iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Seeking Relicensing, Mass. Officials Object

AP  |  By Posted: 05/09/2012 12:30 pm

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' only nuclear power plant wants permission to operate another 20 years, but as a decision nears, some high ranking officials say a record-long federal review of the request spanning more than six years hasn't been long enough.

The operating license for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station in Plymouth expires June 8, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is expected to decide whether to renew the plant's license through 2032 any day now, although top Massachusetts officials have asked the commission to extend its deliberations.

Last month, Attorney General Martha Coakley appealed the NRC's decision to hold hearings on the relicensing, citing what she said were unaddressed safety concerns raised by the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant accident in Japan last year.

On Friday, U.S. Reps. Edward Markey and William Keating warned NRC chairman Greg Jaczko that the commission would send "an alarming message" to people living near nuclear plants if they acted before pending issues are resolved.

And on Monday, Gov. Deval Patrick asked the NRC to take more time, citing "a number of serious concerns that have been raised regarding public safety, public health and the environment."

The NRC staff has already recommended the commission approve Pilgrim's license, and a public commission vote is expected soon.

"We do believe that the plant is being operated safely, we believe that it has the appropriate level of security, and the staff believes that the review that has been conducted shows that the plant can operate safely for an additional 20 years," said NRC spokeswoman Diane Screnci.

Anti-Pilgrim activist Mary Lampert believes Pilgrim's license will inevitably be renewed. But she said her group, Pilgrim Watch, is fighting for increased public awareness about Pilgrim's risks.

"I would hope that it would be closed," said Lampert of Duxbury. "In the interim, you have to work for safer operations to reduce risks."

Pilgrim filed its renewal application on time, so it can continue to operate even if the NRC doesn't relicense it by June 8.

The plant was built in 1972 and purchased in 1999 by its current owner, Entergy. The 680-megawatt plant provides electricity to about 680,000 homes, said Carol Wightman, an Entergy spokeswoman.

Entergy applied for Pilgrim's license renewal in January 2006, but various hearings have made the pending review the longest in NRC history by 13 months and counting, Screnci said.

Opponents have attacked the relicensing from several angles. Markey says the unresolved issues include the NRC's failure to determine how the plant's relicensing would affect Atlantic sturgeon and river herring, which swim nearby and are protected under the Endangered Species Act.

Markey and Coakley say the NRC also isn't fully considering lessons from the Fukushima nuclear accident. For instance, they point to Pilgrim's storage of spent fuel rods in pools of water, rather than encased in dry casks. The same storage method was used at Fukushima, and the rods caught fire.

"With Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station utilizing the same design as the reactors at the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant, it is plain common sense to implement appropriate safety measures before approvals are granted," Markey said.

Lampert says security at the plant is subpar, making it vulnerable to terror attack. She adds that the 40-year-old plant is old and deteriorating.

On Monday, voters in Brewster became the latest to pass anti-Pilgrim resolutions, asking state lawmakers to block the plant's relicensing. But such opinions aren't universal, said Entergy's Wightman, adding that Pilgrim enjoys significant support in a community where it employs about 650 people and paid $10.5 million in taxes during the last fiscal year.

She said Entergy has spent millions in upgrades and runs an aggressive preventative maintenance program.

The NRC is reviewing lessons from the Fukujima accident, and Pilgrim is following its lead to make needed changes, Wightman said.

She added the plant's security is robust and monitored constantly by the NRC's ongoing inspection program.

"We maintain Pilgrim is safe," she said. "We've been running it safely for 40 years."

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW GREEN

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' only nuclear power plant wants permission to operate another 20 years, but as a decision nears, some high ranking officials say a record-long federal review of the reque...
BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' only nuclear power plant wants permission to operate another 20 years, but as a decision nears, some high ranking officials say a record-long federal review of the reque...
Filed by James Gerken  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 95
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Harley 2
02:49 PM on 05/14/2012
It needs to be shut down! We (new england) are due for and earthquake. $10.5 in taxes is not worth the lifes of 3 million people. I'm sure it is safe, for now! 20 years from now if it is relicensed, there will be 100,000's of thousands dead. If something happened during the summer millions could be lost. No one could get off cape cod for one! you pass by the plant to get on or off cape cod.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Harley 2
05:58 AM on 05/13/2012
Country/Territory US cents/1kWh As of Sources

France


19.39


November 1, 2011


EEP[5]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_pricing

France is 80% Nuke, and they pay 19 cents per kWH (in USD) Yer solar can be produced at 3 cents per kHW. hmmmmmm

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/p/renewable-and-energy-efficiency.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Harley 2
05:46 AM on 05/13/2012
Results of the Nuke Poll

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/05/results-of-nuke-poll.html
08:58 AM on 05/11/2012
Probe to Look Into Allegations at NRC

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's inspector general will open an investigation into allegations that a regional supervisor sought to squelch some nuclear inspectors' safety findings, according to an internal memo issued Thursday that defended the agency's safety record.

The investigation was prompted by an April 24 letter from anonymous staff in the NRC's Western region to Rep. Ed Markey (D., Mass.), ranking member of the House energy committee. The letter said one of the region's deputy directors had created a "corrosive environment which inhibits the ability of inspectors to identify safety-significant issues."

.......The allegations in the April 24 letter are largely directed at Troy Pruett, a Region IV manager who oversees the inspection program for 21 nuclear plants. The letter alleged that he tried to override inspectors' findings about the Fort Calhoun nuclear power plant near Omaha, Neb. Mr. Pruett forwarded queries to an NRC spokesman.

The plant suffered a fire on June 7, 2011, that temporarily knocked out power to the pools that store spent fuel rods. Fort Calhoun was idle at the time due to heavy floods in the area.

NRC analysts determined the fire was a "red," or high-level threat to the plant's operations......

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304070304577396602836752294.html

Basically said "if we find a big problem.....it makes too much work for me."
12:15 PM on 05/10/2012
Shut it down.  Invest in clean renewable energy.  Clean renewable energy will never make an entire region uninhabitable for decades after an accident.  Clean renewable energy lasts much, much longer than nuclear or any other energy source.  It's also much cheaper and can be placed almost anywhere in the world.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Harley 2
05:34 AM on 05/13/2012
Exactly, proof here that solar electric is now 3 cents per kWH. sure you have to pay it on the front side, that is more honest that nuke getting paid on the front side AND the back side.
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/p/renewable-and-energy-efficiency.html
11:01 AM on 05/10/2012
The plant is safe until it isn't, and then it's too late.
07:18 AM on 05/10/2012
Here's a story about an explosion at a Thai petrochemical plant that killed 12 and injured 100. There were also 1,000 nearby residents that had to be evacuated.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20120506/as-thailand-factory-fire/
Interesting that the story didn't include any photos or video of the fire and there's no comment section. Now if this were a very small tritium leak of a couple of curries at a nuke plant it would be front page news.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Rowe
"What Me worry"?
10:34 AM on 05/10/2012
And how many years to clean it up...compared to the 70 years to SAFELY remove the radioactive materials? By the way...they still need experts, like yourself over in Japan.
02:59 PM on 05/10/2012
Nuclear power accidents displace fewer people and take up less land than all other energy competitors do during normal operations?

I'm still ready and willing to go if my employer requests it.
photo
abbienormal
What hump?
06:52 AM on 05/10/2012
Don't trust a word issued by Entergy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hikerguy22
This is your carbon footprint
06:21 AM on 05/10/2012
The new reactors in Georgia are already behind schedule even as the ink is drying on the permits. Guess who will pay?
11:24 PM on 05/10/2012
Funny same plants built by American engineers are all on time on budget in China 90% done at half the cost of the Georgia reactors built by American lawyers. .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hikerguy22
This is your carbon footprint
05:50 PM on 05/14/2012
Georgia Power is already 900 million dollars in the hole. Nuclear is obsolete.
08:49 AM on 05/11/2012
Yep China builds everything on time and under budget. Poisoned dog food, lead in toys, high speed trains that fall off the tracks, ect. Loved it when a 9/16 wench broke in half in my hands, I ain't the Hulk, just normal.....Craftsman from now on!

You do know that the new reactors in Georgia and South Carolina are made in South Korea?
Remember that Westinghouse is now totally owned by Toshiba.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/sns-mct-port-of-charleston-unloading-first-big-shipment-of-20120510,0,7317609.story
WonderingNThinking
Think Before We Sink
04:56 AM on 05/10/2012
Meanwhile, Tokyo officials paying bloggers to show how "safe" it is in Japan:
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1863289/pg1
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
05:42 AM on 05/10/2012
Yup, since the cancers will takes years to kill them, who cares?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Rowe
"What Me worry"?
10:35 AM on 05/10/2012
Hey!! Poloniumman they are calling you.
WonderingNThinking
Think Before We Sink
02:53 AM on 05/10/2012
I'm glad there is a growing awareness about the hazards of nuclear power. Every delay in license renewal is a positve step towards protecting our earth.
strangiato
Ha Ha...Charade You Are
11:16 PM on 05/09/2012
Pilgrim Station is an accident waiting to happen. Among its chief concerns are:

1) Inadequately designed containment/storage of spent fuel above reactor that is vulnerable to aerial bombardment or major rupture in cooling system.

2) Vulnerability to a variety of failure modes that result in inadequate heat transfer from the reactor core after a rapid shut down.

3) Plant design is inadequate to withstand earth quakes that could initiate a chain of events resulting in core melt down or spent fuel fires

http://www.wickedlocal.com/capecod/news/x713418039/Study-Plymouth-nuke-plant-carries-2nd-highest-risk-of-major-earthquake-damage#axzz1uQpT8Y44

4) Inadequate ventilation systems to deal with radioactive steam that could interfere with plant personnel's ability to monitor and control the plant in an emergency.

5) Inadequate evacuation planning for surrounding communities down wind of the site - particularly the island of Cape Cod that is home to almost a 1/2 million people and is served essentially by one 4 lane divided highway that runs its length.

6) 2000+ spent fuel assemblies stored in a cooling pond high in the reactor building where most of it would be much safer buried in dry casks to prevent widespread contamination as has occurred from the explosions/fires that took place in Fukushima.

7) Aging piping and control equipment that winds up causing emergency shut downs and radioactive leaks.
http://www.boston.com/Boston/metrodesk/2011/12/pilgrim-nuclear-plant-shut-down-because-safety-relief-valve-leak/iGrt6XDLKSsJAem1djJ3aJ/index.html
photo
abbienormal
What hump?
06:52 AM on 05/10/2012
F&F.
10:58 PM on 05/09/2012
Japan has shut down their 54 nuclear power plants and are getting along just fine without them.

The disaster at Fukishima continues today with no end in sight. TEPCO is being taken over by Japan's government because they are broke. The taxpayers of Japan will be paying for this disaster FOREVER.

We need to learn lessons from Fukishima and move to safe, clean alternative energy sources.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
undsoweiter
but I know where to look it up
02:59 PM on 05/10/2012
Define "fine." One of you guys inserts that perfect falsehood into every comment section.
The Japanese are importing huge quantities gas, oil and coal to cover the loss of 1/3 of their generating capacity. They are burning same.
That's not fine.
photo
Son of Liberty 1765
Exposing Government Lies.
09:49 PM on 05/09/2012
We need this plant. We do not need Martha Coakley.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
05:44 AM on 05/10/2012
We do not need this plant. We do need Martha. But of course, if you love nukes you hate people.
photo
abbienormal
What hump?
06:53 AM on 05/10/2012
Agreed.