iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

White House Conference Call On 'Underwear Bomb' Plot May Have Disclosed Covert Operation

Reuters  |  Posted:


* Obama adviser touted "inside control" of bomb plot

* Leaks forced shutdown of operation

By Mark Hosenball

WASHINGTON, May 18 (Reuters) - White House efforts to soft-pedal the danger from a new "underwear bomb" plot emanating from Yemen may have inadvertently broken the news they needed most to contain.

At about 5:45 p.m. EDT on Monday, May 7, just before the evening newscasts, John Brennan, President Barack Obama's top White House adviser on counter-terrorism, held a small, private teleconference to brief former counter-terrorism advisers who have become frequent commentators on TV news shows.

According to five people familiar with the call, Brennan stressed that the plot was never a threat to the U.S. public or air safety because Washington had "inside control" over it.

Brennan's comment appears unintentionally to have helped lead to disclosure of the secret at the heart of a joint U.S.-British-Saudi undercover counter-terrorism operation.

A few minutes after Brennan's teleconference, on ABC's World News Tonight, Richard Clarke, former chief of counter-terrorism in the Clinton White House and a participant on the Brennan call, said the underwear bomb plot "never came close because they had insider information, insider control."

A few hours later, Clarke, who is a regular consultant to the network, concluded on ABC's Nightline that there was a Western spy or double-agent in on the plot: "The U.S. government is saying it never came close because they had insider information, insider control, which implies that they had somebody on the inside who wasn't going to let it happen."


DOUBLE AGENT

The next day's headlines were filled with news of a U.S. spy planted inside Yemen-based Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), who had acquired the latest, non-metallic model of the underwear bomb and handed it over to U.S. authorities.

At stake was an operation that could not have been more sensitive - the successful penetration by Western spies of AQAP, al Qaeda's most creative and lethal affiliate. As a result of leaks, the undercover operation had to be shut down.

The initial story of the foiling of an underwear-bomb plot was broken by the Associated Press.

According to National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor, due to its sensitivity, the AP initially agreed to a White House request to delay publication of the story for several days.

But according to three government officials, a final deal on timing of publication fell apart over the AP's insistence that no U.S. official would respond to the story for one clear hour after its release.

When the administration rejected that demand as "untenable," two officials said, the AP said it was going public with the story. At that point, Brennan was immediately called out of a meeting to take charge of damage control.

Relevant agencies were instructed to prepare public statements and urged to notify Congressional oversight panels. Brennan then started the teleconference with potential TV commentators.

White House officials and others on the call insist that Brennan disclosed no classified information during that conference call and chose his words carefully to avoid doing so.

The AP denies any quid pro quo was requested by them or rejected by the White House. "At no point did AP offer or propose a deal with regard to this story," said AP spokesman Paul Colford.

As for his appearance on ABC, Richard Clarke acknowledges he made a logical "leap" when he said that "inside control" meant "there was human inside control rather than anything else I could imagine." But he adds that over the course of a week, ABC "took extraordinary measures ... to make sure" that nothing it was planning to broadcast would damage ongoing counter-terrorism operations.


PREMATURE SHUTDOWN

As a result of the news leaks, however, U.S. and allied officials told Reuters that they were forced to end an operation which they hoped could have continued for weeks or longer.

Several days after the first leaks, counter-terrorism sources confirmed to Reuters that a central role in the operation had been played by MI-5 and MI-6, Britain's ultra-secretive domestic and foreign intelligence services, whose relationship with their American counterparts has been periodically strained by concern about leaks.

These sources acknowledged that British authorities were deeply distressed that anything at all had leaked out about the operation.

The White House places the blame squarely on AP, calling the claim that Brennan contributed to a leak "ridiculous."

"It is well known that we use a range of intelligence capabilities to penetrate and monitor terrorist groups," according to an official statement from the White House national security staff.

"None of these sources or methods was disclosed by this statement. The egregious leak here was to the Associated Press. The White House fought to prevent this information from being reported and ultimately worked to delay its publication for operational security reasons. No one is more upset than us about this disclosure, and we support efforts to prevent leaks like this which harm our national security," the statement said.

The original AP story, however, made no mention of an undercover informant or allied "control" over the operation, indicating only that the fate of the would-be suicide bomber was unknown.

The White House may ultimately have to explain its handling of the case both to Congressional oversight committees and to leak investigations the administration itself has launched.

The Republican chairman of the House intelligence committee, Representative Mike Rogers, announced a "preliminary review" of leaks about the operation.

Two leak investigations have been opened by the executive branch as well, one by the Director of National Intelligence and one by the FBI.

On Wednesday, FBI director Robert Mueller, appearing before the Senate Judiciary committee, promised the bureau would "investigate thoroughly." (Reporting By Mark Hosenball; Editing by Warren Strobel and Jim Loney)

Copyright 2012 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
* Obama adviser touted "inside control" of bomb plot * Leaks forced shutdown of operation By Mark Hosenball WASHINGTON, May 18 (Reuters) - White House effo...
* Obama adviser touted "inside control" of bomb plot * Leaks forced shutdown of operation By Mark Hosenball WASHINGTON, May 18 (Reuters) - White House effo...
Filed by Reuters  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 901
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (18 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:55 PM on 05/19/2012
Just another self generated crisis for Obama to take credit for. Pretty sad.
12:08 PM on 05/19/2012
So Brennan tells Richard Clark, an ABC News contributor, about "inside control" and Richard Clark leaps to a conclusion on the air, and we need to find out who leaked what. What am I missing here?
razaminaz
I am not politically correct. You've been warned.
12:07 PM on 05/19/2012
What a suprise, another screw up by the White House. Can anyone really look at our debt and economy and believe that we have anybody in DC that even has a clue? We need to clean house in November and vote ALL of them out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CeePeeDee
"Morning in America" began the end of our era.
11:06 AM on 05/19/2012
The way "major" media is framing this story is that white house leaks led to spoiling an anti-Al Queda operation. Another way to look at is that the white house was attempting to propagandize the public with the idea that the US "anti-terrorist" activities and spending were paying off. Then they incompetently exposed the reality of the situation. Certainly the operation was blown at the point that the government announced the foiled plot- not after the double agent expose.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
windwisper
12:53 PM on 05/19/2012
And now the NATO conference in Chicago is trying to get a ban on weapons and this is against our 2nd amendment. Another White House attempt to take away our freedom. It was in Ruters and there really hasn't been much coverage but Hillary is trying to lead the group that would ban gun sales and take away our rights to bare arms. This would give the president leway to go around the house and have the senate sign off on the bill.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CeePeeDee
"Morning in America" began the end of our era.
01:58 PM on 05/19/2012
While right and left can concur on many issues, I am much more comfortable in a gathering where no one is armed. Much of the time in the contemporary world an individual may not be protected by being armed. Our constitution is worded ambivalently on this matter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Right
02:31 PM on 05/19/2012
Never happen. He knows that would be a death wish. I can't imagine them being that stu pid. Well??
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
429freckles
Ex Republican Now Devoted Democrat
10:11 AM on 05/19/2012
Opps. That was certainly a slip of the tongue.........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Right
02:37 PM on 05/19/2012
Wow, a lil ol slip huh? Way to minimize something that could get people killed or hurt. I like to think of it as stupidity? They ask the question of who leaked butthen tell who leaked in the ssame story. DUHH!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Desmond Maxwell
VETS FOR OBAMA!
09:42 AM on 05/19/2012
Have you considered the possibility of disinformation? "Leaks" are often part of calculated counter-intelligence ie: Osama Bin Laden. (What is you're objection to President Obama truly based on?)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:36 AM on 05/19/2012
nice "spin"... I guess that's how you got your Crime Solver bracelets. Ask the Brits if they approved of the "disinformation" leaked by the WH. Face it Libby, the WH screwed up again by trying to claim credit for this, in an election year. How pathetic the WH is and so is your "spin" on it. You should have your little merit badge taken away.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:46 AM on 05/19/2012
If I can interject - people objections to obama are quite simple - his horrible record.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Conservative White Male
New Dems: What country can do FOR them!
09:34 AM on 05/19/2012
Clinton is right, this White House is full of amateurs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Desmond Maxwell
VETS FOR OBAMA!
10:08 AM on 05/19/2012
For the first time more non-white babies were born in America than white babies. The racial complement of America is changing. The average age for Hispanic Americans is 27.6 years old compared to 40 years old for white Americans. These facts will be transformative in future elections. Conservative white males might want to self-deport back to Europe.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:47 AM on 05/19/2012
offpoint and idiotic contributing nothing other than to make you the writer look suspect at best.
razaminaz
I am not politically correct. You've been warned.
12:10 PM on 05/19/2012
And this has what to do with this blog? I think that story ran a few days ago.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Desmond Maxwell
VETS FOR OBAMA!
09:32 AM on 05/19/2012
All the armchair critics of President Obama and John Brennan's actions regarding this case have no idea what security protocols are in effect concerning this operation and neither does AP. What was "leaked" could very well be disinformation by the NSA/CIA designed to elicit a calculated response from Al Qaeda and then exploit it. The public furor over this "leak" could be part of the planned counter-intelligence op. That would make Obama's critics pawns or dupes in an elaborate espionage ruse. Maybe there is another mole inside AQAP and the "leak" is protecting his cover.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Right
03:04 PM on 05/19/2012
Wow, an insider tidbit from the president himself. I know you are one of his top trustees or you would not make such a foolish statement. You must have access to items we commoners don't. Unless you don't want us to think you are a know it all and smarter than the rest you have to have proof of what you say. Suppose, I know top agents don't like to do so but suppose it is true. Lots of us like to err on the side of safety and good judgement than speculation /supposition. But that's just us "normal" not high profile citizens.
09:24 AM on 05/19/2012
Typical White House incompetence and amateurism. Who would expect more?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:49 AM on 05/19/2012
Sadly no but one can always dream - fanned
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Desmond Maxwell
VETS FOR OBAMA!
09:17 AM on 05/19/2012
Many of the comments posted on this story criticize President Obama for incompetence or naivety. Let me remind them of the success President Obama and John Brennan have had in the battle against Al Qaeda.
Romney would be a deer in the headlights as CIC.
(Who was president on 9-11? GWB and his National Security Adviser, Condi Rice. "Mission Accomplished"... what a joke)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:41 AM on 05/19/2012
LOL, spin it any way you like. The facts are there if you want to find them. This administration is more corrupt and incompetent than any other. You assume how Romney would react, we know how BO did. He had to dragged off the golf course to pay attention to his job. here's a link for some light reading.

http://patdollard.com/2011/05/obama-hesitated-%e2%80%93-panetta-issued-order-to-kill-osama-bin-laden/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:50 AM on 05/19/2012
Al Qaeda is getting STRONGER as confimred by both hillary and brenner.

clinton was offered obama 3 times and turned him down.

Now would you like to join the rest of us in reality?
09:15 AM on 05/19/2012
I'm glad to hear that the truth is coming out. Then again, maybe it's coming out now so that we can all watch in horror as the U.S. TITANIC sinks before our dumbed down eyes. Oooh, is that a new GAME CONSOLE on sale? Duuurrr
09:01 AM on 05/19/2012
What's wrong and who can we blame? Our current administration is one joke after another and no one is to blame but our President.
JMD400
I am a loyal Baltimore Colts Fan
08:54 AM on 05/19/2012
Loose lips sink ships. Apparently this administration is full of holes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Desmond Maxwell
VETS FOR OBAMA!
09:40 AM on 05/19/2012
Have you considered the possibility of disinformation? "Leaks" are often part of calculated counter-intelligence operations. "Loose lips" can be manipulated for a strategic purpose. What is you're objection to President Obama truly based on?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:46 AM on 05/19/2012
geez, you don't give up with that rediculous spin. I would say the "true objection" is that this administration is filled with incompetent, unqualified bafoons whose only claim to their job is that they were former bundlers, campaign leaders, or supporters that had an extreme Left approuch to government.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:51 AM on 05/19/2012
Third time won't work either. And again our ojections to obama are based soley on his dismal record.
08:43 AM on 05/19/2012
BHOzo must go.
08:24 AM on 05/19/2012
As far as I can tell no one in the Obama administration has the brains God gave lettuce. Political expediency & points are more important than the life of this operative. Hopefully they already pulled him out of there before he got dead or soon will be.