iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

TIME Cover Masks Problem: Too Few Kids Breastfed

By LAURAN NEERGAARD 05/11/12 04:34 PM ET AP

Too Few Kids Breastfed

WASHINGTON -- The real issue with breast-feeding is this: Too few infants who could really benefit from it are getting mom's milk.

Sure, Time magazine's cover photo of a woman breast-feeding her 3-year-old is generating debate about how old is too old. But examples like that are pretty rare.

About 44 percent of U.S. moms do at least some breast-feeding for six months. But only 15 percent follow advice from the American Academy of Pediatrics that babies receive breast milk alone for that time span. And fewer still stick with breast-feeding for a year, also recommended by the academy.

About three-quarters of mothers say they breast-feed during their baby's first days and weeks of life. Then it drops off fast.

By their first birthday, fewer than a quarter of children are getting breast milk, according to the government's latest national report card on breast-feeding.

That's a public health issue, because breast-feeding brings so many benefits to babies.

By 2020, the nation's health goals call for more than a quarter of babies to be exclusively breast-fed through their first six months of life, and for more than a third to still be nursing when they turn 1 year old.

To help reach those goals, the surgeon general last year issued a call to ease the obstacles that make it harder for women to breast-feed – from the hassles of pumping milk at work to a general lack of understanding about how super-healthy it is during that critical first year.

"We have a lot more work to do," says Academy of Pediatrics' spokeswoman Dr. Tanya Altmann, a pediatrician near Los Angeles. "It would be much more beneficial to focus on breast-feeding infants and young toddlers," she said, than on the rare older examples like Time found for its cover.

Not every mother can or chooses to breast-feed. And the surgeon general's report said they shouldn't be made to feel guilty.

But the academy's latest update, published in March in the journal Pediatrics, lists the benefits of breast-feeding for at least several months and up to a year: Breast-fed infants have a lower risk of sudden infant death syndrome. They suffer fewer illnesses such as diarrhea, earaches and pneumonia, because breast milk contains antibodies that help fend off infections until their own immune systems become robust. They're also less likely to develop asthma, or even to become fat later in childhood.

Moms can benefit, too, decreasing their risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer.

How old is too old for the child? The pediatricians' guidelines say breast-feeding should continue along with solid foods to age 1 – "or as long as mutually desired by mother and infant."

The World Health Organization recommends continuing "along with appropriate complementary foods up to 2 years of age or beyond."

Toddlers sometimes make clear that they prefer a cup, but Altmann says if both mom and child are comfortable, there's no harm in going longer than average.

Still, the clear nutritional benefit wanes as youngsters start getting most of their nutrition from solid food, and Altmann says parents need to teach their tots to soothe themselves.

"At some point it's less about nutrition and more about comfort," says Altmann, who breast-fed her own two sons until they were 1.

__

Lauran Neergaard covers health and medical issues for The Associated Press in Washington.

FOLLOW PARENTS

WASHINGTON -- The real issue with breast-feeding is this: Too few infants who could really benefit from it are getting mom's milk. Sure, Time magazine's cover photo of a woman breast-feeding her 3-ye...
WASHINGTON -- The real issue with breast-feeding is this: Too few infants who could really benefit from it are getting mom's milk. Sure, Time magazine's cover photo of a woman breast-feeding her 3-ye...
Filed by Jessica Samakow  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:32 PM on 06/24/2012
This is an important subject. I think it's important that breastfeeding moms get the support they need to overcome some of the possible struggles that can occur when choosing to nurse your baby. For example, infant jaundice is something that can occur in many breastfed babies but most women are unaware of this before choosing to breastfeed. If you want to find out more information about infant jaundice here is an article you might like to read Infant Jaundice: What You Need to Know http://kelleyward.hubpages.com/_3u47dtkr7xqut/hub/Infant-Jaundice-What-You-Need-to-Know
12:13 AM on 05/12/2012
Some of women can not breast feed. I did not give my daughters a bottle until they lost to much weight and I could not provide enough to solely rely on breast milk that I could provide. I still breast feed as long as I could. I did everything that was recommended to me, herbal supplements, pumping after every feeding, bed rest, different positions. It was so taxing emotionally and physically that I had to give them formula. Some women can not drop everything in their lives to just to breastfeed for a year.
photo
Gonzo36
Pro-awesome!
05:22 PM on 05/12/2012
Thank you. Your story is the same as my own.
09:36 AM on 05/13/2012
You share a valid point and many agree for different reasons you just can't. I was taking medication for infection and other problems and yet we are critized and made to feel awful. As for the cover photo, I am sorry but its just creepy. Whenthey are old enough to take off your shirt, its something else. As for those who say in other countries its the norm, well other countries don't have the clean water, dairies that are clean, formular that is full of the same things breast milk has, and disposable diapers either. So mega mommies need to back off, there are many reasons moms can't or don't want to.
10:38 PM on 05/11/2012
i don't know if i'd say too fewkids are breast fed.....breast feeding isn't for every mom and every baby. but.....this woman breast feeding a 3 year old, that's insane. the kid is waaaaaaaayyyy past the age to be nursing. makes one wonder if mom doesn't have some kind of attachment issue.
06:31 PM on 05/12/2012
Not past the age to be nursing.
Our culture just thinks so....doesn't make it so.
11:45 PM on 07/03/2012
I disagree. Babies do not actually lose their sucking reflex until about 22 months old. It is not way too old. The baby does not need to nurse for nutrition, but he or she does feel a close attachment and receive comfort. So really what you take issue with is a baby seeking comfort. Most children that still nurse at this age just do it once a day regularly and possibly more frequently if they fall and get hurt or are sick. Most likely this is not an indicator of anything except a patient Mom in tune with her child's feelings. None of my children nursed the same amount of time. I have three and the shortest amount of time I nursed was 10 months (he wanted a sippy cup like the other kids) and the longest was when my middle daughter was about 2 and half. She had a baby brother and needed to feel loved also. Nursing was comforting to her and when she was ready she weaned. It is really no big deal. I would much rather the children of the US be treated with compassion and love than be pushed away. I believe discussing children who are being fed with propped bottles and end up with bottle mouth should be shamed far more frequently than I ever hear whispers about breast feeding.
10:38 PM on 05/11/2012
the real problem with the time issue, is having kids 3 years old and older, breast feeding, and all of these gurus, come out of the woodwork, to tell people how they should raise kids. many times common sense goes out the window, replaced with political correctness, or whatever expert is trying to force on us...for every arguement, for or against something, there is the opposite. carrying around kids in harnesses, and slings, work in 3rd world countries, but not for the reasons we think, and the same goes for breast feeding.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eksharris
10:02 PM on 05/11/2012
A lot of moms just need more support and information. Many don't understand the process. some think they have "lost their milk" when it really is that your body has adjusted to breastfeeding and it just seems as though there is not as much milk as before. A baby has a growth spurt and wants to nurse more often, leading mom to believe that her milk is not good enough or that she doesn't have enough. the more frequent nursing helps to build up the supply and is only a temporary phase. Many times there is a small problem or something mom does not understand happens and she often does not know where to go for advice, so she quits nursing. I have seen one mom who stopped nursing because her baby had a rash, it was just a rash that newborns get sometimes and is not caused by nursing. Far too many times, a mom stops nursing because of jaundice. Doctors often tell moms whose babies have jaundice to "temporarily" stop nursing. It is hard to maintain a supply of milk when you stop "temporarily". What do they tell bottle feeding moms to do? It was proven decades ago that breast milk does not cause jaundice, nor does it make it worse. Yet doctors still follow an outdated practice of telling moms to stop nursing "temporarily". Often, Baby gets used to the bottle nipple and then refuses to nurse. Why not, it's easier.
11:50 AM on 05/13/2012
I'm not sure what state you live in but I have never heard of doctors telling nursing mothers to stop temporarily because of jaundice. I live in Michigan and when both my sons had jaundice they told me all I could do was to keep nursing them as often as my baby would let me. Eating, pooping, and sleeping are the biggest things that help them push the bilirubin out of their systems. Other then sunlight, which even then should only be in small non direct sessions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Antidiot
11:35 AM on 05/22/2012
They do sometimes recommend supplementing when jaundiced. I've seen that happen.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eksharris
03:37 PM on 05/30/2012
My first was born in Kansas. They told us in Lamaze that it is advised to stop nursing for at least 24 hours. I met someone who was forced to do that, her baby was under the bilirubin lights and she got worse. My younger 3 were born in Iowa, I knew a mom who quit nursing when her baby was under the lights. I had taken my 4th kid home and was made to take him back to the hospital to be under the lights. I was told to quit nursing for a week. They wanted him to drink water and he refused it but would drink formula, they insisted on soy. He got worse under the lights, he would get better when I was with him and worse when I went home. The hospital denied this, it was obvious from his scores, they were considerably better when I would arrive and he would nose dive when I left. I took him home after 3 nights in the hospital, against medical advice. He stayed the same despite demand nursing until Tuesday when I took him to the chiropractor. He improved immediately afterwards. They were not expecting him to get better without bilirubin lights.