iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Dead Satellite Envisat May Be Space Junk for 150 Years

Posted: 05/12/2012 9:36 pm Updated: 05/12/2012 9:36 pm

Dead Satellite
Artist's impression of the European Space Agency's huge Envisat Earth-observing satellite, which stopped communicating with Earth in April 2012.

By: Mike Wall
Published: 05/11/2012 11:35 AM EDT on SPACE.com

An enormous Earth-observing satellite that was officially declared dead in space Wednesday (May 9) may stay in orbit for the next 150 years, posing a threat to other spacecraft zipping around our planet.

The $2.9 billion Envisat spacecraft, which is about the size of a school bus, went mysteriously silent about a month ago after 10 successful years of studying our planet from orbit. The European Space Agency (ESA) announced Wednesday that it had given up hope of recovering the satelite, which died a year before its planned 2013 decommissioning.

The announcement instantly made Envisat one of the biggest pieces of space junk in low-Earth orbit. Its body measures about 30 feet long by 16 feet wide (9 by 5 meters), but its 46-foot-long (14-m) solar array gives the satellite an even bigger profile. The dead spacecraft weighs 17,600 pounds (8 metric tons).

At the moment, the disposal plan for Envisat is simply to let the huge spacecraft spiral slowly down to a fiery death in Earth's atmosphere. In 2010, ESA scentists estimated that this could take 150 years or so. [6 Biggest Spacecraft to Fall Uncontrolled from Space]

"Therefore, from an environmental standpoint, the recent failure of Envisat does not pose any greater risk than if the spacecraft had continued to operate until its expected decommissioning next year," said Nick Johnson, chief scientist of NASA's Orbital Debris Program Office at the Johnson Space Center in Houston.

Space debris trackers will be keeping a close eye on Envisat to help protect functioning spacecraft. The Joint Space Operations Center at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, for example, will give satellite operators a heads-up if Envisat is projected to come within 0.6 miles (1 kilometer) of their spacecraft, Johnson said.

For now, however, there's no way to prevent Envisat from slamming into other pieces of space junk and adding yet more pieces to Earth's ever-growing cloud of orbital debris.

"In the near term, there is nothing that can be done to prevent a collision between Envisat and other cataloged orbital debris, although such a collision has a very low annual probability," Johnson told SPACE.com via email.

That's not to say, however, that Envisat will definitely stay aloft for the next century and a half, zipping around Earth as a sort of zombie space missile. More and more researchers are stressing the need to start actively removing debris from orbit, lest the planet's space-junk problem get truly out of hand.

Scientists have proposed a number of debris-removal concepts, from net-wielding spacecraft that drag junk out of orbit to giant lasers that steer defunct spacecraft down into Earth's atmosphere. None of these ideas have been put to the test — yet.

"Envisat could be a candidate for a future orbital debris removal demonstration mission," Johnson said.

You can follow SPACE.com senior writer Mike Wall on Twitter: @michaeldwall. Follow SPACE.com for the latest in space science and exploration news on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.

Copyright 2012 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW SCIENCE

By: Mike Wall Published: 05/11/2012 11:35 AM EDT on SPACE.com An enormous Earth-observing satellite that was officially declared dead in space Wednesday (May 9) may stay in orbit for the next 15...
By: Mike Wall Published: 05/11/2012 11:35 AM EDT on SPACE.com An enormous Earth-observing satellite that was officially declared dead in space Wednesday (May 9) may stay in orbit for the next 15...
Filed by David Freeman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 82
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
rtgmath
There has got to be a better way!
10:43 PM on 05/15/2012
We really do need to start actively eliminating space junk. The continuing collection of space debris (pollution) poses the eventual possibility of making any space activity virtually impossible. Who would launch when the possibility of collision and damage reaches 50%. Already our launch windows are severely constrained because of debris.

This should be NASA's next large project, combined with private companies and other governments.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Riverman
The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars,
01:07 PM on 05/14/2012
We have got to stop thinking that destroying things is the answer to what ever problem we have in space. We pay $10,000 per pond to lift sophisticated equipment and exotic materials to earth orbit. We need lobster like space craft that are robust enough and maneuverable enough to gather the so called junk. Once gathered it could be removed to a high orbit junk yard or a similar facility in lunar orbit or even deposited on the moon in a region where a future colony is planned. If a near earth object happens by we should not blow it up or shoot it out into deep space. We should manipulate it so that it is captured in lunar orbit. Not only is the day coming when such ideas will be very helpful to mankind but that day is also not all that far away. Wastefulness is not a virtue on earth or anywhere else.
10:22 AM on 05/14/2012
When private entrepreneurs begin operations in space, because of the low Delta V required, you can be sure they will eventually be harvesting larger masses of junk for raw material.
09:10 AM on 05/14/2012
The dead spacecraft does not weigh anything up there!!!!
09:51 AM on 05/14/2012
It has no weight, but it has mass (and therefore momentum and inertia). Only Americans measure spacecraft in pounds. Everyone else measures in kilograms or metric tonnes (1000 kg).
05:55 AM on 05/14/2012
Wall e
10:01 AM on 05/14/2012
I said...it has NO weight up there....I know it has mass....it can do damage as well for sure...i.e. weightless damage debris
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim Kunk
Aimlessly wondering the information highway.
11:32 PM on 05/13/2012
Harry Broderick, Is the man for the job. But the government, has given him to much trouble over the years.
11:22 PM on 05/13/2012
A space shuttle would be fully capable of retrieving this satellite and returning it to earth intact. Oh yeah. We don't have space shuttles any more. A $2.9 BILLION satellite isn't worth retrieving, refurbishing and returning to space? It's what the Space Shuttle was originally built for. Not redundant trips to a useless space station. I'm a huge fan of space travel and technology, but that sprawling space station was truly a waste of time and money.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ProudToBeVeryLiberal
Science is the antidote to the poison of religion
05:17 AM on 05/14/2012
Just for the record, the estimated price tag for one of the the last Shuttle missions was close to $1 billion (NASA's "official" $550 million figure is rightly derided by anyone in the industry.) Definitely not a cost-effective way to retrieve/repair satellites.
09:42 AM on 05/14/2012
No it wouldn't. Envisat wasn't designed for the Shuttle payload bay. Most satellites are designed to be mounted axially from one end on top of a conventional launch vehicle. Shuttle payloads must mounted longitudinally along three sides (left and right keels and ventral trunnion).

Also, Shuttle payloads must be human-rated to ensure they do not present a hazard to the flight crew. Envisat hasn't been human-rated. It contains highly toxic hypergolic propellants, and because of its avionics failure, we have little insight into the state and health of the satellite.

The Space Shuttle just isn't practical for retrieving satellites. We did it once. That's it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trekkinbob
Reason, not religion.
07:59 PM on 05/13/2012
NASA IS SUCH A WAST OF MONY. THE ERTH IS 6000 YRS OLD AND SCIENTUSTS THINK ITS MILYONS. LAFF OUT LOWD. i DON WAN MY TAX DOLLERS PAYING FOR MORE OF THIS. TO DANGERUS FOR WEN JESUS COMES BAK.
08:39 PM on 05/13/2012
Before someone sends a reply, I would hope they would check their facts, spelling and grammar. Otherwise, we may conclude your comment was submitted by an idiot.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trekkinbob
Reason, not religion.
08:54 PM on 05/13/2012
I appreciate the fact that Huff Po moderators enjoy the occasional parody of some of the serious comments we see on articles such as these from those less endowed intellectually as well as those willfully less endowed for whatever reasons.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wander7676
killed and eaten by cannibals in a previous life
04:40 PM on 05/13/2012
Easy just send up a big magnet!!! lol
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alexander Forbes
OBAMA2012
04:28 PM on 05/13/2012
Yes, attention scrap dealers and recycle centers: here is your next New Frontier!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Davidc Smith
Montani Sempre Liberi
03:05 PM on 05/13/2012
Somebody is going to have to go up there with a big high tech garbage bag and pick up the trash--but that would require a real space program which we don't seem to have anymore.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carl Caroli
I just don't understand people
12:01 PM on 05/13/2012
We'll trash the universe sooner or later.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PrairieGayCompanion
To improve is to change
11:26 AM on 05/13/2012
No worries. Kang and Kodos are in the process of getting a salvage license from the Rigellians so they can do a reality show on their Starship Poopers Network.

"We have reached the limit of what rectal probing can teach us."
photo
darter22
Very funny, Scotty. Now beam down my clothes.
11:21 AM on 05/13/2012
Would it be possible or economically feasible to launch a craft to intercept it? After the rendezvous, a retro rocket could fire and slow the satellite enough to fall out of orbit and burn up in the atmosphere.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
06:15 PM on 05/13/2012
It'll cost you at least $500m-$1bn. The cost of a collision with Envisat, mulitlplied by the risk of it happening - I suspect rather less.
George Picard
Send lawyers, guns and money
10:25 AM on 05/13/2012
We need to build a huge space garbage truck to go into space and pick all the junk up.
02:35 PM on 05/13/2012
This won't happen until we have the technology to make it only pick up the garbage at 5:00am and while making enough noise to wake me up
George Picard
Send lawyers, guns and money
03:08 PM on 05/13/2012
lol