorts markets and picks winners and losers in the private sector. "Not only should members of Congress reject this expansion of authority, but they should reject the bank's charter and shut it down for good," the Club for Growth said.

It's not the first time Republicans have been pulled in opposite directions by small-government devotees on one side and their business friends or constituents on the other. A similar situation arose on a still-pending bill to finance highways and other infrastructure and on legislation to keep federal student loan interest rates low. In this case, the conservatives' ties to the business community appear to be winning out.

In late April, 30 House Republicans wrote Cantor and House Speaker John Boehner that "as conservatives, we believe it is imperative that Congress move forward with a multiyear reauthorization of Ex-Im that provides certainty and stability for U.S. manufacturers and exporters as soon as possible." They said that, while in a perfect world there would be no need for this type of export financing, "it seems counterproductive to unilaterally disengage."

They also noted that more than 700 small businesses were among the companies that used the bank for the first time last year, echoing the bank's assertions that it is far more than "Boeing's bank."

Last year 87 percent of the bank's transactions directly benefited small business, a total of $6 billion in export-financing support. At the same time the bank helped finance about $11 billion worth of Boeing's large commercial sales, supporting 85,000 aerospace jobs and assuring that Boeing can compete on a more equal footing with Airbus.

But it also eases the way for foreign carriers, such as Air India, to buy Boeing's newest aircraft, and Delta has argued that this has resulted in it being squeezed out of some markets, to the detriment of its workforce.

The airline is not against Ex-Im reauthorization, said Delta spokesman Trebor Banstetter. But he said the bank needs to analyze how financing affects employment to airline employees as well as aircraft manufacturers. He also urged the government to open negotiations with Europe on finding a way for both sides to get out of the business of export credit for aircraft sales.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Since the Export-Import Bank was founded in 1934, Congress has methodically renewed its charter two dozen times with little or no controversy, attesting to the independent federal agency...
WASHINGTON -- Since the Export-Import Bank was founded in 1934, Congress has methodically renewed its charter two dozen times with little or no controversy, attesting to the independent federal agency...
Filed by Paige Lavender  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 579
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
09:07 AM on 05/07/2012
Bless America...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vicla1942
06:54 AM on 05/07/2012
The congress is a national disgrace. We need a constitutional amendment
to reform the rules of congress.We need a constitutional amendment to
allow direct referendums on government power including a check on the
Supreme ct. They corrupted the political system. Congress ran up a 15.8 trillion
national debt , we need reform before we loose our democracy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
05:42 AM on 05/07/2012
"It's not the first time Republicans have been pulled in opposite directions by small-government devotees on one side and their business friends or constituents on the other."
--------------------------------------------------->

Remove Delta and boeing from the equation momentarily. In a global economy the republicans can't have it both ways. They claim they want to shrink government, yet the very reductions come at the expense of the small businesses they claim they want to help. It actually makes them look hypocritical at a minimum and nefarious at the extreme.

It's no wonder that the GOP is in constant conflict with the democrats, because as this points out, they are deeply conflicted within.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VPerry24
Carpe Diem!
05:25 AM on 05/07/2012
Reform congress now so we can move forward. Congress is embarrassing, dead locked and they only represent themselves and the 1%ers while taking the rest to the cleaners.
11:58 PM on 05/06/2012
When a Democrat adds an amendment to Republican legislation we get their pat NO NO NO. Between their NO NO NO and sabotaging every Democratic move, they do nothing else. In every previous congress what had always been "business as usual" for the Republicans has now become a hurdle that they will never handle. What do the Republicans do other than say NO?
photo
dollbaby
Spice...."The Toughest Fighter."
10:44 PM on 05/06/2012
Wonder what position Romney will take on this? He doesn't even need to spin the weather vane for this one: Club for Growth
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
byronic
08:49 PM on 05/06/2012
The Republicans are caught in a trap of their own making. Having moved the party to the right and courted the religious extremists, they now depend for their survival on the unsophisticated, uneducated and divisive extremes of American society. No GOP member of Congress can afford to be seen as a reasonable voice lest he or she be targeted by the far right and all their Super-Pac money...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sylvia wadlington
Kindle Writer
06:49 PM on 05/06/2012
This might be the perfect MUST PASS bill for republicans to be attached to the Transportation bill WITH ALL REPUBLICAN POISON PILLS STRIPPED OUT! If it means that much to them, it's time to see politically how much they are willing to give to get it through. It is long past time that the democrates started playing the game with the same rules Republicans are using.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DARK STAR
One small step for Man...
05:37 PM on 05/06/2012
I do not know much about this Federal Bank, but it proves the US Government can run a bank without the Federal Reserve.

Buried in the article: "The bank says that its transactions supported some 290,000 American jobs at no cost to taxpayers. It operates through fees and interest charged its customers and over the past five years has paid $1.9 billion into the Treasury."
photo
dollbaby
Spice...."The Toughest Fighter."
10:27 PM on 05/06/2012
and that is why the club for NONgrowth wants it gone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DARK STAR
One small step for Man...
07:48 PM on 05/08/2012
That is also why it is never mentioned in the corporate media.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vietveter
To the FAR LEFT
04:48 PM on 05/06/2012
Go back to sleep,Harry. It is time for you

and all other professional politicians on

both sides to retire or be voted out.

You are the problem; we need a

solution.
Rowwdy
Truth Will Set You Free
01:30 PM on 05/06/2012
"Not only should members of Congress reject this expansion of authority, but they should reject the bank's charter and shut it down for good," the Club for Growth said.

Lets shut down the Ex-Im Bank, EPA and any other agency which which stands in the way of the republican parties agenda, slavery and creating a government based on plutocracy...
12:36 PM on 05/06/2012
The Tea Party has no problem with picking "winners and losers" when they approve those massive taxpayer giveaways to the Oil Cos. But to keep American jobs; to keep America competitiive; they don't want to pick "winners and losers" for loans -- loans -- from a Ex-Im Bank. Nonsensical Baloney.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tin soldier
No more Mr. nice guy
03:03 PM on 05/06/2012
Please detail those MASSIVE taxpayer giveaways to the oil companies
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sylvia wadlington
Kindle Writer
06:54 PM on 05/06/2012
40 billion a year in subsidies from the U.S. government, EVERY YEAR, while big oil gouges taxpayers at the pump and sabotages government backed GREEN ENERGY projects while trying to start another middle eastern oil war with Iran.
BIG OIL is friend to no man or government on this planet.
photo
dollbaby
Spice...."The Toughest Fighter."
10:31 PM on 05/06/2012
Is this what you were looking for (and don't want to see):

It is impossible to determine exactly how much taxpayer money is dished out just to the oil & gas industry alone. The reason is painfully obvious; our elected officials, and certainly the industry, don’t want the public to know how much it is; they would prefer we didn’t even know it exists. But many organizations and individuals have attempted to do so with limited success. That said, it seems that the general consensus averages’ around $24 billion each year in both direct payouts and Tax Expenditures, with the top number at about $37 billion.

http://www.cps-news.com/wp-content/corporate-welfare/Oil-and-Gas-Industry-Subsidies.html
09:45 AM on 05/06/2012
Great picture of Reid. The average age of Reid, Pelosi, Hoyer and Clyburn is over 70. Almost as old as the newest progressive idea. And the left pretends the GOP is the party of old stodgy pols an ideas. Wrong, again.
photo
NVEd
I love mountains.
09:49 AM on 05/06/2012
The Repub party is the party of 19th century ideas. Just because they have people younger than 70 doesn't mean their ideas are young.
09:59 AM on 05/06/2012
It's true self reliance, free enterprice, family, country before self, and God have been around for centuries. Tried and true. Progressivism doesn't work and historically, has never worked. After all, sooner or later you run out of other people's money. BTW- classic lib retort... very thoughtful. Not.
12:25 PM on 05/06/2012
The Tea Party doesn't mind "picking winners and losers" when they vote to Give Away Taxpayer Dollar to the the Oil Industry via massive Subsidies. But they have a problem voting to keep America competitive to the rest of the world by providing Loans -- Loans -- via an Ex-Im Bank. They are fools.
01:35 PM on 05/06/2012
God, I wish you guys understood the difference between subsidies and tax credits for depreciation and exploration. The green energy business gets subsidies and almost every heavy industry gets tax credits for depreciation and exploration. Let's get rid of ALL the subsidies, including the ones YOU like. And I know this will come as a surprise to you, the money any company makes, including the evil oil companies (I guess bike everywhere you go or are you just a run of the mill hypocrite?) isn't YOUR money.
09:27 AM on 05/06/2012
Our leaders sold us out long ago !
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vicla1942
05:28 AM on 05/06/2012
Time for a constitutional amendment to reform congress.Term limits
no lobbyist money, campaign financing limited to 200 per voter
nothing else.
09:18 AM on 05/06/2012
amen add no outragious pensions just social security , and buy their own healthcare
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sylvia wadlington
Kindle Writer
07:06 PM on 05/06/2012
Fanned and faved, this election will be a referendum. The American people will decide as they always have the direction of the country. Republicans plan to make birth control illegal and cut taxes for the rich and raise them for the poor AND BRING RELIGION INTO GOVERNMENT. Democrates want to create jobs by repairing and rebuilding America's crumbling infastructure, give all Americans equal rights and protect women's rights to choose while keeping religion OUT OF GOVERNMENT. The voters will decide who and what they want.