iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Bank Of America Protests Begin At Shareholder Meeting (LATEST UPDATES)

Posted: Updated: 05/09/2012 2:29 pm

Activists from Occupy Wall Street, the environmental movement and labor unions, along with victims of home foreclosures, have begun massive demonstrations at Bank of America's shareholder meeting in Charlotte, N.C., on Wednesday morning.

(Above, video from Wednesday's protests)

Occupiers have characterized the event as a test run for activism ahead of September's Democratic National Convention, and expect more than a thousand protesters for a full day of marches and direct-action demonstrations both inside and outside the shareholder meeting. For those gathered, Bank of America has become the quintessential culprit for the Great Recession -- a bailed-out bank with a bad record on foreclosures and the environment.

Inside the Bank of America meeting, disgruntled shareholders -- including Trillium Asset Management, the City of New York and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees -- will force votes on proposals that would curb the bank's political spending and force it to review its foreclosure practices. Foreclosure victims are hoping to give testimony during the meeting.

Outside the meeting, protesters promise a boisterous slate of events to draw attention to Bank of America's relationship with the federal government, the coal industry and its long record of foreclosure abuse. Occupy Atlanta's Tim Franzen said there are three marches planned, each with its own theme: the bank's environmental record, the housing crisis and corporate accountability issues. The marches will converge into one big protest.

Scroll down to follow the latest developments from Charlotte in the live blog below.


live blog

Oldest Newest

Outside Bank of America Stadium, the crowd is chanting "we'll be back!" -- a possible reference to the fact that President Obama will be giving his speech there at the Democratic National Convention.

premostadium

Photo of the crowd outside the stadium, courtesy of Michael Premo.

Share this:

While the official webcast of Bank of America's shareholder meeting was dominated by comments from disgruntled shareholders, preliminary results indicated that all of the shareholder proposals to change the bank's operations were defeated.

Such votes are typically dominated by large institutional investors reluctant to take a controversial stand, since they manage shares on behalf of a diverse set of clients. Nevertheless, many shareholders unhappy with the company's management were denied access. Campaign for America's Future spokeswoman Liz Rose sends along this anecdote:

I just got a call from the Bank of America's shareholder meeting in Charlotte from Richard Eskow, a writer for the Campaign for America's Future. Richard represents 82,000 shares of investor stock of BoA and yet he was turned away with 40 other shareholders just now and he and the others were asked to leave BoA property. Some shareholders who were turned away were elderly.

-- Zach Carter

Share this:

Moynihan defended the company's operation of subsidiaries in nations identified as international tax havens by saying, "We're a global business," suggesting that Bank of America needs its sub-companies in other nations because that's where the business is.

"I don't think there's a whole lot of Bank of America operations in the Cayman Islands," one disgruntled shareholder responded.

-- Zach Carter

Share this:

Noting that 19 peer-reviewed scientific studies in the past two years have indicated that mountaintop removal studies causes birth defects, cancer and other deadly ailments, Coal River Mountain Watch president Bob Kincaid took BofA CEO Brian Moynihan to task for continuing to finance companies that engage in mountaintop removal mining.

"You are part of the poisoning of Appalachia and so is every one of your directors and so is every one of your shareholders," Kincaid said. "You are part of the destruction of an entire region of the country."

"Sir, our environmental team will take a look at it. We look at it all the time," Moynihan said. The crowd responded with jeers.

-- Zach Carter

Share this:

Boston's City Life/Vida Urbana is participating in today's march. Here is a photo of one member submitted by Michael Premo.

premocitylife

Share this:

Shareholders have good reason to be upset about Bank of America's consumer abuses. Fortune magazine reports on a Wall Street analyst who ranks BofA chief Brian Moynihan as the worst-performing bank CEO in America.

Michael Mayo, a bank analyst at Credit Agricole Securities, recently ranked current bank CEOs by the relative performance of their shares during the time since they took over the banks. Moynihan became the CEO of B of A in early 2010. Since that time the bank's shares have fallen 42%. That puts Moynihan at the bottom of the heap. It's not just the stock market performance. Mayo says there are a number of things that Moynihan has done wrong. One of the biggest was the bank debit card flip-flop, which turned off customers despite B of A eventually deciding under pressure that it wasn't going to charge the fee afterall. What's more Moynihan, like other bank CEO, was slow to stem the problems in its mortgage servicing division, which led to the $25 billion industrywide settlement with state AGs.

The one positive, perhaps, for Moynihan, is that CEOs of other large banks aren't far behind. Shares of Morgan Stanley (MS) are down 39% since James Gorman started as the head of that firm, also in early 2010. Citigroup's shares are down a whopping 89% since Vikram Pandit took over the job as CEO of Citigroup (C). But that includes the heart of the financial crisis, which are not included in Moynihan's or Pandit's figures. The best performing CEO, according to Mayo, was Jim Rohr, who heads up PNC Financial Services Group (PNC). Since taking the helm of the Pittsburgh-based bank in mid-2000, making Rohr the longest service top bank CEO, the banks shares are up 43%.

Read the whole story at Fortune.

Share this:

Inside the shareholder meeting, Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan just defended the company's financing of coal and mountaintop removal mining. As HuffPost reported Tuesday:

Environmental groups will be decrying the bank's relationship with the coal industry.

"A human health crisis is exploding in Appalachia and Bank of America lights the fuse every day," said Coal River Mountain Watch president Bob Kincaid. "This bank and its shareholders must confront the brutality of what they do."

Kincaid noted that 3 million to 5 million pounds of explosives are detonated every day in Appalachia in mountaintop removal mining, stripping away rock and soil to expose mineable coal. Scientific research shows that runoff from those activities is poisoning citizens in surrounding areas, with increased birth defects, cancer rates that lead to 4,000 deaths a year in West Virginia, according to Kincaid.

"That's a newborn who never knows a clear breath, a 4-year-old who never gets to be a 5-year-old, a mother who never gets to be a grandmother," Kincaid told reporters Tuesday. "That is what Bank of America finances when it finances the coal industry."

"We adopted a policy 4 or 5 years ago that said we will not finance companies that primarily do mountaintop removal," Moynihan said at Wednesday's meeting. "And we've stuck to that policy."

The trouble, of course, is that the company continues to finance big coal companies with diverse operations, including massive mountaintop removal activities.

"A catastrophe is happening on your watch," one shareholder said, directing her comments to Moynihan.

-- Zach Carter

Share this:

Occupy Wall Street veteran Max Berger will appear on CNBC this afternoon regarding today's protest:

@ maxberger : I'm going to be on The Closing Bell on CNBC at 3:45 to talk about #bankvsamerica and the need to #BreakUpBofA. Wish me luck! #fb

Share this:

None of the shareholder proposals were approved, and all of the bank's directors up for shareholder approval were given another term.

Bank of America's executive compensation packages were approved with 92 percent of the shareholder vote.

Shareholder proposals are notoriously difficult to pass, since most shares are controlled by large institutional investors that manage stock for many different clients. These large firms are reluctant to demand changes to a company's operations for fear of creating problems among their customers, some of which may approve of a resolution, others of which may not.

Nevertheless, active shareholder presences at annual meetings can sometimes convince management teams to change policies, even when formal votes fall short of passage.

-- Zach Carter

Share this:

franzendirt

Photo courtesy of Tim Franzen.

Share this:
Share this:

premofront

Photo courtesy of Michael Premo.

Share this:
@ allisonkilkenny : Code Pink not impressed w/#99power: RT @codepink: Organizers of #bankvsamerica don't seem too keen on the idea of anything radical happening

@ codepink : Nooo not unimpressed, just making an observation. It's very well organized. @allisonkilkenny

@ codepink : Fantastic diversity here #bankvsamerica

Share this:

MoveOn sponsoring Sympathy protest in Austin today.

@ OccupyAustin : Community Calendar: MoveOn-sponsored Bank of America Protest. 4:30pm at Texas State Capitol, south steps. #BankvsAmerica #OWS #OATX #Austin

Share this:

More overtones of the activism that will surround the coming Democratic National Convention in Charlotte in September:

@ tracyvs : How many more 99%ers will be arrested before a banker goes to jail, @BarackObama? http://t.co/KTjr1DuI #makeboapay #99power

Share this:
@ the99power : Great! RT @andrew_dunn: Appears that most shareholders in here are activist-minded. Lots of applause for criticisms. #BofA #99power

Share this:

timmarch

Photo courtesy of Tim Franzen.

Share this:

It's the spot where President Obama will give his speech at the Democratic National Convention in September.

@ Sara_Jeans : Marching in the streets to Bank of America stadium. Bank of America, BAD for America! #makeboapay #occupydc

Share this:

Sister Barbara Bush, a housing counselor in the Cincinnati, Ohio area, just took Bank of America and its CEO Brian Moynihan to task for failing to deliver on promises to overhaul its foreclosure practices.

Noting that 41 percent of her organization's housing counseling customers have their loans managed by BofA, Bush said, "We find that BofA is the hardest to deal with."

Years ago, Bush's agency was granted a "single point of contact" on its loan modification requests. Mortgage servicers rarely assign a single person to handle a specific loan, instead allowing the process to be managed by a revolving crew of poorly paid and often short-term customer service employees that bear a greater resemblance to telemarketers than credit analysts. With no single point of contact to handle each mortgage, struggling homeowners often lose their homes, even though other employees at the bank are working to find an alternative solution for them.

After BofA promised Bush's company a single point of contact for the families she works with, she believed the company's foreclosure abuses would abate. Instead, she said, "we have no one to talk to. They do not call us back. I understand, Mr. Moynihan, that you really believe that you've done something, but ... you've got to do something about your mortgage servicing."

"Will you commit to stopping at least the dual track and to reviewing your servicing, and reviewing it until it's right?" she said. "You've reviewed it before, and I'm here telling you, it's not right."

Moynihan said that Bank of America already performs more loan modifications that other big banks and that it will fix any problems that are brought to the bank's attention.

-- Zach Carter

Share this:
@ Sara_Jeans : March now on the move #makeboapay

Share this:

timwide

Photo -- showing a large turnout -- submitted by Occupy Atlanta activist Tim Franzen.

Share this:

Patch is reporting:

Locally, those claiming unfair practices by the banking giant here will descend upon one of their Morristown branches, 188 South St., at 2 p.m. Wednesday. It's just one of over 200 nationwide protests scheduled on the day of Bank of America's annual shareholder meeting in Charlotte, N.C., according to Morristown protest organiers Move-On.org and Occupy Morristown.

"It's an educational thing," said Lew Schwartz, organizer for the Morristown Bank of America demonstration. "Their management is not starving, but their customers are and they don't seem to care, at least that's the impression we get."

Click here to read more.

Share this:

Inside the meeting, Michael Garland of the Office of New York City Comptroller John Liu invoked a recent HuffPost story while advocating for a proposal requiring the bank to review its foreclosure practices.

"The New York City funds continue to have concerns regarding the integrity of the bank's servicing [and] foreclosure ... processes," Garland said, noting that, "In April of 2012, The Huffington Post reported that Bank of America had sued itself in 11 foreclosures."

The New York City pension funds and 9 other institutional investors are urging Bank of America to conduct a thorough review of its foreclosure practices and report the results to shareholders. BofA has been plagued by widespread allegations of fraud in the foreclosure process, with a report from the Inspector General at the Department of Housing and Urban Development finding that the bank's management was involved in the improper foreclosure practices. BofA management opposes the shareholder resolution that would require a review of foreclosure practices.

-- Zach Carter

Share this:
@ Sara_Jeans : There are 100 shareholders on our side, inside the meeting. They say they can hear us drumming and chanting #makeboapay #occupydc

Share this:

Video by HuffPost's Zach Carter

Share this:

Wayne Borders calls into HuffPost to report that there are roughly 100 protesters/shareholders inside the meeting.

Share this:

Inside the meeting, several shareholders are blasting the company's management.

"I'm of the judgment that Bank of America is a felon," one shareholder said. "I don't believe that Bank of America would be here today without the 99% of taxpayers that bailed out Bank of America. The $45 billion that you received pales behind the hundreds of billions that were guaranteed in bonds, commercial paper, and the list goes on and on."

The shareholder's microphone was then cut off.

Another shareholder who identified herself as Judy Konick said, "I accuse [former CEO] Ken Lewis [and current CEO] Brian Moynihan of theft, fraud and abuse."

-- Zach Carter

Share this:

charlotte police

charlotte police

These photos were submitted by Occupy Columbia activist Wayne Borders, who is on the scene in Charlotte.

Share this:

Inside the meeting, Andrea Luquetta of the California Reinvestment Coalition spoke in favor of a resolution requiring Bank of America to conduct a review of its foreclosure practices and publish the results for shareholders.

"We've found that federal programs and rules have not stopped illegal foreclosure sales," she said. "Housing counselors have consistently rated Bank of America as the worst servicer ... even in violation of HAMP rules."

HAMP is short for the Home Affordable Modification Program, the foreclosure relief program sponsored by the Obama administration. It is operated by banks, however, and has been plagued by widespread allegations of abuse.

"We obey the law every day," CEO Brian Moynihan said, noting that the bank is "cleaning up" problems from companies it acquired in recent years -- likely alluding to its purchase of Countrywide, the nation's largest subprime lender during the housing bubble.

But Josh Zinner of the Neighborhood Economic Development Advocacy Project pushed back.

"Bank of America's performance in mortgage servicng is among the worst ... and as a shareholder I'm very worried about the reputational risk," Zinner said. "I was here last year to talk about the problems in servicing, and I'm sorry to say that they have not improved at all."

Another shareholder blasted Moynihan's response:

"Let's be absolutely clear -- other companies you acquired may have made those mortgages. Your company and our company have been the servicer of those mortgages."

"We have 50,000 plus people working on it," Moynihan said. "We continue to do everything we can."

-- Zach Carter

Share this:

Photos submitted by Occupy Atlanta activist Tim Franzen.

occupy arrest

occupy arrest

Share this:

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Activists from Occupy Wall Street, the environmental movement and labor unions, along with victims of home foreclosures, have begun massive demonstrations at Bank of America's shareholder meeting in C...
Activists from Occupy Wall Street, the environmental movement and labor unions, along with victims of home foreclosures, have begun massive demonstrations at Bank of America's shareholder meeting in C...
Filed by Jason Cherkis and Zach Carter  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 983
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (18 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
lightningbolt 12:02 PM on 05/09/2012
"Fortune magazine reports on a Wall Street analyst who ranks BofA chief Brian Moynihan as the worst-performing bank CEO in America."
-WHY ISN'T HE GETTING FIRED?  Why can CEOs fail at their job and continue to get multi-million dollar salaries and bonuses?  I thought we  Read More...
11:28 AM on 05/15/2012
These are the folks Obama promised he will pay rent for. I guess they are here to collect.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SkinTight
01:49 PM on 05/13/2012
I left Bank of America and went straight to the Delta Community Credit Union.

I took my husband's accounts along for the ride. Even convinced another 10 people to follow suit. Best decision I ever made!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:01 PM on 05/12/2012
I wonder how many of these protesters have a BOA debit card?

We can protest all we want, but as long as we continue to give them our business, they will continue to do what they do. They are a business designed to make money, not a charity. If you don't like them, don't use them, tell people who care about the issue to do the same.
photo
Randy Dye
Veteran and retired Trauma/ICU nurse. Happily mar
03:25 PM on 05/12/2012
The III Percenters are with OWS on this one....The Bank of America Declaration!!

http://ncrenegade.com/editorial/the-bank-of-america-declaration/#comment-19713
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:42 PM on 05/10/2012
1. Bailing out anything is wrong, be it banks, the auto industry, the Post Office, etc. Stupid move America.

2. Using bailout money to give your management staff bonuses is wrong. Stupid move banks.

3. Calling banks evil for evicting people who can't cover their responsibilities is... you guessed it, WRONG.

I guess I'm the only one commenting here who actually has bought a house before and understands that you sign this thing called a contract with the loan, that spells it out in no uncertain terms that you are responsible for paying back your loan with interest, and that if you should fail to do so, you will be evicted?

It's not evil people, it's common sense. Stop calling people who won't pay your way and give you stuff for free evil, for a form of evil is actually taking from others what is not yours and bemoaning other people their success (two things Occupy scramble-heads seem to have no comprehension of).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thaddeus Orwell
08:50 AM on 05/12/2012
Go read every Matt Taibbi article on the financial crisis that he's written over the last couple years. He spells it out pretty clearly how the banks are evil and how the game is rigged. I don't see how anyone who hasn't been following his work could possibly understand what's going on.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:07 PM on 05/12/2012
Forgive me if I don't consider the musings of a vicadin abusing journalist with no economic or business background to be an authoritative voice on the subject.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
webnova
and Justice for All
09:42 PM on 05/12/2012
When I read posts like yours, I can't help but wonder how you could possibly take the time and write anything of this subject if you don't have a clue of what went on. If you knew what went on and is still going on you would have taken the time to do your due diligence on this subject mater and you would not have written what you wrote.
You might be in one of those categories that these very people are protesting about and you don't even know it.
If you have a servicer rather then an actual lender that you are paying on your mortgage you are most likely one of those people.
The whole thing is so sad and criminal it is beyond comprehension and you really need to take the time and investigate it rather then spew your comments on something you know nothing about.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:23 PM on 05/12/2012
When I read redundant responses like yours, it makes me repeat my original comment, that perhaps buyers should understand what they are signing when they get a loan. Just because their loan gets shipped to a servicer, doesn't mean the general terms change. If you can't make your payments, you can't make your payments, no matter who you are supposed to be paying. If you were risky enough to take a variable rate mortgage, that's your own fault. And if you were smart enough to take a fixed rate, but find yourself not able to cover your mortgage, what right do you have to get pissed at the lender for not lowering the rate that you signed the contract for?

I understand people can fall on hard times, but RESPONSIBLE people don't drag it out until it's too late. They prepare and plan ahead and LIVE WITHIN THEIR MEANS so that when stuff hits the fan, they can have a plan B - be it selling the house and moving to an apartment, renting out a room to help pay the mortgage, etc. But begrudging the people who were nice enough to lend you the money so you could get the house in the first place is nothing short of immature.

I'm sorry, but I can't find any blame with a company refusing to take losses because the people they lended money to failed to cover their part of the bargain.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NY Guy
Don't blame me, I didn't vote for him
06:55 AM on 05/10/2012
So go bank at Chase.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrew Nutra
A Democrat against OWS
08:49 AM on 05/10/2012
Too easy! That would deny them theatrics like drum circles.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:30 PM on 05/10/2012
Don't forget "hooping" and the occasional molotov cocktail.
01:35 AM on 05/10/2012
Police arrest and film protesters executing their democratic rights while the traitors and criminals inside get their protection.

And not because the police officers are part of it but because the politicians who give them their orders are wholly owned subsidiaries of the traitors and mass frauds inside. They make their poeple fight themselves by turning police on citizens and I for one did not do three tours in iraq to fight for freedom only to come home to see that I could have stayed at home to do that. This will trun ugly soon and I will not be fightinf against freedom again.
photo
Independent66
www.linkedin.com/in/harveyring
09:16 PM on 05/09/2012
What is striking is to contrast the OWS failure in Charlotte and the success of the Tea party to defeat Lugar in Indiana. The OWS crowd made a lot of noise, but none of their objectives succeeded, no proposals made at the meeting by the activists were successful. The Tea party was organized and as a result Luger was soundly defeated. Even they were surprised by the margin of victory. This is a lesson for the Dems, the Tea party is still active and well managed. They are adding to their successes in 2010 and will surely add to their numbers in November. Will they have another victory in Wisconsin and defeat the unions and the Dems? Based on their tactics in Indiana, I expect them to help Scott Walker win in Wisconsin. What is the difference between the Dems, unions and the OWS crowd. And the Tea Party and Republicans? The Dems, unions and OWS are fighting to be relevant and to survive. The Tea party and Reps are fighting to preserve our Constitution and the welfare of the American people past, current and future.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:31 PM on 05/10/2012
Amen. Amen.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sherlockhemlock
One world is enough.
09:20 AM on 05/12/2012
Utter humbug.
photo
Independent66
www.linkedin.com/in/harveyring
10:48 PM on 05/12/2012
Ignore my comments and you are accepting the risk that this administration has created for this country. If you are retired, or on some welfare program, or work for the government you are going to suffer the most if we do not change the direction of our government. Read a few of my other posts in the last few days if you care to understand why. It's too bad the groups that will suffer the most when we hit a wall, are the groups that this Administration says they are helping. In fact this administration is setting them up for a terrible future.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mansterEZ
searching for secular humanist fact-based truth
07:43 PM on 05/09/2012
Why do people continue to hold stock in this fascist company? It is better to invest ones money in a community bank that makes loans to qualifying individuals wanting to purchase a home in their own municipality or county. The higher up one invests the more of a chance a Wall Street gambler will want to take more than a fair share.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:56 PM on 05/09/2012
Congressman Brad Sherman was on "Dylan Ratigan" talking about his bill to break up the TBTF banks:

http://bradsherman.house.gov/2012/04/sherman-reintroduces-too-big-to-fail-too-big-to-exist-act.shtml
Sherman Reintroduces "Too Big to Fail, Too Big to Exist Act" | Congressman Brad Sherman, Representing the 27th District of California

"Washington DC – Yesterday, Congressman Brad Sherman (D – CA), reintroduced the “Too Big to Fail, Too Big to Exist Act,” (HR 4963) in the 112th Congress. The legislation was cosigned by Congressman Maurice Hinchey (D-NY). Senator Bernie Sanders (I –VT) introduced similar legislation in the Senate during the last Congress. Under this legislation, any institution that is too big to fail will be broken up and reorganized to avoid more Government bailouts and future risk to our economy..."
photo
Independent66
www.linkedin.com/in/harveyring
09:33 PM on 05/09/2012
While I have cancelled all my accounts at B of A, I don't believe this legislation we go anywhere. If there were more people who cancelled their accounts at B of A we might make an impact. It is really easy to do and be sure to tell them why you are leaving. I think this will eventually help them to change their policies . You can do it tomorrow!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:10 PM on 05/09/2012
It might get their attention.

B of A has been getting a lot of unwanted publicity at their shareholders meeting. :-)
06:52 PM on 05/09/2012
The "Shareholder Spring" has arrived. Governments would not do it so the shareholders (and the people) will!
06:02 PM on 05/09/2012
Yeah NLG!!!! Glad to see those hot green hats there!
05:54 PM on 05/09/2012
Everyone needs to get their monies and close all their accounts at all these major mortgage banks mainley (Wells Fargo, BOFA and Chase). These people are CROOKS and don't care about anyone!! We also need to do these marches in front of Wells and Chase too not just BOFA. Once again, everyone should stop paying their mortgages at the same time (starting on the first of June 2012). If they don't get their funds on mortgages they won't be able to pay their loans back to Fannie and Freddie and they will come in and take those assets away. Don't be scared to take this step to keep a roof over your head and your family. It will only take one whole month of no $$$ coming in from anyone or anywhere (including revolving credit card accounts) they are all connected in one way or another and they will colapse. This will make the CEO's absolutely scared out of their minds and will give into the people. If your credit is already screwed one more mark is not going to kill you and if you have good/excellent credit it won't even make a dent and you can still go buy Starbucks. SO PEOPLE STOP CRYING AND HAVE SOME GUTS TO TAKE CARE OF BUSINESS SO WE CAN GET OUR NATION BACK ON TRACK AGAIN. I HAVE ALREADY BEGUN THIS MYSELF STARTING THIS MONTH, ARE YOU BRAVE ENOUGH TO JOIN ME?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:46 PM on 05/09/2012
People can use this site to find a small bank or credit union by entering their zip code:

http://moveyourmoneyproject.org/
Move Your Money Project
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:35 PM on 05/10/2012
So let me get this straight. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I read your post as follows:

Banks are Crooks because they give people loans, those people sign on the dotted lines indicating that they understand that they will be responsible for paying back that money, with interest, and then, when those people realize that they cannot pay that money, the Banks are somehow evil for requiring the people they basically bought the house for to move out so that the bank doesn't basically pay for the no longer responsible/capable resident to live there?

That seems like a pretty strange way of thinking...
01:54 PM on 05/18/2012
The banks have first hand on their credit reports and know if they will eventually loose that property because of their previous lack of paying their debts.  They teased the buyer into believing that they could sell these houses before their adjustable rate came due because the market was so good... Though, the fact was it was nothing more that a bubble to burst.  I think the banks already knew it was going to happen and started giving these very low rate and high loans.  Most individuals are vunerable and can be munipulated especially when they have no clue or education on real estate.  So, all they are wanting is part of the American Dream like others.  Therefore, if it is presented in a way that is very easy to puchase a home then they are going to do it.  I also blame the loan representatives and even Realtors who were just money hungry for commissions who really knew their clients couldnt afford this and just turned their head in the other direction. 
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LiberalRick
Politics: My Sport… Hunting Zombies: My Passion
05:51 PM on 05/09/2012
“The more I see of the moneyed classes, the more I understand the guillotine.”
--George Bernard Shaw.

VIVA LA REVOLUCION!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pedestrian101
05:46 PM on 05/09/2012
SOUNDS LIKE THE DNC CONVENTION 1968 IN CHICAGO...