WASHINGTON -- In a nod to a dramatic shift in public opinion, Barack Obama on Wednesday became the first sitting president to announce his support for same-sex marriage.
In a sit-down interview with ABC's Robin Roberts, Obama completed what has been a markedly long and oft-mocked evolution on the matter.
"I've always been adamant that gay and lesbian Americans should be treated fairly and equally," Obama told Roberts, in an interview that will air in full on ABC's "Good Morning America" Thursday.
(Watch ABC's entire clip below)
"I have to tell you that over the course of several years as I have talked to friends and family and neighbors when I think about members of my own staff who are in incredibly committed monogamous relationships, same-sex relationships, who are raising kids together, when I think about those soldiers or airmen or Marines or sailors who are out there fighting on my behalf and yet feel constrained, even now that Don't Ask Don't Tell is gone, because they are not able to commit themselves in a marriage, at a certain point I’ve just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same sex couples should be able to get married," he said.
The statement constitutes an act of political bravery on the president's behalf, as well as a major victory for the gay rights community, which has been pushing him to declare his support for marriage equality for several years. With the issue back in the news this week, the pressure intensified.
On Sunday, Vice President Joseph Biden told NBC's "Meet The Press" that he was personally comfortable with same-sex marriage, which was followed the next day by Education Secretary Arne Duncan saying the same.
The White House insisted that there was no daylight between the vice president's position and the president's, noting that Biden clarified his statement as being in reference to civil rights for gay couples. But the explanation was largely dismissed by both supporters and critics as a convenient way for the president to signal support for marriage equality without having to declare it himself.
On Tuesday evening, the state of North Carolina passed an amendment that defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman. The president expressed his disappointment with the measure, but it remained difficult to square his opposition to a measure outlawing same-sex marriage with his opposition to same-sex marriage itself.
As the political pressure continued to mount, the president finally chose to speak out Wednesday, with the White House hastily scheduling a sit-down interview.
“It’s interesting, some of this is also generational,” the president said. “You know when I go to college campuses, sometimes I talk to college Republicans who think that I have terrible policies on the economy, on foreign policy, but are very clear that when it comes to same sex equality or, you know, believe in equality. They are much more comfortable with it. You know, Malia and Sasha, they have friends whose parents are same-sex couples. There have been times where Michelle and I have been sitting around the dinner table and we’re talking about their friends and their parents and Malia and Sasha, it wouldn’t dawn on them that somehow their friends’ parents would be treated differently. It doesn’t make sense to them and frankly, that’s the kind of thing that prompts a change in perspective.”
The president's support of same-sex marriage will have little political impact, from a practical standpoint, as much of the activity on the issue is currently occurring in the states and the courts. Already the Obama administration's Department of Justice has stopped defending the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defines marriage as a legal union between a man and a woman. Legislation to overturn DOMA outright would likely be blocked by congressional Republicans.
The more promising path for same-sex marriage advocates remains a friendly hearing by the United States Supreme Court.
Still, the symbolism of Obama's remarks is hard to ignore. In becoming the first president to publicly support marriage equality, he sets the bar for its political acceptance. He also has the ability to shape public opinion further on the matter.
Of course, there may be drawbacks to such a strong expression of support. While recent polls show that popular support for marriage equality is gaining widespread acceptance, some pivotal swing states remain largely opposed to the concept. And one of them, North Carolina, remains a major target for the president's reelection campaign.
"The question is, is there a risk?" a prominent Democratic Party official who requested anonymity told The Huffington Post after Biden's remarks. "It is not nationwide [polling] we are talking about. We are talking about Virginia, North Carolina and other swing states. And we are talking about, would Karl Rove and his team stoop to using horribly grotesque and hateful tactics ... and would that peel off 10,000 votes?"
Until Wednesday, that question was hypothetical. Now, it's a critical component of the 2012 election.
Below, reactions to Obama's announcement from around the political world:
Loading Slideshow
Mitt Romney
"I believe marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman," Mitt Romney said.
Kyrsten Sinema
Daniel O'Donnell
Kirsten Gillibrand
Jeff Merkley
Elizabeth Warren
Michael Bloomberg
"This is a major turning point in the history of American civil rights," said New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg. "No American president has ever supported a major expansion of civil rights that has not ultimately been adopted by the American people - and I have no doubt that this will be no exception. The march of freedom that has sustained our country since the Revolution of 1776 continues, and no matter what setbacks may occur in a given state, freedom will triumph over fear and equality will prevail over exclusion. Today's announcement is a testament to the President's convictions, and it builds on the courageous stands that so many Americans have taken over the years on behalf of equal rights for gay and lesbian Americans, stretching back to the Stonewall Inn in Greenwich Village."
Jerrold Nadler
"I applaud President Obama for announcing his support for marriage equality today," said Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) "For the first time in this nation's history, a sitting president has shown the courage and leadership to stand up for all American families by pledging to support the fundamental right of every person to marry the person they love, and to have that marriage fully respected. I commend President Obama for this brave and honest step. Those who seek to politicize civil rights for personal or political gain will certainly attack him, but the course toward marriage equality and justice is the correct and inevitable path."
Brad Lander
Fred Karger
"I'm thrilled!" longshot GOP presidential candidate Fred Karger told HuffPost, referring to Obama's embrace of marriage equality. Karger is the first openly gay Republican or Democrat to run for president. "The Karger pressure has worked," he joked. "Particularly after the defeat in North Carolina, we welcome him to the full equality position."
Vince Gray
Martin O'Malley
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen
Barack Obama
Mark Udall
Senator Chris Coons
Rep.George Miller
Jim Himes
Nancy Pelosi
Nita Lowey
"I have been blessed to have a long and happy marriage. I strongly believe all Americans deserve that same opportunity," said Rep. Nita Lowey (D-N.Y.)
Antonio Villaraigosa
Jackie Speier
Michael Steele
Dennis Kucinich
John Brunner
Cory Booker
Chris Gregoire
Fred Karger
Ted Strickland
Jared Polis
Reince Priebus
"While President Obama has played politics on this issue, the Republican Party and our presumptive nominee Mitt Romney have been clear. We support maintaining marriage between one man and one woman and would oppose any attempts to change that," said RNC Chairman Reince Priebus.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Chellie Pingree
Christine C. Quinn
Mike Huckabee
"Barack Obama just announced he supports same-sex marriage," Mike Huckabee wrote in a fundraising appeal to supporters. "Nancy Pelosi immediately jumped on the announcement and emailed Democrat activists nationwide promising to continue their fight. This is going to be a defining issue this election. Obama, Pelosi and the Democrats have been a complete failure on economic issues so now they are going to focus on issues that will rile up their base. Well, Mr. President it's going to rile up our folks also. Men and women who support traditional marriage."
Rep. Bill Taylor
Deval Patrick
Frank Lautenberg
"President Obama's support for marriage equality marks an important moment for civil rights in America," said Senator Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ), who co-sponsored legislation that would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). "We simply can not treat same sex couples as second-class citizens in our country. Marriage equality is one of the most significant civil rights battles of our time and is critical to guaranteeing the equal protection under the law promised to every American in the Constitution. The President's support for marriage equality should inspire Congress, Governors and state legislatures to advance civil rights for all Americans."
Allen West
Ann McLane Kuster
Sen. Patrick Leahy
Peter Welch
"This is an historic moment and I applaud the President for his decision and courage," Rep. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) said. "One of the greatest and most liberating human emotions is acceptance. And what the President did today was accept that the quality of love two people share is more important than their gender. The President's decision required him look within and engage his heart. It is truly wonderful and welcome news."
Senator Patty Murray
Steve Rothman
"As an early and strong proponent of Marriage Equality, I am very happy that President Obama has made this announcement," said Rep. Steve Rothman (D-N.J.) "Marriage Equality is a matter of basic human rights and all of America's same-sex families are now closer to having their unions recognized by our government. This is an important step in our country's march toward achieving true justice and equality for all."
Chuck Schumer
JackieForNH
Howard Dean
"President Obama's public support for marriage equality is an historic affirmation of the fundamental American value of equal rights for all," said Howard Dean. "Having signed the nation's first law allowing Civil Unions as Governor of Vermont, I'm also proud to see our president affirm the belief that I and so many other Americans hold: loving and committed couples should have the same benefits that are extended through marriage. Marriage equality is a right and a benefit to all families."
Shortly after President Barack Obama announced his support for same-sex marriage in an interview with ABC on Wednesday, former Senate candidate Christine O'Donnell said that...
After Barack Obama told ABC's Robin Roberts "I do" when it comes to his support for same-sex marriage, the Twittersphere blew up with reactions from...
UPDATE: President Obama officially endorsed gay marriage, speaking to Robin Roberts on Wednesday. He said that "at a certain point I’ve just concluded that for...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's campaign says he's "disappointed" with North Carolina's constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. Obama campaign spokesman Cameron French said in a...
When asked about his views on same-sex marriage, Vice President Biden said he is "absolutely comfortable" with men marrying men and women marrying women. When...
President Barack Obama will soon have a new arena to test out his "evolving" views on same-sex marriage -- the annual LGBT Leadership Council's gala,...
Whatever led Obama to fully evolve, the fact that a sitting president proclaimed that we should be free to marry whomever we love and want to share our live with is a big deal worthy of celebration, but only to a point. The civil rights reality for gay couples remains mixed.
Many people have been surprised to see me, a professor of biblical studies, at "Vote Against" forums and rallies. It is precisely because I see the motivation to support this amendment as grounded in how people read the Bible that I felt an urgency to speak out.
What does all this boil down to legally in the short term? Not much. Little will change immediately at the federal level because of the president's statement today, but it's doubtless psychologically meaningful for many people.
Since marriage in the US is a contract at civil law, this is clearly a civil rights issue.
And the Constitution---in more than one place---requires equal treatment under the law. And the "full faith and credit" clause comes into play as well.
That's why DOMA is unconstitutional---it allows states to avoid the full faith and credit clause, which has no part exempting marriage from
Read More... it.
So President Obama is just doing the right thing---morally and constitutionally.
His statement will lose him a few votes form the intolerant and fooIish---but it will gain him far more votes from the intelligent and inclusive, who believe in the equal worth of all people and the rights granted by the Constitution.
I've never been more proud of President Obama. I know I'm not alone in that feeling.
ThunderclapNewman: Since marriage in the US is a contract at civil
Regarding President Obama's gay rights issue, I don't condone gay marriage and I had to go to God with this one. I have peace within to vote for the President again in this...Gays must stand before God, as do all of us and be judged for every sin. We are not God! God said in his word to work out your own soul salvation. President Obama is an extremely wise man as is our First Lady. I know he had to search deep within himself to find assurance and I know he had to understand in depth the purpose of his announcement pertaining to gays. Which I believe was in accordance with this...God loves us all, everyone of us, the sinners and the sinners saved by grace. There are things we do that displeases God for we are not perfect, we may not be gay, however, we are not perfect. A sin is a sin! Point is President Obama's compassion and respect for all American Citizens no matter ones belief or doings, has similarity to God's agape love for us...For he loves us all no matter ones belief or doings.
Linda_Anderson_Davis: Regarding President Obama's gay rights issue, I don't condone gay
YOU make a difference. ♥ Thanks again to the 2.2 million who joined my group for same-sex marriage in 2010, and the 60,000 who signed my petition! ♥
Sharon_Love: YOU make a difference. ♥ Thanks again to the 2.2
As the Coalition of Africian American Pastors so elequently put it. "A just law is a man-made code that squares with the law of God, and an unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with moral law. "
In other words, it’s an attempt by men to use political power to declare that an act contrary to God’s law and to the natural law is a civil right.
Jane_Martin1: As the Coalition of Africian American Pastors so elequently put
Jane's comment only makes sense if you buy into that fantasy fiction bible of hers. She must also support stoning to death women who are not virgins at marriage. Sorry, Jane, to see that you buy into the hatred and viciousness that is in you fiction bible. Must suck.
RunNewtRun: Jane's comment only makes sense if you buy into that
Wow, Run, what an ignorant comment. So let me get this straight- you are isolating and mocking Jane for her belief. Even insinuating that it is a belief based on fiction and lies?
How is that any different than a person speaking out against homosexuality and saying that it is a choice or a sin?
You want equality? Give it to EVERYONE, including the people YOU don't agree with.
Maggiebakes: Wow, Run, what an ignorant comment. So let me get
President Obama has demonstrated that it is possible for adults who have been clinging to the same fears and stereotypes to grow, become more educated, more tolerant, and overall evolve spiritually. Perhaps someday you too will be able to demonstrate the same thing. Then again ............ maybe not?!
TarzanaGirl: President Obama has demonstrated that it is possible for adults
COLEGIO RETAMAR: What is OPUS DEI? What is OPUS DEISM? What is OPUS DEILOGY?
OPUS DEISM is the TWIN of ZIONISM. They are both the ESSENCE and the ROOTS of the WORLDWIDE MALEVOLENCE. They have given birth to RACISM, APARTHEID, LEGAL TERRRISM, ATROCITIES, CRUELTIES, GENOCIDES, BLOODTHIRSTY ORGIES, the CULTURE of DEATH, the IDEOLOGY of SPIRITUAL TERRORISM, the THEOLOGY of WAR CRIMES, the CREED of IMPERIALISM, the CATECHISM of the EXPANSIONISM, the WAY of the WAY that leads to the 999 WAYS of the HOLY WORLDWIDE SUPREME MAFIA, the TRUTH that gives WAY to the POOR WEALTH DOMINATION and the WAY that drives to turn the TECHNOLOGY into an INSTRUMENT of the THIRD WORLD RECESSION, REGRESSION, ANIQUILATION and PROFANATION. The ARABOPHOBIA, the ISLAMOPHOBIA and the PALESTINOPHOBIA have been the FRUIT of thy WOMB OPUS DEI and ZIONISM. The POOR have become the IMPERIAL RICH TASTY FOOD.
Moiss_Ibrahim: COLEGIO RETAMAR: What is OPUS DEI? What is OPUS DEISM?
This Is nice, but how about this one, put your money where your mouth is Mr. President. create a bill and sign it into law the same way you did with the preparedness executive Order you made to put us all in the first time in history too, martial law during peacetime. Create an executive order than both bans any anti-gay marriage law as well as legalizes gay marriage with full benefits enjoyed by heterosexual couples.
Alternately use the same secret method you used to get a secret law passed and signed into law march 12th 2012; namely bill 347.
Or if all fails create a monstrous piece of legislation that cuts all the programs the republicans and the Tea party wants and buried inside legalizing gay marriage, "don't read it, sign it!"
Unless you do this Mr. President I think you are lying to just get re-elected. You have zero intention in passing gay rights to full benefits in marriage. I am a gay White man with a black boyfriend, blacker than you Mr. President. He is half Latino and half Black, he is both my best friend and my lover as well.
Mericus_FAartist: This Is nice, but how about this one, put your
You are wrong President Obama and you know it. We all know you did it because all your contributors are gay, we all know you did it because the democrats were putting pressure on you to do so, we all know you did it because this is an election year and you have less than a 50 percent chance of being reelected. We know you did it because you're a politician not a generous human being. How you can ignore the Bible's clear and evident definition of marriage between a man and a woman from the Old Testament to the New is evidence that you and this new breed of gay activists who have infiltrated our churches and seized positions of power do not understand the Bible and do not understand Christian doctrine and tradition. God will judge you when you leave this life Mr. President and when he does I can assure you he won't pat you on the back for promoting the perversion of marriage. You know better Mr. President. You know better.
Jujubeen: You are wrong President Obama and you know it. We
Who do you think you're talking to, the Pope??? You are talking to the president of the U.S., who has the duty to protect the constitutional rights of all the people, not just your little hillbilly church.
RobertoM: Who do you think you're talking to, the Pope??? You
David Parker Gerry Wambolt, and the Montalvo family of Massachussetts. All Christians. All victims of the homosexual rights movement.
David found out his son's school was teaching about homosexuality and promoting prohomosexual views without his consent and without informing him. He asked the school to inform him whenever they would have the discussions so that he could withdraw his son from them. The school and the court told him he had no right to decide whether teaching homosexuality to kindergartners was appropriate. Some evolution. (SARCASM). But I know as do all conservatives and all Christians who believe in traditional marriage that David Parker is not the last victim of the homosexual agenda and he won't be the last. Oh, did I mention David kept going to the school trying to get them to respect his and his wife's religious beliefs. They had him arrested. And in court the judge ruled that schools have the right to teach our children what is right and wrong and that the parents don't have the right to object if inappropriate things are taught or things against their moral values. The kid was a kindergartner! You liberals like President Obama have no shame and no sense of decency. Read about David Parker. This really happened in America.
Jujubeen: David Parker Gerry Wambolt, and the Montalvo family of Massachussetts.
Stop making a victim of this man. He has problems. He had to be removed from the school by the police and was barred from returning. No court will listen to him. Why do you think that is?
His child probably wouldn't even have noticed the photograph of the family with same sex parents in the schoolbook, but I guarantee one thing, he'll never forget it now! Even if the kid had noticed it, Parker could have used this as a teaching moment to explain how his christian beliefs conflict with same sex relationships, but that everyone's rights are protected under our system of government, particularly in that state where same sex marriage is legal and there are same sex parents with children in that school.
But no, he demanded that public school policy be dictated by his church teachings, and that every trace of same sex families be removed from the school. Of course, the only way to insure that would be to remove the children of same sex parents from the school, as well. The irrationality becomes clear when you listen to this guy. For him, anything having to do with same sex couples is an effort on the part of the school to try and make his child homosexual. It's the most disgusting kind of bigotry and I feel sorry for your lack of shame in promoting it.
RobertoM: Stop making a victim of this man. He has problems.
If you don't agree with something that is being taught to your child, then you have every right to homeschool them. Saying you don't want them teaching your child about homosexuality and acceptance is like saying you don't want them to teach your child about evolution. If you feel that strongly about it, then homeschool your child and teach them the sheltered nonsense that you want to teach them.
Emmica_Bunneh: If you don't agree with something that is being taught
life is to all not just you are going to say next you love all but that not true what you said is hate you need to look at your self and what if some one is saying that to you
from Mark 7: How can you teach the word of the lord in vain, when you teach from the commandments of man. From the Pledge of Allegance: One nation under God. From Mark 7: Making the word of the lord void through your traditions
griffindonna45: from Mark 7: How can you teach the word of
What is with this notion that this president is gay? My conclusion is because people like you and Paul Cameron are closet cases that have the hots for the guy.
Minty6: What is with this notion that this president is gay?
The question is what is marriage equality? As stated by Kyrsten Sinema, "President Obama supports marriage equality. A huge step forward in the move to protect and support all families in America!" Marriage equality between a man and a woman as it is designed by the creator of this world not according to people distorted images set off by old slothfoot himself, satan. I say its ok to be in a relationship of same sex couples without the sexual contact. Its simply not naturual from God's original plan.
Frankj250: The question is what is marriage equality? As stated by
It would make since that after winning the supprt of the majority of the Churches, Celebrities, and African Americans in this country, that he would come out as a supporter of Gay Marriage. After realizing once again he has no real competition in the presidential election. This is the perfect time to get the majority that has always been against this issue to follow suite because they are supporters of anything Obama.
bryansroad9: It would make since that after winning the supprt of
Obama has not “evolved”— he changes positions for political expediency. Running for the Illinois state senate in 1996, he was for gay marriage. “I favor legalizing same-sex marriages,” he wrote back then. In 2004, he was running for the U.S. Senate and needed to appeal to voters statewide. So he evolved, and favored civil unions but opposed homosexual “marriage.” During the 2008 presidential race he said, “I believe marriage is between a man and a woman. I am not in favor of gay marriage.” Now that he's facing a tough reelection campaign, he's pandering for votes from gays and Hollywood liberals. It's so funny how the gay community buys into his lies. Evolving...? Sure...just like lying is now called "compression". The left redefines anything they please to fit their distortions.
Laquasha: Obama has not “evolved”— he changes positions for political expediency.
It's sad, isn't it? He's as bad as Abraham Lincoln, who supposedly "evolved" on slavery. First, Lincoln claims he's trying to save the country from breaking apart in the Civil War, and then he tries to end slavery only in the south. Yeah, right. Talk about pandering. Then they even give black people the right to vote and look where that got us. At this rate we may end up with a black president someday!!! All these hypocrites on the left should stop demanding equal rights for everyone and blah, blah, blah. I mean, the bible clearly teaches that slavery is right and recognized by God, just like the bible is against gay people. Obama should take note of where he is leading this country and stop distorting the truth. Does he want to be compared to Abraham Lincoln???? I should think not!!!!
RobertoM: It's sad, isn't it? He's as bad as Abraham Lincoln,
nice try dude, Lincoln was always an Abolitionist. He was against slavery since a young man he did not miraculously evolve his thinking to decry slavery to get election at all.
obviously you were absent from Social Studies or History in both grammar school and High School. I seriously doubt you ever attended any college. Oh yes one more thing you are dead wrong about "There is nothing in the Bible that specifically is against the Homosexual condition." my source is 154 PhD's how many PhD's do you have? D.S. Bailey is alive and well in his descendants' ignorance and stupidity on the subject of homosexuality and the Bible, sad dude, very sad.
Mericus_FAartist: nice try dude, Lincoln was always an Abolitionist. He was
Born that way? The scientific evidence does not support it. Same sex attraction is a trait which has been demonstrated to be less influenced by genetics (heritabiilty of .30) than nicotine addiction (.50), alcohol addiction (.40-.90), or depression (.40). Despite significantly higher genetic influence in all of these traits smokers do stop smoking (1+ million/yr), alcoholics stop drinking (~5%/yr), and many clinically depressed are depressed no longer. If individuals have no choice in being LGBT, then there should be no former gays, lesbians or bi's who settle into monogamous relationships. But we all know of former gays. Same sex attraction is "fluid" - meaning it changes over time (ie not immutable). (Developmental Psychology 2008, Vol. 44, No 1., 5-14). So why does it get protected status of an immutable trait. If gays want special protections, then form a religion - just like all the others where people opt in or opt out based on their convictions/conscience. As a religion they are entitled to their own private views and the rest of us won't have the government forcing us to teach our kids that gay is normal.
sourceseeker: Born that way? The scientific evidence does not support it.
We are all evolving and in pursuit of happiness. Individual freedom to pursue one's path in life should be unencumbered by the rules man makes be they religious, legal, etc. As long as one’s pursuit of happiness does not impinge on the rights and freedoms of others, they should be/feel free to pursue their destiny.
PublicCitizen21044: We are all evolving and in pursuit of happiness. Individual
when a gay wrestling team mate in high school grabbed my crotch (it was clearly an advance, not a wrestling move), my rights were impinged upon. homosexuals in these environments introduce an unwanted sexual dynamic that does impinge on the rights of others who want to be free from being groped or stared at in a sexually unwanted way. There are certain contexts (a wrestling room, a men's shower, a single gender sleeping area, etc) where we simply want to be free from weighing the sexual motivations of others - the presence of gays in those contexts impinges on that freedom.
sourceseeker: when a gay wrestling team mate in high school grabbed
Evolving? Evolving into what? Maybe some think they are evolving by wanting to become "unencumbered" by the rules of nature, never mind religious or legal. The pursuit of happiness of one individual might involve molesting a young neighbor or at the least getting him indoctrinated to the homosexual lifestyle. Any adolescent having a homosexual thought should not have that thought cultivated by a permissive society to make him believe he is that way. The adage that people should "come out of the closet" sets the stage for the young ones to accept homosexuality as a normal part of nature.
Flickwatcher: Evolving? Evolving into what? Maybe some think they are evolving
There’s no reason to take a statement about sexual orientation at face value; people hide their true feelings often enough that this should be an obvious point. If sexual orientation = attraction AND a desire to act on it, then, by that definition, it can change if one loses desire to act. But, can the basic attraction change? Most people have more physical attraction to certain types. Would a tall, dark and handsome kind of woman switch to being attracted to fat, balding guys…DH notwithstanding? A person associated with a social group disapproving of their particular orientation can feel threatened (by the possibility of isolation, criticism, violence) to the extent of lying (even to themselves). Given that individuals often find the idea of sex with a member of the uninteresting gender “yucky”, a true change in actual attraction seems unlikely. Try to imagine yourself - straight, I take it - being somehow pressured into trying to want to have sex with someone of your own gender. How would that work, exactly? I know of no “former gays” other than the ones in articles about people who have fallen in with hyper-religious social groups and undergone some supposed reprogramming. That kind of reversal reminds me of a high risk teenager being “revirginized” at a Christian revival event, only to bring a stranger home two weeks later (something I witnessed): it does nothing to address any actual unhappiness, only appeases those wielding the pressure to change.
BDuck: There’s no reason to take a statement about sexual orientation
Posted: 05/09/2012 2:55 pm Updated: 05/11/2012 10:59 am