iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Iran-Syria Arms Shipments Violate UN Ban

Reuters  |  Posted: Updated: 05/17/2012 1:25 pm


By Louis Charbonneau

UNITED NATIONS, May 16 (Reuters) - Syria remains the top destination for Iranian arms shipments in violation of a U.N. Security Council ban on weapons exports by the Islamic Republic, according to a confidential report on Iran sanctions-busting seen by Reuters on Wednesday.

Iran, like Russia, is one of Syria's few allies as it presses ahead with a 14-month old assault on opposition forces determined to oust Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

News of the panel's report came as Tehran and the U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency try narrow their differences on how to tackle concerns over Iran's atomic program, and as Iran prepares for talks with the five permanent council members and Germany in Iraq next week.

The new report, submitted by a panel of sanctions-monitoring experts to the Security Council's Iran sanctions committee, said the panel investigated three large illegal shipments of Iranian weapons over the past year.

"Iran has continued to defy the international community through illegal arms shipments," it stated. "Two of these cases involved (Syria), as were the majority of cases inspected by the Panel during its previous mandate, underscoring that Syria continues to be the central party to illicit Iranian arms transfers."

The third shipment involved rockets that Britain said last year were headed for Taliban fighters in Afghanistan.

"The Panel recommends the designation (blacklisting) of two entities related to these interdictions," it said. "The report also takes note of information concerning arms shipments by Iran to other destinations."

The kinds of arms that Iran was attempting to send to Syria before the shipments were seized by Turkish authorities included assault rifles, machine guns, explosives, detonators, 60mm and 120mm mortal shells and other items, the panel said.

The most recent incident described in the report was an arms shipment discovered in a truck that Turkey seized on its border with Syria in February. Turkey announced last year that it was imposing an arms embargo on Syria.

Diplomats told Reuters that the panel's draft report may be changed by the Security Council's Iran sanctions committee before it is submitted to the council itself for consideration.

It was unclear how long it would take the committee to pass the report to the Security Council. Last year's expert panel report on Iran was never made public because Russia blocked its publication.


CIRCUMVENT SANCTIONS

The report also discusses Iran's attempts to circumvent sanctions on its nuclear program but notes that the four rounds of punitive measures the 15-nation Security Council imposed on Iran between 2006 and 2010 are having an impact.

"Sanctions are slowing Iran's procurement of some critical items required for its prohibited nuclear program," it said. "At the same time prohibited activities continue, including uranium enrichment."

Among the items Iran has attempted to procure for its nuclear program, the panel said, were nuclear-grade graphite, high-strength aluminum, aluminum, powder, specialized alloys, maraging steel, carbon fiber, magnets, vacuum pumps, turbines, electrical switchboards and helium gas detectors.

"The Panel identifies the acquisition of high-grade carbon fiber as one of a number of critical items Iran requires for the development of more advanced centrifuges," the report said, adding that nations should be on alert for illicit attempts to acquire such items.

Iran rejects allegations by Western nations and their allies that it is secretly developing the capability to produce nuclear weapons. It has refused to suspend its enrichment program as demanded by the Security Council despite being hit with increasingly draconian U.N. and various national sanctions.

The report said Iran has been trying to circumvent U.N. and other unilateral sanctions on financial firms by using correspondence banking relationships with institutions not under sanctions, and appears to be relying on Iranians abroad to carry out such transfers. Transfer traffic has risen sharply, it said.

The panel said it had received information about a small firm set up abroad by an Iranian national that was involved in funds transfers to various recipients worldwide. The firm, which the report did not identify, had processed transfers amounting to some $11 billion over an 18-month period, it said.

The report discussed at length the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines, known as IRISL. While IRISL itself is not formally under U.N. sanctions, three of its subsidiaries are, and the council has warned U.N. member states to be vigilant regarding potential sanctions violations by IRISL.

The panel report said that Irano Hind Shipping Company, one of the IRISL subsidiaries subject to sanctions, continues to operate vessels. IRISL is a difficult company to monitor because it is constantly changing the ownership, names and national flags of its ships, the report said.

The panel said that IRISL, as Reuters has previously reported, has set up what appear to be front companies intended to operate vessels and obscure its ownership. Currently IRISL's more than 130 ships are owned by some 75 different companies, which the panel said was unusual for a major shipping line.

IRISL and its related companies have also been changing the names of their ships to get the word "Iran" out of them.

Before the council passed resolution 1803 in March 2008, which warned all U.N. member states to be "vigilant" about IRISL, most of its vessels' names contained the word "Iran." Now fewer than 10 do, the panel said.

Since March 2008, IRISL and its related companies have carried out more than 220 changes in ownership of vessels, the report said.

Turning to Iran's ballistic missile program, the report said it "continues to develop with additional launches, which are prohibited under resolution 1929," adopted in June 2010.

"The Panel takes note of the recent designations (U.N. Security Council blacklisting) ... of two (North Korean) entities and their links to Iran's ballistic missile program."

The two North Korean companies linked to Iran's missile program are the Green Pine Associated Corp and the Korea Heungjin Trading Company. The council's North Korea sanctions committee blacklisted them on May 2. (Editing by Mohammad Zargham and Will Dunham)

FOLLOW WORLD

By Louis Charbonneau UNITED NATIONS, May 16 (Reuters) - Syria remains the top destination for Iranian arms shipments in violation of a U.N. Security Council ban on weapons exports by ...
By Louis Charbonneau UNITED NATIONS, May 16 (Reuters) - Syria remains the top destination for Iranian arms shipments in violation of a U.N. Security Council ban on weapons exports by ...
Filed by Clare Richardson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 126
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nelson rivera
Disabled US Veteran hopes we can work together
06:21 PM on 05/19/2012
It appears Iran would like to have Nuclear Weapons because Israel has some. Plus Iran is helping it's Ally Syria, so Assad he can stay in Power. A Machine Gun is louder than Words.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NorthernBorder
02:31 PM on 05/17/2012
When the Syrian export arms - they really mean it!!!!! ( or arms and legs from Iran)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thebosssssny
12:30 PM on 05/17/2012
Interesting that the UN sees every shipment to the Syrian government, but somehow they don't see any shipments at all going to Hezbalah or to Hamas. How did Hezbalah suddenly get thousands of rockets that they claim can hit Tel Aviv. I thought there are UN observers there.

I can see it now, they are observing all the shipments to Hezbalah and since their such nice people they are even helping them carry the stuff. What a joke this UN is
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NorthernBorder
02:40 PM on 05/17/2012
The un cant go to where the stores are - the strange story is how did they get them through the border which was a very specific agreement in the treaty and the UN were meant to be at the crossing. I know there are a number of crossings and I guess with all our drone watching they peferred to drink tax free whisky and hashish for free.
My own little theory for destroying the 60000 rockets would be to quick artillery or bomb the stores. The secondary blasts would be catastrophical to the Lebanese and we will again be called villains - on the other hand we have been called everything anyway so what the hell. Just remember NorthenBorder if 60000 rockets fall on his head.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nelson rivera
Disabled US Veteran hopes we can work together
06:28 PM on 05/19/2012
Don't Worry the US and Israel see Everything. Only on a Need to Know Basis. Israel is Ready for Any Attack.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NorthernBorder
12:17 AM on 05/20/2012
I am sure - but best laid plans go awry - i am pro getting rid of damacles sword but i be very scared. Sometimes reminds me of past wars when I looked at my friends and wondered who wont be here tomorrow
screwitall
excellence
11:13 AM on 05/17/2012
Iran violates a UN rule, as it sells arms to Syria.I wonder why the US got off scott free for selling arms to Bahrain.a country that is widely known for human rights violations.
09:56 AM on 05/17/2012
Guess we better get ready to invade both countries. Maybe that is why a NY Senator wants to put women on the front lines. Too many of her kind are avoiding the military.
photo
BruceMar
God bless the IDF
09:08 AM on 05/17/2012
I guess Israel's concerns regarding Iran and Syria are not paranoia. It seems to me Syria is cruising for another bruising from the IAF.
09:07 AM on 05/17/2012
the un is the parent with the unruly kids running around the restaurant saying now johnny and jane you have to sit down--while doing nothing---------------all talk zero action playing kissy face with every third rate dictator all around the world
Chrismoo3
Interesting, though elementary
08:54 AM on 05/17/2012
Oh my, oh my. I never thought they would do such a thing. They gave their word. . .they promised.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
08:00 AM on 05/17/2012
As we move towards the "Arab Summer" why don't we try something new: Let the opposing factions in Arab nations fight their own civil wars without US aid or intervention? We have plenty of things that need doing here at home and if we have learned anything in the past two decades it is that Middle Eastern intervention costs us billions of dollars but more importantly the lives of our best and brightest for no positive return. Let the UN deal with the task it was established to perform or disband.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
07:56 AM on 05/17/2012
Nasty nations ignoring the UN? Say it ain't so!
photo
sr25fullauto
Go get your own opinion if u don't like mine!
07:53 AM on 05/17/2012
Just one question.....how many AMERICAN made weapons are in Syria right now?
09:58 AM on 05/17/2012
Probably none. But even the American government now uses lots of European made weapons. Most Amerian made weapons are a lower grade made for civilian use. Most of the weapons in Syria and Iran are probably Russian made since Russia still does business with both countries, and old Soviet weapons are in abundant supply in that are of the world.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NorthernBorder
02:50 PM on 05/17/2012
Oops Klachnikov was JEWISH
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NorthernBorder
02:47 PM on 05/17/2012
Not very mny at all if not none - but I PRAY we are helping the revolutioaries - just to save life - our ulimate reason for existance HAI

( in 73 war we found trucks from Russia with heating that couldnt be switched off and drivers chained to the steering wheels)( Syrian army cigarettes have to be smoked parallel to the ground - if it point down the tobacco used to fall out. Hope they got over that part of devlopment)
05:49 AM on 05/17/2012
Violations & Non-Violations -
Iran is accused of violating a UN ban by continuing to supply the Syrian forces with weapons, but the Western and other arab countries that are supplying weapons to the Syrian rebels, somehow are not violating any UN ban?

-http://www.prisonplanet.com/us-officially-arming-extremists-in-syria.html
07:19 AM on 05/17/2012
You have to love the hypocrisy!
09:59 AM on 05/17/2012
Not at all. Iran is banned from distributing weapons as part of the financial sanctions placed on them by the UN. No such ban on supplying rebel insurgents exists.
03:09 PM on 05/17/2012
So one side can get weapons, but the other side can't. And isn't it the same countries that are funding and arming the Syrian rebels, who sponsored the UN ban on Iranian weapons exports? And so, Syrian forces must not get any weapons from Iran, because of a UN ban sponsored by the very same countries, that are threatening Syria and Iran, and arming rebels in both Syria and Iran?
And let us not forget that the US routinely ignores or vetoes UN resolutions, it doesn't like, while insisting that others respect each and every UN resolution?

- http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=29080
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:25 AM on 05/17/2012
Banned by a stroke of Barack Obama’s pen.
In a move unprecedented in American history, the Obama Administration quietly banned the re-importation of nearly 600,000 American made M1 Carbine rifles.
That includes 950,000 M1 Garands, 1.2 million M1 Carbines, and 300,000 1911 Pistols.
And according to Hillary Clinton’s State Department there is a danger they might “fall into the wrong hands.”
That they might, possibly, one day be used in a crime.
10:02 AM on 05/17/2012
I find this comment very interesting, but I am doubting the reality of it. From where were they supposed to be reimported ? Where have they been ? Why were they there ? And why would anyone have that many WWII era American weapons ?
04:50 AM on 05/17/2012
And this is Kosher?:

Syrian rebels battling the regime of President Bashar al-Assad have begun receiving significantly more and better weapons in recent weeks, an effort paid for by Persian Gulf nations and coordinated in part by the United States, according to opposition activists and U.S. and foreign officials.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/syrian-rebels-get-influx-of-arms-with-gulf-neighbors-money-us-coordination/2012/05/15/gIQAds2TSU_story.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
wizeanne
wizeanne
05:15 AM on 05/17/2012
Reminds me of the billion spent to support, train and arm thse "rebel freedom fighting protesters" in Libya...where known mercenaries were involved in that coup. Known facts Saddam Hussein in Iraq, no WMD, and neither did Quadaffi in Libya, did not support Al Queda terrorists groups. There demise, other than their OIL, was because Saddam and Quadaffi were going to start accepting another currency, NOT the dollar, as payment for their OIL. That was unacceptable, for it would devalue the "dollar," which is the recognized world currency.
10:11 AM on 05/17/2012
This comment is so fraught with inaccuracies it is hard to know where to begin. First off, America did not arm or train Libyan rebels. Other European nations did(mainly France), but America did not. The French had already begun aiding them before we even voted on it, so there was no need for us to. Of coarse there were mercenaries in Libya, Gadhafi has long supported and housed mercenaries and terrorists, so why would they not be there when he is overthrown. They're mercenaries, they'll work for whoever pays them, including the new incoming regime.
10:13 AM on 05/17/2012
In addition, Hussein was trying to obtain nuclear weapons. Had been since the 80's when that Pakistani guy Kahn was selling nuclear knowlege and manufacturing technology to Iraq, Iran, Libya, North Korea, and India. Moreover, Hussein did have and did use bio-chemical weapons. He used them in the first Gulf War, so it is a known fact that he had them. You may not consider bio-chemical weapons WMD's, but they are just as lethal and dangerous as nukes, just without the sheer destructive power.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
wizeanne
wizeanne
05:44 AM on 05/17/2012
Same game...different country....whose next? http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/index.html
04:46 AM on 05/17/2012
|r@n gets slapped for selling arms to the govt. of $yria while the Petr0-D0llar M0narchies, with a nod from the U$, are shipping weapons to the rebels to spread democracy....

Welcome to the Twilight Zone