iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Backs Gay Marriage: Golden Rule Informs American Religion

Posted: Updated: 05/11/2012 7:18 am

Obama Gay Marriage
President Barack Obama declared his support for gay marriage Wednesday.

By David Gibson
Religion News Service

(RNS) As pundits and politicians struggle to divine the political fallout from President Obama's sudden endorsement of same-sex marriage, one thing has become clear: The Golden Rule invoked by Obama to explain his change of heart is the closest thing Americans have to a common religious law, and that has important implications beyond the battle for gay rights.

In fact, one of the most striking aspects of Obama's revelation on Wednesday (May 9) that he and his wife, Michelle, support marriage rights for gays and lesbians, is that he invoked their Christian faith to support his views. In past years, Obama -- as many believers still do -- had cited his religious beliefs to oppose gay marriage.

Obama told ABC News that he and the first lady "are both practicing Christians and obviously this position may be considered to put us at odds with the views of others but, you know, when we think about our faith, the thing at root that we think about is, not only Christ sacrificing himself on our behalf, but it's also the Golden Rule, you know, treat others the way you would want to be treated."

Obama has frequently mentioned the Golden Rule or that general idea when speaking about how his faith shapes his policies, and he can point to chapter and verse to back up his views.

Jesus twice invoked the Golden Rule in the Gospels, in a phrase that is often rendered "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." And Jesus is cited three times boiling down all of God's law to what is known as the Great Commandment, a dual injunction to "love the Lord thy God with all thy heart" and to "love thy neighbor as thyself."

In those passages, Jesus is actually citing the Hebrew Scriptures -- specifically Leviticus 19:18, when God tells Moses to "Love your neighbor as yourself" -- and scholars of religion say some version of the Golden Rule can be found in almost every religious tradition.

That universality is especially useful in modern-day America, as the religious landscape has not only become increasingly diverse, but as people of different faiths are increasingly living and working together, and marrying each other and raising children.

"Given today's religiously diverse context, this way of thinking about religion and spirituality provides a handy bridge across religious differences," said Nancy Ammerman, a sociologist of religion at Boston University.

Ammerman said she first became aware of the centrality of the Golden Rule precept as she studied American congregations in the 1990s, and more extensive surveys since then have underscored the premium that U.S. believers put on this live-and-let-live tenet as opposed to any specific sectarian doctrine.

"Consistently, roughly half say that it's how you live your life everyday and how you treat others," said Ammerman, whose book on these and other findings, "Sacred Stories: Religion and Spirituality in Everyday Life," will be published next year. "About 40 percent place the emphasis on more evangelical practices like reading the Bible and witnessing to others. And about 10 percent say that it's about working for justice."

That phenomenon was also a central finding in a sweeping study of U.S. religion, "American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us," published in 2010. In that book, authors Robert D. Putnam and David E. Campbell elaborated the so-called "Aunt Susan Principle" -- the "Aunt Susan" in all our lives, "the sort of person who epitomizes what it means to be a saint, but whose religious background is different from our own."

Increasingly, just as we find it impossible to consign Aunt Susan to eternal damnation because of her differing beliefs, so too American believers -- including the Obamas -- struggle to deny equal rights to gays and lesbians who try to live upright lives, which would include a monogamous marriage.

In everyday life, this means that believers can invoke the Golden Rule in order to respect others, like gays and lesbians, while maintaining their particular religious views, which may or may not endorse homosexual relationships.

While this tendency toward toleration may not translate immediately into legislative or judicial victories for gay rights -- witness the ban on gay marriage that North Carolina voters approved this week -- the shift to social acceptance is broad and swift and, as even many religious conservatives concede, probably inexorable.

The Golden Rule template is also one that experts say will likely one day pave the way for greater acceptance of marginalized groups like Muslims, just as it did in past generations for Catholics and Jews. Mormons like Mitt Romney already seem to be benefiting, as their visibility grows and more Americans see them as living upstanding lives.

Whether Obama will benefit from his invocation of the Golden Rule remains a point of intense political speculation. That's no surprise, given that the nation remains divided on gay rights, and culture war issues can often be used as stand-ins for airing other grievances.

But the White House seemed to recognize the power of the Golden Rule as it scrambled to stage-manage the potential public relations crisis. As the president's interview was being aired, the White House sent Democrats a list of talking points that featured this exhortation: "In the end, the values that the president cares most deeply about is how we treat other people."

The memorandum was supposed to be confidential, but Obama's aides could have simply opened up the Bible, or asked most any American believer, and found the same advice.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW RELIGION

By David Gibson Religion News Service (RNS) As pundits and politicians struggle to divine the political fallout from President Obama's sudden endorsement of same-sex marriage, one thing has become...
By David Gibson Religion News Service (RNS) As pundits and politicians struggle to divine the political fallout from President Obama's sudden endorsement of same-sex marriage, one thing has become...
Filed by Jahnabi Barooah  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 541
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
07:12 PM on 05/31/2012
It cracks me up that he calls himself a 'practicing" Christian. He rarely attends Sunday service which is one of the 10 commandments, he would take his daughter for an abortion so she would've have to see her life 'ruined' by one 'mistake' and he is for homosexual sex/marriage. This is an example for practicing the biblical teaching. Sheesh
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maxi1643
01:54 PM on 08/15/2012
Perhaps he should get another wife. The Bible is ok with polygamy.
06:27 PM on 03/14/2013
@ Huffy Super Duper User:

Actually, Obama would probably look to the Koran for supprt of polygamist marriages. Obama is the product of polygamy. His mother was his Muslim father's second wife. (Simple fact. Do some research.)

SO-O-O, if Same Sex Marriages are a Constitutional Right as purported by Obama in a recent Huffy article, why aren't polygamist marriages a legal right too? SERIOUSLY?
Answer that please, Super Huffy! Where do we draw the line? Or should we draw a line anywhere?

IN REALITY, the controversy of 'Marriage Equality' is a wonderful way to distract the American Sheeple from the insidious issues of high unemployment, an insane federal deficit, a monumental national debt, and exploitation of the masses by rapacious mulitnational corporations. Yeah, let's all worry about Gays Getting Married while our standard of living goes down the toilet. Sheesh.
05:30 PM on 05/29/2012
mentally stable folks don't like to touch what you see below
05:28 PM on 05/29/2012
numero two.
04:38 PM on 05/29/2012
Using the golden rule as justificaton for supporting gay marriage is just ridiculous. Here the constitutional law scholar shows he is not even at the level of a first year Christian in his understanding of Scritpure and how to apply it properly to a particular question. I'm sure he spends little time even bothering to study it.

God instituted marriage in Genesis Chapter 2, and we see its between a man and woman. After this, later in the book of Genesis,(and in several different books in the Old AND New Testaments as well) , He states that homosexual acts are sin and forbidden. You cannot then say, 'well we men and women marry, so then what's good for us is good for members of the same sex'. NO-- the word clearly says sex between members of the same sex is forbidden and sex is a part of ,marriage.

Perhaps in his brillance he will also apply to the golden rule to polygamy and adult sibling to sibling or parent to adult child incest too. It make just as much 'sense' to do so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CMR64
u hurt my feeling
07:47 AM on 06/02/2012
stone me then
02:56 PM on 06/02/2012
"stone me then"

There is no need for stoning anymore. Jesus took the punishment for all of our sins so that we could be reconciled to God. All we have to do is first agree with God that what we are doing is wrong. Then accept the free gift of forgiveness and salvation that Jesus provided by dying in our place on that Passover Day.

God knows we are going to sin. It's in our nature. But we need to be willing to look at things from His point of view and call sin what it really is. Wrong. That doesn't mean that we as Christians hate you. We are just standing on the principles and Word of the creator of the universe. Now if you don't believe in His existence, again that's entirely your choice. It would be the same if you were a liar, or a thief, or an adulterer, or a glutton, or whatever else God considers to be sin.
09:15 AM on 06/04/2012
Beloved, it’s not me you disagreeing with. You are disagreeing with God. I did not say ""'Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable". God said that. It's as simple as this: If Henry Ford was alive today and made a car, he would make an owner manual to go with it. In the manual it would tell you how to maintain the car. What to do and what not to do. What oil to use. What gas to use. If you choose to do things your own way, your car will not run as it should and eventually will break down. Well, the creator of the known universe made an instruction book. The Bible and through it He revealed who He was, and gave us instructions on how to live. We can choose to follow these instructions or we can choose to go about things our own way. But we have to realize that if we do things our way, we are not living as God intended. You know why the world is in the state it is today?
11:41 PM on 05/19/2012
There is a difference between hating homosexuality and hating the homosexual. I hate all kinds of sin including homosexuality. But I love my family members who are homosexual.

Using the Golden Rule to justify condoning gay marriage is ridiculous. I try to treat others as I would want to be treated and I would not want people trying to talk me into sinning and going to Hell. I need friends that will lift me up and encourage me to keep fighting the good fight of faith someone that will help me make it to the prize (Heaven). And that is the way I treat others I am not going to tell someone they can keep sinning and still be able to make it to heaven, that would be the absolute worst thing I could do to a person, there is nothing worse than going to Hell. I will tell them things that will hopefully help them have a close relationship to God and hopefully go to Heaven which is the best thing that can happen to a person.

That is where the Golden Rule would apply in this situation. Obama is nowhere near spiritual enough (unless maybe evil spirits) to discern anything about the Golden Rule.
photo
TBJ
Irrelevent Blurb
02:37 PM on 05/22/2012
Except they didn't choose to be attracted to only members of the same gender.

You're hating them for acting on attractions that are immutable, actions that harm no one.

And our laws here are not based on religious beliefs or the concept/hope of the afterlife, try to keep up.
04:40 PM on 05/29/2012
...Except the attraction is a disorder not a genetic manifest destiny. Disorders can be dealt with, and have been successfully despite all the loud denials to the contrary by homosexual practiioners who want to continue in their disorder claiming they are born that way
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
10:32 AM on 05/19/2012
"Golden Rule can be found in almost every religious tradition."

But let's not remove Christ from Christianity.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
anon004
Yes, it's true -- reality has a liberal bias
11:25 AM on 05/18/2012
Consider this:

I believe fervently in the Flying Spaghetti Monster because it is the source of all wisdom. The one true word of the Flying Spaghetti Monster is contained in the Fannie Farmer Cookbook. All those who use other cookbooks or who doubt the need for a cookbook or who cook without a cookbook at all are ignoring the revealed truth of the Flying Spaghetti and they will be condemned and destroy our society. In order to save them and our country, the contents of the Fannie Farmer cookbook shall be made the law. All other recipes and methods of cooking, and cooking without the book will be against the law.

For those of you who wish to use the bible to justify a ban on marriage equality, do you now understand how silly and arrogant you look to the rest of us?
07:56 PM on 05/16/2012
President Obama could care less about The Golden Rule.
Obama is only interested in promoting Homosexuality. Why??
Obama is only interested in himself and staying in power.
For the record, Obama is not a Christian, Christians follow The Bible and its teachings.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
anon004
Yes, it's true -- reality has a liberal bias
08:08 AM on 05/18/2012
"Obama is only interested in promoting Homosexuality"

How do you know that? Are you a guy and he asked you out?
07:49 PM on 05/19/2012
No to aksing out, but I do follow the National News.  Whats your excuse for not knowing the obvious.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cade Frost
Overturn the Filibuster!
10:24 AM on 05/18/2012
True Christians follow Christ's teachings. You could use some lessons.
photo
Rock Biologist
My micro-bio is molecular.
02:09 PM on 05/16/2012
I've asked it several times before with no answer. Can anyone provide a legal justification why same-sex couples cannot enter into marriage as a civil contract? To speed things along, keep in mind that 1) the United States is not a theocracy, 2) only adult human beings can enter legal contracts, and 3) human sexual orientation is innate.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
gal416
is a Bible verse † † †
04:03 PM on 05/16/2012
If it was only religion that is against gay marriage, it would already be on the books by now. The bigger problem for gays, which is less conspicuous, is corporations. That is why it is not legal. They don't wan't to pay the extra benefits and neither does the government.
07:42 PM on 05/16/2012
Funny how corporations keep coming out in favor of marriage equality while claiming that it's good for business. I guess that's another reason why so many in govt. are also backing it?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:34 PM on 05/17/2012
Now this is something people forget all the time - also, love the verse (4:16)
04:32 PM on 05/16/2012
Too many heads would explode?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Compassionnotreligion
Be awed & humbled by nature & empathy -not Juju.
10:27 AM on 05/16/2012
The Golden Rule ...was of course plagarised by Christianity.

Since the vast majority religionists, by their very nature/indoctrination take in no new inputs or do any checking before passing on the virus to their children, what a shock to find out religion didn’t invent “morality”!

Incarnations of the Golden Rule are found in the Code of Hammurabi, (1780 BCE)
It was a common principle in ancient Greek philosophy. E.G.:
• "Do not to your neighbour what you would take ill from him." – Pittacus (c. 640–568 BCE)

As non believers, we can live by this without religion and the supernatural - and not have to commit crimes of intellectual dishonesty in doing so.

No, not all atheists are good. It would be ludicrous to suggest so. And religionists certainly aren’t the holders of morality. This self-appointed credit must be decoupled from religion, because like the rest of the Abrahamic religions' stories, it's plagarised.
02:34 PM on 05/17/2012
The law of love to one's neighbor (Ex. xxiii. 4 et seq.), which takes account of the stranger and even of the enemy, is nowhere discernible in Hammurabi's code. The law of retaliation, of cold, calculating equity, "as thou to me so I to thee"; the revenge of the stronger on the weaker—these form a broad foundation on which the love of one's neighbor finds no place.

Hammurabi's service to religion consisted chiefly in the fact that he opposed the use of spells and enchantments. A similar advance in this direction had already been made by King Gudea. The discovery of Hammurabi's code completely disproves one of the chief hypotheses of the Wellhausen school, that a codification on the part of the Hebrews was impossible before the ninth century.

Abraham ( 2165-1990B.C.)

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/7150-hammurabi
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Compassionnotreligion
Be awed & humbled by nature & empathy -not Juju.
03:07 PM on 05/17/2012
My point was simply that religion - didn't invent 'morality', though it likes to take credit for it. No one needs religion to be moral - and in fact 'morality' that is done by the decree of a supposed magic sky daddy (who shows little morality!) can never be as honest as that achieved by understanding and rationality.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rsttho557949
What is Job's Crucible?
12:43 AM on 05/16/2012
Folks keep using this "Golden Rule" stuff as a way of copping out on how the really feel about this issue. Now if the true Christian is about loving his neighbor, he would tell him or her;
1. Love God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind and with all your strength (Mark 12;30)
2. Not everyone who says to Me, Lord, Lord shall enter the kingdom of heaven but he who does the will of My Father in heaven (Matthew 7:21
3. And do not fear those who kill the body ( or won't vote for you) but cannot kill the soul. But rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell( Matthew 10:28)
Passing that wisdom onto another is true love...not conforming one's self to this world (Romans 12:2)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CBinKY
Tolerance doesn't require "taking it" from a bully
11:08 AM on 05/18/2012
Interesting how you narrowed the definition of "love" from something other than its common meaning.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rsttho557949
What is Job's Crucible?
11:56 AM on 05/18/2012
Love really has a narrow definition. Love means to serve. Now many can't put their own spin on it such as:
1. "Deeply caring for the other"
2. "A feeling where you have another's best interest at heart"
3. "A commitment to another where you put them first."
4. Doing something for another where you don't expect anything in return"

They are all good but love simply means to serve another. That can be a beloved or a stranger.

Perhaps the greatest act of love that doesn't involve human sacrifice is when one tells another about the Gift from God-Jesus-and what one needs to do to return to God after "passing" (death) from this dimension to the next.

I have said all along, that I really don't care (and I believe most people feel the same way) what people do in the privacy of their own homes with two consenting adults (with the exception of extremes of behaviors and plots to hurt other people) but don't attack the Bible or its believers to promote a controversial lifestyle or behavior.
09:30 PM on 05/15/2012
if you have a problem with homosexuals, blame straight people. they're the ones that keep making gay babies.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iknowscottyknows
08:45 PM on 05/17/2012
Everyone is responsible for their own sin.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CBinKY
Tolerance doesn't require "taking it" from a bully
11:09 AM on 05/18/2012
Then let them be responsible (it is between them and god)- and stop encouraging society to enact your ideas of judgment.
05:22 PM on 05/15/2012
The golden rule. I'd expect to be able to go by all the laws, statutues, ordinances and ways of the Bible and would expect others to do the same. It can be looked at that way.
04:43 PM on 05/16/2012
Only in a world in which everyone believes exactly the same thing you do.
02:44 AM on 05/17/2012
For starters is the Church where people are looking to be able to go by "truth, the life and the way". The path surely does look narrow but people are looking to get through. We're going to have to look into opening up the floodgates because there's a mighty river with a rushing water that's looking to come through.
03:55 PM on 05/15/2012
Conservatives point to the verses condemning homosexuality. Obama points to the Golden Rule. It's amazing how the same book can be used to either condemn or to support a group of people. I think Obama's right on this one. IMO people should be able to marry who they are attracted to. Who knows why some people are attracted to their own sex, but they are and it's no use forcing them to go against what their brain is telling them. Homosexuals will always be a minority and it is up to us in the majority to look out for them. When the Bible condemns homosexuality as unnatural and a perversion I think that it was simply a case of the writer not knowing that it is natural for a small segment of the population and that it is no more a perversion than heterosexuality is. This is why I agree with Obama that the right scripture to consider in this case is The Golden Rule.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
anon004
Yes, it's true -- reality has a liberal bias
08:19 AM on 05/18/2012
"When the Bible condemns homosexuality as unnatural and a perversion I think that it was simply a case of the writer not knowing that it is natural for a small segment of the population and that it is no more a perversion than heterosexuality is."

There's also the historical context of an enbattled tribe attempting to sustain itself in a world of high infant mortality and a high death rate in general. Condemnation of homosexuality originates in the idea that the tribe can't afford to lose the breeding potential of any of its members. Of course, with eight billion peole and counting, the planet could use a lot more loss of breeding potential these days.
Hidare
Let me help you out. Which way did you come in?
11:56 AM on 05/21/2012
The bible is not a "buffet" to pick and choose verses to justify our own actions. We are to partake in its entirety for proper context and understanding.
03:16 PM on 05/22/2012
You are probably right in that the Bible is not a buffet. However I am glad that Obama decided to support gay marriage. Maybe he shouldn't have used the Bible to justify his actions since in other parts of the Bible homosexuality is condemned. Obama seems to be a committed Christian though, so I would be interested to hear what he thinks about the parts of the Bible that condemn homosexuality.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CMR64
u hurt my feeling
07:53 AM on 06/02/2012
then you are for stoning people who are gay
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bill Duckworth
It is a DOOZY
11:24 AM on 05/15/2012
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.", "love the Lord thy God with all thy heart" and to "love thy neighbor as thyself."

Killing Osama Bin Laden WITHOUT a trial by jury seems very Mutual Exclusive TO ME.

Let alone a JD of constitutional law and 12 year of teaching Constitutional LAW

Boggles the mind of what may have been learned about the WAR on Terror. But as far as loving your neighbor from OBL, to Drones, to excalations, occupations. I see Obama's heart very clearly
photo
UnicornsOccur
They're invisible and yet pink.
10:33 AM on 05/16/2012
"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" is a rule that justifies rape. That's the problem with trying to simplify semi complex situations into a saying that could fit on a bumper sticker. There is no nuance.