iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

'Gaydar' Study: Face Holds Clues To Sexual Orientation

Posted: Updated: 05/17/2012 8:44 am

By: Stephanie Pappas, LiveScience Senior Writer
Published: 05/16/2012 02:19 PM EDT on LiveScience

People can judge with surprising accuracy whether someone is gay or straight — even when they're looking at a black-and-white photograph, cropped of hair and identifying marks, and presented upside down.

The findings from a University of Washington study suggest people use a combination of clues from individual facial features and from the way those features fit together to make snap judgments about sexual orientation, said researcher Joshua Tabak, a graduate student in psychology.

"We may be doing this so efficiently that we may not even have to try to make this judgment," Tabak told LiveScience.

Guessing sexual orientation

Tabak's is not the first study to find that people can correctly guess a person's sexual orientation from a photograph more often than just by chance. This "gaydar" isn't infallible: The rate of correct guesses is usually in the high 50 percent to mid-60 percent range, Tabak said.  

Still, that's pretty impressive, he said, given that researchers use cropped faces without hair, jewelry or other possible hints about sexual orientation. [5 Myths About Gay People Debunked]

What earlier studies had not done was to tease out how people make these snap sexuality judgments. They might base it on individual facial features — nose or eyes — or they might look at how the features fit together in the face, such as how far apart the eyes are. Or it could be some combination of both.

Looking at faces upside down is known to mess up people's processing of how faces fit together. In one popular optical illusion called the Thatcher effect, it's tough to tell even when the eyes or mouth are flipped the wrong way around in an upside-down face. But even upside down, people are good at processing individual facial features.

Tabak and his co-author exploited this quirk of the brain by presenting photographs of 111 gay men, 122 straight men, 87 gay women and 93 straight women to 129 student volunteers. Some of the students saw upside-down faces, and others were shown the faces right-side up. In either case, the black-and-white cropped photos were presented for only 50 milliseconds.

Lesbian advantage

As in previous studies, people were better than chance at guessing whether the faces belonged to gay or straight people. In a first for studies of this kind, the researchers were able to directly compare how people did when judging the sexual orientation of men versus women. They found that people were better at judging women correctly. There were fewer "false alarms" than when looking at men, Tabak said, meaning instances when a straight person was judged gay.

"Why this is we can only speculate," he said. "It's really interesting to speculate that there might be this ironic effect that because we're more familiar with the concept of gay men [in the media], maybe we're more liberal with labeling a man gay."

When looking at upside-down faces, people were still able to guess their sexual orientation correctly at rates better than chance — although not quite as accurately as when the faces were right-side up. That suggests both facial features (which can be processed in upside-down and right-side-up photos) and facial configuration provide hints into orientation, the researchers report Wednesday (May 16) in the journal PLoS ONE.

It remains to be seen how or if people use "gaydar" in real life, when they have more to go on than a glimpse of a photograph, Tabak said. He and his colleagues are now using brain imaging to monitor brain activity as people look at pictures of gay and straight individuals without knowing their sexual orientation. The results will help clarify whether these sexuality judgments are automatic, much like the judgments we make about people's gender.

"You don't think about judging whether someone is a man or a woman," Tabak said. "You just know."

You can follow LiveScience senior writer Stephanie Pappas on Twitter @sipappas. Follow LiveScience for the latest in science news and discoveries on Twitter @livescience and on Facebook.

Copyright 2012 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW SCIENCE

By: Stephanie Pappas, LiveScience Senior Writer Published: 05/16/2012 02:19 PM EDT on LiveScience People can judge with surprising accuracy whether someone is gay or straight — even when they're ...
By: Stephanie Pappas, LiveScience Senior Writer Published: 05/16/2012 02:19 PM EDT on LiveScience People can judge with surprising accuracy whether someone is gay or straight — even when they're ...
Filed by Jacqueline Howard  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 497
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BacSi
Celer, Silens, Mortalis
01:11 PM on 05/21/2012
Maybe having "gaydar" is not all that important for most.

But gaydar is very important for a public health person or a medical provider.

Because many MSM will not vol that they are having sex with other men.

Yet MSM are at much greater risk for a whole host of diseases. Diseases a doctor may not automatically look for in a person they do not think is a MSM.

MSM are 2% of the US adult population. 4% of the US male population. Based on survey data.

Yet MSM account for 60% of the new P&S syphilis DX in the US.

MSM account for over 60% of the new HIV DX in the US.

And MSM are prone to a number of other infections or health conditions that are much less common in straights.

And since the MSM population in the US is only 2% of all adults a lot of doctors are not going to ask the big question----are you having sex with other men?

Having a little gaydar can be a big help. It can even save lives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Blanc
10:57 AM on 05/21/2012
I was part of a 'sensitivity group' that met for over a year. We discussed issues like race, gender and sexual orientation. On the weekend that we talked about sexual orientation (gay-straight) it was pretty tense and also pretty funny. Nearly all of the women in the group said they were ok with any sexual orientation - they were able to cope. Some of the men were less comfortable and said that they would be ok if a co-worker were gay but they didn't want to be alone in the bathroom with gay workers because they would not want to have to fend off an approach. That became a general consensus, then a little old white lady in the group started laughing and said, 'it's interesting that everyone here is so sexy that they expect every gay person they meet to come on to them. Does that happen to you as straight people?' And that cracked everyone up and made us all realize that we have some pretty odd notions about our own appeal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerorem
Linus v. Lucy
09:04 PM on 05/20/2012
Another bait-and-switch. I expected a serious study on what "signs" cause others to determine another to be gay. Something more serious, like body language or facial clues [not mascara or "butch" hair].

Such a study would be valuable to straight or gay. Reading others' signs.
07:59 AM on 05/19/2012
If the dude is wearing eyeliner, blush, lipstick, and isn't going for the goth look, chances are he's gay.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MexiChick67
Que? Que? Queee?
04:26 PM on 05/20/2012
I'm venturing to say that 98% of all gay men (same as hetros) don't wear make up. Men are now wearing 'guy-liner', tanning powder, and neutral shades of lip balm and are considered 'metrosexuals'.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BBLOND
Anyone but Obama
07:52 AM on 05/19/2012
Some angry comments here.I thought people would love this since that subject(gays,gay rights) dominates the internet /papers these day.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlanBannacheck
President of the Deep Thoughts Association (DTA)
01:51 PM on 05/19/2012
Yes, and as a gay man I don't want to be singled out. It's quite awkward actually!
09:24 PM on 05/19/2012
tough
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sonya Parker
Uppity since 1959
07:35 AM on 05/19/2012
I challenge anyone to find a picture of Marcus Bachmann in which he even remotely appears to be a straight man.
photo
Ossit
Ossit
05:03 AM on 05/19/2012
A) This is crap
B)This is crap
C)People should stop obsessing about others' sexual preferences that are none of their business
D)Anyone can come up with any 'study' to air their prejudice
E)People with nothing better to do will start looking at everyone with their newly discovered bogus 'Gaydar' that's all in their minds.
08:00 AM on 05/19/2012
:: beep beep beep DING :: I've found one.
photo
Ossit
Ossit
04:19 PM on 05/19/2012
LOL! Oh you're so bad, Rob.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MexiChick67
Que? Que? Queee?
04:27 PM on 05/20/2012
Yeah, there are differences and we should celebrate them and not use them to hurt each other.
photo
Ossit
Ossit
11:22 PM on 05/20/2012
Amen and faved MexiChick67.
caugrl
I like my micro-bio being empty.
03:56 AM on 05/19/2012
The study only showed an accuracy rate slightly above 50%. I am not impressed. Since probibility would suggest 50% (yes they are, no they are not). Also, why were the faces presented upside-down?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sundae Driver
"The path to youth takes a whole life." (Picasso)
04:55 AM on 05/19/2012
To prove how ridiculous this "study" was.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fixitguy331
The beatings will continue until morale improves.
03:11 AM on 05/19/2012
Able to identify which are gay "high 50s percent of the time"??...Barely above "chance"...If the identification were something like 80 or 90 percent, this may be news.....No, it probably still wouldn't.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:57 AM on 05/19/2012
how exactly can someone tell ? which features would be able to know?
01:41 AM on 05/19/2012
This study is seriously flawed.
Anyone in research can spot the flaws a mile away.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
seriouslydood
I used to be indecisive; now I'm not so sure.
12:48 AM on 05/19/2012
Boy, and to think I could have started a load of laundry instead of reading this drivel.
12:39 AM on 05/19/2012
Always amazes me with this subject matter all the so-called straight men who instantly become experts on homosexuals...
12:38 AM on 05/19/2012
do a study on identifying people with bad hygiene, manners and laziness. see if you can get that from a picture. or try racism, or greed and even fornication. aha, do a research on opinionated people, lolol it is puzzling how peole whoare not homosexual KNOW SO MUCH ABOUT IT!!!! lololol hey look at a picture and see fat obese person, are they lazy?
12:16 AM on 05/19/2012
I'm hearing that part of the gaydar thing as well as all visual judgment of attractiveness is based on symmetry and how close a person's features come to the average or mean of all the faces that our brain processes as well as how much they look like themselves and in some cases their parents! But I remember hearing 10 or 15yrs ago that a face that was TOO SYMMETRICAL in fact did not look attractive and that a small amount if asymmetry was more attractive. This sounds like one of the stories about how sugar substitute was bad then good, and the same for coffee, chocolate, peanut oil etc. etc. So what is it symmetry GOOD or symmetry BAD? Most of the women I personally find attractive have what I call 'Mona Lisa' features. Not too strong, sort of plain, usually brunette and big dark eyes. Many Germans and Italians have these nice mild features and IMO Brunettes have the most potential for beauty. The dark hair frames the face instead of detracting from it as in blond hair. My 2 cents.