iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Poverty: Salvation Army Report Concludes Americans Don't Have Accurate Picture Of Poverty

Posted: Updated: 05/16/2012 2:37 pm

Perceptions Of Poverty

By Mark Hrywna, The NonProfit Times

Americans don’t quite have an accurate picture of what poverty in the United States looks like, at least according to a new survey.

Released today, “Perceptions of Poverty: The Salvation Army’s Report to America” surveyed more than 1,000 Americans online in February. The survey had a margin of error of +/- 3.1 percent.

The perception by Americans of how much annual income makes a family “poor” is roughly 25 percent less than the actual federal poverty level. On average, Americans believe the annual income that makes a family “poor” is approximately $18,472 – almost $4,600 less than the federal poverty level for a family of four, which is $23,050.

Overall, Americans believe that 34 percent of the population is living in poverty. The level varies with income, with the belief that 40 percent of those earning less than $25,000 annually, compared to 37 percent among those earning $25,000 to $50,000 and about 27 percent among those earning more than $50,000. In reality, about 16 percent of Americans are living in poverty, or roughly 49 million people, according to The Salvation Army.

About two of every five Americans reported having received assistance from a charitable group, including food from food banks or financial assistance/housing support. Individuals who currently have lower household incomes are much more likely to have needed assistance, with 63 percent of Americans earning less than $25,000 having received assistance. Among Americans ages 35-54, nearly half said they received assistance at some point in their lifetime.

About one in eight Americans reported having spent a night in a shelter or on the street due to a loss of housing. Those who currently have lower household incomes are much more likely to have experienced a lack of shelter: About a quarter of Americans who earn less than $25,000 annually reported sleeping in a shelter or on the street. The number dropped to 6 percent among those earning at least $50,000 annually.

About 59 percent of Americans reported donating to charity last year and the prevalence of donating to charity increases with income: 70 percent of those who earn more than $50,000 a year reported donating. Even 46 percent of those earning less than $25,000 reported donating to charity.

Of those making contributions, a quarter of said they gave less than $50 and another quarter reported giving more than $500. About one in five said they gave anywhere from $300 to $500.

The vast majority of Americans across all age groups – almost nine out of 10 surveyed – believe people in poverty deserve help.

Almost half agreed that “a good work ethic is all you need to escape poverty,” while 47 percent believe if poor people received more assistance, they would take advantage of it.

Others were less forgiving. About 43 percent agreed that if poor people want a job, they could always find a job, while 27 percent said people are poor because they are lazy and 29 percent said they usually have lower moral values.

Almost three out of five people surveyed said poverty is a trap some people just can’t escape no matter how hard they try while more than half believes it’s not possible to eliminate poverty in our society. About a third said there is “really nothing much I can do to help poor people.”

This story originally appeared in The NonProfit Times.

Flickr photo by Trowbridge Estate.

FOLLOW IMPACT

By Mark Hrywna, The NonProfit Times Americans don’t quite have an accurate picture of what poverty in the United States looks like, at least according to a new survey. Released today, “Perce...
By Mark Hrywna, The NonProfit Times Americans don’t quite have an accurate picture of what poverty in the United States looks like, at least according to a new survey. Released today, “Perce...
Filed by Emily Heinz  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:15 AM on 06/05/2012
Frankly, I'm surprised more people are not homeless in the U.S. It doesn't seem too rational to me that people spend more than 30% of their income on shelter, yet that is what many do to avoid homelessness at the expense of future savings, assuming their income is going to a rental. And the housing bubble has also shown even ownership is not without risk as well, especially given it's a leveraged asset.

Income volatility has risen dramatically over the last few decades, and it seems to be a point of pride in conservative ideology. Perhaps job volatility helps the overall economic picture in keeping costs down, but the consequence on an individual basis is that lifetime incomes are less than a person is projecting based on current income. Age-related declines in employability and income are also not properly being factored in by most people, all of which causes inadequate levels of personal savings before people take a risk on overspending on shelter.

Better to go homeless when a person is younger and can tolerate it and the saved money has more significance, than when they are older.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plaidsportcoat
04:37 PM on 05/28/2012
Just because one was born here doesn't mean one is required to love Americans and their ideas.
photo
PrisonReformMvt
America Home of the Free, Land of the Incarcerated
11:41 AM on 05/26/2012
There should be NO homeless in the United States...period.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sajwert
03:29 PM on 05/19/2012
over 50-70 years ago, the city I live in had many factories operating day and night. Granted, many of the jobs were hard and certainly boring for many, and the pay was not as good as it could have been for the work turned out. But there were jobs and people managed to support their families and most of their kids got at least a high school education and some of them went on to college.

Now, the factories are gone, the jobs pay minimum wage, do not work a person 40 hours a week therefore not having to give any benefits. Rents are extremely high, food is going up, free lunch and even breakfast is now a staple in the schools, we have 4+ food kitchens and several shelters.

Tell me all about how easy it is for the poor to get jobs and get out of poverty. I'm listening.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bgofca
05:08 PM on 05/18/2012
1/4 of all children live below the poverty level. a large percentage of college kids are hungry because they cannot afford a place to stay, rising tuitions and food.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plaidsportcoat
04:38 PM on 05/28/2012
Americans say:
They must not have any work ethic. It's all their fault.

I wonder how many young people were interviewed in this survey - zero percent, perhaps?
05:02 PM on 05/18/2012
Here in Tallahassee a living wage for a single person just to be able to supply enough to sustain them in a moderate apartment with no luxuries is $15.51 an hour. That is 93 hours of work at minimum wage. I know people that are working and have no choice but to live in the shelter here as they can not afford an apartment. Most of the homeless I know have some sort of income and yet can not afford a low rent apartment. Homeless vets getting a military pension can not afford an apartment. We are not lazy, there is just no affordable housing for us because we at the bottom of the socio-economic ladder.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plaidsportcoat
04:42 PM on 05/28/2012
The only answer will soon be violence unless someone comes up with a novel non-violent way for people to get more of the resources AWAY FROM THE POWERFUL.
Hopefully younger people won't be as brainwashed to think you can make it with a work ethic alone. And hopefully they won't continue to pretend that the term "work ethic" isn't a moralizing euphemism for GREED GREED GREED
09:16 AM on 05/18/2012
We have no one to blame except OURSELVES. We the People gave our own decent paying jobs away by buying Imported products. When is the last time you looked at the label on the toothpaste you buy to see where it is made? Some of the top brands of toothpaste are now made in Mexico, yet you continue to buy them___when there are other brands still made inside the USA.
photo
Lifeisdone
"Chickens are decent people"
11:42 PM on 05/21/2012
Please name some brands of household products made in the U.S. I have yet to come across them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stanley Bonk
"mad, bad, and dangerous to know"
08:54 AM on 05/18/2012
I'm hearing a lot of uncharitable and unthinking opinions here. One of them is that a job is always the answer. It often isn't. Explain to me how an unwed mother on welfare who gets a monthly rent subsidy, food stamps for her and her child, and qualifies for extra assistance for her child in school, can possibly get off the public dole? The instant she gets a minimum wage job, earning say $150 a week after taxes, and that costs her say, $20 dollars a week in gas money to get to the job, an initial outlay of $60 or so go buy a uniform, $5 a day to get a hot dog for lunch, and Jesus knows what other expenses, to say nothing of now needing daycare for her child, only to go home at the end of the day with her first paycheck to find out that her housing allowance is now gone, the food stamps are no longer coming, and her child no longer qualifies for school assistance?

There's a problem there, all right, but I don't think it's a problem the woman can solve by being more industrious. For we as a society to look down our noses at her and accuse her of simple sloth is the same kind of semi-institutionalised sadism often seen in the way municipalities treat the homeless.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plaidsportcoat
04:44 PM on 05/28/2012
I pay $80 a week to get to work, so let's be realistic. On the west coast, gas is 4.25 a gallon and has been for --- years.
Rubberfish
Who needs a stinkin' micro-bio
10:06 PM on 05/17/2012
I'm from Germany, and the thing that strikes me most about poverty in the US is that some families have been living on public assistance for decades. People don't even seem to look for jobs, even if there are jobs that don't require any special skills. When you ask people why they're not working they'll say because those jobs don't pay much, but what did they expect? I sometimes wonder if it wouldn't be better if welfare benefits would only be paid for a few years, not decades.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bgofca
05:10 PM on 05/18/2012
if there were jobs so they could get off of welfare (that means a living wage, not minimum wage.)
09:46 PM on 05/19/2012
Sorry - not true. I have 20 years of experience and couldn't find a job at minimum wage or a job paying me anything else. There are several reasons why.
1) Over experienced and they knew I would probably leave someday (be it death or eventually after the recession a job paying me above $9 an hour.)

2) I walk with a cane. I have D cups and yet the first thing they saw was my cane not even my freaking boobs :/

3) I've over the age of 25 - too old.
Rubberfish
Who needs a stinkin' micro-bio
11:16 PM on 05/19/2012
I'm over 35, over 300 lbs, and don't even ask me the size of my cups! But I've never had trouble finding a job. I think flexibility is the key here; sometimes you'll have to look outside the box, outside the field you're trained in. I started out in engineering, and since I've come to the US I've done all sorts of jobs I've never thought I'd do, like security, nurse's assistant, driving a school bus or an armored truck. Currently I'm working for my kids' elementary school, which is a great place to start working again after having stayed home with children. Although I've started at the bottom of the ladder with subbing jobs, I've just been asked to work as a paraeducator, and who knows, maybe I'll actually teach one day. You just have to keep an open mind and not let anything -like your cane- stand in the way.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:39 PM on 05/17/2012
It is not so clear to me that the government has done such a great job in helping people who are poor. What I have seen is a growing dependency on the "dole" and a huge loss of self-respect. I think private organizations -- churches, synagogues, community self-help groups and the like -- can do a far superior job of getting the resources to where they are needed the most. Further, here in the United States, I don't see why anyone should be homeless, even in this Great Recession. Don't talk to me about the "1%" either; it only takes about $346,000 annual income to join that group. Further -- and I wish Obama, "The Great Divider" could hear this -- you don't make the poor rich by making the rich poor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plaidsportcoat
04:48 PM on 05/28/2012
You are so misinformed if you think private organizations are anywhere NEAR un-greedy enough to spend what it takes to help even those homeless people with the Holier-Than-Thou Moralists' Seal Of Approval. Do the math.
photo
IrieMoon
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
03:05 PM on 05/17/2012
It is astounding that in this day and age we still have people who think that the poor can just go find a job and their problems will just dissolve.
Or the ones who think people are poor because they're lazy or have "lower moral values".

What do you want to bet that most of the people who think that way call themselves "Christians"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
susanbsbi
Slave to 3 cats
10:17 AM on 05/17/2012
There is still a problem of the under privileged in America. We all need to stop the congress from making it worse, especially with the children, who need a break in their life.

Every one of us needs to tell our congress person, to stop building up the defense budget for war, and taking it from the programs that help the children and each one of us some day in our life. As we are not promised a tomorrow, and we never know when we might lose our jobs, get a serious illness or a death, that can tear up the money you have saved and you find you can't put food on the table for you children, your parents or grandparents.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:18 PM on 05/17/2012
If we take away the defense budget how do you think the freedoms we have will remain? Children today are not getting the social skills nor the problem skills they need to effectively run our country. So no amount of money will make this happen, we need to start at home. And yes, I do support my military because with out my time in the service I would have been one of those children. My time made me a better person, a mature adult. No war is not the answer to everything but we still need a military to protect us as needed or say good bye to the freedoms we have.
12:27 AM on 05/18/2012
"We need a military to protect us" is a far cry from justifying "we need the single most expensive military in human history to maintain a presence in every corner of the planet."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plaidsportcoat
04:50 PM on 05/28/2012
STILL A PROBLEM is an understatement. You have only to talk to most economists to realize that ALL Americans below the top few percent have LOST INCOME POWER starting with REAGAN. It's been a problem since Americans dumbed themselves down in the schooling and thinking department and started electing rich people surrogates who worship GREED.
08:29 PM on 05/16/2012
As for "helping" people for the short term when they need it because of events beyond their control, I agree with that 100% and it is the right thing to do. However, I know people, not disabled, who have been in subsidized housing for over 20 years. Other people, also not disabled, who have been on food stamps for over 20 years. That is not the taxpayers "helping" them. That is them "screwing" the taxpayers. Somebody has to have brains enough to know the difference.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MeinNH
Ooooo Silly Me
09:08 AM on 05/17/2012
Give it a break...you are one of the people they are talking about for crying out loud!
lofttypeofaview
I pledge allegiance to the poor!
04:39 PM on 05/17/2012
The problem with the poor that aren't disabled yet have to collect government benefits for decades, is that they are just breaking even. There is no surplus left to use/save to improve their situation after their bills are paid. It is sort of like that statement "Give a man a fish, feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and he'll eat for life". However if that man isn't anywhere fish are and can't afford to relocate or he needs a fishing license but doesn't have the money for it and/or transportation to go to where he needs to buy it, then he can't fish; even if he was taught how.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kolbpilot
07:34 PM on 05/16/2012
A friend of mine once made the statement that everybody pleads poverty, claiming they have no money. Maybe so. But I am living in poverty at the moment yet I'm lucky enough to be living in my house. Thank goodness for a low mortgage payment. Yet there is very little money left over, food, gasoline, all the rest a concern. To me people in poverty are for the most part, invisible from the rest of society, for by all outward appearances, everything looks normal. One can dress quite nicely cheaply. But if they only knew.....l
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:13 PM on 05/17/2012
the diference between being broke & being poor - one is temporary the other is not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kolbpilot
08:24 AM on 05/24/2012
Not these days.