iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Carlos DeLuna Execution: Texas Put To Death An Innocent Man, Columbia University Team Says

Posted: Updated: 05/16/2012 3:40 pm

Mugs Texas
Carlos DeLuna (left) and Carlos Hernandez

One of the strongest arguments against the death penalty is the frightening chance of executing an innocent person. Columbia University law professor James Liebman said he and a team of students have proven that Texas gave a lethal injection to the wrong man.

Carlos DeLuna was executed in 1989 for stabbing to death a gas station clerk in Corpus Christi six years earlier. It was a ghastly crime. The trial attracted local attention, but not from concern that a guiltless man would be punished while the killer went free.

DeLuna, an eighth grade dropout, maintained that he was innocent from the moment cops put him in the back seat of a patrol car until the day he died. Today, 29 years after DeLuna was arrested, Liebman and his team published a mammoth report in the Human Rights Law Review that concludes DeLuna paid with his life for a crime he likely did not commit. Shoddy police work, the prosecution's failure to pursue another suspect, and a weak defense combined to send DeLuna to death row, they argued.

"I would say that across the board, there was nonchalance," Liebman told The Huffington Post. "It looked like a common case, but we found that there was a very serious claim of innocence."

Police and prosecutors treated the killing of Wanda Lopez at the Sigmor Shamrock gas station on February 4, 1983, like a robbery gone bad. A recording of the chilling 911 call from Lopez, a 24-year-old single mom working the night shift, captured her screaming and begging her killer for mercy.

DeLuna, then 20, was found hiding under a pickup truck a few blocks from the gory crime scene. A wad of rolled-up bills totaling $149 was in his pocket.

Eyewitness testimony formed the bedrock of the case against him. Now, that testimony is perhaps most contested aspect of his conviction.

Cops brought DeLuna back to the Shamrock. A customer filling his tank before the murder told police that DeLuna was the man he saw putting a knife in his pocket outside the store. Another customer who rushed to the store's entrance when he heard Lopez struggling identified DeLuna as the man who emerged. A married couple saw a man running a few blocks away and later identified DeLuna in police photos shown to them.

With DeLuna's record of numerous arrests for burglary and public drunkenness, plus a conviction for attempted rape and auto theft, it seemed like police had found the perp. But Liebman said DeLuna took the fall in a case of mistaken identity.

Among the key findings in the Columbia team's report:

  • The eyewitness statements actually conflict with each other. What witnesses said about the appearance and location of the suspect suggest that they were describing more than one person.
  • Photos of a bloody footprint and blood spatter on the walls suggest the killer would have had blood on his shoes and pant legs, yet DeLuna's clothes were clean.
  • Prosecutors and police ignored tips unearthed in the case files that Carlos Hernandez, an older friend of DeLuna, who had a reputation for wielding a blade, had killed Lopez. The defense failed to track down Hernandez, who bore a striking resemblance to DeLuna.

"If a new trial was somehow able to be conducted today, a jury would acquit DeLuna" said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, who read a draft of Liebman's report. "We don't have a perfect case where can agree that we have an innocent person who's been executed, but by weight of this investigation, I think we can say this is as close as a person is going to come."

Story continues below

Loading Slideshow...
  • Carlos DeLuna

    Carlos DeLuna booking mug

  • Carlos Hernandez

    Carlos Hernandez

  • Wanda Vargas Lopez

    Wanda Vargas Lopez.

In 1983 and during the appeals process, officials handling DeLuna's case saw the opposite -- a slam-dunk conviction. The prosecution and the court-appointed defense lawyer didn't put much stock in DeLuna's claim that Hernandez plunged a knife into Lopez's chest. Record-keeping was so lax there's no clear evidence the gas station was robbed during the slaying, Liebman said.

In trying to clear his name, DeLuna didn't help himself. For months after his arrest, he refused to reveal the name of the real killer, because he feared Hernandez. His credibility plummeted when other parts of his alibi for the night of the murder were disproven by the prosecutor.

The fateful night began, according to DeLuna, when he went to a skating rink, where he met Hernandez and two sisters. DeLuna admitted that he was near the gas station later, but said he was across the street in a bar. While he nursed his drink, Hernandez bought cigarettes in the Shamrock. He said he emerged from the bar to see Hernandez fighting with Lopez. Hearing police sirens, he said he fled, because he didn't want to get into trouble.

The prosecution, however, discredited DeLuna's version of events. One of the sisters who was allegedly with him at the rink testified that she was at her baby shower that night.

"I had blown his alibi to bits," said Steve Schiwetz, one of the prosecutors.

A guilty verdict was reached with little delay. The capital murder trial lasted six days in July 1983.

"I'm open to the argument that somebody named Carlos Hernandez really did it," said Schiwetz, "but everything I know confirms the original impression that DeLuna did it."

The apparent random targeting of Lopez wasn't Hernandez's style, Schiwetz said. Hernandez's tendency was to unleash violence on the his girlfriends and wife, not strangers, he said. In 1986, Hernandez was accused of murdering another woman with a knife, but the case was dismissed.

Several of Hernandez' family members interviewed for the Columbia University report said pictures of the murder weapon found at the gas station looked like the knife Hernandez habitually kept with him. In all of DeLuna's numerous arrests, police never found him carrying a blade, according to the Columbia report.

The relatives' portrait of Hernandez's disheveled appearance gelled with a description of the suspect seen fleeing the convenience store. Witness Kevan Baker said the killer looked like a "derelict," wearing a flannel jacket and gray sweatshirt. Hernandez's relatives said he often wore a flannel coat. DeLuna was fastidious with his appearance and always wore black slacks and dress shirts, the report said.

Liebman sought more scientific proof. Fingerprints taken from the knife and cigarette pack found at the crime scene were sent to a former Scotland Yard investigator for comparison with Hernandez's prints. But the evidence had been so poorly collected by police, Liebman said, that the results were inconclusive.

The Columbia University team's report, more than 400 pages long, also is a biography of the central players, emphasizing the troubled upbringings and hard-drinking adulthoods of DeLuna and Hernandez.

Liebman learned about DeLuna roughly 10 years ago, when he began examining convictions in which a single eyewitness testified. As he and a student delved into the files, they became convinced DeLuna wasn't guilty.

They turned over their findings to the Chicago Tribune which published a three-part series in 2006 that found evidence suggesting Hernandez killed Lopez. Multiple people told the Tribune that Hernandez -- who died in 1999 in prison from cirrhosis of the liver -- had confessed to killing her.

Revisiting questions about Lopez's death would be too painful, her nephews said.

"That's something our family has had to deal with," Louis Vargas told The Huffington Post. "We've had closure with it and we don't want to reopen it. We believe the justice system did what it had to do."

One of DeLuna's attorneys, James Lawrence, told HuffPost he doesn't count him among the clients who've been wrongfully accused of capital crimes.

"The fact that he wouldn't help us and this was his life on the line -- that's the one thing that kept bothering the living daylights out of me," Lawrence said.

Since the Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment in 1976, there have been 1,295 executions, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. Texas leads with 482 executions.

The ease with which DeLuna was prosecuted and the obscurity of his death are what makes his case so important, said Liebman.

"There are many cases out there that nobody has ever looked at and are probably at risk of innocence," said Liebman. "It's a cautionary tale about the risks we take when we have the death penalty."

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW CRIME

One of the strongest arguments against the death penalty is the frightening chance of executing an innocent person. Columbia University law professor James Liebman said he and a team of students have ...
One of the strongest arguments against the death penalty is the frightening chance of executing an innocent person. Columbia University law professor James Liebman said he and a team of students have ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,637
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (77 total)
10:47 AM on 11/04/2012
So, after all these years of the most painstaking searching, you finally found one.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ktthrp6
08:13 AM on 07/02/2012
This is so sad, and It truly sounds like DeLuna's constitutional rights were violated because he was not given capable representation. He had absolutely no chance. Maybe that's why he didn't cooperate. Also, it is a typical thing for people of minorities to distrust police and be afraid, so they do not cooperate. On top of that, it was said that he was afraid of Hernandez, which would be reason enough that he didn't cooperate because he would have been ratting him out. From some communities, you don't do that, or you get killed. This was a very interesting article, but I wish these people would concentrate on inmates on death row who are still alive, they are the ones who will benefit. There are countless innocent death row inmates who will be killed even though there is so much reasonable doubt that it never should have been a conviction.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NatTurner1
Clinton 2016
11:52 AM on 06/04/2012
There has been more than two dozen cases where the Innocence Project has found via DNA and other evidence that has removed men condemned to die. I find it difficult to believe that prior to these efforts, America's justice system was 100% in its condemnation. I also want to bring attention to the 100s of men and women that died without judge, jury and due process at the end of a rope...hanging like strange fruit to vigilante and Southern justice.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:42 AM on 05/31/2012
Carlos DeLuna: Another False Innocence Claim?
Dudley Sharp, May 29, 2012

No one can, responsibly, accept what the Liebman/DeLuna report, ”Los Tocayos Carlos: Anatomy of a Wrongful Execution,” says, without fully fact checking it, as well as evaluating bias.

It is unwise to, blindly, accept any study.

Downright foolish it would be to blindly accept a study from within a hotly contested public policy debate, when the study was conducted by an active partisan within that debate. James Liebman is an active anti death penalty defense attorney.

When reviewing the previous record of both Liebman and the anti death penalty movement, a healthy skepticism would be merited and wise.

What happened when folks took the time to fact check Liebman's prior opus, "A Broken System"?

Take a look.

"A Broken Study: A Review of 'A Broken System"
http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2009/10/broken-study-review-of-broken-system.html

Regarding credibility, it is astounding that Liebman would allow any references to Rev. Pickett, in connection to supporting an innocent claim for DeLuna. Pickett has zero credibility, based upon "The DeLuna Deception: At the Death House Door" Can Rev. Carroll Pickett be trusted?", below.

Liebman either didn't fact check Pickett or he didn't care - or some other excuse? Regardless, it goes to credibility.

SNIP The rest at:
http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2012/05/carlos-deluna-another-false-innocence.html
07:29 AM on 05/30/2012
Have innocent persons ever been executed? "Christie doon it!". In case you don't know what that means, see the film based on fact Ten Rillington Place. This case led directly to the UK abolishing the death penalty and a complete pardon to the executed man.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:13 AM on 05/22/2012
They should call Texas the string and hang them state.
01:09 AM on 05/20/2012
What do you expect?? It's Texas. I think we should build a border between it and the rest of the US and give it back to Mexico!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hsspringman
We can cure fundamentalist.
08:08 PM on 05/19/2012
As much as I know that I would want to kill anyone that killed a member of my family, I do not support the death penalty for many reasons. This article is a prime example of the main reason. It is far to likely that an innocent person will be executed and you cannot give life back. No civilized society should lust for the death penalty the way many of our citizens do, it is just wrong and does nothing for society has a whole.
05:28 PM on 05/19/2012
Oh please. From the start this report wanted the man to be innocent. They completely whitewash his past criminal record or attempted rape, robbery and weapons possession and they make the guy seem like he is a complete angle.
07:32 PM on 05/19/2012
And not even an obtuse angle.
02:15 AM on 05/22/2012
that doesn't make the man that was executed the murderer.
photo
Stephen1349
The law is reason..free from passion.
05:28 PM on 05/19/2012
Romney likes firing people and Perry likes executing people..Republicans! Why don't you fire a corporation, Mitt, and why don't you execute a corporation, Rick...so I can believe that corporations are people, too.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bigwave48
05:23 PM on 05/19/2012
American justice.... Perry is proud of his record , on the death penalty... have another beer
Perry.
05:19 PM on 05/19/2012
Obviously Texas isn't up to handling the responsibility of capital punishment. What a disgrace.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
05:05 PM on 05/19/2012
The report doesn't explain why De Luna tore off his shirt and kicked off his shoes as he ran from the crime scene. Police followed directions from witness who saw De Luna fleeing the murder scene and found him hiding, with no shirt or shoes, beneath a pickup truck. There are no inconsistencies in the police reports from the night of the stabbing. According to the police report, the witness said De Luna was wearing a ligh-colored or white shirt with black pants. Ther article mentions that "A customer filling his tank before the murder told police that DeLuna was the man he saw putting a knife in his pocket outside the store." However it neglects to \mentioned that De Luna engaged the customer in onversation,offering him drugs in exchange for a ride. This customer, who is also Hispanic, identified De Luna only a few minutes later when police brought him back to the Shamrock station. DeLuna made up the story about the "real killer" being a friend named Carlos Hernandez after the prosecution proved he had lied about his original alibi. However, he refused, for obvious reasons, to help his defense team identify which Carlos Hernandez he was referring to. His lawyer showed him mug shots of every Carlos Hernandez who had been taken into custody. The main reason Hernandez has become a suspect is that he's dead. Did the authors of the report sattempt to verify where he was the night tof the murder?
07:33 PM on 05/19/2012
Does it even matter? There's doubt. And no one deserves to be killed when there is an ounce of doubt as to their crime.
08:17 PM on 07/27/2012
No one deserves to be killed, period. Not in war, not in a prison, not by mob rule. People reeeeeally need to evolve a bit.
photo
DesmondPro
[Insert cliche quote here]
05:01 PM on 05/19/2012
Why are the states that pride themselves on being pro-life also pro-execution?
02:16 AM on 05/22/2012
because that is the christian way?
08:13 PM on 07/27/2012
That's bull. It's the fundamentalist way, it is not the Christian way. Wow am I tired of the cult of hate against people of faith just because some decide to use their faith to justify hate. What makes your hatred any cleaner than theirs? Self-righteousness, I am betting.
04:41 PM on 05/19/2012
I recall hearing about Willingham's case a couple of years ago when the Texas Forensic Science Commission started reviewing the case. While I was horrified that someone who was clearly innocent had been executed I, and other opponents of the death penalty, figured that we finally had our perfect test case. Our system is based on the premise that it's better for 100 guilty men to go free than to wrongfully imprison one innocent man. Of course, that takes on a whole different level of importance when you are talking about the DP. I had hoped that it would lead to Texas imposing a moratorium on the DP, like other states have done in the wake of large numbers of convictions overturned on DNA evidence. It frustrates me that proponents of the DP use those same exact cases to insist that the system works. It has been clear for some time that it would take proof of an innocent man to change things and it seemed like Willingham would be it. And then here comes Rick Perry...whose Attorney General rules the Commission cannot review any of the evidence that came to light after 2005...and who continued his pattern of good old boy cronyism by replacing four of the Commission members--including the chair--with his own donors/pals. Maybe this case will change things, but probably not...it seems that no matter what the evidence shows someone will always insist that they got their man.