iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Lead Poisoning Threshold Lowered By CDC, Five Times More Children Now Considered At Risk

Posted:

Lead Paint

The number of children considered at risk of lead poisoning jumped by more than five-fold on Wednesday, as the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention lowered its threshold for the diagnosis.

Children's health advocates applauded the decision, but also expressed concern that recent congressional budget cuts will drastically limit funds that could help affected kids and prevent further poisoning.

"It's a sad irony," said Ruth Ann Norton, executive director of the nonprofit Coalition to End Childhood Lead Poisoning.

In January, a CDC advisory panel recommended that the threshold at which a child is deemed to have lead poisoning should be cut in half, from 10 micrograms per deciliter of blood to 5. By accepting the panel's recommendation, the CDC now effectively increases the number of children under age 6 with elevated blood lead levels from approximately 77,000 to 442,000.

Rather than a doctor telling parents that their child's blood lead test "came back negative" when, say, the result is 7 micrograms, now those parents will be armed with information that might help them monitor and reduce further exposures.

Among Norton's recommendations: removing old leaded windows, repairing paint that is chipping or peeling, using a HEPA vacuum and keeping kids' hands washed.

"We are dealing much more frankly with parents about the threats that lead poses to their children," she said. "For generations we've allowed families to think their children were safe, while in fact they were being impaired by lead."

Experts emphasize that the new level remains more or less arbitrary. "There is no safe level," said Dr. Philip Landrigan, chairman of the department of preventative medicine at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York City. "Lead is toxic to the developing brain at low levels. Prenatal exposure causes brain damage. Exposure to an infant or toddler causes brain damage."

"But none of us is pushing for a zero standard," he added. "That's just not doable. There's too much lead in today's world."

An estimated 38 million homes in the U.S. still have lead-based paint, according to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

The main source of children's lead exposure remains the flakes and dust generated by lead-based paint, which can settle on everything from windowsills to toys. Young children who spend a lot of time crawling on the ground and putting things in their mouths are particularly prone to exposure. The effects can turn up years later in the form of behavior problems, lower IQ, even heart and reproductive problems.

Lead-removal programs have made significant progress in recent years, but as The Huffington Post reported in March, funds for the CDC's Lead Poisoning Prevention Program have been cut by 93 percent -- down to $2 million this year from $29.2 million last year. The money is primarily funneled to state health departments for childhood screening, education programs and data collection. Another large chunk of money for lead poisoning prevention comes from HUD, but its support for cities, counties and states to get lead hazards out of homes has also decreased in recent years. Further, HUD-supported work often relies on data from CDC programs.

In Wednesday's response to the advisory committee, the CDC expressed its concern about the dearth of resources in the face of an inflated case load. "These reductions limit CDC's ability to fully implement many of these recommendations in the short term," the statement said.

The consequences go beyond children. In 2008, lead poisoning cost society an estimated $50.9 billion. And according to the U.S. Economic Policy institute, each dollar invested in lead paint hazard control results in a return of $17 to $221.

Rebecca Morley, executive director of the National Center for Healthy Housing, pointed to ominous new studies on academic achievement. She said third-grade test scores, which are highly correlated with high-school drop out rates, were significantly lower among children exposed to lead -- even at blood levels as low as 3 or 4 micrograms per deciliter.

"We're really putting ourselves at a disadvantage nationally in terms of education and crime," Morley said.

"The brains of today's children are the security of the nation a generation from now," Landrigan added. "There are high stakes here."

FOLLOW GREEN

 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:31 PM on 06/09/2012
Where is the scientific evidence, based on well conducted experiments/studies, that proves that the amount of lead in the blood stream is correlated with clinical pathology of any kind? I mean actual cases of persons sickened due to lead in their blood. A statement such as "There is no safe level" is clearly absurd. We need to determine the level at which provable harmful effects set in. Till we have that information, we have no useful knowledge to act at all.
09:43 AM on 05/23/2012
I think about what little accountability they have in this area. If they were to have a release by air or soil all kinds of Hazmat teams would be called in. But when an employee is unknowing bring home dust whether by clothing or their cars nothing is done. My employment ended with this company in 2005. That year my youngest son was hospitalized a total of 6 times. My Plant Manager sat in my office and told me "My Mommy sh@@ wasn't cutting it and he wanted me to resign”. The first offer of my severance package requested I sign away not only my rights but my children's rights. How many people out there have had their children's rights included with their employment? Of course I didn't sign them and the second copy was required to have only ME the employee. My experience has taught me firsthand what they have offered. Force them to do the right thing with workplace safety and exposing children to lead poisoning. My 14 yr. old has the education level of a third grader with 11 years of special education. How many more children out there are struggling with the effects of lead poisoning?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dockelly1954
10:34 PM on 05/21/2012
The threshold been lowered so we can import more Chinese Junk.
10:42 AM on 05/21/2012
There are options for parents with children to protect them from the ill-effects of lead poisoning. Doctors and parents should insist on getting their children's blood tested for lead -- especially if they live in older neighborhoods. Lead can be in paint dust, soil and from chipping paint on neighbor's houses. Know your child's blood lead level. LockUpLead is a lead neutralizer that can be used SAFELY around the home to detoxify lead dust on contact. LockUpLead has been proven from independent studies to decrease the lead's ability to be absorbed by over 80% into the body. By simply spraying it on, the lead is converted into a non-soluble substance that, if accidently enters the body, will pass through without harming the child. Visit www.lockuplead.com for more information.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roadrun
In Financial Theocracy we Trust
06:59 AM on 05/20/2012
This serious problem went ignored until congress finally proved just how bad lead poisoning can become in lieu of controls.

The bad part is that we still have to put up with them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Howes
Video Online Training
11:22 AM on 05/17/2012
Get the Lead Out what makes a room HOT with lead take a packet of sugar one grain of sugar will make the hole room bad for a little kid or a older person. You can look at history people use to drink wine out of lead cups, that group is no where to be found. We need to ask about the soil for produce growen leaded gas use still today produce up takes and that is why they are so red. Lead in Paint makes the paint very strong stops mold so it is doing it's job. Our housing stock is old in older parts of towns, we need to have every house checked this would take time a way to do this is when a mom is expecting a child someone goes to the house and check if the place has lead in the paint this needs to be taken care of. To understand more people need education training understand there are standards safety & wellbeing how to clean up be able to make a house bad to you can live in. I could go on, I have best methods to work in this industry Yes skilled labor force needs training for the solution with proper knowledge abilities this old house can be a nice place. I have lead awareness class so you can start to understand the problem there are local laws you need to go by. Video Online Training www.isoclasses.com I can help
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
June25
10:38 AM on 05/17/2012
.Do we really need a government regulations to tell us that when renovating homes built before 1978 to replace the old paint and windows with new paint and windows.It may take anouther 50 years to get rid of all the lead but as long as we limit new exposure we will eventually succede.
photo
Iatros78
Science is the consensus of expert opinion
12:01 PM on 05/17/2012
If it weren't for government regulations, paint and windows would still be made with lead.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
01:45 PM on 05/18/2012
In the United States. If we followed Sweden's lead, our kids would have been becoming lead free decades ago. And that is true with all toxins. But it is profit first in Amerika. It's more cost effective to sell and release poisons in the air, water and land and make money while waiting for sickness and death to appear and then bring in the lawyers to lie, delay and obstruct. That's the Amerikan plutocratic way.
01:10 PM on 05/17/2012
Yes. Waiting 50 more years is not an option.
10:18 AM on 05/17/2012
Why did they decide to make this change at this time? Is there some kind of new evidence or something?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
01:48 PM on 05/18/2012
Yes. Increased Illness and deaths from lead poisoning at a tremendous cost to the healthcare system, costing you and I.
10:18 PM on 05/18/2012
Ok. Where can I find the new studies indicating that we need to lower the threshold for the diagnosis of lead poisoning in children? Of course we want to eliminate all the lead that we can from children's environments, but why was this an acceptable level for 40 years and suddenly it isn't acceptable any longer? Where can I find the new scientific study indicating that we need to change this and why we need to change this? There's just too much left out of this article. Does this information even exist?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roadrun
In Financial Theocracy we Trust
07:01 AM on 05/20/2012
The T-party
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Davidc Smith
Montani Sempre Liberi
10:14 AM on 05/17/2012
Eating lead and Mercury is very very good for you--just ask Mitt Romney!!! Eating heavy metals--particularly gold--made him the man he is today--but as old Mitt won't share his golden breakfast of Champions--then the rest of us are stuck with whatever else may end up in the water.
09:37 AM on 05/17/2012
I would say, blame the reign of leaded gasoline.

I don't know if there is -NO- safe level though. EPA drinking water standard is in the ppb (I think) This is like 50ppm. That's rather high if you ask me. I certainly wouldn't want to have that high of a concentration in my blood.

Also, for that guy to say it's just not doable is rather silly. All you can do in these sorts of situations is deal with it on a case by case basis. I mean hell, Asbestos siding is suppose to be illegal now, you can still find it if you look hard enough.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sister777
Make Corporations Pay
08:52 AM on 05/17/2012
Lead poisoning makes children mean (bullying) and mercury poisoning makes you really depressed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Milks
Ecologist
07:08 AM on 05/17/2012
This is the heart of the issue:

'Experts emphasize that the new level remains more or less arbitrary. "There is no safe level," said Dr. Philip Landrigan, chairman of the department of preventative medicine at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York City. "Lead is toxic to the developing brain at low levels. Prenatal exposure causes brain damage. Exposure to an infant or toddler causes brain damage. But none of us is pushing for a zero standard," he added. "That's just not doable. There's too much lead in today's world."'

Translation: The only safe lead level is zero but we've polluted our environment to such an extent that everyone is contaminated. Wonderful.
photo
Conspiracy2Riot
Go ahead, try and eat that fiat currency
02:21 AM on 05/17/2012
see? we can solve any problem out there. american exceptionalism at it's finest.
12:32 AM on 05/17/2012
What good will this do? Lead can be removed from the body! But oh, let us continue putting fluoride in the toothpaste - water supplies - and food... especially that fluoride being shipped in from China and dumped into American community water supplies... Yes, especially when the American people PAY for dumping the toxic fluoride trash of China' aluminum industry processes ....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smoker
Qué Será, Será
10:40 PM on 05/16/2012
What I want to know is why did CDC lower the threshold and not about their whining of the decrease in the budget. When you vote for the GOP/TP, you have that coming.

Poorly written/copied article, Hu-Po.
photo
abbienormal
What hump?
08:55 PM on 05/19/2012
Here you go:

http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/

Or you can wait for the report to be published in the journal "Pediatrics" in the next few months.