iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Foreclosure Victims Make Surprising Return To Homeownership

Reuters  |  Posted: Updated: 05/17/2012 12:47 am



By Jilian Mincer

NEW YORK, May 16 (Reuters) - When Jennifer Anderson's family could no longer afford their mortgage and lost their home, she expected many years to pass before they would again become property owners.

But less than two years later, in March, they purchased a $297,000 house outside Phoenix, Arizona, after qualifying for a loan backed by the U.S. government.

They joined a small but growing number of Americans who are making a surprisingly quick return to homeownership after defaulting on their loans or being forced into short sales that cost their banks money.

"We didn't really expect it," said Anderson, 40. "We were resigned to the fact that we were going to be in a rental property for a while."

Financial problems arose after she lost her job as a customer service representative for a health insurance company and her husband's hours at an automaker were cut. To make matters worse, they used up her retirement savings trying to keep their home.

Data is not available, but interviews with more than 30 lenders, builders, Realtors and consumers suggest that a growing number of Americans are getting back into the housing market, even though they went through a foreclosure, bankruptcy or short sale in recent years.

"Most are not ashamed or bashful about what happened because so many people were forced into that reality in the last six years," says Graham Epperson, vice president of sales in Arizona for the PulteGroup, a leading U.S. homebuilder.

They want to escape rising rents and take advantage of home prices, which are down by about a third from an April 2006 peak.


FHA TO THE RESCUE

Much of the comeback wouldn't be possible without help from the U.S. government, namely the Federal Housing Agency. It was created in the 1930s as part of a broader push by Washington to foster home ownership and fight the Great Depression.

The number of FHA-insured home loans has soared in recent years as subprime loans have disappeared and fewer Americans have qualified for conventional mortgages backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which were rescued in 2008 by the U.S. government after loan losses.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke stressed the point last week, saying banks have become so restrictive that many worthy homebuyers are being frozen out of the market, and lending practices are not likely to loosen any time soon.

In contrast, FHA-backed loans are an option for many who defaulted on their mortgages or were forced into a short sale. FHA loans, combined with those backed by the Department of Veteran Affairs or the Department of Agriculture, had a record share of the market in 2011.

"These are not mainstream programs geared for mainstream borrowers," says Greg McBride, senior financial analyst at Bankrate.com, who expects to see more of those with blemished credit reenter the housing market.

Most of these reentering buyers are using FHA-insured loans, which at the end of 2011 accounted for about 30 percent of loans for home purchases, compared with 4.5 percent in 2005.

A conventional mortgage typically carries a lower interest rate than does an FHA-backed loan, but it also requires a credit score of at least 720, proof of income and a significant down payment. In contrast, FHA loans historically have been available to help low and moderate-income families buy homes.

FHA borrowers typically need a credit score of at least 620 and a 3.5 percent down payment. The FHA charges an upfront mortgage insurance premium of 1.75 of the loan (which can be rolled into the mortgage) and an annual 1.25 percent premium on the outstanding loan.


BAD MEMORIES

For some economists, alarm bells are ringing.

Edward Pinto, resident fellow at American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank, said the rise of FHA-backed loans flies in the face of the government's stated mission of getting more private capital into housing finance.

Furthermore, a requirement that borrowers taking FHA-backed loans make a down payment of just 3.5 percent of the purchase price brings back bad memories of how many subprime mortgages turned bad as housing prices began to fall in 2006.

According to the S&P/Case-Shiller 20-city composite index, U.S. home prices were down 3.5 percent in February from a year earlier and are now at their lowest since late 2002, although there have been some signs that prices are beginning to inch up.

"FHA is putting people back into situations that still have high risk of default," Pinto said.

He noted that a lot of these loans are made to consumers with credit scores well below 720 -- the median national score for all households-- and that about 15 percent of loans made to people with scores of 620 to 659 are likely to fail.


A SECOND CHANCE

There have been about 4.2 million foreclosures in the United States since 2007, according to data firm RealtyTrac. It expects that number to climb to 6 million by early 2014.

A bankruptcy remains on a consumer's record for seven years, but that consumer can start raising his or her credit score in several months by decreasing debt, not borrowing more and paying bills on time.

"Most of the loans that are getting done are for people who have really rebuilt their credit," says Frank Donnelly, president of the Mortgage Bankers Association of Metropolitan Washington, D.C. "They have to prove (to the lender that) it was something like a job loss that caused this and not chronic delinquency."

As well as a minimum credit score of 620, lenders look at why the person lost the home. They're much more likely to lend to people who lost a job than to consumers who could have afforded their mortgage but chose to default.

Builders eager to sell homes are not only offering to help once debt-mired clients find loans but providing free credit-counseling programs like the Homebuyer Solutions program offered by Quadrant Homes in Bellevue, Washington.

"A lot of times when people enroll they just don't know where to start," says Teage Christensen, manager of the program. His goal: help clients get at least a 600 credit score.

Debra Eaton stumbled on the program when she and her husband were visiting model homes out of curiosity. They had filed for bankruptcy in 2008 after her husband was seriously injured at work and she took time off from her job to care for him.

After the bankruptcy, their credit score plunged to 460. "It's not that you don't pay your bills because you want to go on vacation," she says. "You don't pay because you don't have the money."

By November 2011, their credit score had improved to 680 and Eaton and her husband, a veteran, qualified for a Veterans Administration loan to purchase a $252,000 home near Tacoma, Washington. They moved into the three-bedroom house the day before Thanksgiving.

"If you would have asked me then if I was going to buy another home, I would've told you no way," she says.

FOLLOW BUSINESS

By Jilian Mincer NEW YORK, May 16 (Reuters) - When Jennifer Anderson's family could no longer afford their mortgage and lost their home, she expected many years to pas...
By Jilian Mincer NEW YORK, May 16 (Reuters) - When Jennifer Anderson's family could no longer afford their mortgage and lost their home, she expected many years to pas...
Filed by Reuters  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 210
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
02:27 PM on 05/17/2012
First, I'm glad that people are able to get back on their feet. Capitalism is supposed to be tolerant of failure, such that we can all make mistakes and get back up again. I admit that I often feel like if I lost my job and my home, I'd simply never be able to recover. Reading that other people go through that and DO recover is a good thing.

But second, I don't understand these families buying $297,000 and $252,000 homes. Personally, I don't think that anyone should voluntarilly take a 30-year mortgage. If literally your only financial option is a 30-year mortgage on a $50k dump of a home, because you make minimum wage, go for it, that's better than renting. But I think that most people who can afford a 30-year $252k 3-bedroom home can probably fit into and afford a $170k 2-bedroom home. I'm not trying to judge everyone, so if someone's raising a family of 4 kids, yeah, do what you've gotta do.

But I can say that I've never carried a mortgage over 15 years, and I've never lived in a home that cost me $252k or more. I've lived in spacious places in good neighborhoods for much less, and I've budgeted carefully for my future.
photo
PRETTYWOMAN-2
possum-queen/1999,2003
02:46 PM on 05/17/2012
depends on your part of the country [prices for new/old-homes],......i'm in ma., there's multiple bidding going-on right now for any ''fixer-upper''s under $200-grand !.....and the builders get first-dibbs on anything $120-170/grand in my town [tear-downs],......the market is coming-back !
03:03 PM on 05/17/2012
I bought my first home during the near-peak of the bubble in Washington DC, one of the upper-priced real estate and cost-of-living markets in the country. I spent $106,000 on it. Just a quick search in downtown Boston shows 2-bed condos available for $200k or less. Granted, I don't know Boston well enough to know the neighborhoods I pull up, and I'm not gonna go out and look at the condition of the properties. This was a quick glance at what I'd presume to be the priciest location in your state, that's all.

If $200k is the cheapest thing that's out there in Boston, then that's what you've gotta do. My current home cost more than that, so I can understand spending that much. I'd merely suggest that if cheaper IS available, AND you cannot afford a 15-year mortgage on your home of choice, then perhaps it's worth considering whether the better financial option would be to buy something more affordable. I'd also observe that with $200k condos available in Boston, and $100k coops available in DC, it's really unlikely that the most affordable option in Phoenix is at $297k.
12:31 PM on 05/17/2012
297000 wow? Hope you dont foreclose on that one either.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kate Lynn
02:04 AM on 05/17/2012
297k is a bit much for me even when my credit is still good.
07:33 AM on 05/17/2012
It's an absurd notion, period.

There isn't a house on the planet worth $300k.
photo
PRETTYWOMAN-2
possum-queen/1999,2003
02:48 PM on 05/17/2012
what about ryan-$eacrest's $50-mill./home [purchase] the other day !?
12:58 AM on 05/17/2012
Wow...sounds like the cycle is starting again. Who is lending them the money doesn't look at history and should they really jump back into howownership that soon? The economy isn't exactly booming with respect to jobs so this sounds like a risky move all around.

Let the insanity start all over again.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:13 PM on 05/16/2012
Can anyone hear the Canary singing? What's the definition of insanity, doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result.
photo
oneeasyrider
E=mc2: From light you exist
06:51 PM on 05/16/2012
Except, it's not the same thing...not even close. The housing bubble in early 2000's was a manufactured Wall St. pyramid scheme. Wall St. manipulated rating agencies and ignored due diligence (the reason they're given fees). Instead, Wall St. simply processed loans fast as they could and dumped them on Fannie and Freddie or anywhere else in the world they were able, but were caught holding the bag when the bubble collapsed, thereby cannibalizing themselves in their endless pursuit of greed, avarice, and gluttony.

Now, housing prices have stabilized, so people who have found steady employment and qualify DO deserve a second chance at home ownership which is beneficial to the economy as a whole. Historically, long as homeowners aren't being gouged and are employed, they DO pay their mortgage, bills, and maintain their properties.

Take Wall St. unfettered gluttony out of the equation and homeowners are stable and do just fine.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Olderandwiser55
getting older and wiser....
07:53 PM on 05/16/2012
I agree-and the banksters didn't want to get people in houses and loved being in control. Old is new again and FHA is back...
08:51 PM on 05/16/2012
NONSENSE.

Housing prices are falling.
medialv2
I love Capitalism!
06:08 PM on 05/16/2012
This 'article' is a bunch of housing propaganda. My wife and I both have over 740 credit ratings and are FHA approved with $5000 in downpayment and closing costs. Virtually every house we have looked at is swept up for thousands of dollars less then our retail price offer on the house.
How? Evidently it is all CASH buyers. Who are all of these 'people' who can buy up all these expensive houses for cash? According to the local country recorders office it is foreign banks. Most of which received money on they sly from our own 'federal' reserve when the super important 'bailout' occurred. You know the one, the one where your great great grand children's lives got sold into debt slavery to foreign bankers. Watch your county recorders office property rolls like a hawk everyday and you will see I am not fibbing like this article is.
06:17 PM on 05/16/2012
With a meager $5k for a downpayment AND closing costs, why are you even looking to buy a house much less expensive houses?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Olderandwiser55
getting older and wiser....
07:56 PM on 05/16/2012
Yes, I would say some more fraud going on. They are controlling the inventory, trying to bump prices. How many people actually negotiated a "short sale" and bought their house back? I know some have. Report this behavior anywhere you can.
05:36 PM on 05/16/2012
Good for them. I am SO happy to hear normal people coming back. I fought with my bank for over a year tryng to get a modification. In the meantime I used up most of a small inheritance to keep paying our bills. On the third application I called my congressman's office and they helped us by calling the bank weekly and sitting on them. It worked. Now there are two credit cards we can't pay, we are on social security, so don't know what to do with them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmanuel kalu
information is knowledge, knowledge in power
04:19 PM on 05/16/2012
the problem with the previous housing crisis was pure greed by the banks and bad underwriting supported by greed. if this new loans are underwritten properly, income is verified, every document provided. then it is a good thing for people to start purchasing homes again. we need this housing market to start moving up again.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cats530
16 Trillion To Banksters Per GAO Audit
04:39 PM on 05/16/2012
They still haven't stopped slicing/dicing (securitizing) these mortgages and they still haven't stopped using MERS.
05:19 PM on 05/16/2012
"we need this housing market to start moving up again."

And why is that? Nevermind... you're a reaItor.
04:04 PM on 05/16/2012
STICK IT to the banksters and STOP paying your mortgage.
03:41 PM on 05/16/2012
If once you don't succeed try try try. Some people never learn
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cats530
16 Trillion To Banksters Per GAO Audit
03:50 PM on 05/16/2012
Like the banksters you are so proud of.
photo
hazyafternoonsunshine
Life's a ball, buster!
03:38 PM on 05/16/2012
I am glad that people are able to own a home again, don't get me wrong. I just think that homes are still over-priced. When it takes two incomes to own a home, the home costs too much. $297K? That is too much money for a home. These days cars are priced at what a home should cost, and homes are astronomical. Homes should be priced at a point where foreclosure is not the likely outcome of employment loss. That is just too stressful for families. There must be alternatives, and thankfully, some people are beginning to come up with interesting solutions: http://www.phoenixcommotion.com/
03:41 PM on 05/16/2012
What is a "home". Do you mean a house?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Law101
My micro-bio is now full.
04:07 PM on 05/16/2012
Wow you really aren't the brightest crayon in the box are you?
03:43 PM on 05/16/2012
Does that community come with a token drum circle or is that an add-on?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Azlegit
02:57 PM on 05/16/2012
So you walk away from one home and then turn around and get a government loan to do it all over again! Unreal!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cats530
16 Trillion To Banksters Per GAO Audit
03:06 PM on 05/16/2012
Not unlike the banksters who received TARP, then came begging for QE, ZIRP and 16 trillion per GAO audit.
03:43 PM on 05/16/2012
So when has, if your friend jumped off a bridge you should too, become govt policy?
03:35 PM on 05/16/2012
Well... If you bought a house from 1998-2012, you'd walk away too after realizing you paid a grossly inflated price for what has always been a depreciating asset.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Azlegit
10:45 AM on 05/17/2012
So you buy a new car, hopefully a Chevy Volt, and when you realize you have paid a grossly inflated price as it depreciates by several thousands of dollars once off the lot, you leave it parked somewhere because you just screwed yourself??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
motherfather
Politricks ain't easy!
02:55 PM on 05/16/2012
We were recently told that we would be unable to get a FHA loan until 3 years had passed. We did a shortsale due to a relocation two years ago. We were told by the bank that we had to stop paying the mortgage in order to facilitate the short sale which we did only after submitting a buyer for the property. How is it that people witha foreclosure can get back into the market when we have to wait three years for a short sale? SMH.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Law101
My micro-bio is now full.
03:09 PM on 05/16/2012
A lot of people dont realize that a short sale negatively effects your credit almost as much, sometimes just as much as a foreclosure. When the bank reports they took a huge write off on the loan to your credit score, it doesn't show up whether it was due to a short sale versus a foreclosure.

Depending on how underwater you are, you might be better off just taking the hit on the sale to protect your credit.
03:46 PM on 05/16/2012
Who give a crap about FICO when your faced with massive losses if you continue to pay on a rapidly depreciating asset like a house???
02:33 PM on 05/16/2012
While my house is not worth what I owe I'm curious why people even think that a reduction in price either principle or interest. One signed the loan agreeing to the terms. It should now be changed why? Because something happened and one can no longer afford it? It's not worth what it should be (in one's eyes)? Why not ask for the same 2 weeks after buying a new car? Same scenerio applies...

And don't worry about the banks loosing money...all you guys that went in with less that 20% down have MIP which is insurance againt your default...so the banks get paid either way...
02:11 PM on 05/16/2012
So we have learned nothing. #.5% down is a pittance. One should have to put at least 20% no matter what. That way one has something to loose and may think twice before setting themselves up to fail yet again.

Another typical government (FHA) fiasco that has/will go sideways at taxpayers expense.